I assume it's the 3 people they have had in custody since the day of the "chase". They have said repeatedly they have 3 people in custody, now they are being formerly arrested and charged.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/19/three-people-reportedly-taken-into-custody-in-new-bedford-mass-as-part-of-boston-bombing-investigation/

Any reason why "chase" is in quotations here?

That article states its two men and 1 woman. Here we have three men. While its possible that two of them are the same men , without the names mentioned or any follow up from WBSM its a loose end. (One possible link: Note the neighbor report that "the three who were questioned share the same cell phone bill with the bombing suspect." Keep an eye out for that link. If the news drops that at any point, then , These are the same people for sure) The whole news report is coming from the neighbor who knew they were taken into custody so , I wonder who the woman was. ?

More precise information

Azamat Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev, both 19 and of New Bedford, were charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice by plotting to dispose of a laptop computer and a backpack containing fireworks belonging to bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the US attorney’s office said in a statement.

Robel Phillipos, 19, of Cambridge was charged with making false statements to law enforcement officials in a terrorism investigation, prosecutors said.

This, on the other hand, seems ridiculous.

Plot Twist: Everyone's a suspect now.

Especially Joker Johkar Dzohkar

http://translate.google.com/#auto/en/Dzohkar

you do realize thats not how his name is pronounced.

Of course. SYL La ble Syl LA ble

well well you write things like that, it makes it look like you are putting crediblity or weight to a coincidence like that which is barely a coincidence since you have to go through multiple iterations to walk us to that point.

I mean choke in spanish is Ahogar, Dzhaogar Dzohkar

[deleted]

there is a sense of humor, that is not funny. You had to literally walk us through the whole joke. I mean if it was A then B fine but you had A to B to C. thats not good joke construction, especially for a weak reference.

[deleted]

just step up your comedy game.

More Info

Dias Kadyrbayev and Azamat Tazhayakov have been accused of conspiring to destroy a laptop and backpack containing fireworks belonging to the bombers.

...

The affidavit says Tazhayakov and Kadyrbayev agreed to get rid of the backpack at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth after concluding from news reports that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was one of the bombers.

Probably his school laptop bag. I had a laptop bag and a book bag plus other random bags Depending on what I was doing that day.

This includes some texts mentioned in the affadavit:

Kadyrbayev recognized Dzhokhar Tsarnaev at once, the affidavit said, and he texted Tsarnaev to tell him so.

“Lol,” Tsarnaev texted back. And he sent another message: “I’m about to leave, if you need something in my room take it.”

Has anyone ever been to UMass Dartmouth? The architecture there is enough to drive a person to desperation.

According to this article, his friends took it upon themselves to go to Dzhokhar's dorm room and dispose of his backpack and laptop? People believe this shit?? Those same 3 people have been in custody since the day the photos were released. When exactly did they go to his dorm room, collect the evidence and dispose of it?

According to the complaint, they stated that on April 18 they went to the dorm room in the evening and disposed of the items in the trash around 10 PM.

You could have looked that up yourself.

Except it says that they recognized him from the photos released on April 19th. Don't be an ass.

from the photos released on April 19th.

The photos were released at about 5 PM on April 18th.

ass.

Nice.

Edit: 3 people downvoted a statement of easily verifiable fact. Classy.

Those same 3 people have been in custody since the day the photos were released.

Proof?

Article from April 19th. Halfway down the page at 7:53pm. I was mistaken, it was the day after the photos were released.

Even if those were the same three(which there is no proof of from your source as their names aren't provided, but regardless we can assume they are the same) then wouldn't they certainly have had more than enough time to go to his dorm room(one of them lived with him, the others in the same dormitory) and get those things given the fact that they were taken in over 24 hours after the photos were released? Twenty four hours is quite a lot of time to throw something out in a dorm room you either live in or live in the same building as.

Here is an article that says they were arrested 11 days ago.

As I pointed out, I thought it was on Thursday that they were detained. It turns out it was Friday.

People believe this shit?? Those same 3 people have been in custody since the day the photos were released. When exactly did they go to his dorm room, collect the evidence and dispose of it?

So would you say you no longer think it's unreasonable people "believe this shit" when obviously there was more than enough time for them to access that dorm room before police showed up?

Yep, I don't believe these 3 people took it upon themselves to go to his dorm room and look for anything that might be considered incriminating. It doesn't say anywhere that Dzhokhar asked them to do it. So they just went to his dorm room, took a bunch of his shit (including his laptop) and threw it in the trash.

I agree, I've never heard of college guys doing something stupid trying to protect a buddy from something he did wrong. That would be impossible.

[deleted]

Well it appears they were helping their friend get out of trouble, so that would still fall in line with there just being the brothers.

These arrests don't contradict that the brothers worked alone if you bothered to read the complaints against the arrestees. They had no knowledge he did it until after the attack.

Another link from RT

Maybe his roommates had the leverage.

not enough, apparently.

My co-worker pulled up an article a little bit ago (can't remember what site it was) that mentioned that the lab found female DNA on one of the bomb fragments (could just be from a spectator who got hit with it or an employee of the store where the part was purchased). I remember that there were reports that they took two males and a female, supposedly Dzhokhar's roommates, in for questioning shortly after the FBI photos were released. Could that third suspect be the female?

Looks like the third suspect is a dude.

My co-worker pulled up an article a little bit ago (can't remember what site it was) ... I remember ... Could that

Excellent research.

1. Female DNA - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50145873n
2. 3 College Students Questioned - http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/20/us-usa-explosions-boston-arrests-idUSBRE93J02U20130420
3. "Could that" was the beginning of a question I was asking. I don't know what you were trying to prove with that one other than your capability to delete words.

I looked at your history and noticed you berated someone for not looking something up themselves. All of the points I brought up were easily found on Google. It probably took you longer to try to make me look bad than it would have to just quickly look up what I was talking about. Not every comment in the sub needs to be a padded folder of links.

Shithead.

I wasn't asking you to recount widely reported aspects of the case that you are apparently only vaguely aware of from your coworker telling you. Rather, I was highlighting that your commentary is based on vague recollections of second-hand information.

What else would you like me to explain in simple language you can understand?

Shithead.

Nice.

The only thing I was vague about was the website I saw the DNA story on. I was there reading it with him, hence why I said he pulled it up, not "he told me about an article." Nothing in my original statement indicated second-hand information.

None of the other instances I mentioned were started with "I think" or "I'm pretty sure" or anything like that. "I remember" is not vague. I was talking about news that was widely available online since April 19th (re: the questioning of the three students). We're in a sub where users have been staring at photos of naked guys in handcuffs and trying to listen to faint dialog in a cell phone video of a shootout. You think no one here would take two seconds to search what I'm talking about if they thought it was bullshit?

Apparently your "simple language" is twisting words and pulling stuff out of your ass.

was the website I saw the DNA story on.

It was reported in every major news outlet, and innumerable minor ones.

By the way, my coworker pulled up an article a little while ago talking about a bombing in Boston (can't remember what site it was). Do you think that could be related?

I feel bad for them if they thought he was innocent and didn't want him to look suspicious...sucks that this is on them now.

Do you guys think this is why they combed that landfill? Because in the NBC report I just read one of them told police he threw the stuff in a dumpster. That makes me wonder then, how did officials originally know to ask them about this stuff??? Where did it come from? I don't understand why these kids would talk unless police already had leverage on them. They maybe wouldn't have searched the landfill without a tip off. I'm making the assumption that the landfill search was because these guys said something, and not because they searched and then found stuff.

According to the complaint, they told investigators that they realized Dzhokhar was involved in the bombing while still in the dorm room when they found hollowed out fireworks in the backpack.

The complaint contains additional info about the interviews with each of them

Thanks for clearing that up, I hadn't read it yet. I should read this and get filled in, especially since you mention there's more.

Can you please link this "complaint" you keep telling everyone about.

"complaint"

Why did you put it in quotes? You don't believe a criminal complaint has been filed? Or do you not know what one is?

Also, you need help finding something currently linked from the top of every major news site?

The public isn't falling for the first story, So lets add more people to it and increase the complexity of our story and maybe the people will believe this one. Or this was planned from the beginning. As in all who did it movie plots, you slowly at first, then exponentially give the watcher/reader more clues/dots to connect until the full climax of the plot is shown. Giving the watcher closure with a full picture of what you want them to think transpired. To much info at first ruins the suspense.

Face it, whatever the official story was, you would have never believed it. You made up your mind that it's a false flag the moment you heard the news.

Sure... except they were arrested for conspiring to destroy evidence and giving false statements to law enforcement. But please, continue to build your fantasy world.

You believe everything you are told?

Yeah, makes more sense to make up your own story and jump to conclusions.

Nothing is the truth.

Who are we suppose to believe with the logic you have?

No, but it'd be nice to know where these three came from.

Kyrgyzstan, Kyrgyzstan, Cambridge

Can you please link this "complaint" you keep telling everyone about.

Yep, I don't believe these 3 people took it upon themselves to go to his dorm room and look for anything that might be considered incriminating. It doesn't say anywhere that Dzhokhar asked them to do it. So they just went to his dorm room, took a bunch of his shit (including his laptop) and threw it in the trash.

Thanks for clearing that up, I hadn't read it yet. I should read this and get filled in, especially since you mention there's more.