In light of PRISM, how does the Boston bombing happen?
75 2013-06-08 by [deleted]
Does this bother anyone else? Should this be a question in the lash back?
75 2013-06-08 by [deleted]
Does this bother anyone else? Should this be a question in the lash back?
28 comments
28 Bacore 2013-06-08
The idea of PRISM is not stopping terrorists,as proved by the Boston bombers. The point of PRISM is to locate political dissent, of which I am not one of... I'm just merely mentioning the fact. I actually support the regime and enjoy my life. I'm going to go sit down and be quiet now.
7 [deleted] 2013-06-08
[deleted]
0 groth117 2013-06-08
LONG LIVE THE KING! LONG LIVE THE KING!
4 [deleted] 2013-06-08
Nice track covering.
3 verybadwolf 2013-06-08
you funny
17 MrPSAGuy 2013-06-08
Also, FBI was WARNED by the FSB about the Tsarnaevs.
It's like someone telling you a guy's going to smash your mailbox tonight, has it on good authority, then you deliberately letting it happen so that you can annex the patch of road in front of your house in the name of security.
2 onlysaneman_ 2013-06-08
Same as the US was warned by multiple international agencies (and domestic terrorism investigators who were blocked at every turn) about 9/11.
1 cryma 2013-06-08
and then you have multiple pictures and video footage of the guy. and you still need help to ID him
1 MrPSAGuy 2013-06-08
Yeah but this is all questionable - the Soviets used to airbrush people into and out of photographs like nobody's business. This technology exists for video these days and works in near or real-time.
10 streetyouth 2013-06-08
you could easily plan a terror attack without using any electronic means of communication.
6 moparornocar 2013-06-08
Especially so if you already live together.
5 board4life 2013-06-08
But they said they stopped another one using PRISM (one that is conveniently classified and thus can never be verified). But yea, I agree OP, its like the shit at airports, they haven't actually caught any terrorists with the TSA, they've only let one through.
4 kat9879 2013-06-08
i think you probably know the answer to that http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/07/before-police-could-plan-for-terrorist-attack-real-thing-happened/ufxjb9O0RXyzVZNPFyGkiI/story.html
4 necromanser 2013-06-08
In light of the United Nations, how does wars like Iraq 1991 and 2003 happen ? In 70 odd years the U.N has never prevented any war, which IS the alleged primary function of this peace nee private organization. Think bigger. Abolish the U.N for a failed charter.
4 verybadwolf 2013-06-08
In light of the World Bank being established to end world hunger how does the rampant malnutrition of 1/6 the population happen?
2 Unkn0wnn 2013-06-08
Hi NSA
2 xChrisxRulzx 2013-06-08
Things like Boston have to happen to keep the people scared and continue to hand over more freedoms. They'll tell us its to keep us protected but it wont happen because they will always need more freedoms.
2 HiramAbiff33 2013-06-08
They let it, they condone it, they foster it and grow it like a seed into a flower. Then they broadcast it to scare you and use fear to justify their very own existence, for the masses must believe their "protection" is needed, otherwise the house of cards begins to crumble.
1 kat9879 2013-06-08
They have outright admitted today the conspiracy theories are true about it being a training exercise - just have not come completely clean yet http://letsrollforums.com/dhs-admits-boston-training-t29755.html
1 space_walrus 2013-06-08
Remarkable.
1 [deleted] 2013-06-08
"Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."
1 space_walrus 2013-06-08
"Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."
1 candidlol 2013-06-08
the NSA is not very good at sharing, well none of the intelligence agencies are very good at sharing with each other i.e. the NSA gathers data and analyzes but could give 2 shits how helpful that data would be to the CIA and FBI and whatever agencies in the intelligence community. They serve whoever is at the top of the foodchain and their interests.
1 onlysaneman_ 2013-06-08
That's not necessarily true. They have a rivalry and there are certainly tensions between different agencies (domestic and international), but when it comes to actual national/international security matters, they work very efficiently together.
The document this is from is here.
I'll type out relevant parts (taken from a different source, as i haven't paid the $35 for the full PDF.)
Finally, it is important to note that the efforts to prevent or disrupt terrorist action frequently are successful...
In actual operations and special events, agencies generally coordinated their activities. For example, we examined several overseas counterterrorist operations and found that agencies generally followed the draft interagency international guidelines.
Minor interagency tensions or conflicts during these operations were resolved and did not appear to have posed a risk to the mission...
This whole "lack of communication" excuse that is constantly peddled by the government and others is just completely false.
0 FFandMMfan 2013-06-08
Because it was a false flag.
-1 leex0 2013-06-08
He's just trying to protect America from terrorists who hate our freedom.
Everyone wants security, but everyone just wants it for nothing. why can't we
Let Obama have a benefit of the doubt that he's doing this because he's a
Patriot? who do you think would be doing a better job right now? Romney?
McCain? i don't think so. If it wasn't for Obama there'd be 10 bombings.
Everyone just lay off him will ya.
sigh: my witty wordplay went right over you dolts' heads.
1 BrittainTheCommie 2013-06-08
/s
Right?
RIGHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHT?
1 qs0 2013-06-08
What are you smoking? Don't give everyone one side of the bogus two-party system. If you really believe that horse crap, then you're brainwashed.
1 ZoinksJeepster 2013-06-08
HELP ME!!! : )