r/conspiracy: Well, it's official. Obama has declared that Assad has "crossed the red line" even in spite of the fact that he has NOT used chemical weapons and in spite of the fact that the rebels have not only been caught multiple times with them, but have used them.

Well, it's official. Obama has declared that Assad has "crossed the red line" even in spite of the fact that he has NOT used chemical weapons and in spite of the fact that the rebels have not only been caught multiple times with them, but have used them.

28 2013-06-13 by [deleted]

I really don't know what to say. Turkey and Assad have both caught the rebels with chemical weapons and the UN has even declared that the rebels have, most undoubtedly, used chemical weapons. In spite of this, this article claims that Assad has used chemical weapons on multiple occasions and flat out says that there is no evidence that the rebels have used, or have even been caught with chemical weapons. It has come to this. Here is the Obama administration's new tactic, ignore the fact that our proxy army broke international law, wait a couple weeks and then rewrite recent history.

This will be the end, as Russia has no intention of backing down. This will be the start of WWIII, this will be the war to end all wars... if it is allowed to happen.

Edit: forgot link to article: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57589252/u.s.-syria-used-chemical-weapons-crossing-red-line/

17 comments

7 wearebornfree 2013-06-13

Did our government just start WW3 to take the heat off the spying scandal? Or was the "leak" of the spying scandal just a preliminary step for WW3?

9 [deleted] 2013-06-13

I think there's a multitude of reasons, not just the four or five major scandals that Obama is currently engrossed in. One of the main reasons is Israel. The US and their little, Zionist slave master really fucked up by attacking Syria. This 'civil war' was supposed to be over in a year to two years, tops but it has dragged on long enough that Assad has gained the upper hand, destroyed the rebels supply routes, acquired more recruits and weapons from Russia and has been able to establish and impregnable anti air system. This rules out the option of an actual no fly zone, as it was reported that Assad took out multiple Israeli aircraft when they attacked Damascus. Since then, Israel has sat the fuck down and minded their manners.

The US has been left with only two options, continue supporting rebels, in hopes they somehow win, or intervene directly, in spite of inevitable war with Russia. Since Assad and Hezbollah have the military capabilities to strike Israel, after the war, and probably will, they only have one option, get the US involved.

Of course there are all the other, obvious reasons such as gun control, American economic woes and Obamas many scandals but I believe these are the main reasons.

4 platinum_peter 2013-06-13

Pretty damn scary living in a world like this.

3 VanillaPudding 2013-06-13

Agreed... Russian intervention has helped Assad so far and there is no reason to think it will not also escalate when we do. This will be a serious fucking face off...

3 VanillaPudding 2013-06-13

This leads me even further down the road of thinking this leak was to show us they are watching... watching for dissent.

4 biding 2013-06-13

Ask yourselves this question: Where'd they get the chemical weapons?

I"ll let yrugay or someone else provide the links to how often US fingerprints (and papertrails) have been connected to this kind of crap.

2 [deleted] 2013-06-13

We already know where they got them. Documents were leaked sometime last year outing a military contractor called 'Britam' that planned on committing a false flag to draw the US into Syria.

0 [deleted] 2013-06-13

[deleted]

2 [deleted] 2013-06-13

A military contractor called Britam more than likely provided the sarin gas to the rebels. There is no evidence that Assad has chemical weapons. The idea that he might have them is based off the idea that 'Saddam hid his chemical weapons in Syria before the Iraq war'. There is no evidence for this as it was already known, even before the Iraq war, that Saddam almost definitely did not have chemical weapons.

0 [deleted] 2013-06-13

[deleted]

1 [deleted] 2013-06-13

You may be right, but they've got no reason to manufacture them, let alone use them.

3 R4F1 2013-06-13

Its all about keeping the prophecy in mind. The prophecy says indict Assad for "WMDs", therefore that is what shall be done!

2 laughattheleader 2013-06-13

Writing a script is one thing. Getting everyone to enthusiastically play their parts is another. What we need is an actor's strike. Let the script writers perform their own production while everyone laughs.

3 DZP 2013-06-13

It's another make up fraudulent excuses to wage a war. I thought that ended when the Bush regime ended.

1 Scoled321 2013-06-13

I thought we were running a "war on terror" since 9/11 on al-Qaeda. I thought that was justification #1 for NSA wiretapping.

1 izucantc 2013-06-13

Where does Russia come in on this?

2 [deleted] 2013-06-13

Russia has a naval base in Syria, so a war with Syria, is a war with Russia.

1 izucantc 2013-06-13

Thank you for clarifying that.

1 [deleted] 2013-06-13

Anyone have Obama's email address? Maybe we should send him the video of the "Rebels" stockpiling and testing chemical weapons.