What if all this information damning the government has been leaked on purpose in order to inspire dissent in the american people so that they may enact all the fema/emergency laws and begin interning us as they plan.
I don't think it was a cover up. I think that a lot of the "scandals" revealed lately have been an attempt to "start" building dissent in order to replicate the Arab Spring in the states.
Basically, once the people stirred with enough dissent, many of them attempted rebellion. After being crushed by the government, many of these Arabian entities enacted even more intrusive and draconian measures to restrict their populaces' rights (Edit: under the guise of preventing another rebellion).
This ties in to the theory that dissent is being purposefully controlled in the states in order to bring about similar changes. We need to be ever vigilant against agent provocateurs.
The state has a monopoly on violence, so we can either play their game and lose, or cheat and bring their tools of destruction to side with us like you see in Brazil.
Spread the message! Too many now call for violence. While we should respond in kind if it is forced upon us, now is the time to fight smarter, not harder.
Rand appears to be a politician that understands the Constitution and the perils of a federal government run amok. Of "electable" potential POTUS candidates out there, he comes closest to my personal beliefs. He talks the talk, which makes me wonder, is all.
SAuRON: Sentient Authority Response Oversight Network, the flaming eye atop of the pyramid. All your frequent flier points, your customer service calls "recorded for quality purposes", your geotagged photos, your cookies, search terms, your mouse clicks, your blink rates, your hemoglobin levels, your rate of hair growth. All your data belong to us.
Well, obviously there is more than one story going on in the world at all times. But, again obviously, you can probably not be reading two articles in the news at the same time.
Added bonus: people are outing themselves online as to their political affiliations by taking sides in the conversations, or calling for action.
If I were the NSA, I'd be about ready to blow my load after all of this stimulation.
23 comments
10 Whereeaglesdare219 2013-07-07
What if all this information damning the government has been leaked on purpose in order to inspire dissent in the american people so that they may enact all the fema/emergency laws and begin interning us as they plan.
2 azzagbag 2013-07-07
....or to let us know how much they are monitoring us.
9 kravguy 2013-07-07
I don't think it was a cover up. I think that a lot of the "scandals" revealed lately have been an attempt to "start" building dissent in order to replicate the Arab Spring in the states.
3 TheWiredWorld 2013-07-07
What did the Arab Spring do? I've heard a few people say how that benefited the state, but yet to see how.
7 kravguy 2013-07-07
Good question!
Basically, once the people stirred with enough dissent, many of them attempted rebellion. After being crushed by the government, many of these Arabian entities enacted even more intrusive and draconian measures to restrict their populaces' rights (Edit: under the guise of preventing another rebellion).
This ties in to the theory that dissent is being purposefully controlled in the states in order to bring about similar changes. We need to be ever vigilant against agent provocateurs.
The state has a monopoly on violence, so we can either play their game and lose, or cheat and bring their tools of destruction to side with us like you see in Brazil.
2 [deleted] 2013-07-07
Do you really think these guys makes mistakes?
2 kravguy 2013-07-07
It isn't a mistake.
2 [deleted] 2013-07-07
Yeah. I get it now. Thanks.
3 kravguy 2013-07-07
Spread the message! Too many now call for violence. While we should respond in kind if it is forced upon us, now is the time to fight smarter, not harder.
1 bigtony2tone 2013-07-07
Makes you wonder, then, who is being propped up by TPTB. I hope it's not Rand Paul.
1 TheWiredWorld 2013-07-07
You DO realize he sold out his dad and is therefor in no way connected to what you probably believe in?
1 bigtony2tone 2013-07-07
Rand appears to be a politician that understands the Constitution and the perils of a federal government run amok. Of "electable" potential POTUS candidates out there, he comes closest to my personal beliefs. He talks the talk, which makes me wonder, is all.
6 Three_Letter_Agency 2013-07-07
Speak your mind then!
5 purehater 2013-07-07
Come on, come on, come on! Lets see if we agree.
5 glacierfresh 2013-07-07
SAuRON: Sentient Authority Response Oversight Network, the flaming eye atop of the pyramid. All your frequent flier points, your customer service calls "recorded for quality purposes", your geotagged photos, your cookies, search terms, your mouse clicks, your blink rates, your hemoglobin levels, your rate of hair growth. All your data belong to us.
7 [deleted] 2013-07-07
"All your data are belong to us."
4 renholder777 2013-07-07
"Somebody set us up the Boston bomb..."
2 [deleted] 2013-07-07
Lay it on me, bud.
2 MrJok3r14 2013-07-07
I'm curious to hear as well
2 brownestrabbit 2013-07-07
More like: if you were to entertain some unfounded assumption;
Sure, no one can trust what they cannot truly see with their own senses, but other than an assumption, what do you have?
1 raisedbysheep 2013-07-07
Well, obviously there is more than one story going on in the world at all times. But, again obviously, you can probably not be reading two articles in the news at the same time.
Added bonus: people are outing themselves online as to their political affiliations by taking sides in the conversations, or calling for action.
If I were the NSA, I'd be about ready to blow my load after all of this stimulation.
1 dovzakheimsjoystick 2013-07-07
Like General Cartwright?
1 Nerdherd99 2013-07-07
Follow the money.
1 TheWiredWorld 2013-07-07
You DO realize he sold out his dad and is therefor in no way connected to what you probably believe in?
2 [deleted] 2013-07-07
Yeah. I get it now. Thanks.