I don't remember 100% exactly, as I listened to her interviews a couple of days ago, but I believe she might have mentioned that the second sun and some of its planets are already detectable.

She said that during sun up and sun down you should be able to see that our sun has a LOT of haze around it that is uncharacteristic for it, and this is a sign of what's happening. I'm not doing justice to what she said, and am not explaining it as well as she did, but I do know that the other day before I heard the interview, I remember being able to look literally right at the sun because it was so dull and orange and it was covered by so much haze. I also live in Los Angeles, however, so it's always smoggy and hazy around here, but I DO remember thinking "Damn. This is a LOT more hazy and smoggy than even we here in Los Angeles usually are. Weird."

And then I heard this interview and it made me think back to that moment.

That would seem to be the case - certainly. I don't know what to say at this point one way or the other about this other than lets wait and see. In a week's time it might all turn out to be bogus. It would be good if it is.

If it's not bogus and she's right, then I guess I can come back here laughing and say "Ha ha! See, you morons! We are all going to die! Woowee! I'm right yet again!...oh wait a minute."

We don't have to wait a week because we already know it's not going to happen because it's ridiculous.

I'll remember to come to you whenever I need flawless logical skills used on any argument. Check.

Anybody who continues to consider it after even a little bit of thought is nuts.

Gotcha. Thanks for that.

I personally wouldn't classify the possibilities that she explains and goes into as "entertaining".

lol. :)

Yeah. It's kind of a wait and see type of thing. She doesn't sound like much of a crazy kook either (to me, anyway), and along with the fact that I did notice the atmosphere around the sun was a LOT hazier than I remember ever previously seeing it, it's got me thinking heavily about some of the things she said.

It does give one pause. But to think that it will end in a blink of an eye is a lot to think about.

Well...according to her, it'll be a long blink. About three months or so actually.

Not to mention that there are all the other "Aliens" to consider.

Are you referring to the ones that are on this planet? I imagine that they are either taken care of by the MIC or their own interstellar family or part of their voyage/"mission" here on this planet is to experience just such a catastrophic occurrence as the very one that the Brassard mentions is about to occur.

We mere Earthlings aren't alone in this.

This is very, very true.

This is a cosmic shit storm, not mere Earth politics, entirely

Well, at the very least a stellar and solar system shit storm...possibly even a galactic shit storm. I'm sure there's cosmic significance to it too, but I would imagine that the kind of thing Brassard predicts happens all the time on a cosmic level, so there might not be that much brouhaha in the grander universal scheme of things. You're definitely right, however, that it's not just about "Earth politics". That's real small potatoes in comparison with what's really going on.

Should make some good headlines either way.

Yeah...If what Brassard says is valid though, then the news simply won't be around to print any headlines at all.

There are other beings that don't hang out on Earth directly but that have a vested interest in Earth just the same.

This, of course, is most definitely true.

Remember Earth is part of a wider community.

Correct.

This wider community, unlike Earth politics, actually has a well balanced system at work.

Sounds about right.

If the Earth gets taken out then this upsets the universal balance.

There's an even larger system, however, than the proximate one that the Earth and the other galactic beings here immediately belong to. It is true that we are part of a larger galactic council...but there are literally billions of galaxies, each with their own congregation (their own "galactic UN" of sorts) representing each area, each sector, and the many beings living amongst the billions of stars in each of the billions of galaxies in the cosmos. Taken in this context then, what happens to one of the billions of star systems in the outskirts of this particular galaxy is something that the "Milky Way UN" presiding here has to deal with on its own without worrying too much that such an event is going to be much more than a tiny blip on the cosmic radar of "current events" in the entire universe as a whole.

If the Earth gets taken out then this upsets the universal balance.

Oh no, my brother. Brassard is in no way saying that the Earth is going to get "taken out". She makes no mention of this whatsoever. The Earth isn't going to get "taken out" according to her at all. It's merely going to experience a "slight shifting" as it will be influenced by the gravitational pull of the other planets that will be passing by in close proximity to it.

This "slight gravitational pulling", of course, will be enough to cause the oceans to entirely engulf all coastal land masses, however, along with undermining all nuclear power plants, etc - resulting in billions of human non human deaths. This "slight gravitational pulling" will destroy the delicate balance of human life on this planet.

It will be little more than a slight jostling to the planet Earth herself, however. She will be fine. Mother Earth will be okay. The tiny ants littering her will have to come back another day though - cuz many of them (us) will be gone according to Brassard's information.

We'll see what happens.

...Not a horrible question. Brassard herself made mention that TPTB actually knew that nothing would happen on 12/21/12 but drummed up the paranoia on purpose so that the population could be lulled to sleep by thinking "This 8/17/13 thing is just another doomsday hoax like 12/21/12." This, again, will cause the masses to not really act while the elite elite are preparing so that when the disaster DOES hit, they can quickly tuck themselves away in their previously prepared safe houses while everyone else dies.

So yeah...Perhaps shit's still about to go down, and in a big way. Perhaps the Mayans were right after all...Just off by a few months.

Might want to be more specific if you expect any type of intelligible answer. Maybe you don't expect one though. I don't know.

If that's what you think, then meh. Thinking that you know what you're talking about makes you simply look more embarrassing and stupid. Oh well.

Moving on.

I saw this too and it caught my attention for a few reasons, but first to clarify for OP she said that the 2nd star (I will call it Sol 2) is not a red giant but rather (And I might be misquoting) a brown dwarf that is about 1/10th the size of Sol (our sun).

I believe you are very correct, actually. It's a brown dwarf. Not a red giant. Thanks for that.

The interesting thing about this is that it blends rather well with many other theories that I have heard before

Yes, sir. Indeed it does. All the flood "myths" in so many religions go along well with this, as well as offering a decent explanation for why there are so many darned "submerged cities" at the bottom of the ocean. Perhaps they experienced the kind of overwhelming flood Brassard mentions will overtake this current civilization soon.

yet she doesn't seem interested in promoting them or anything rather just presenting her knowledge to the public as it stands.

I think this actually fortifies her information for me because it shows that she's not really interested in presenting any sort of greater, historical or academic context behind her information. She's more interested in just making sure that the information gets out there in the first place and that's it.

Interestingly during one of the interviews she makes the claim in passing that there are intelligent beings that live there and that the gov't has made contact and in fact they are responsible for messing with human genetics in the past for the purpose of making us a slave species.

Yep. I remember that. It was pretty much exactly in line w/Sitchin's work and what's been said about the Anunnaki, etc.

This is an already existing theory and it is interesting because after making this comment the interviewer tried to press her for more info, but she declined because it was "irrelevant" to the current emergency and she didn't want people too not believe her.

Yep. Seems to show that she actually isn't interested to any extent in anything but the nuts and bolts information that she's presenting. "Just the facts, ma'am." kind of thing. This gives the information more validation, not less.

As Sol 2 approaches its magnetic influence on earth increases and this is what has caused the accelerated polar shift that has been documented by scientists.

The key here, of course, being "that has been DOCUMENTED BY SCIENTISTS" - for those so starving for "proof".

The 'event' has already begun and will begin intensifying to a point where it is undeniable around 8/11 or 8/12 (tomorrow or the day after as of posting this) and will climax around 8/17.

If this is true - and, like you said, certain facts have already begun to be scientifically documented - then...watch out, Earth human population.

Thank you for this quick overview. Very much appreciated, good sir. Well done.

Also in her interviews when she was mentioning the aliens that are suppose to live there I got the impression that she was implying that there was more then one species of them and that at least one of those species was benevolent.

Oh well that is most definitely the case, and we didn't need her to tell us that. There are various other individuals and sources that have attested to this.

If this were the case I wonder what the chances are that they would try and save Earth

Nu uh, brother. It's not like that. The Earth won't need any saving. She won't be dying. She'll only be jostled about a bit by the gravitational undulations the planet fly byes will cause upon her surface. She'll wobble this way and that, her poles will shift, she'll get a bit of a "make over", etc, but nothing much else will happen to her in the "catastrophic" sense.

Many of the little fleas on her, however (human fleas and otherwise), will likely definitely go bye bye. That won't bother her much though. She'll be okay. Again, she won't need any ETs coming in to help her. I think she'll ultimately be fine.

seeing as how I would imagine that a species as advanced as they are implied to be would have worked out a way to protect their planet from the similar effects that it would also be experiencing.

A few things: One, I personally don't think that humans deserve saving. We're, for the most part, fucking assholes. We kill each other left and right, to say nothing about how we treat other forms of sentient life. Not only that, but I wouldn't doubt if other ET beings are under a galactic "non interference" order of some sort.

"Don't interfere with primitive, developing species." - humans being a prime example of such. Perhaps a few of us might be helped. Most of us would likely have to reincarnate again if we want to have another stab at "being human".

I'm personally not sure I'd want another go around, however. :)

I don't think this is the case, we are lead by assholes for sure.

We may not be inherently assholes, but we sure do seem to fall nicely into that category and nestle into it rather well. Just looking at some of the responses on here is rather indicative of that.

I think Humans in general have the potential to be pretty awesome if we could just sort out this government and religion bullshit.

I wouldn't disagree with that...but I think this particular iteration of humanity...might just be on about its last legs. It might be ready for a reboot. The REAL powers that be (not the Earthly ones) might be like "OK. This version is too much of a fuck up too. Time to start over and try another version of humanity. This one's too stupid."

As to treatment of other species, while I don't know about you personally I would be humbled and honored to be in the presence of an advanced alien civilization

As would I most definitely. It seems that there is still too great a percentage of humans that wouldn't feel this way, however, and would react negatively or violently.

As for the notion of a galactic non-interference agreement I think that a lot of people might argue that such a contract was broken long ago.

Yes. This would most certainly seem to be correct...amongst some species. I think there are still some ET civilizations that are still holding fast to that agreement, however.

Also where does one draw the line between primitive/developing and advanced/developed

I'm not sure, but I think we are somewhere in the middle.

we Humans have come pretty far in the last hundred years

Through the likely help of ET beings that gave us technology we wouldn't otherwise have had. I don't think we should take too much credit for how far we've come, therefore.

if we weren't being limited by the petty interests of politics and business I feel like we could go much further.

I wouldn't disagree with this.

While I do believe in the potential of this species, I am totally on board for reincarnating into the advanced civilization that already has this shit sorted out.

Oh well hell yeah. That would be awesome. I wouldn't want to come back to THIS species, but another, better one? Yeah. Sign me up.

I don't know if I would be worthy of reincarnating in that other class though. Depends on the grades I get in this class here on this planet first.

I feel as though a lot of the observed stupidity/hate/greed we see in the world is the by-product of terrible leadership/brain-washing propaganda.

I would greatly agree with this, sir. I feel that a responsible leadership would influence the people toward being more evolved. Things certainly seem purposefully contrived not for the better, but often for the worse, however.

While some people are genuinely evil I think that most simply don't know any better, bitterness and distrust is all they have ever known.

Seems correct to me.

While this may be true, I hold that it doesn't have to be. I still think we could be saved if we tried hard enough, and perhaps got a little outside help.

I think we have to be worthy of that outside help first, and right now, human civilization as a whole seems much too lazy to get up and do what's necessary to oust the losers that are in the leadership positions here.

The biggest factor in this fight is the fact that almost no one is trying, no one knows that they are about to lose it all.

Yep. We just pretty much said the same thing here. We are on the same wavelength, it seems.

If we are graded based on the average then I don't think you have too much to worry about

In one sense, this way of grading seems like it might have some merit. In another, I imagine that there is a great extent to which one's performance is based upon how one did independent of the outside influences. It seems that's part of what makes ones actions count. What did you do independent of your circumstances or the difficulty you found yourself in?

I'm trying. Sometimes Often I fail, but I keep trying.

Peace,

I think the joke will be on...like everyone if you're wrong, so I personally hope you're right about it being disinfo.

You're trying way too hard to not be an obvious troll. FYI, your post wasn't even read.

Let's meet up in 10 days when we're still alive and I'll explain again how easy it is to see that you're either being duped or just trying to get attention.

What? Dude WHO CARES if I'm wrong? Seriously. Who. Cares? I'm telling you right now I HOPE I'm wrong. Helllllo. Facepalm. How stupid do you have to be to think that I'm hoping I'm right? WTF?

I'm not believing or disbelieving the information. That's the difference between me and you. I'm just putting the information I came across out there for others to see. That's it.

That's the easiest and best way to settle this.

Dude. That's really sad (on your part). You see, there's nothing to settle. It simply is what it is.

What are you going to do if the information is wrong? Are you going to come back here on Sunday 8/18/13 and say "Ha ha! See, no1113? We're still alive!" lol. Man...I'm literally just shaking my head at the stupidity of you people.

So what if we're still here on Sunday? Again, THAT WOULD BE A GOOD THING.

We're most certainly all going to die eventually - and that's a good thing. Last thing you want to do is stay in this decrepit human body forever. I just found some info that says it might be happening a lot SOONER than some of us want it to happen. That's all.

If it happens, it happens. If it doesn't. So what?

Don't be a troll or a douche or an asshole about it. Sheesh. It's just stupid to go so far out of your way to shit on information that you might be wrong about.

Everyone would be 100% correct in saying that there have been a lot of doomsday prophecies that haven't panned out for sure. It's one thing to point that out, however, and quite another to attempt to bash the messenger for simply bringing up another source for people to see and be made aware of. I've no problem with anyone saying "This might turn out to be nothing." Hell, not only do I agree with that, but I've already over and over said that I personally actually HOPE it's nothing. However, there have been so many people on here that have gone really out of their way to be unnecessarily mean that one has to wonder why on Earth would they do that?

Anyway. The fact that you came here to give someone the benefit of the doubt shows that you're not one of the ones that are being unnecessarily mean, so that's good.

It's also probably partially a kind of psychological self-preservation response

Yep. That it for the most part is. I guess I just get tired of seeing it. I know it comes predominately from fear, and the person doing it is more a little frightened child inside than anything else, but it can still get pretty frustrating when that person gets pretty antagonistic and hubristic. Very frustrating. One can only take the "forgive them for they know not what they do" philosophy so far before you have to start coming back with some "stfu" responses yourself.

make fun of something that terrifies you and hope that that empty spot in your knowledge is filled with good things and not bad.

Yeah. I get that, but I look at it this way: make fun of something that educate yourself as much as you can about what terrifies you and hope that that empty spot in your knowledge is filled with good things and not bad.

That's been my life philosophy for a while now, and while I may still not know a lot about a lot of things, I still try to tread slowly and inform myself about as much as possible.

I think some folks here legitimately don't see enough evidence to give it more credence than any other doomsday concerns from the past.

Great. And, as I said a bunch, I honestly hope they're all very correct.

It's reddit so it might be setting expectations a little high to hope everybody involved is super serious

Yeah. Very correct, unfortunately.

I dunno. Benefit of the doubt, empathy, etc. was really just trying to help.

And that you did, good sir. You helped by, if nothing else, simply sharing constructive energy without being a jerk. It's possible to not agree and still be cool. Thanks. :)

Just be careful. I've heard that humans have a subconscious tendency to begin adopting behaviors they are exposed to regularly unless they are particularly strong-willed.

Well...I can definitely say in no uncertain terms that I can absolutely be a total asshole. I've heard it from many people here, and from a few people in real life. I'm not super certain that Reddit is the one that brought that out or if I've always just been a bit of a jerk though. I think maybe a bit of both.

I do try to be even-headed though. The Latin blood in me gets me going quick though.

I'd hate to see someone as thoughtful as yourself behaving like the trolls and antagonistic people you encounter when you speak your mind.

Honestly, that is so very kind of you, and I do appreciate that greatly. Thanks for the considerate sentiment. Again, I certainly at least try to be courteous, but my fuse can suddenly be pretty short if I come across a troll. I guess I'm the type that tends to give back what I get in spades regardless of whether it's good (as is the case here), or bad (as is often the case on Reddit in general). I will continue to work on that, and thank you again for the kind reminder and encouragement.

Peace,

If we were about to be hit by a giant star

According to the information in the OP, there actually won't be a collision with the red dwarf star. That'll be too far away. It won't be the star we have to worry about. There won't even be any collision with one of the star's seven planets.

According to the information, what will happen is that there will be a stellar/planetary passing between one or more of the red dwarf's planets and the Earth of sufficient proximity that it will alter and significantly effect Earth's gravitational field. Not only will the Earth's gravitational field be significantly effected, but the Earth's waters/oceans will move and turn at different and faster rates than are currently the case - causing tsunamis that will absolutely wipe out all coastal cities bar none.

wouldn't there be a huge glow in the sky at night that is bigger than all the other stars?

The speaker mentions an added haze that can be noted during sun up and sun down as one looks in the direction of the sun. I've noticed an added haze around the sun when I look in that direction, but I also live in Los Angeles, so I don't know if it's just more crazy smog/pollution.

Yeah. I've seen a clip of this. It seems to give a bit of weight to Brassard's claims...ominous as that is...

Oh. Really? Okay. How does a binary system work then?

A binary system results of two bodies orbiting around a common center of mass. It would contradict most proven theories of binary starts to have two stars with separate bodies orbiting around each other individually.

There is nothing about what I said or how I described a binary star system that would preclude two stars orbiting around a common center/one another, etc.

While it is extremely possible for the current accepted sets of planets to orbit around this comment center of mass, it is implausible for each star to orbit around this center while having individual planets orbiting around them separately.

Why so? The accompanying planets need not have enough mass to immediately pull the stars off their momentary orbit. The stars could have enough momentum to orbit for a certain amount of time before their accompanying planets pull them off that orbit. This could happen over the course of millions or billions of years though, so what I've postulated is in no way unsound in the context of human spans of time.

Edit: look at the theory of space time and how these bodies interact, even in hand written notes of Einstein and the likes who have studied this, it's relatively implausible.

There's a lot Einstein didn't understand.

Also, why would anyone hide these sets of planets who discovered them?

I could see a LOT of reasons why such information would be hidden if the discovering of such other planets necessarily leads to the understanding of a coming global catastrophe for the planet Earth and the human race living on it.

It would be a Nobel prize instantly.

The Nobel prize is a joke.

I can see more reasons why the information would be published for exactly the same reasoning.

Not if the elite prefer you and me and most of us dead.

Why would they?

Because the majority of us are a blight upon the planet?

What do they have stopping them from being killed as well?

DUMBs - which Brassard said won't actually help them, but they're at least working very diligently at them none the less.

And how does that explain the billions of people that should be able to just look up in the sky and see this thing and CAN'T?

You keep asking the same question, and I keep giving you the same answer. And that is that I don't have "all the answers". If the interviewer/Brassard is wrong, then she's wrong. Um...that's a good thing by the way, in case you didn't actually know that.

It seems you're trying a bit too hard to be "the right one" here, when the fact of the matter is that this subject is so beyond trying to be right or wrong one way or the other. As far as I'm concerned, it's just about making people aware of information. That's it. If it turns out to be not right, then okay. Hey, that's great actually.

Veering too strongly to one side or the other (i.e. "It's definitely going to happen!" or "There's no way it's going to happen!") seems equally stupid though, and, again, you seem to be spending way too much time and energy looking for ways to nit pick and show why this individual is wrong.

Again, if they're wrong, then good. Your trying as hard as you are to show that she's wrong, however, speaks very strangely of you in particular and your motives.

Good. Look at the "EDIT" I made in the OP, btw. Just a slight bit of added info.

EDIT: I would say that the added information I posted in the "EDIT" goes toward the "has anyone else seen or verified this second star?" question you had. Might not be readily seen by the naked eye yet, but apparently, some have indeed seen it and verified the reality of its existence.

I was under the impression that the orbits you described would be incredibly unstable, but it appears that it is possible, if unlikely.

Well, honestly, I actually didn't describe any specific orbit, so I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to when you say "the orbits you described". I imagine that there can be a great deal of variation in orbits, so I imagine that a LOT is very, very possible and much more likely than we in our very limited understanding of the universe might suppose.

Still doesn't explain why nobody has announced their discovery of this second sun.

I responded to that to some limited extent here.

If there's a red giant that's close enough that it's going to kill us all in seven days, we should be able to see it quite easily (likely even in the daytime).

That seems to be sound reasoning to me as well, but I also know that there might be something else happening that I might not be accounting for.

If the information turns out to not be valid, then so be it. Being facetious, however, in no way whatsoever helps those working toward the discovery of truth one way or the other. You came here to make a comment that doesn't help the discussion. Perhaps you feel good about that.

Okay. I hope it's improved your day.

Wow. You're impressively close minded. Very impressively close minded.

Nope. Not in the sense that you think. But yeah. You sure definitely are in another sense.

Why? So you could continue to do your little cognitive dissonance dance? Na. You're comments and your energy are definitely not worth it.

At the end of the day, as I already said to others here, I personally would prefer for the interviewee to be wrong and for NOTHING to happen in a week or so. That would be great. I'm not looking forward to the possibility of drowning or getting UV fried or whatever.

I think it's important to help people know about information, however. I would rather let people know and be wrong than to simply not let anyone know. That's all.

You're a fucking idiot, man. Seriously. I didn't even read the entirety of what you wrote. Enough feeding the trolls. Your energy is laughably caustic. Your own darkness is eating itself.

I'll let you continue to consume yourself with your own stupidity. I'll let you have the last comment. Go ahead.

The indoctrination is strong in this one.

You're sad. I hope you can figure out how to keep the vitriol from continuing to spread in you like that cancer that it is.

Good luck.

What's consummately sad is that you are entirely unaware of the significance of what you just said.

Oh well.

Best,

I have an abundance of vacation left and Its "use it or lose it" so might as well use it!

lol. Don't do it before the 17th though. If the the 17th comes and goes and there is no change in the atmosphere, etc, then you might wish you would have held back on those vacation days.

Honestly I hope this is just completely wrong.

You and me both. I'm not sure of too many people that would actually WANT something like this to happen. I mean I imagine the elites might want a lot of us dead, but I don't know if they would prefer to have to deal with all the nuclear fallout involved in having it happen this way.

It is a really hardcore far reaching conspiracy that would take an extreme amount of effort to cover up to this point.

What is? Covering it up? If that's what you're referring to, then I would say not really. There are a lot of other even more far reaching realities that have been covered up via PTB conspiracies, so I wouldn't be too surprised if this situation were successfully covered up as well.

Not dismissing it but man, wouldn't it suck.

It would suck, and I personally don't think that saying so is dismissing it.

Spend all your time researching and trying to find the truth all for it to go up in smoke.

Well I wouldn't go that far. We are not physical beings that occasionally have spiritual experiences. We are spiritual beings that occasionally have physical experiences - and being human on this planet is one of those experiences. After this life is done - whether it ends naturally and peacefully, or whether it gets engulfed in a planetary catastrophe - then the physical manifestation will be finished. The energy that created that manifestation won't be finished, however.

I think that would be a good idea.

This post right here on your part is actually rather significant and indicative of possibly the whole of our conversation and the other posts you've submitted here in that, while it does have some worth to it and cannot be discarded offhand, it continues to miss rather important points that heavily change the status of the conclusions which you ultimately draw.

That "EDIT" post I offered was actually put up coming on two years ago. A lot of travel can take place in that time. That fact combined with the very remedial level of understanding humans have about the universe in general (we are more babies than anything else where it regards what we actually know in that area) means that we should be very careful where it regards what information we discard offhand.

Yes, sir/ma'am. That is correct. Well-said.

Well-said - all of this. It's about having a balanced perspective. Don't go too far one way or the other. She might be right, as a lot of what she's said does seem to be based on sound reasoning and empirical evidence (FEMA camps, DUMBs, Fukushima, etc). She might be wrong, however...and HOPEFULLY, she is wrong. However, she seems to believe what she's saying, and she seems to be sound enough in how she's explaining things, so it wouldn't be wise to discard the information offhand as so many here have done.

Just wait and see, I guess.

All I keep getting is some metal dude on youtube. Is that who you're referring to? His latest video looks like a music video with lots of blood and some bald dude.

And yeah. I hope it's fake too.

Somehow, I don't think that's what you were referring to though, was it?

That is indeed pretty interesting, sir. Pretty interesting indeed.

Googled "two suns, grimvolf", but still nothing. If you get by a computer, link me.

The hostility in the back-and-forths on this thread are rather absurd

Agreed.

namely the hostility toward those who are doing anything but completely writing it off as complete horseshit, immediately and without question.

Doubly agreed.

For horseshit, it sure has the attention of naysayers.

Yeah. I've actually been surprised at how much heat this OP has gotten.

I don't believe or disbelieve it. The only remarkable thing about the interview-- to me-- was just how goddamn sure she was about what she was saying.

Dude. Exactly. That's what I'm saying as well. This is a great part of the reason why I even made this darn OP. It's because, like I said, this lady does NOT sound like a kook, and she confidently states a lot of information pertaining to what she alleges. As I said, it might all be nothing. I, again, HOPE it's nothing. I'll be pretty pleased if all the moronic naysayers can come back on here on the 18th and say "Na na! She was wrong!" I'll say "Great! Thank goodness!" But thus far, she sounds pretty confident and not like some crazy bag lady type.

Is she batshit insane? Quite possibly. Is she right? Who knows.

Yeah. We're pretty much essentially on the same wavelength in this area.

The sad part is the level of vitriol present in the posts of those denouncing her and the idea itself is smackingly similar to those who still deny 9/11.

It feels to me like there's actually a lot of fear masking as vitriol, arrogance, and hubris on here. I try to let it slide off, but some of the ignorance is downright flabbergasting.

Insist your opinion is fact, irrefutable, concrete proof, and then when challenged, resort to name-calling. Quite sad.

All well-said, sir.

Try to keep an open mind while still having a level head. Isn't that what this subreddit is supposed to be about, after all?

Anyway. Thanks for your thoughts.

Peace,

Take it w/a grain of salt, but keep an open mind. I for one hope the information is mistaken, but there seems to be a certain soundness to it.

That's right! Thanks for reminding me. I'm going to make another OP addressing the fact that we're all still here. :)

The solar flare is certainly interesting, but I think we've had pretty big solar flares before and nobody died right?

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1klep0/its_friday_81713_and_were_still_alive/

:)

You came here to be nothing but a naysayer? Like...and unqualified, complete naysayer? Did you even listen to anything that was said? Any of it whatsoever?

The fact that you say "the guy" and kept talking like that when it's actually a FEMALE and not a male in the first place almost entirely invalidates what you're saying here. It shows you as being someone who's come on here to be nothing more than a very uncritical type of person that doesn't even pay attention to basic information.

That's actually kind of embarrassing and shameful considering this subreddit should be more open to real investigation than that.

End of the day, we'll find out in a week or so. Correct.

And you know what? I hope YOU are actually correct in your assessment. As I said in another post here, I'm in no way afraid at all of death itself, but I'm not crazy about the possibility of drowning, or frying, or being nuked, or having to undergo some serious pain or torture on the way toward death.

That part would suck.

This video is very important. It connects EVERYTHING.

Perhaps you're being sarcastic. If you are, then you should have put an "/s" after your statement. If you weren't, then I'd say you might actually be alone in the sentiment you expressed here, as I don't know anyone who actually feels the video connects "everything".

Whaaat? Of course not. lol. I'm just some dude passing on the information. Just because I don't immediately and reflexively discard the information without stopping to critically think about what's actually being said (like various posters on here have done) you think I'm Patti Brassard? I've already said on many occasions here that I hope she's wrong. She provides interesting information that it seems to me should be listened to, however. That's all.

But you just did that on my post.

I immediately and reflexively discarded what information without stopping to critically think about what you actually said? That I'm possibly Pattie Brassard? What? I'm not following what you said I did. Explain please.

Even though it has indeed been discovered that this solar system - having another star relatively nearby (in AUs) - is, as a result, indeed a binary star system (like "the national inquiry lady" said) and not a single one like we've always been told?

I have no idea what the answer is to any of these two questions. I don't know what her fb page was/is and I don't have a link to any navy map. Apologies.

That would certainly be interesting information if anyone has it. One would think that effects that we will presumably be able to start feeling this coming Saturday will possibly already begin making their presence known now/already...but perhaps not. I'm not looking forward to her being right, and I hope she's not, because if she is...then...

shudder.

Well yes, like anything, with a grain of salt.

Agreed. However, there do seem to be various signs that seem to lend some sort of credence to what she says - the link in the "EDIT" I provided being one of them.

All this is telling us (like a million other scenarios) is to be self sufficient, And non-reliant on the daily milk and food delivery.

Correct. Most of us have allowed ourselves to become lazy at the hands of TPTB, however...and here we are.

I haven't prepared, the divorce from the ex-wife financially done me over. So when the power goes.. My electric stove top is useless. Cold baked beans for me then..

...if I can even find a can opener that is...

The first thing OP does is refer to ATS - which is a website that is absolutely rife with people who are simply naysayers. Referencing that site as a source is immediate grounds for being skeptical about the claims.

Secondly, he then follows up by saying that Brassard is a "NASA whistleblower". I don't recall her ever actually saying she was in NASA. She was in the military - not NASA, right? This, again, doesn't seem to bode well for the information itself as far as it being valid or sound.

Regardless of these two faux pas, if what is said in the Godlike productions link that OP provided is true (yet another site that has a less than stellar reputation), then it would seem that Patti Brassard is indeed a hoax.

If that's true, then you have provided a pretty good service, and I definitely thank you for that. As I said from the beginning, I hope this is all b.s. and wrong.

I also referenced your response here above in my own OP so as to hopefully clear the air regarding what this situation might be about. Thanks again.

Should I be expecting a wild month?

If she's correct, everyone should expect more than just a wild month.

Besides food prep, what should I do?

She goes into a bit of detail, but she mentions burying a Faraday cage 3ft under ground and planning on hanging out in there for a few days at least.

Do you know what date that was recorded?

I don't know what date is was recorded, but the youtube video was posted on August 6th, so only just four days ago.

There was an awesome lightning storm last night (just like she said).

O_o

Did you see the EDIT? If you did, and you still stand by what you just said here, then it's not me that needs the mental help.

Interesting how you've apparently entirely ignored the "EDIT" where CNN reports on a brown dwarf star that is, in terms of AUs, nearby and is...what? "pure rubbish" too right?

Okay, buddy.

Okay. As I've said about a million times already, lets hope for your sake and everyone's sake that you're right. If not, then nobody will be around to tell you how stupid you were for saying this.

Was going to respond at length to your fear-based ignorance, but GunsRGud already did so well enough.

Keep telling yourself that. If you're wrong, however...well, at least the good news is that there won't be anyone around to tell you how stupid you were, right?

That's so fucking stupid. I mean really. You're like...embarrassingly stupid. I haven't for once said that the speaker IS RIGHT. I've actually literally said that I hope the speaker IS WRONG. If the speaker IS wrong? Then great. What is there about any of that that will make you come back and be happy about "rubbing it in my face"? Seriously? Damn.

Wow. You people really are just...stupid...dense. Seriously.

What's really depressing is that people like you exist that are this deluded toward moronic antagonism. It's sad really.

Moving on.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1k41oa/according_to_this_person_we_are_all_going_to_die/cblm96x

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1k41oa/according_to_this_person_we_are_all_going_to_die/cblm69f

Couldn't even read through all of this. Too much ignorance contained.

it won't happen in seven days.

I would personally hope not. Enjoy the rest of your day.

The answer is no. You're ignorant for many, many other reasons along with that one as well.

I'm no less ignorant in my own ways - as is everyone else. It's part of being human.

Some understand this fact better than others.

So you can try your hardest to deny them? That's playing a child's game, and I'm not here to play children's games. If you think you're not ignorant, or if you even need reasons sited to you in order for you to begin grasping that fact, then your case is already a bit too lost to even understand what anyone could tell you.

I'm sure you'll come up with some witty come back in response to this in order to try and make yourself still seem relevant. Okay.

Ok if I'm ignorant for many reasons give me 3.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1k41oa/according_to_this_person_we_are_all_going_to_die/cblyynp

I'm sure examples number two and three (of I don't know how many others) will be shortly forthcoming.

A binary system results of two bodies orbiting around a common center of mass. It would contradict most proven theories of binary starts to have two stars with separate bodies orbiting around each other individually.

There is nothing about what I said or how I described a binary star system that would preclude two stars orbiting around a common center/one another, etc.

While it is extremely possible for the current accepted sets of planets to orbit around this comment center of mass, it is implausible for each star to orbit around this center while having individual planets orbiting around them separately.

Why so? The accompanying planets need not have enough mass to immediately pull the stars off their momentary orbit. The stars could have enough momentum to orbit for a certain amount of time before their accompanying planets pull them off that orbit. This could happen over the course of millions or billions of years though, so what I've postulated is in no way unsound in the context of human spans of time.

Edit: look at the theory of space time and how these bodies interact, even in hand written notes of Einstein and the likes who have studied this, it's relatively implausible.

There's a lot Einstein didn't understand.

Also, why would anyone hide these sets of planets who discovered them?

I could see a LOT of reasons why such information would be hidden if the discovering of such other planets necessarily leads to the understanding of a coming global catastrophe for the planet Earth and the human race living on it.

It would be a Nobel prize instantly.

The Nobel prize is a joke.

It does give one pause. But to think that it will end in a blink of an eye is a lot to think about.

Well...according to her, it'll be a long blink. About three months or so actually.

Not to mention that there are all the other "Aliens" to consider.

Are you referring to the ones that are on this planet? I imagine that they are either taken care of by the MIC or their own interstellar family or part of their voyage/"mission" here on this planet is to experience just such a catastrophic occurrence as the very one that the Brassard mentions is about to occur.

We mere Earthlings aren't alone in this.

This is very, very true.

This is a cosmic shit storm, not mere Earth politics, entirely

Well, at the very least a stellar and solar system shit storm...possibly even a galactic shit storm. I'm sure there's cosmic significance to it too, but I would imagine that the kind of thing Brassard predicts happens all the time on a cosmic level, so there might not be that much brouhaha in the grander universal scheme of things. You're definitely right, however, that it's not just about "Earth politics". That's real small potatoes in comparison with what's really going on.

Should make some good headlines either way.

Yeah...If what Brassard says is valid though, then the news simply won't be around to print any headlines at all.

That would seem to be the case - certainly. I don't know what to say at this point one way or the other about this other than lets wait and see. In a week's time it might all turn out to be bogus. It would be good if it is.

If it's not bogus and she's right, then I guess I can come back here laughing and say "Ha ha! See, you morons! We are all going to die! Woowee! I'm right yet again!...oh wait a minute."

I don't think this is the case, we are lead by assholes for sure.

We may not be inherently assholes, but we sure do seem to fall nicely into that category and nestle into it rather well. Just looking at some of the responses on here is rather indicative of that.

I think Humans in general have the potential to be pretty awesome if we could just sort out this government and religion bullshit.

I wouldn't disagree with that...but I think this particular iteration of humanity...might just be on about its last legs. It might be ready for a reboot. The REAL powers that be (not the Earthly ones) might be like "OK. This version is too much of a fuck up too. Time to start over and try another version of humanity. This one's too stupid."

As to treatment of other species, while I don't know about you personally I would be humbled and honored to be in the presence of an advanced alien civilization

As would I most definitely. It seems that there is still too great a percentage of humans that wouldn't feel this way, however, and would react negatively or violently.

As for the notion of a galactic non-interference agreement I think that a lot of people might argue that such a contract was broken long ago.

Yes. This would most certainly seem to be correct...amongst some species. I think there are still some ET civilizations that are still holding fast to that agreement, however.

Also where does one draw the line between primitive/developing and advanced/developed

I'm not sure, but I think we are somewhere in the middle.

we Humans have come pretty far in the last hundred years

Through the likely help of ET beings that gave us technology we wouldn't otherwise have had. I don't think we should take too much credit for how far we've come, therefore.

if we weren't being limited by the petty interests of politics and business I feel like we could go much further.

I wouldn't disagree with this.

While I do believe in the potential of this species, I am totally on board for reincarnating into the advanced civilization that already has this shit sorted out.

Oh well hell yeah. That would be awesome. I wouldn't want to come back to THIS species, but another, better one? Yeah. Sign me up.

I don't know if I would be worthy of reincarnating in that other class though. Depends on the grades I get in this class here on this planet first.