That is basically correct, although it needs to be explained further. If you recall, 4 planes were hijacked. It would make sense that 3 planes were meant for 3 towers, and 1 plane was meant for the Pentagon. Since one plane was crashed other than the place intended (I think it was meant for building 7) they couldn't leave the burning building there rigged with explosives, so they had to demolish the building without a plane to explain the corruption of the building's integrity. That is the only reason 9/11 in general was a proven conspiracy. Otherwise, enough doubt would exist (despite eyewitnesses. If you recall other conspiracies, eyewitnesses don't really matter). NIST says between 1.75 and 4 seconds, the building fell at freefall speed. That is literally admitting controlled demolition. After that fact is accepted generally (I have no idea why it isn't already) the eyewitness testimony, of which there is plenty for any court, becomes plausible, therefore the bombs they heard and felt and witnessed becomes a reality in the public's consciousness.
The majority have a bad case of denial (cognitive dissonance). To accept any facts outdide of the NIST mythology would be to deviate from the government's official story. More of us are paradigmic thinkers than you would initially imagine.
I get it. You think he is a dictator. You think he is just as bad as Hitler or Hitler is the easiest comparison to come to mind. My point is that people should understand what words mean before using them.
No... Still off base. You're over thinking the comparison being made here. It's not the person in power, it's the prevailing ideology that is being compared. "Do not question authority".
23 comments
14 reputable_opinion 2013-09-24
I'd rather be a terrorist then. Come and get me. I'm no Nazi collaborator.
10 funnymanisi 2013-09-24
Fuck you Hitler.
8 [deleted] 2013-09-24
He's almost smiling as he says it... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ
-3 MrTulip 2013-09-24
as expected, flawless logic in the youtube comments..
6 [deleted] 2013-09-24
That is basically correct, although it needs to be explained further. If you recall, 4 planes were hijacked. It would make sense that 3 planes were meant for 3 towers, and 1 plane was meant for the Pentagon. Since one plane was crashed other than the place intended (I think it was meant for building 7) they couldn't leave the burning building there rigged with explosives, so they had to demolish the building without a plane to explain the corruption of the building's integrity. That is the only reason 9/11 in general was a proven conspiracy. Otherwise, enough doubt would exist (despite eyewitnesses. If you recall other conspiracies, eyewitnesses don't really matter). NIST says between 1.75 and 4 seconds, the building fell at freefall speed. That is literally admitting controlled demolition. After that fact is accepted generally (I have no idea why it isn't already) the eyewitness testimony, of which there is plenty for any court, becomes plausible, therefore the bombs they heard and felt and witnessed becomes a reality in the public's consciousness.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm
1 woo_hoo_boobies 2013-09-24
Yeah, I have always, since late 2001, wondered why noone it seems did or would allow themselves to accept the obvious: "WTC was 93's building" ?
1 inkandpaperguy 2013-09-24
The majority have a bad case of denial (cognitive dissonance). To accept any facts outdide of the NIST mythology would be to deviate from the government's official story. More of us are paradigmic thinkers than you would initially imagine.
1 funkarama 2013-09-24
Heil, Obama!
1 TheWiredWorld 2013-09-24
When did he actually say this?
1 21022012 2013-09-24
you are either a terrorist or a nazi!
-2 ArmchairCritic1 2013-09-24
Does no one understand the terminology. By definition, Obama is not a Nazi as he does not follow the 25 tenants of Nazism.
2 5arge 2013-09-24
Yeah...you're missing the point yourself pal.
0 ArmchairCritic1 2013-09-24
I get it. You think he is a dictator. You think he is just as bad as Hitler or Hitler is the easiest comparison to come to mind. My point is that people should understand what words mean before using them.
4 5arge 2013-09-24
No... Still off base. You're over thinking the comparison being made here. It's not the person in power, it's the prevailing ideology that is being compared. "Do not question authority".
3 [deleted] 2013-09-24
Brain.
2 5arge 2013-09-24
Heart.
2 [deleted] 2013-09-24
No brain.
0 ArmchairCritic1 2013-09-24
I never fucking insulted you.
1 [deleted] 2013-09-24
You.
0 ArmchairCritic1 2013-09-24
No. I just think its hilarious that you live a life of paranoia and hate. Why would I cry about being insulted by some random on the Internet.
1 [deleted] 2013-09-24
I don't know, because you're sensitive?
0 ArmchairCritic1 2013-09-24
Not at all friend.
1 woo_hoo_boobies 2013-09-24
Yeah, I have always, since late 2001, wondered why noone it seems did or would allow themselves to accept the obvious: "WTC was 93's building" ?