Nope, and there never will be. Nukes can be tracked based on unique chemical signatures. If the US ever used a nuke in a false flag attack, the entire world would be able to independently check where the uranium was enriched.
Seismic detectors in Canada, Mexico, England, France, Germany, China, Russia, and many other nations would pick up the nuclear blast. Radiation detectors in many of those same countries would detect the nuclear signature and track its source to country of manufacture.
The evidence is atmospheric and impossible to cloak. This is why nuclear testing went underground decades ago - secrecy, not environmental concerns.
What? Are the different departments not allowed to mingle?
Oh no, better call the police, because I drove my Army HMMWV onto an Air Force base. I didn't realize that wasn't allowed, and now I have to turn myself in. I'm a repeat offender. This has happened at least three times in the last year. I deserve whatever punishment the UCMJ finds fit. Clearly this is a most serious infraction.
That's what we do. We're just like "Hey, we got like six bros with HMMWV's who are just gonna like be headin your way."
I did not, however, know that they didn't have an airfield.. That would make it particularly hard if at all possible to land an aircraft there. The only other option would be to land an aircraft at any nearby civilian airport, though if we're talking about a nuke being moved around, I don't think that would happen.
A C-130 though only needs about 3000 ft of runway at max weight. You could land one on just about any solid surface.
Why, when they tell the important stories usually a day or two before the MSM? MSM always have to wait to get approval on what will be the official narrative before breaking ANYTHING anymore. MSM is nothing but controlled, corporate conglomerates, that have zero desire to educate you or help you get any real truth. The dumber you are the better. AJ may be controlled opposition, who knows, but do you have a better alternative than corporate slanted media>?
Official Media Outlets tell you what "they" want you to know. Alternative Media Outlets tell you what "they" want you to know. Both have they're own agenda's, whatever they might be. Use your own brains people. read between the lines. Look at both sides of the story, and the truth will almost always be somewhere in the middle. Stop the World , I want to get off.
28 comments
3 bhgrove 2013-10-12
The admiral was at Subase Bangor and the general was at Schilling Air Force base.
5 TheWiredWorld 2013-10-12
Shilling Airforce Base!! GET IT
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
what city/state?
3 bhgrove 2013-10-12
Bangor is in Washington State (Silverdale) and Schilling is in Kansas (Salina).
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
and where was the suspected nuke transfer a couple weeks ago???
3 [deleted] 2013-10-12
Dyess AFB in Abilene Texas, my hometown.
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
anybody think there's any connection???
8 Algee 2013-10-12
Nope, and there never will be. Nukes can be tracked based on unique chemical signatures. If the US ever used a nuke in a false flag attack, the entire world would be able to independently check where the uranium was enriched.
2 TheWiredWorld 2013-10-12
Unless ofcourse noone got a hold of any of it.
Kind of like how the majority of the steel in the WTC attack was sent across seas and melted before an investigation on them.
4 Algee 2013-10-12
Ahold of any of the nuclear fallout?
3 MaximumAbsorbency 2013-10-12
They scooped up the dust clouds with gigantic vacuums right?
2 Sonmi-452 2013-10-12
Seismic detectors in Canada, Mexico, England, France, Germany, China, Russia, and many other nations would pick up the nuclear blast. Radiation detectors in many of those same countries would detect the nuclear signature and track its source to country of manufacture.
The evidence is atmospheric and impossible to cloak. This is why nuclear testing went underground decades ago - secrecy, not environmental concerns.
0 bhgrove 2013-10-12
I heard it was someplace in Idaho. An easy transfer considering how close Bangor is. Dyess would make sense too considering its proximity to Kansas.
3 [deleted] 2013-10-12
No, it was definently Dyess that the claims regarded they even had a story of it on the local news.
http://www.bigcountryhomepage.com/story/dyess-responds-to-rumors-regarding-transfer-of-nukes-to-coast/d/story/urlFTGx7EEisV2kOR33vww
2 bhgrove 2013-10-12
Thank you.
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
Sure. Just land the USAF plane at the USN base... Oh, wait.
1 RuTsui 2013-10-12
What? Are the different departments not allowed to mingle?
Oh no, better call the police, because I drove my Army HMMWV onto an Air Force base. I didn't realize that wasn't allowed, and now I have to turn myself in. I'm a repeat offender. This has happened at least three times in the last year. I deserve whatever punishment the UCMJ finds fit. Clearly this is a most serious infraction.
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
How do you allege the USAF plane would get clearance to land at Bangor? Do you think they would wire duty orders ahead?
Nevermind the fact that Bangor has a heliport and no runway.
1 RuTsui 2013-10-12
That's what we do. We're just like "Hey, we got like six bros with HMMWV's who are just gonna like be headin your way."
I did not, however, know that they didn't have an airfield.. That would make it particularly hard if at all possible to land an aircraft there. The only other option would be to land an aircraft at any nearby civilian airport, though if we're talking about a nuke being moved around, I don't think that would happen.
A C-130 though only needs about 3000 ft of runway at max weight. You could land one on just about any solid surface.
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
I think if you showed up at the gate of Bangor sub base, the duty guard would shrug at you. It's not the kind of base you visit for a tour.
As long as they are moving a stolen nuke, they aren't going to have a cordon. So they might as well stop over at DIA or whatever.
Anyway, what are we talking about, anyway? If a nuke moved from Dyess to SC, it didn't need to land anywhere.
3 TheWiredWorld 2013-10-12
Google, holy shit
2 [deleted] 2013-10-12
Breaking news: http://www.infowars.com/top-nuke-commanders-fired-following-missing-nuclear-warheads-report/
Breaking news: http://www.infowars.com/top-nuke-commanders-fired-following-missing-nuclear-warheads-report/
-8 muckraker2 2013-10-12
Please don't use the terms "news" and "infowars" together. Thanks.
6 MajorMitchell 2013-10-12
Why, when they tell the important stories usually a day or two before the MSM? MSM always have to wait to get approval on what will be the official narrative before breaking ANYTHING anymore. MSM is nothing but controlled, corporate conglomerates, that have zero desire to educate you or help you get any real truth. The dumber you are the better. AJ may be controlled opposition, who knows, but do you have a better alternative than corporate slanted media>?
1 muckraker2 2013-10-12
RT.com
1 TodaysIllusion 2013-10-12
There is an AP story on the reddit conspiracy about them on the conspiracy hot page. Also this earlier story about one of them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/us/vice-admiral-is-suspended-in-gambling-investigation.html?_r=0
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wdy24fMbqMY
1 thefury001 2013-10-12
Official Media Outlets tell you what "they" want you to know. Alternative Media Outlets tell you what "they" want you to know. Both have they're own agenda's, whatever they might be. Use your own brains people. read between the lines. Look at both sides of the story, and the truth will almost always be somewhere in the middle. Stop the World , I want to get off.
0 bhgrove 2013-10-12
I heard it was someplace in Idaho. An easy transfer considering how close Bangor is. Dyess would make sense too considering its proximity to Kansas.
1 [deleted] 2013-10-12
anybody think there's any connection???