Food for thought: Since new accounts are easy to spot, shills are buying old accounts for credibility and trolling this sub.

2  2013-12-14 by [deleted]

If you spot dismissive "skeptics" with few posts in this sub and constant barrage of nay-saying, you got one.

Note: Weird how so-called "skeptics" always doubt the theory presented, and not the version the media shoves down our throats?

Gold mine

Tag them while you can, guys. This honey pot was a success.

41 comments

You seem to believe that anyone who has a skeptical bone in their body on this subreddit is instantly a government shill. What happened to actual critical thinking? If you believe every conspiracy you hear you're just as brainless as people who believe whatever politicians say.

Here's an easier explanation for what you're proposing: there are people with whom you don't agree on this subreddit and you don't like it so you go off the deep end like you always seem to.

I know right? He claims no one ever tried to approach his hypothesis yet i have tried repeatedly and everytime i did he responded with shill-porn.

He's either a pretty dedicated troll or he is one paranoid person. I'm sure there are some shills here and I really don't give a shit. It happens. It's good to point it out but trying to pass ridiculous 'theories' off as if they're verifiable facts is going too far.

Agreed. I usually am pretty open, even to the "ridiculous" theories, as long as the OP provides sources and evidence to their claims. This is something that OP of this post does not do very often.

as long as the OP provides sources and evidence to their claims.

Did you... read the title of this post? (hint: the first 3 words)

Hey, it's entertainment at least, right?

Eh. At least it passes the time while im stuck at work!

Your life sucks if this is entertainment.

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░███████░░░░░░░░░░███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░░░░███▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░█▒▒▒▒▒█░░░██▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░█▒▒▒█░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒████▒▒▒▒████▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░█████████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ██▒▒▒███████████▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ █▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▒▒▒▒████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░█▒▒▒███████████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░████████████░░░█████████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░

You gave up easy. Almost... too easy.

Lol, ok. You're a troll. Well done.

Good. Keep thinking that. It will keep the drones away from my house if you guys just think I'm a troll.

░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄

░░░░░░░░▌▒█░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▌

░░░░░░░░▌▒▒█░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▒▒▐

░░░k░░░▐▄▀▒▒▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▐

░░░░░▄▄▀▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▄█▒▐

░░░▄▀▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀██▀▒▌

░░▐▒▒▒▄▄▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄▒▒▌

░░▌░░▌█▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▀█▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▐

░▐░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌██▀▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀▄▌

░▌░▒▄██▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▌

░▀▒▀▐▄█▄█▌▄░▀▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▐

▐▒▒▐▀▐▀▒░▄▄▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▒▒▌

▐▒▒▒▀▀▄▄▒▒▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▐

░▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒░▒▒▒▌

░▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▄▒▒▐

░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▄▒▒▒▒▌

░░░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▄▀

░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▀

░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀

trying to pass ridiculous 'theories'

Food for thought. Did you read the title?

Food for thought: Since new accounts are easy to spot, shills are buying old accounts for credibility and trolling this sub.

Noun 1. food for thought - anything that provides mental stimulus for thinking

Provides mental stimulus alright. You guys are having a blast talking about what a non-issue this is. I's almost as if it mattered to you?!

No were just bewildered at your logic. Youre complaining about people not approaching your hypothesis and yet, when i have asked you several times about it, and when i have tried on several occasions to discuss your hypothesis in depth, you retract and spew garbage about how everyone is a shill.

Youre not posting this for logical debate or food for thought. Youre posting this to start flame wars for your own entertainment. If you were posting this for logical and sensible debate, youd be interactively participating in my attempts to further the discussion on your own hypothesis.

And since youve made it obvious that logical discussion is not your intent, we wont take this seriously.

My title is pretty specific. Don't blame your inability to interpret text on me.

Another proof of your mental dyslexia, I never, not once asked for anyone's opinion. I waited for those who would obviously doubt this simple logic to manifest themselves. Mission accomplished.

I didn't engage your comments because, as I stated in the posts' description: "Weird how so-called "skeptics" always doubt the theory presented" I merely stated tagging those that fall under that category for my own records. I never intended on engaging you people, but had to keep conversation going.

Youre posting this to start flame wars for your own entertainment.

Not mine. You and your friends, apparently.

So the purpose of posting this post and the other "similar" post was to not start discussion, but just for people to read and move along?

For the unbrainwashed, yes.

Then you guys started popping up, actually exposing yourselves with your nah-uh's.

Like I mentioned in the other post, it's easier to find you setting up this honey pot than some random post. I knew only shills would try to bury this.

My comments on the other post got -10 karma after posted for 1 minute, on a comment with 20+ children. Who would stick around to read all the way down, after it was already hidden?

Like I said, it was a success. I supposed I should thank you guys for doing my job for me.

Youre contradicting yourself. See this is what im talking about. First you say you just wanted to post this for people to read ("food for thought") then you say we are doing your job for you by posting on your fake post and "outing ourselves" , exposing an ulterior motive for your post.

So which is it? Food for thought? Or a shill witch hunt?

Youre contradicting yourself.

Not spoon-feeding you my intentions is not a contradiction.

Food for thought = attention-getting title. Thinking goes in your head, usually, but some people can't contain themselves, and have to suppress such information verbally, not just downvoting and moving on like most people would do with uninteresting posts. So yeah, that worked like a charm.

shill witch hunt

What's wrong with hunting shills? Do you like them?

Well then it seems i have mistaken you for someone who actually likes productivity in this sub. Ive ehausted all attempts for discussion. Nice ploy btw.

Oh, it's been quite productive. Your mistake was assuming which part I was looking at. It's the most action I've seen from the shill horde. Like setting an ant hill on fire, I love to watch shills squirm.

Now squirm, bitch.

anyone who has a skeptical bone in their body

Weird how so-called "skeptics" always doubt the theory presented, and never the government approved version the media (or government) shoves down our throats.

What happened to actual critical thinking?

This coming from someone who goggles up all information from mass media.

just as brainless

go off the deep

Ad hominem, but thanks for trying anyways.

This coming from someone who goggles up all information from mass media

How could you possibly know this about me? Also, it's 'gobble' not 'goggle'.

By the way, calling my point invalid because I 'goggle up' mass media is an ad hominem as well.

The more you know

Also, it's 'gobble' not 'goggle'.

See? I knew it.

Worked, didn't it?

Notice how no one acknowledges my assumption, but automatically gets on the defensive and/or ridicules, like you just did? Awesome sight.

Honestly i dont think anyone is really paid to be here and spit bullshit.

Thanks for stalking by! Tell your new friends! (hopefully)

Thanks for stalking by!

If clicking on the eight link in the "new" column counts as stalking

You're engaging me on several posts I authored about the same topic. That's technically stalking.

        4.  No stalking.

Hmm, me gun reporht joo

Im replying to new posts. Just happens that you are spamming r/conspiracy with bullshit.

Im replying to new posts.

There are other new posts you can comment on. This does not drive away the point that you're engaging me on several posts I authored about the same topic.

There are other new posts you can comment on

And ive been engaging those as well. Youre not that special.

And why are you so defensive over receiving the same responses to your spam posts containing bullshit? Are you really that surprised that your repeated posts receive the same attention?

FYI, Albert Einstein once defined "insane" as "doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results each time."

Youre not that special.

You certainly make me feel like it.

Are you really that surprised that your repeated posts receive the same attention?

Not from you, no, not surprising at all. That's what stalkers do. Also, they are not repeated, the wording is different. Similar, thus permitted.

FYI, Albert Einstein once defined "insane" as "doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results each time."

Who said I was expecting different results?

Also, they are not repeated, the wording is different. Similar, thus permitted.

The content is the same. The context is the same. The intent is the same. The posts are the same. Therefore they are repeated.

Ill even add some precedence to this claim. The fda claims that if a molecule is similar in structure to an illegal drug, it is considered illegal as well, and for legal purposes, it is considered the same.

The content is the same.

Read the description. The text is different, as is the title.

The context is the same.

Technically, all posts related to a specific subject can be considered being the same context. In this case, are you saying we can never repeat a topic in this sub?

Sure did. I'm pretty sure you got all of them. I tagged them all from the other thread so now I'll know the shills when I see them.

Never mind the debate. I want to know how someone could 'buy' an old, 'credible' account. What's the going rate, anyway?

Also, it's 'gobble' not 'goggle'.

See? I knew it.