You're too emotional to be an effective mod, IMHO.

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/SubredditDrama] /u/flytape asks for opinions on if he should remain mod of /r/conspiracy gets butthurt when people give their honest opinion

• [/r/SubredditDrama] /u/flytape asks for opinions on if he should remain a mod of /r/conspiracy. Drama starts when users begin to contribute negative impressions of him.

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

See?! You react, even when obviously baited. I don't know why you even posted this question, if you wanted to stay in utter denial. Shit, I suspect some of these "positive" comments are even your sockpuppets.

Do us all a favor and wait a full 72 hours from post time, if you want to see the "true" opinions of this sub.

What do they have to do with my comment? ...

And honesty, if you're a mod, you should be familiar with regular users here, correct? I'm female, man...

My opinion doesn't seem to be your concern either, though you readily asked for it. I'm not upvoting myself, others agree you're arrogant, reactive and have viewpoints that are inappropriate for the type of moderation this radically diverse sub needs.

But I'm going to end here. I get so disgusted WITH MYSELF for even trying to converse with someone who is so obviously in love with them self, that they feel like reddit is a life mission. You need some priorities, and I suspect, some IRL friends to shock you into self awareness. You can blame your personality defects on the hive mind, but it's not until you meet new people who then are offended by your actions, that you'll really have to look at YOURSELF.

Omg, you honestly DO deny that any regulars here don't want your moderation. So technically, all the brigades against you are personal and only coming from "trolls". WOWOWOWOWOWOW, I actually feel really bad for you, you are the definition of delusional.

So are you actually surprised that the kind of person who would be interested in modding r conspiracy is under the impression that any and all criticism is the result of...wait for it...a conspiracy against them?

Said the guy that mods a sub about fictional armies...

Mmm, I love the smell of ad hominem in the morning. Because clearly liking something you don't like invalidates all my opinions. Well done.

Except...that's exactly how you operate on your own shitty subreddit...

It's not that I don't like you, it's that I don't respect you. I am entitled to my opinions on what is constructive commentary and what is drama. I don't think you possess the skills to be an impartial and fair moderator. That was your original question, right?

The last paragraph I utterly disagree with. I get constant disrespect when I mention Christianity, despite the sub rules.

Honestly man, are you just pretending like those are the only people that find you grating?

LOOK AT ME, I'M BEING PERSECUTED. PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!!

Well first there were dinosaurs, but they got big and dumb and died, and became oil(at least according to TPTB), then the Arabs bought Mercedes Benzii. Next, over 35 years ago, two people who were attracted to each other, possibly because of alcohol, got together and had sex. Then the stork dropped me down the chimney. If you want to know what sex is, I suggest you ask someone else.

Nope. I don't agree with whatever you read into my comment.

And wrong again. /u/mr_dong unbanned me. I DO thank you, however, for not making fun of my autism or appearance, assuming you don't again.

As for shaping up, look at my history. NONE of my comments in this sub for at least the past month are in the negative. Can you even claim that, even for the last day or two? Heck my last submission to this sub is in the positive count. Not even this post itself is positive.

I'm just calling it like I see it. You seek external validation and want to believe you are being persecuted, and will try to find anything to confirm what you believe.

Number one, lets remember that you claimed you didn't originally ban me, but instead said it was another of the mods. Glad to know I was right that it was you behind it the whole time, instead of the listed, at the time, Rule 6, which stated that bans were ONLY done after mod consensus. Yeah, one of the side effects of the Autism is that I have great memory, even of convos nearly a year ago. That said:

Entering a conversation where one posted in order to get opinions from others is not "mocking". It's exactly what you wanted when you posted. YOU ASKED for opinions. You just seem to have a problem with people who are being truthful and not fitting what your version of reality is. I bet you blame any downvotes you have in this thread on me, but I hate to tell you, but all the upvotes/downvotes are from others besides me, e.g. /r/conspiracy readers.

I'll totally post a screen grab for proof, but lets just settle for the text of your message:

from Flytape [M] via /r/conspiracy/ sent 9 months ago

I wasn't the one who banned you either time.

You were banned this time for a junk post by EMF. don't try to hang me with your rope.

Actually, it was only TWICE. I am currently posting after my second and so far last ban. Stop trying to lie your way through this. I'm not known for my bullshit. I'm actually known for being VERY honest.

You however, tried to elicit sympathy from me over being banned, because we are both supposedly "the same" , b/c you forgot you banned me months earlier.

Rule 6 - No caps lock.

Comment removed.

Well, they didn't fully get here til this morning. And fuck, I'm partly to blame. Smdh.

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/stalkerwatch] Pathetic Flytape goes fishing for compliments and attention in /r/conspiracy

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

I personally find it odd that anyone would have to criticize you for being democratic diplomatic*, for people voicing against you as a mod, you were simply asking for a consensus, I don't see the problem here.

I'm glad the matter is resolved though personally, I've never had a problem with you in general.

They aren't criticizing him for being "Democratic" (asking in a sub you control is democracy??), they are criticizing him for seeking attention and compliments.

Sorry I meant to say diplomatic.

If that's what you'd like to call self aggrandizement

I want to hear the opinions of /u/mr_dong, /u/axolotl_peyotl, /u/SovereignMan, and /u/AssuredlyAThrowAway.

Here I am!

I think that Flytape should stay on as a mod.

Just to clarify, I personally have no beef with you. As long as you don't let your political bias affect your mod duties.

And the more you keep conspiratard away from this subreddit, the more you'll receive my blessing.

Is it a valid way to solicit feedback having a poll from a controversial mod who has a penchant for banning anyone who looks at him crossways, while he retains the full power to punish dissenters? I guess it is if you are after a predetermined outcome.

This is a sub that is notorious for smashing dissent and banning anyone who doesn't adhere to the sub's orthodoxy. Among both mods and followers here there is a widespread and wholly sincere belief that anyone who disagrees is a literal enemy, a literal agent of the government (or some other nefarious agency), and that these enemies need to be purged and punished. This is heart of fascism stuff, totally contrary to American values but perfectly consistent with the values of extreme right wing authoritarianism.

The point is that having a paranoid, ban-happy political extremist who believes he is waging a literal war for the survival of a besieged minority ask in a forum he still moderates if he should retain his authority is not the best way to get candid, honest feedback. Very few people are going to feel free to say anything against Flytape as long as he continues to have the power to eliminate them.

The outcome of this query was rigged before it began.

(Throwaway account created for this occasion, simply because dissent is punished in this sub and freedom of thought and expression are expressly prohibited and regularly punished - as everyone here knows.)

Are you denying his assertion or pretending that your post is in itself a rebuttal of his assertion?

I have no issue with you being a mod of /r/conspiracy, I think you are very suited for the job and represent the community well.

However if you felt like you wanted to step down from /r/xkcd, then be my guest, I wouldn't stop you.

God, are you capable of posting anything on any sub without it devolving to a childish argument between you and some other person. How about you just give the sub back? What do you and soccer even care about xkcd anyway? It obviously doesn't gel with your worldview. Just quit ruining the sub for everyone that actually enjoyed it and give it back already. Or don't and fuck off.

I didn't even know your name an hour ago and just a brief look into your comment history and these asinine, petty little bitchfights you have on EVERY FUCKING THREAD is enough to make me sick of you. You really bring the hate on yourself I hope you realize that.

It being a few days old doesn't make my observation any less relevant. And yes, it is an issue. The way you can it is still an issue is because people are still talking about it.

Firstly, unless the issues that caused the commotion to begin with have been fixed (inappropriate sidebar links, auto mod that deletes and censors people who want to address the issue or the mods) then it isn't "operating normally". And the fact that /r/xkcdcomic has been rapidly gaining subscribers and your sub has been losing them is evidence of that fact.

Secondly, I don't really give a shit about the mod who got kicked. Not every one who disagrees with you is "in on it" with someone else, which also speaks to your apparent fondness of accusing dissenters of being part of an SRS brigade. I care about the sub, and I'm angry because it got hijacked by people who really had nothing to do with it in the first place, and then began pushing their own agenda into the sub and censoring or banning anyone who addressed it. I find it extremely ironic and hypocritical, as well, that a person who was a MOD OF /R/CONSPIRACY would engage in this sort of activity and then deny it.

And thirdly, acting benevolent by making insincere sign offs to your replies doesn't make you sound nice, it kind of makes you sound like a dick.

It got hijacked when /u/soccer started exerting his own personal (and unrelated) preferences over the content of the sub, and deleting and banning those who tried to address it.

Look dude, stop playing coy. You know perfectly well why people are upset and you know perfectly well what /u/soccer did that was out of line. Based on your own posts, if the exact same thing happened on one of the subs you like you would be the first one to cry foul. The fact that you cannot recognize the same behavior when it happens to be with a point that you agree with makes you at best a hypocrite and at worst a delusional hypocrite.

And obviously you aren't done.

If a second sub wants to advertise and gain members good for them!

Okay, great! Let us do it.

What if we just said "/r/xkcdcomic is a subreddit very similar to this one, but with moderators that don't censor comments"? I mean, that's advertising without telling them to unsubscribe or subscribe to /r/xkcdcomic. Would you allow us to do that?

Edit: The link to my "history of the /r/xkcd kerfuffle" thread was removed, even though it didn't tell people to unsubscribe from /r/xkcd or subscribe to /r/xkcdcomic.

Well, you said "let them advertise," so I thought we were free to do that. Did you mean "I'd be fine with you advertising; it's soccer who doesn't want you to,"?

I understand why soccer wouldn't want me to. I was just confused why you said "let them advertise" if you weren't going to let us advertise.

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/stalkerwatch] Flytape confirms he and soccer looking for some sort of profit or personal gain to give up XKCD

• [/r/xkcdcomic] Sorry to bring the meta-drama back. But /u/Flytype is willing to sell XKCD back to us, if we're interested.

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

I have money, how much do want for it?

No, I'm serious, you want something for the sub, I'll give you something.

What do you want, bitcoin? I can send you bitcoin if you transfer the subreddit back to /u/XKCD.

I don't understand why he wants a sub for a sub. Does he just collect them for no reason? Genuinely curious here!

We will probably never get that far because trading subreddits is fucking retarded and most definitely should not be allowed. Could you imagine the horrible precedent that would set? Not only would we have the subreddit squatters we have now, but those top mod squatters would then be allowed to collect and trade subreddits like playing cards. No thank you.

I'll give you /r/bitteroldmen, or how about /r/Ihateyou?

How about I give you /r/Ihaterobotevil. It's yours if you transfer the subreddit back to /u/XKCD and /u/Wyboth.

You know what, I'll even throw in /r/FlyTape.

Keep in mind that I don't have control over xkcd. Soccer does.

So why the fuck are you here talking out your ass about it then?

You are in here discussing trading subreddits like playing cards and it kind of pisses me off. I don't think the people who are sitting on /r/stormfront give a fuck about /r/xkcd.

Trading subreddits is not a solution. It's almost as bad as selling them. They are not commodities to be traded like players on a team, they are thriving communities and if he isn't a member of the communities he moderates he has no damn business being a moderator. Sooner or later he will get shadowbanned or go inactive and be removed via redditrequest and then the problem will solve itself, it's only a matter of time.

Yup, let's try to solve problems with backroom deals instead of using the system the way it was intended (or trying to fix the system if it's broken). Instead of trying to broker a shady backroom trade, you should be trying to get the admins to change their policies. Maybe when the fact that there are mods who are trying to trade subreddits like playing cards comes to their attention they might be persuaded to do so.

Why is robotevil here?

How much do you want for /r/xkcd?

What are you looking for? Cash payment? A trade for /r/Judaism?

Oh wow, did you just call us terrorist because we disagree with your political views?

Have you always been a fan of Rush Limbaugh?

When did I try to get you banned?

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/stalkerwatch] Flytape calls another user a "terrorist" for "trying to get me banned". When asked for an example he can't provide one.

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

...another user

Looks like someone's got quite a multiple-personality disorder. :/

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/SubredditDrama] /u/Flytape discusses the possibility of /u/soccer giving up /r/xkcd--for a price. USD, bitcoins, /r/stormfront swap all mentioned.

• [/r/ThePopcornStand] In which /u/Flytape tries to negotiate a subreddit trade, and everyone thinks he means he wants money

• [/r/conspiratard] In which /u/Flytape tries to negotiate a subreddit trade, and everyone thinks he means he wants money [x-post from /r/ThePopcornStand]

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

Is there a reason you are asking this? I haven't seen any reason to think you should be removed.

My main guess is attention/external validation.

Who is "they"?

You mean half the sub saying you shouldn't be here?

I've been seeing a number posts like that lately, just random over-the-top racist comments that have nothing to do with the actual topic. Looks like it's another attack by the "Let's make /r/conspiracy look like a racist forum" Brigade. Pretty lame.

As for the topic at hand, why would you not stay on as mod? Because you are conflicted about whether or not to penalize users for racist comments? That's against the rules, right?

Can you be more specific about your conflict?

I don't believe there's any reason for you to step down as a mod, you haven't done anything that would warrant you to step down. I feel if you did step down we'd be losing a quality moderator who is very fair and reasonable.

Agreed.

I've always liked you as a mod.

Look, we're under attack right now and need a moderator that understands the urgency to identify and remove these blatant attempts to discredit the sub and those contributors that actually bring forth interesting, relevant, timely disclosure. You must stay on task and not waiver. The onslaught has just begun. You are a proven mod with an eye for fairness.

Do Not Quit!

Besides, what else could you possibly do with your time?

we're under attack right now

I'm not trying to be a jerk, honest, genuine question: Who exactly do you think r/conspiracy is under attack from?

There is a handful of people that have formed a group of the like-minded that have spilled over from the /r/EnoughPaulSpam sub into the /r/conspiratard faction who revel in their attempts at thwarting interesting open discussion about alternative narratives for popular world impacting events. These few people have enjoyed their raids, down vote brigades, ridicule, chat sniping, false complaint reporting, and so on virtually unchallenged. It has caused much chaos among the loosely organized watchers of /r/conspiracy. Many are much like myself isnomuch that we frequent this sub, but rarely engage the raiders. We allow for the mayhem to move about just as long as it doesn't ruin or take away from our personal /r/conspiracy experience. That said, as of late the entire sub has been undergoing a power struggle for direction and control internally. There has been rumor and manufactured controversy regarding who exactly is causing the deletion of many important threads. Make no mistake, there is a concerted effort to stifle, thwart, mute and ridicule any and all /r/conspiracy posts along with their OP's.

Make no mistake, there is a concerted effort to stifle, thwart, mute and ridicule any and all /r/conspiracy posts along with their OP's.

Like I said, not trying to be a jerk... but WHY? Can you point out an example of a thread that someone would actually view as a threat? This sub has never actually exposed, predicted, or DONE anything.

Oh, you think I'm saying that they feel threatened, they do not. It is for sport. There is zero threat to them only to us and this sub.

Oh gotcha, fair enough.

I would guess some very dedicated trolls from the sub that must not be named.

But I'm wondering why comments and postings seem to be down in general. Seems to me in December, we lost a lot of users.

You think rather highly of yourself I see.

The blatant racism like that is never from regular posters here

The problem is, you have other subreddits like conspiratard that are OBSESSED with "racism" and "anti-semitism". There was a thread there yesterday talking about how racist it is here because the AIPAC link on the sidebar links to some other zionist subreddit lol

Who the hell stickied this to the top and then who the hell decided to unsticky it? Not going the way you want it to or what?

Long Live Flytape!!

Good call! Sounds good.

Hi Flytape,

I have voiced support for you in the past, you can see in my comments.

I was concerned about all the meta-drama with u/soccer I tried to follow it but I'm not sure what to think about it. Who is u/p1impstick? What is your association with u/soccer? I understand that he is a powerful mod, it's just that the whole thing was curious to me.

For the record, I support you Flytape and am happy you are back as mod. I was just hoping for some clarification on the subject.

Thanks.

For reference: this is what I'm asking about

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1wi665/the_soccerflytape_conspiracy_a_small_group_of/

I don't see the comparison to /u/bipolarbear0. He appears to be active in nearly every subreddit he moderates, whereas /u/soccer seems to only be active when people request control of one of his squatted subs.

Is he not a sub squatter?

Thank you for your reply.

Please keep fighting the good fight for /r/conspiracy

Stay.

Nope.

Really depends on how you feel about it. As a mod, you are inevitably going to be put in positions where you are hated by many people around here. Does it bother you? Is the hatred of you by others here justified? Do you feel it is time to move on? I think these are questions I would think about before making such a decision. Ultimately it is on you. Just take you time and figure out where you want to go from here.

As for me personally, you have banned only one person in six days. Since this board is a breeding ground for anti authoritative individuals, I would say you are doing a good job. Good luck with the decision friend.

**With further reading here is what I would do. Go through /r/conspiratard tagging all the submitters/commenters there so you can have a better idea of who is trolling this sub. With that tag, you can more easily tell the context of who is posting here. Hell, I do it myself. It is very surprising how many of them are on this sub; and some of them actually contribute to the conversation here, (very, very few btw). Stay on as a mod, just use some different tools perhaps?

Wait, so you are being asked to step down by the other mods??? Why would they do that, you've been a staple of /r/conspiracy for a LONG time. I like pretty much all of our mods, I was happy to see them all get their position but I'm pretty surprised by this. Hell, r/conspiratard HATES you, that alone is deserving of a spot in my opinion. I was shocked that you actually took a mod position again, I didn't think you would do it. No, I think you should stay.

Stay on as a mod. You haven't done anything to require your dismissal. The new mods just want to establish their positions at your expense. The rules changed, you shouldnt have to reapply for the job.

From what I have read in this thread, I was under the assumption that the new mods put you up to this because they were all voted in and you were just chosen for the job. Is that correct?

This is all because of that bullshit thread the other day. If that kind of shit can depose a mod here now, then what is there left for the rest of us in this sub? It's already controlled by the griefer trolls who bombard us daily until we cannot have an in depth conversation about anything as we're all fighting idiots. I hate to see the bastards win and just leave, but by forcing all this drama they are pushing good quality posters away.

Unless and until you abuse your moderation powers, hell no you shouldn't step down!

I'm new-ish to this sub.

I haven't had the chance to meet you, but I've met a mod who sides with trolls. I'm still waiting for an answer from this mod on who to contact for rules violations from the same user. Here's the exchange. As always, the troll's comment is at the very bottom of the thread. Scroll down to the very bottom. The debate takes place there.

I've received a mixed message from another mod about the trolls. That mod says "I really don't want /r/conspiracy to lower ourselves to the level of /r/conspiratard. The more we ban the users over there, the more we stoop to their level."

I'm at a loss as to which mod will deal with trolls. If you're that guy, please stay. If you'll give the the run-around as the other mods did, then I see no point in talking to 3 brick walls.

Thanks for your time.

Edit: clearer message with link

Currently, the troll is claiming ad hominem on a legit user for showing how physics works.

This user has only ever commented in /r/conspiracy. They only disagree with every post they comment on. They only antagonize legit users when questioned.

I question those who hide behind "rules violations" without giving any thought to enacting a new rule.

Well the link you provided went to the generic comments section.

The specific user is at the bottom of the thread.

Why would I hope to have a known conspiratard troll removed from this sub?

Edit: snark aside, what answer did you think I was hoping for? The same answer that most of /r/911truth also longs for? How many socks does this user have? I've noticed people have pointed out this one user has at least 3 alt accounts.

[deleted]

[deleted]

You have no problem on applying the rules equally to someone that is part of this sub - while knowing fully well that the offended party, the person that reported, is a debunker troll - and someone that is not part of this sub. Although I had to directly tell you because the report probably failed to follow or you are the only one trying to handle the entire sub.

You are the kind of mod this sub needs, as far as I can see, so if they don't want you because you weren't voted in then here you have my vote now.

This thread has been linked to from elsewhere on reddit.

• [/r/nocontext] "Weird day for me so far. I woke up tied to a huge wooden stake about to be burned. Then suddenly its a surprise party in my honor. Then I was rescued by a gay unicorn who forced me to ride facing backwards."

^{I am a bot. Comments? Complaints? Send them to my inbox!}

How did you know the unicorn was gay?

So this all sounds like a really weird coming out party. I mean the wooden stake insinuates you'd be a "flaming" homosexual, the surprise party about you means it's like an intervention and the gay unicorn forcing you to ride them wow so symbol. Flytape it maybe me just reading too much into this but that's how I see it, but only because it sounds hilarious did I even bring it up. My apologies if you're not into my sense of comedy but I'm trying not to disparage you or gay people; it just seems if it's stressful for you maybe that's one more reason you'd been reconsidering the responsibilities of a moderator.

EDIT: duh there's a user called gay unicorn I'm dumb.

(...) there's a user called gay unicorn (...)

Yes.

Well thanks for not agreeing on the dumb part. I think. Hey do you like MyLittlePony?

Sorry, I'm not a "brony". The name is a nostalgic memento from the tribes game - the first one.

Niether am I, it was a wild guess.

Now they are asking me to step down

So they want me to ask this question of the community.

Who is "they" here? The "tard" bigots?

I don't see any reason to remove you. You've done a fine job and until someone can point to some specific abuses then I think you should stay on.

Someone got banned for racism, and you resigned in protest?

So I was invited back by the mods.

That's not exactly true Flytape. You were invited back by a single mod as far as I'm aware - without a discussion. The issue was never talked about between the team. you also never put your hat in the ring when r/conspiracy added the new mods.

A number of readers picked up on this so for the sakes of fairness i suggested you address the community and ask for their opinions on you being a moderator here.

I have no problems with your contributions but it is right to ask the wider community after the other mods were voted in.

My opinion is that the community has the right to decide who moderates the page, nothing more. You haven't done anything wrong on /r/conspiracy as far as i'm concerned but i was still surprised to discover that there was no discussion between the senior and new moderators before you were invited back.

I don't have any beef with you at all.

The way I see it, if he was voted in the first time, I see no reason why he shouldn't be allowed back in as long as the reason he first stepped down wasn't due to the community wanting it.

Flytape stepped down of his own accord. He's helpful to the team and i get on with him. All we wanted was to clarify with the user base if he should stay on as a mod, given he wasn't voted in after stepping down.

What about sharing a beef stew with friends, doesn't that count? I also do a mean lamb shank. As long as users here don't have issues with you being a mod there is no problem as far as im concerned, im sure the rest of the mods will feel the same.

You son of a....

I haven't had lamb in probably 3 weeks. Now you had to put it in my head.

you also never put your hat in the ring when r/conspiracy added the new mods.

I did for him.

That didn't answer either of my questions but it's okay, cause now I know what I wanted to know: what's happening.

Indeed, this subreddit needs someone to flense away the obvious trolling. I have no complaints about the moderation here, but perhaps I haven't been entirely aware of the work that goes into that. After all, I don't see banned threads.

[deleted]

Well, my point was, I don't want to. And that's what a decent moderator does: filter the stuff I myself don't want to see. I guess I just wasn't aware of how much work that could be.

Why are so many posts deleted from /r/conspiracy? It seems like 90% of them are from here.

I hate the mods in general, but I support Flytape from what I've seen of him so far!! I don't want the bastards to take over this website.

:(

You are the only moderator who is on my friend list and has been I think since before you were a moderator here. I don't know enough about the others to know for sure. I basically trust you, Flytape, and SovereignMan from what I've seen of your contributions to the site. Mr. Dong has concerned me in the past regarding his push of aliens and questionable calls on what gets stickied on top I think or promoted on the subreddit as far as side images go too. We've just disagreed in the past on what is of utmost best quality and what is there to make us look foolish or overly speculative. But take all this with a grain of salt because I could easily be fooled and overly judgmental as well. But I am very concerned with the quality of this subreddit going forward and I know there are people here who have no interest in uncovering or exposing the validity of conspiracies and would rather mock us, ridicule us, or inject absurdity in here to make us look bad.

Peace. Thanks for your openness Flytape! Someone at one time said the moderation log should be made public and I thought that was worth considering too. Peace.

Thanks for being moderators. It is a crucial, yet often thankless job. And I appreciate it when done with good intentions.

You're one of the only mods who actually seems to give a shit about enforcing the rules. If you left, I believe the sub would suffer.

Unless you truly feel that your interests would be better served elsewhere, I would say to resist any pressure you may be getting to step down.

yawn

I think you have always been fair and offer good commentary. I have RES and you are currently at +31.

Ban more trolls please.

You son of a....

I haven't had lamb in probably 3 weeks. Now you had to put it in my head.

So are you actually surprised that the kind of person who would be interested in modding r conspiracy is under the impression that any and all criticism is the result of...wait for it...a conspiracy against them?

...another user

Looks like someone's got quite a multiple-personality disorder. :/