Funny how spreading info about Snowden's / Greenwalds new leak leads to removed post within 5 minutes.

93  2014-02-25 by [deleted]

Here (news)

Here (news)

Here (news)

Here (news)

Here (technology)

Here (news) - I tried again and measured takedown time, this one was 2 minutes until removal.

Mine (the first one) never even hit the new queue, well- it was gone from the first few pages with 0 upvotes/downvotes at 3 or 4 minutes after posting. The link was original as well.

Please add any you find.

7 comments

Because the news directly conflicts with reddit's business model. I wonder how many mods on reddit are involved?

It wouldn't even need to be too many of them, just a few in key positions of power in some of the larger/default subs.

a zionist as a mod of /r/news for example lol

Not directly related to the Greenwald censorship itself, but something I found on the front page seems to fit the modus operandi of that which was detailed in the 'Shillgate' exposition from yesterday.

THIS is on the front page. 3500 ups or so. Quite near the top at any rate.

Right there it just seems like the usual r-conspiritard-esque jab.

Looking at the poster's profile we see their entire link karma is generated from this one link. Redditor for five months. Only two comments posted, ever.

I scroll down a bit, not sure if I'm expecting it or not, and then BAM, there it is. And the subsequent hee-haw'ing bash-a-thon.

It's not just swaying of conversation that they do, derailing and whatnot. They try their hardest to pre-emptively mold the day's discussions and inject the herd-mentality bias before any dissenting or otherwise objective views can be formed.

EDIT: Hehe, didn't take long. r-conspiritard regular /u/duckvimes_ is now chiming in on the bash.

I looked over the duck guys posts after reading your comment and your right he's a total tool. What a cunt

Funny? Try business as usual.

You expect a story about online shills to get posted to a website crawling with them?