It has a context though...Peter was describing how he and Adam talked politics
“And talk about talkative: man, that kid, you couldn’t shut him up!” Peter said. In the years that followed, they would talk about politics. Adam was a fan of Ron Paul, and liked to argue economic theory...
You must be a fan of fascism, legal counterfeiting, and corporate rape of the people. Not to even mention the corruption with donations to politicians.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
In the context of the overall hoax, I guess it's entirely predictable. I don't support Ron Paul's politics, but the way he was defrauded by the GOP in their sham nomination was so blatant it made me sick.
You didn't find it strange either that the LAX shooter had a note his pocket about The Fed and NWO, right?
Think about what you are seeing: The Father of an autistic teenager who killed a bunch of kids is referring to himself in the third person while telling the country "You can't even trust your children anymore." He literally spent the first couple minutes talking about how you "can't trust you children". It's so ridiculous it's scary that so many people fall for this shit.
What the fuck? Anyone who buys this fucking fraud had their mom rubbing fluoride toothpaste on his gums as a baby.
You didn't find it strange either that the LAX shooter had a note his pocket about The Fed and NWO, right?
Not that that's related, but no.
Think about what you are seeing: The Father of an autistic teenager who killed a bunch of kids is referring to himself in the third person while telling the country "You can't even trust your children anymore." He literally spent the first couple minutes talking about how you "can't trust you children". It's so ridiculous it's scary that so many people fall for this shit.
Where is that in the article?
What the fuck? Anyone who buys this fucking fraud had their mom rubbing fluoride toothpaste on his gums as a baby.
14 comments
4 eooxx 2014-03-11
It has a context though...Peter was describing how he and Adam talked politics
-7 [deleted] 2014-03-11
That's consistent with most people's experience with Ron Paul fans.
8 IAmNotHariSeldon 2014-03-11
Well you got us to shut up. You shouted us down. And now look where we are, on the edge of WWIII, with no virtues left to be proud of.
1 Bong_Loader 2014-03-11
You must be a fan of fascism, legal counterfeiting, and corporate rape of the people. Not to even mention the corruption with donations to politicians.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
-4 redandterrible 2014-03-11
God, you 'Ron Paul!' guys are hilarious.
-2 ANewMachine615 2014-03-11
Oh you don't like Ron Paul evangelization? WELL TOO BAD, SETTLE IN FOR A LECTURE ON AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE GOLD STANDARD
3 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-03-11
Yep. Toss it onto the mountain of suspicious things about SH.
1 [deleted] 2014-03-11
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/03/17/140317fa_fact_solomon
1 Sabremesh 2014-03-11
In the context of the overall hoax, I guess it's entirely predictable. I don't support Ron Paul's politics, but the way he was defrauded by the GOP in their sham nomination was so blatant it made me sick.
-1 redandterrible 2014-03-11
Only if you were excessively thin-skinned and defensive on that subject.
-7 [deleted] 2014-03-11
I don't.
4 33degree 2014-03-11
You didn't find it strange either that the LAX shooter had a note his pocket about The Fed and NWO, right?
Think about what you are seeing: The Father of an autistic teenager who killed a bunch of kids is referring to himself in the third person while telling the country "You can't even trust your children anymore." He literally spent the first couple minutes talking about how you "can't trust you children". It's so ridiculous it's scary that so many people fall for this shit.
What the fuck? Anyone who buys this fucking fraud had their mom rubbing fluoride toothpaste on his gums as a baby.
1 Ferrofluid 2014-03-11
also had his hands handcuffed behind his back, look again at the picture of the perp.
-4 [deleted] 2014-03-11
Not that that's related, but no.
Where is that in the article?
Ok.