Here is everything I have found so far on Freescale

First off, they are a direct partner with Curtiss Wright which is also a defense technology company. CW built a majority of the planes for the US military by the end of WWII, they have changed the course of their business after a few bad business decisions and now focus on things like providing chips for a widely controversial product, drones. (Screenshot of their website). There may be other aspects of business in which they are involved with in military markets. Freescale is more than likely a main contributor of chip technology for Curtiss Wright with their defense technology. I’m not sure why the press is running with the “electric car company” because it appears that Freescale is more involved with Aerospace & Defense tech than anything else. Even Freescale’s Mission Statement is pretty fishy. “Freescale Semiconductor is a global leader in embedded processing solutions, providing industry-leading products that are advancing the automotive, consumer, industrial and networking markets. From microprocessors and microcontrollers to sensors, analog integrated circuits and connectivity – our technologies are the foundation for the innovations that make our world greener, safer...”

Looking at the shareholder information of Curtiss Wright and Freescale, there appears to be some similarities which might be worth checking in to as well. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=CW+Major+Holders http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=FSL+Major+Holders

And a very interesting thing I have found after looking through the shareholders, Freescale's biggest institutional holder is none other than Blackstone who bought out the mortgage for the WTC building 7 in 2000. Curtiss Wright has a similar major institutional holder BlackRock.

Here is a thread about those two groups posted to this subreddit 1 month ago.

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1wobie/til_the_blackstone_group_llc_purchased_the/

What a coincidence.

woah, you may be on to something

Not only that but they provide some/the/unknown amount of encryption and high level hardware services for the NSA/Government. I'm finding direct NSA and government references on online documents.

Page 6. http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/brochure/BRNTWKSECSOLTN.pdf

They even have hardware in jets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II

Just the tip of the iceberg. This firm is in deep with classified info. I just went looking for a NSA tie/reference and was surprised when pages of hits came up. Means nothing but that many people with possibly a lot of classified information tied to National Security you can almost bet someone is after that information.

somebody willing to steal a 777 to get their hands on 20 Freescale engineers, or maybe crash the plane to disrupt Freescale.

No way it was "crashed". If it was crashed someone would have found it by now. Creepy really. Just imagine with today's technology. Any plane in the world full of people could just "disappear".

The ocean is miles deep Brah.

The 20 employees may have been working with China on something the US/UK/EU doesn't have. Maybe they were helping China hack the US/UK/EU/Western Private companies for a long time.

If wreckage and bodies from the flight are found soon, I'll still be suspicious. There are too many odd connections and it's been too long since the flight. News is mainly focused on China pushing the Malaysian government to be more transparent, and Western countries searching the oceans for wreckage. News is too fishy.

Could you make up your mind between these two statements. There is a difference between being a customer and a partnership.

First off, they are a direct partner with Curtiss Wright which is also a defense technology company.

vs.

Freescale is more than likely a main contributor of chip technology for Curtiss Wright with their defense technology.

I’m not sure why the press is running with the “electric car company” because it appears that Freescale is more involved with Aerospace & Defense tech than anything else.

They make RF power components for commercial aviation applications. You've made quite a leap.

What is fishy about Freescale's mission statement?

The reason why I stated that they were partners is because Freescale is listed as so on CW's website.

http://www.cwcdefense.com/about-us/partners/technology.html

The part that is fishy in the mission statement is that they forgot to include that they are in the defense technology market as well as the last little bit about making the world safer. It's just an observation I made and shouldn't be held as any type of evidence.

Source for defense technology

http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/brochure/PWRARBYNDBITSSKD.pdf

There are no coincidences, if you follow the $$$.

It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh...

... I am the walrus...?

Shut the fuck up, Donnie.

sure there are

There are no coincidences

Pretty much sums up this subreddit.

99.99% of Freescale's employees are supporting, quite literally, run of the mill parts you find in every day objects. It does not strike me as odd that 20 people would be on a plane at the same time. They could have been technicians from a die fab or call center support going for training, anything. While i do appreciate alternative theories, i really don't see this as being part of any reason. For example, here in Chicago, what if something happened to a transit authority train? There is a good chance there are multiple Boeing employees on board, and that would not be unusual at any time. The question is, how often do Freescale employees travel, and was this flight unusual? Probably travel every day, and not unusual at all.

Well that's just the perfect cover, now isn't it? :)

they're specialized engineers that were working on freescales chip facilities

OK, and they may have thousands with that particular job description, it's still not evidence, red flag for me. What i feel is particularly outrageous, is with all this NSA / NRO crap going on, someone must know

I'm not thinking false flag, I'm thinking kill the engineers who made something for you so no one else can have it.

Doritos chips I hope

they specialize in microchips. really small cool ranch ones.

That's cheezy. Not yo joke.

I think you're right on point

a defense contractor linked to cloaking technology

Ok researching this brb...........

I'm trying to look into this more but it's difficult. Lot's of newspapers (MSM as well as the others) are mentioning this and Freescale does have links to Carlyle Group and other defense companies but they don't exactly say on their websites "we have been working on cloaking technology to hide planes".

So I'm hoping you can find something better.

I see.

Post the claim now, research it later.

You care why? Shouldn't you be debunking some sandy hook/boston/911 post?

Purely speculation but....if you consider how valuable graphene semi-conductors are going to be to the embedded communications/wireless industry.

There is far more money in graphene than cloaking technology unless ... cloaking technology is made with graphene.

Huh I did some research on Freescale and posted on reddit similar observations 2 days ago http://www.reddit.com/r/BlackOps/comments/1zxxvw/20_employees_of_semiconductor_among_missing_malay/ , one comment only however- glad someone else posted (you) and got some readership out of it. I couldnt care less for "upvotes" but wish people would pay more attention to coincidences. Other than that, it is possible the plane simply crashed and is in the jungles of eastern Malaysia. For every Transatlantic flight there is a good chance there are some engineers or "important" businessmen aboard.

Cloaking technology?

Was wondering about that, op give info on this plz

This is where disinfo comes from. One person says cloaking technology, then a bunch of others will repeat it, all without any sources.

After enough people try connecting all these dots, which of course will connect tenuously, because rich people are tightly networked, it has the appearance of some kind of plot.

A couple of days from now, some dipshit will have written an entire website or blog about the cloaking technology and its connections with Freescale, the bushes, the "fake planes" on 9/11, etc. Then that website will be treated as a source.

I've read all your posts on this thread, I feel some, if not all are actually valid. However, you should be aware that your skeptic approach in r/conspiracy will not be welcome here unfortunately... Even I'll get downvoted to hell for this.

Why wouldn't it be welcome?

Because you're not as susceptible.

I don't think disinfo means what you think it means. Disinformation is what you are doing, claiming things don't exist based on your opinion alone. You forgot to add "move along, nothing to see here".

edit: spelling

But aren't you claiming things exist out of your opinion alone?

Disinfo is making claims that are false. I'm not making claims, I'm suggesting other people's claims are false based on the fact that they have no evidence.

Cloaking devices? Give me a @#$%ing break.

I'm not making claims, I'm suggesting other people's claims are false

Right or wrong, that's some truly inspiring mental gymnastics. Bravo, sir, bravo.

I agree with you but personally believe cloaking is old tech. Philadelphia experiment?? 'They' were trying it back in the 40s.

I'm not making claims, I'm suggesting other people's claims are false

Because you never make any claims. You're just here to disrupt. Your comment history is a pathetic display of disinformation, derailing and trolling. Switch back to your /r/conspiratard posting account and try to stay there, ok kid? You won't be missed here.

Also, because you don't know about it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Do you know what the term "Classified" means?

I'm sorry you don't know how dialogue works.

I'm just asking questions. Around here I never get responses, only bitching.

Dialogue works when both parties contribute.

I'm not making claims

...is not contributing. If the "bitching" annoys you, you're welcome to not participate. In fact, I encourage it. I'm sure the rest of the sub would appreciate that. Let me repeat: Switch back to your /r/conspiratard posting account and try to stay there, ok kid? A conspiracy denier brings no benefit or value to this sub.

Dialogue works when both parties contribute.

I am contributing questions.

Please contribute responses.

I'll expect another paragraph of bitching.

Do you have any answers to anything besides what the media tells you?

Yes. Which media are you talking about. RT? Fox? CNN? Al-Jazeera?

Ok, I'll make some claims.

Al Qaeda highjacked MH370. I have as much evidence as anyone else does of their claims. Prove me wrong.

I totally believe this. If you say I'm wrong or ask me questions you are a conspiracy denier, and you bring no benefit, and you should switch back to your conspiratard posting account and try to stay there.

Ok, kid?

The difference between us and you is that not one legit member will care to argue with you about your claim.

So, where does this information about the Freescale cloaking devices come from?

Did you care to research? That's what people do here. They discuss what they have researched themselves. Why do you feel you are exempt from doing that? I haven't seen one substantiated claim you from you in this sub. Ever.

Your submission history in this sub is a testament of utter failure. You're not fooling anyone, kid.

Yet you're the one responding to me.

[deleted]

I am still here.

[deleted]

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/13/tech/innovation/cloaking-technology/

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/13/tech/innovation/cloaking-technology/

I don't believe everything I hear, but I don't discount everything either. Why talk when you can read?

that's a good point but it does beg the question why it's only in this forum and a few others that even mention Freestyle Semiconductors techs and the CARLYLE GROUP large percentage of ownership why doesn't the media check things out as much as redactors? do we have to do all their research?

Do you always criticize people's *thought processes? Are you some kind of thought police?

Are thought processes not subject to criticism?

Not yours. You have no authority on that.

Oh. Ok. Please start policing your own thoughts, then.

Who says it needs policing at all? Are you denying my right to free speech?

No. But when we police our own minds it prevents us from saying things that aren't true.

Do you usually need to police yourself to not lie? If not, you should start. I on the other hand don't have that habit.

What have I lied about?

I'd say pretty much everything when your version of the truth is "coincidentally" aligned with propaganda, disinformation and derailing. JTRIG 101.

Ok, so there's nothing specific that I'm wrong about. Got it.

Show me a comment of yours where you actually support something here.

I'm sure there isn't one.

Then why do you insist on disrupting our discussions? Is this some sick past time to you?

Can't you just ignore me? It would make your life a lot easier.

I'd rather you ignore this sub. It would everyone's life easier.

Sure.

http://www.examiner.com/article/malaysia-jet-hidden-by-electronic-weaponry-20-ew-defense-linked-passengers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2578197/Is-Boeing-777-hiding-invisibility-cloak-lost-black-hole-Experts-try-unravel-mystery-Malaysia-Airlines-missing-aircraft.html

Sorta. Not quite Klingon Bird of Prey, but theoreticals are already public.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/13/tech/innovation/cloaking-technology/

Freescale have this on their website.

http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=RF_PWR_AERODEF

So lets say you were the bushs and wanted to send illegal to export sensitive technology from one of your companies to china where you could make huge dollars and exploit it without pesky usa rules.

Normally it would be restricted.

But if all the necessary secret personnnel "died" on the way to china then there really wouldn't be anyone to restrict would there? They would be free to land and do whatever.

And fake deaths have been used before .

Maybe this was suggested and I missed it but doing a simple connect the dots: Freescale makes complex parts for military radar and electronic warfare.

http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=RF_PWR_AERODEF&tid=vanRFmilitary

They sign a contract to improve and optimize China's military detection capabilities and send 20 techs to China to work on this project. The US gov is not happy about this so they divert the plane and capture or crash it to both deprive China of those experts in the short term but primarily to send a message to the military industrial complex that contracting out of its services to the US's enemies will not be tolerated. Despite their best efforts they couldn't find a way to block this collaboration through legal and legislative means so they used the option of last resort, simply removing the development team literally hours before they were to enter Chinese airspace and thereby become inaccessible. A black op in the US's "Pivot" to Asia.

What adds credibility to your theory is the acquisition of Freescale by the Qiaoxing Group in 2009. This was cited as a concern in a paper written by the Rand Corporation in 2010.

Does anyone know if DARPA is related to this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzgQwDeP7eM

[deleted]

George Noori?

I think what happened is the RAND Corporation, in conjunction with the reverse vampires, cloaked the airplane and have landed it on the moon. This is false flag attack designed to Obama the gun control Sandy Hook.

Do you always criticize people's *thought processes? Are you some kind of thought police?

I don't think disinfo means what you think it means. Disinformation is what you are doing, claiming things don't exist based on your opinion alone. You forgot to add "move along, nothing to see here".

edit: spelling

I agree with you but personally believe cloaking is old tech. Philadelphia experiment?? 'They' were trying it back in the 40s.

I'm not making claims, I'm suggesting other people's claims are false

Right or wrong, that's some truly inspiring mental gymnastics. Bravo, sir, bravo.

I'm not making claims, I'm suggesting other people's claims are false

Because you never make any claims. You're just here to disrupt. Your comment history is a pathetic display of disinformation, derailing and trolling. Switch back to your /r/conspiratard posting account and try to stay there, ok kid? You won't be missed here.

Also, because you don't know about it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Do you know what the term "Classified" means?

I'm not thinking false flag, I'm thinking kill the engineers who made something for you so no one else can have it.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/13/tech/innovation/cloaking-technology/

I don't believe everything I hear, but I don't discount everything either. Why talk when you can read?

I've read all your posts on this thread, I feel some, if not all are actually valid. However, you should be aware that your skeptic approach in r/conspiracy will not be welcome here unfortunately... Even I'll get downvoted to hell for this.

that's a good point but it does beg the question why it's only in this forum and a few others that even mention Freestyle Semiconductors techs and the CARLYLE GROUP large percentage of ownership why doesn't the media check things out as much as redactors? do we have to do all their research?