The more i've been reading on flight Mh730 the more ive been wondering about diego garcia. (The US militaey airport in the middle of the Indian ocean)

16  2014-03-18 by [deleted]

I dont want to believe that the plane was hijacked by the US and landed on the small island, Diego Garcia. But its not ruled out as a possibility..actually all this new information coming out about the planes flight record points closer and closer to the US base.

I think if our government would or had something to do this i will lose all faith of our government and all my trust and faith will be gone.

Heres some things that are interesting

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/567207-diego-garcia-island-atoll-us-base-rumored-to-be-landing-spot-for-malaysia-flight-mh-370/

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/asia/2014/03/16/India-suspends-search-for-Malaysian-plane.html

61 comments

Btw the more evidence comes out the more likely the plane went the Diego Garcia.

Angry voice, rage blurred eyes, throwing his fists in the air How dare you not goose step with the rest of us! You are a coward for even bringing up what the majority quickly dismisses! It is like you think the U.S. has just made planes disappear when they hit....idk...the pentagon or something!

Jk! There are several interesting posts about this. I suggest you add your insights and thoughts. I am still unsure about motivations, but this is fishy. If we have such an important base why didnt that base have radar info?

lol ur first paragraph was good..i love when someone just wants to open up something for discussion and is immediately attacked for it

;)

=}

Its cute that you still trust the government!

Egh i really dont to be honest... The only "area of government" that I can honestly say i believe in and trust is the fire departments. Hell, most of are volunteer

Paramedics?

Yeaaa but i consider them part of the fire dept (my town works that way) lol

Possible Motive for landing at Diego Garcia:

There is another post on /r/conspiracy right now here discussing the possibility that 3 tons of cargo on the plane (not a small amount) was actually out of season fruit at a time in the country when growing seasons have not been so good.

Is it possible that this was actually a covert transfer of some kind to Diego Garcia?

The question then becomes if they were trying to secretly move something, why did the media make such a big deal about it? You'd think that they would keep quiet about it in cooperation with the government...

My personal theory is that the transfer was outed by an enemy of the USA. They could not, not acknowledge a missing 777. It's too big and too new. So they make a big loud noise about it in the news for a few days and generally bullshit the public as much as possible until the news cycle is over, then back to Ukraine or Bieber or whatever else.

Edit: Also the 6 week cycle.

Also the 20 semiconductor company employees

It makes no sense to use a commercial jet for a "covert transfer". Military airplanes carry top secret cargo all the time, so why go through all this trouble to transfer something? Makes no sense at all.

If I was to guess I'd say that whatever was aboard was destined for Beijing, and certainly couldn't enter the Chinese capital conventionally.

Those customs inspections are a bitch.

Because a military plane itself is conspicuous. The planes that fly workers to area 51 from Las Vegas are regular plain 737s with only a tail number.

I admit there are other parts of this theory that are less easily explained such as the families of people on the plane shown on the MSM. Who would they be then? Actors? Were only some of the people on the plane killed? Obviously there are some issues there...

I do entertain the electrical fire theory as the most plausable.

You can connect this to Jacob Rothschild easily, why? Well, money is power and with money you can accomplish anything. Who says he couldn't have paid off the island to make the plane land there and than something something with those 4 other patent holders. It's a possibility.

You still have faith in our government????? I lost that in the early 90 of Ruby ridge and Waco.

I would want to know why they would do that with a commercial flight that would be sure to get so much attention.

This theory doesn't make much logical sense...What motivation could the US have to hijack and then hide a commercial aircraft? Diego Garcia is a very busy airstrip with lots of people around, so how would you hide this from them?

Well thats what i dont know, the motives..

Also diego garcia is not a "well-populated" place. With 4000 people, only military personnel and indigenous people. And their flight traffic isnt very popular at all. Todays arrival flights...zero..

4000 people is an awful lot when you're trying to hide a commercial plane.

And even if it was true.. I guarantee you 4000 people wouldn't be in on it

How many folks lived in Oakridge?

The plane would have landed very early in the morning and still dark out, they could have immediately thrown it in a bunker and had all access restricted after that..seems pretty simple actually

I have actually been to Diego Garcia, you see and hear EVERYTHING, because it is so small.

Thats a bit of an over statement dont u think? Im sure u dont hear someone farting from across the island

But you have absolutely no evidence that this happened. What bunkers exist on Diego Garcia? It would still have a radar signature and ground crew and tower personnel would all have known about it landing.

And you still no reason why this would happen? What possible motive could the US have to hijack a commercial airline? It makes no sense.

Just because you dint understand a motive doesnt mean that its 100% unlikely...

You've yet to come up with even a tiny reason why this would happen, and zero evidence that it did. Further, all the evidence that is coming to light points to the pilot.

Until you at least have a hypothesis this is 100% unlikely.

hahaahahahahah

Show proof why it wouldn't happen. Like legitimate proof, not proof like " what purpose would it serve to steal a commercial jet." Because that isn't proof.

The world doesn't work that way. The onus of proof is on the person who creates the crazy conspiracy theory.

As I expected no proof.

If you're going to defend it, you should have some proof to back it up. That's how it works in the world.

I am not defending anything - you are the one with the crazy idea that the plane landed in Diego Garcia. WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?

Asking for proof of something that does not exist is not only impossible, but shows that you know absolutely nothing about how debate works. You are ridiculous.

I didn't say any such thing about a planeanding anywhere. The only comment I had made was that you should prove your side of the case.

What proof are you asking for? I have no proof..i havent found the plane..but if ur following the story at all...all the directions the plane has been traveling (that was release) was directly towards diego garcia. If it didnt land at the base then it should have shot it down

Have you read the other comments?

They fucked with the radar blips remotely on 9/11... I'm sure they could do it again.

You can't make a landing plane disappear. And why though why steal a plane it makes no sense at all

As well as check out the size of the plane, you need more than just a jet landing track to land that 777.

Not true

You're plain stupid go do your research on it's size before saying useless things here.

Not if 4000 people are working in the military, or natives with zero clue of the modern world

I don't think there are any natives. The 4000 comes from US/UK troops and their support staff.

Look at the possible flight path after the maldives, almost a straight shot to Iran.

You have to consider the distance though.

I dont want to believe that the plane was hijacked by the US and landed on the small island, Diego Garcia.

Then how about you don't until even the tiniest shred of evidence exists to support that idea?

Because there is no evidence that goes against it either..its just a possibility

Because there is no evidence that goes against it either..its just a possibility and when you say tiniest bit of evidence, what do you mean? Like a plane?

You seem to be confused. Literally all the evidence we have about the event goes against your idea. Saying "there's no evidence against it" is just plain wrong.

What evidence goes against this ? Please, enlighten me

Literally everything, starting with the fact that the plane was never within a thousand miles of Diego Garcia.

If you trace the point where the transponder was turned off through the plane's last radar contact in the strait, that line points right at Diego Garcia.

The arcs provided by the satellite ping suggests a north or south path, but it's based on the transmission of a single ping received by a satellite that received five further pings. If they calculated the arcs for the other pings, a clear picture of the path should have been clear, but that data hasn't been released.

Meanwhile, residents of the Maldives report seeing a low flying jumbo jet at 6:15a local time flying in the direction of Diego Garcia: http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/4986445?utm_hp_ref=uk

So, I wouldn't say there's no evidence for this theory.

The facility features a single 3,659m-long runway paved with concrete. The runway can handle a range of aircraft including C-130, C-141, C-5, KC-10 and C-17. The air traffic control (ATC) centre at Diego Garcia controls the traffic of the air mobility command (AMC) aircraft operating in and around the Indian Ocean region. The Ground Electronics Maintenance Division (GEMD) monitors the maintenance works performed on navigation and communication equipment.

I'd add to this that the early stories about the Maldives all confirmed the jet seen was bearing MA red stripes and was travelling north to south west. That is what is stated in the Huffpost article you've linked.

Interestingly, you'll find that on all articles about the Maldives plane sighting dated on the 19th, the quote remains more or less identical, however the direction has changed to north west to south EAST. This can be seen here:

http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-maldives-discounted-as-possible-location-for-mh370-20140319-hvkjq.html

Then, a day later the Maldives military come to the conclusion that no plane passed over at all, even though it confirmed it the day before.

If this is never found, then it's because it's at Diego Garcia.

Thanks for this...i want to see their response lol

Oh so you know where the plane is? Even a 1000 mile radius cant be determined by multiple governments

Well there's probably A government that knows about where it is or what happened it's just that they won't tell.

Supposedly nobody knows where the plane is, right? So how can you make this statement?

Planes cannot magically teleport.

They do it every day, it's called 'flying'.

You probably were 100% sure that the plane crashed the first couple of days this story came out..

Literally everything, starting with the fact that the plane was never within a thousand miles of Diego Garcia.

Planes cannot magically teleport.

You're plain stupid go do your research on it's size before saying useless things here.