He's not important enough to be with or against. I listen to his radio show. I also think he's a paranoid bully who never met a political conspiracy theory he didn't believe. I have no use for the man at all. However, he does make valid points from time to time.
I think that Alex Jones can not be trusted. When I was younger he overwhelmed me with his research but in time I realized that his interpretation of facts are questionable.
He blames the NWO for our problems but never once has he hammered the military industrial complex.
He hammers the military industrial complex, I think it was EndGame were he includes the Eisenhower clip mentioning the MIC.
Other than that I agree with your statement. He feels like controlled opposition. Calling his listener's infowarriors. Remember Glenn Beck's FNC show where he would pause in the middle of an inflammatory statement making it sound worse than it was?
I'm with him, those that say that he's too angry or that he's spreading fear have obviously never reported on the things he reports on, all of which are scary and more than enough to get angry of.
I sympathize with him because I also get as angry as he does when I witness injustice, in my opinion, that makes him human, not a shill or whatever the haters call him.
As far as his products go, I see nothing wrong with selling movies, filters, generators, cameras & supplements. All of which work. Guy's gotta fund his business somehow, why not sell things that are catered to his audience?
What you should bear in mind is that whenever Jones say "I'm not against ...." he is really saying he's against it. Example, he says "I've got nothing against gays." Translation, he hates gays. He says, "I'm not a name dropper." Then he immediately goes on to drop names. He says "I'm not bragging." Then he immediately starts to brag.
That's radio, you ramble on for hours and go back and fourth between subjects, if he name drops he checks himself, if he's going on about gays he checks himself.
I can't tell you that he hates gay people, but I can personally tell you that I know that there is a gay agenda, and the more they try to push it down everybody's throat the more hate its going to breed, especially when they try to indoctrinate children and confuse their sexuality at an early age.
I personally (can't speak for Jones) hate those that are actively pushing any sort of sexuality on children. The current situation with homosexual child abusers in England and the Pedophile Information Exchange, has made me even more awake to the gay agenda and it's incessant goal of sexualising kids.
I have no time nor patience for political correctness, the truth is the truth.
I hear you. I was just making the point that Jones is a hypocrite. He says one thing when he means the opposite, a lot of the time. I'm not saying he's wrong to hate gays, I'm just pointing out that he hates gays, but says he doesn't. I believe he's right that children are being sexualized too early in life.
Homosexuality and pedophilia are two completely different things. A grown man that has sex with or molests a young boy is not a homosexual. He is a pedophile. The idea that homosexuals are likely to molest a young boy is like saying that heterosexuals are likely to molest young girls. Pedophiles molest young kids. Heterosexuals have sex with consenting adults of the opposite sex. Homosexuals have sex with consenting adults of the same sex. There is no overlap of these ideas.
I completely disagree. A man having sex with a boy makes him a homosexual pedophile, to ignore this is to be in denial and completely ignores basic facts.
I have to point out that I have nothing against homosexuals, but I know that there is a subculture inside the community that strives for the legalization of child sex, shocking words, but true.
So by that logic a heterosexual man is equally attracted to a 2 year old girl as he is attracted to a 20 year old woman and the only thing keeping him from having sex with the child is the law? I don't know about you, but I can't get an erection for a 2 year old girl even though I'm attracted to females. Pedophiles are the only ones who are attracted to kids. Normal functioning adults physiologically are incapable of having sex with children. If a 30 year old man has sex with a 2 year old girl he isn't a normal heterosexual man who also is a pedophile. He is a pedophile. It actually bothers me that some people think this is even debatable because that makes me think that they would/could have sex with children if not for the law preventing it.
No, I don't find little girls attractive, that's just another diversionary attack to take attention away from facts.
Pedophiles are attracted to children and could very well be attracted to adults, it is their choice of gender that makes them gay or "straight". A pedophile that is attracted to little girls isn't a gay pedophile just a pedophile.
A male pedophile that likes boys is a homosexual pedophile (and likely attracted to other men), very simple.
And since we're openly talking about homosexuals and the homosexual agenda, can you explain to me why it is so important to espouse whom you are attracted to during every goddamned public gathering?
So what about a guy like Jerry Sandusky who was a man married to a woman but was having sex with little boys? He was a heterosexual man that was also a homosexual pedophile? Ooooor was he just a pedophile who was living a lie as a heterosexual man? Pedophilia is his sexuality. This is why psychologists don't classify pedophiles as gay or straight pedophiles. That doesn't exist. The fact that a person is attracted to a prepubescent child is a sexual defect and they are no longer hetero or homosexual. They are strictly pedophiles.
As far as why homosexuals are constantly speaking about their homosexuality in public now more than ever, it is because they are currently trying to garner support for equal marriage rights across the country. You don't see many million man marches with black people now because they are legally able to vote and marry members of other races across the country. Now it is gay people trying to do that same thing. As long as they are only talking about it and not engaging in any sexual acts in public it is nothing to worry about. You are either born gay or straight. Kids seeing that gay people exist isn't going to make them somehow turn gay. It isn't contagious.
there is a subculture inside the community that strives for the legalization of child sex
I truly doubt this is true. The "subculture" might exist but it's not within or supported by the Gay community. There are pedophiles who prey on little girls and I'm sure they want it legalized but most heterosexual people are appalled by them. Don't try to lump in pedophelia with homosexuality then say "I have nothing against homosexuals". If you weren't trying to push your biases forward you wouldn't have tried to correlate two entirely different subjects.
Most of what he says and his team reports on appear to be correct. Some of it you can ignore and he can be very dramatizing of a topic or in his interviews, this is annoying to me. I prefer to see the reports of Mr. Knight and LeeAnn and I avoid listening to Alex himself.
I think its good to have that person in the room to tell it like it is and cover the hard to eat material.
Similar to anything you ever read concerning conspiracies. The general gist of the conversation is correct but the details are where things get fabricated.
I hate how he continually criticizes the so called dinosaur media, when all he and his team do is scour that same media for stories. He makes more money than many newspapers but never sends reporters to hot zones to report "the truth". Say what you like about Fox, BBC, CNN, MSNBC but all of them have reporters on the ground in almost every hot zone on earth and over the years quite a lot have been killed doing their job. I think the 'alternative' media is doing a bang up job, viewership of all msm channels is falling and Alex is laughing all the way to the bank. Public sympathy for the msm is at an all time low and now gvt is attempting to curtail the freedom of the press.
If the msm disappears how the hell will we hear of any news? Alex jones isn't about to actually use his millions to pay real reporters is he? So we'll rely on places like reddit where it could be paid shills giving their false versions of current events. Matt Drudge is just as bad, pages of links to real reports, who did those reports? Journalists who work for the dinosaur media, that's who! As AJ proudly boasts he has a greater quantity of listeners than CNN and MSNBC combined yet he doesn't have a single real journalist on his payroll.
The BBC flat out said he's CIA. A real journalist said as much. I think his role is to undermine the msm, reduce public confidence in them so that eventually we have no news.
It's a huge issue because we rely on mainstream sources for so much information. Even the current weather is supplied by mainstream sources, without them we are seriously fucked. Yes they do misreport and push the left wing agenda, but at least they report it and we can pick at it to reveal something approaching what might be true.
I believe he is a plant, much of his information will be correct. He will interact with many people in the movement gaining trust and will even give good advice much of the time and that is what makes him so dangerous. It's the "Robot Revolution" lol
There are too many divisions and fractures in the conspiracy community. Ever hear of divide and conquer? He's fun and entertaining. Also thought provoking. I agree he is a little too much sometimes. Make up your own mind, but he provides facts and opinions for a lively debate.
40 comments
10 TheOilofPersia 2014-03-30
Just don't believe everything he says
5 conradsymes 2014-03-30
don't believe everything anyone says
3 lakdaddy 2014-03-30
for your own sanity's sake
9 4to3 2014-03-30
He's not important enough to be with or against. I listen to his radio show. I also think he's a paranoid bully who never met a political conspiracy theory he didn't believe. I have no use for the man at all. However, he does make valid points from time to time.
9 molonlabista 2014-03-30
I think that Alex Jones can not be trusted. When I was younger he overwhelmed me with his research but in time I realized that his interpretation of facts are questionable.
He blames the NWO for our problems but never once has he hammered the military industrial complex.
3 SpaktakJones 2014-03-30
He hammers the military industrial complex, I think it was EndGame were he includes the Eisenhower clip mentioning the MIC.
Other than that I agree with your statement. He feels like controlled opposition. Calling his listener's infowarriors. Remember Glenn Beck's FNC show where he would pause in the middle of an inflammatory statement making it sound worse than it was?
4 workworkwort 2014-03-30
I'm with him, those that say that he's too angry or that he's spreading fear have obviously never reported on the things he reports on, all of which are scary and more than enough to get angry of.
I sympathize with him because I also get as angry as he does when I witness injustice, in my opinion, that makes him human, not a shill or whatever the haters call him.
As far as his products go, I see nothing wrong with selling movies, filters, generators, cameras & supplements. All of which work. Guy's gotta fund his business somehow, why not sell things that are catered to his audience?
5 4to3 2014-03-30
What you should bear in mind is that whenever Jones say "I'm not against ...." he is really saying he's against it. Example, he says "I've got nothing against gays." Translation, he hates gays. He says, "I'm not a name dropper." Then he immediately goes on to drop names. He says "I'm not bragging." Then he immediately starts to brag.
1 workworkwort 2014-03-30
That's radio, you ramble on for hours and go back and fourth between subjects, if he name drops he checks himself, if he's going on about gays he checks himself.
I can't tell you that he hates gay people, but I can personally tell you that I know that there is a gay agenda, and the more they try to push it down everybody's throat the more hate its going to breed, especially when they try to indoctrinate children and confuse their sexuality at an early age.
I personally (can't speak for Jones) hate those that are actively pushing any sort of sexuality on children. The current situation with homosexual child abusers in England and the Pedophile Information Exchange, has made me even more awake to the gay agenda and it's incessant goal of sexualising kids.
I have no time nor patience for political correctness, the truth is the truth.
3 4to3 2014-03-30
I hear you. I was just making the point that Jones is a hypocrite. He says one thing when he means the opposite, a lot of the time. I'm not saying he's wrong to hate gays, I'm just pointing out that he hates gays, but says he doesn't. I believe he's right that children are being sexualized too early in life.
1 kgt5003 2014-03-30
Homosexuality and pedophilia are two completely different things. A grown man that has sex with or molests a young boy is not a homosexual. He is a pedophile. The idea that homosexuals are likely to molest a young boy is like saying that heterosexuals are likely to molest young girls. Pedophiles molest young kids. Heterosexuals have sex with consenting adults of the opposite sex. Homosexuals have sex with consenting adults of the same sex. There is no overlap of these ideas.
2 workworkwort 2014-03-30
I completely disagree. A man having sex with a boy makes him a homosexual pedophile, to ignore this is to be in denial and completely ignores basic facts.
I have to point out that I have nothing against homosexuals, but I know that there is a subculture inside the community that strives for the legalization of child sex, shocking words, but true.
1 kgt5003 2014-03-30
So by that logic a heterosexual man is equally attracted to a 2 year old girl as he is attracted to a 20 year old woman and the only thing keeping him from having sex with the child is the law? I don't know about you, but I can't get an erection for a 2 year old girl even though I'm attracted to females. Pedophiles are the only ones who are attracted to kids. Normal functioning adults physiologically are incapable of having sex with children. If a 30 year old man has sex with a 2 year old girl he isn't a normal heterosexual man who also is a pedophile. He is a pedophile. It actually bothers me that some people think this is even debatable because that makes me think that they would/could have sex with children if not for the law preventing it.
1 workworkwort 2014-03-30
No, I don't find little girls attractive, that's just another diversionary attack to take attention away from facts.
Pedophiles are attracted to children and could very well be attracted to adults, it is their choice of gender that makes them gay or "straight". A pedophile that is attracted to little girls isn't a gay pedophile just a pedophile.
A male pedophile that likes boys is a homosexual pedophile (and likely attracted to other men), very simple.
And since we're openly talking about homosexuals and the homosexual agenda, can you explain to me why it is so important to espouse whom you are attracted to during every goddamned public gathering?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/17/new-york-mayor-skip-st-patricks-day-parade
Time and place for everything, something some of these people can't seem to understand.
0 kgt5003 2014-03-30
So what about a guy like Jerry Sandusky who was a man married to a woman but was having sex with little boys? He was a heterosexual man that was also a homosexual pedophile? Ooooor was he just a pedophile who was living a lie as a heterosexual man? Pedophilia is his sexuality. This is why psychologists don't classify pedophiles as gay or straight pedophiles. That doesn't exist. The fact that a person is attracted to a prepubescent child is a sexual defect and they are no longer hetero or homosexual. They are strictly pedophiles.
As far as why homosexuals are constantly speaking about their homosexuality in public now more than ever, it is because they are currently trying to garner support for equal marriage rights across the country. You don't see many million man marches with black people now because they are legally able to vote and marry members of other races across the country. Now it is gay people trying to do that same thing. As long as they are only talking about it and not engaging in any sexual acts in public it is nothing to worry about. You are either born gay or straight. Kids seeing that gay people exist isn't going to make them somehow turn gay. It isn't contagious.
1 shobb592 2014-03-30
I truly doubt this is true. The "subculture" might exist but it's not within or supported by the Gay community. There are pedophiles who prey on little girls and I'm sure they want it legalized but most heterosexual people are appalled by them. Don't try to lump in pedophelia with homosexuality then say "I have nothing against homosexuals". If you weren't trying to push your biases forward you wouldn't have tried to correlate two entirely different subjects.
4 agent_of_entropy 2014-03-30
He's an entertainer, just like Rush Limbaugh.
4 Aswas 2014-03-30
Opinion on Alex Jones
Why do we have to go through this almost every day.?
There are hundreds of threads on him. All you have to do is type his name in the search box
3 lionessheart22 2014-03-30
From my point of view anyone who tries to make us feel hopeless is not with us.
3 Guh99 2014-03-30
I stopped listening to AJ a while ago. He is controlled opposition never taking about how terrible Israel is and how powerful the Jesuits really are.
1 friendsinmahhead 2014-03-30
the jesuits?
1 anarchopotato 2014-03-30
the vatican
2 dalik 2014-03-30
Most of what he says and his team reports on appear to be correct. Some of it you can ignore and he can be very dramatizing of a topic or in his interviews, this is annoying to me. I prefer to see the reports of Mr. Knight and LeeAnn and I avoid listening to Alex himself.
I think its good to have that person in the room to tell it like it is and cover the hard to eat material.
2 Fuckyousantorum 2014-03-30
I prefer www.NoAgendaShow.com podcast, it's free and excellent.
2 shmegegy 2014-03-30
he was funnier as Bill Hicks
1 my_newz_account 2014-03-30
Similar to anything you ever read concerning conspiracies. The general gist of the conversation is correct but the details are where things get fabricated.
1 VLXS 2014-03-30
I believe Alex Jones is a puppet who is paid to intentionally overblow conspiracies so as to discredit wistleblowers and conspiracy theorists.
... A meta-conspiratologist, if you will.
1 21022012 2014-03-30
not seen him for ages, how is he?
1 4to3 2014-03-30
Chubbier.
1 [deleted] 2014-03-30
Works for Zionists George Friedman (Stratfor) and Jeffrey Smulyan. He spouts 90% widely-available truth and 10% disinformation (lies).
His websites are honeypots.
Just remember the chain: CIA>Trapwire>Stratfor>Molly Maroney>Alex Jones. It doesn't get much clearer.
1 [deleted] 2014-03-30
he does 'shriek' a bit much, imo i think he means well, has good intentions, but like always, take it w/a grain of salt, look up info yourself.
1 Andyl66 2014-03-30
I hate how he continually criticizes the so called dinosaur media, when all he and his team do is scour that same media for stories. He makes more money than many newspapers but never sends reporters to hot zones to report "the truth". Say what you like about Fox, BBC, CNN, MSNBC but all of them have reporters on the ground in almost every hot zone on earth and over the years quite a lot have been killed doing their job. I think the 'alternative' media is doing a bang up job, viewership of all msm channels is falling and Alex is laughing all the way to the bank. Public sympathy for the msm is at an all time low and now gvt is attempting to curtail the freedom of the press.
If the msm disappears how the hell will we hear of any news? Alex jones isn't about to actually use his millions to pay real reporters is he? So we'll rely on places like reddit where it could be paid shills giving their false versions of current events. Matt Drudge is just as bad, pages of links to real reports, who did those reports? Journalists who work for the dinosaur media, that's who! As AJ proudly boasts he has a greater quantity of listeners than CNN and MSNBC combined yet he doesn't have a single real journalist on his payroll.
The BBC flat out said he's CIA. A real journalist said as much. I think his role is to undermine the msm, reduce public confidence in them so that eventually we have no news.
It's a huge issue because we rely on mainstream sources for so much information. Even the current weather is supplied by mainstream sources, without them we are seriously fucked. Yes they do misreport and push the left wing agenda, but at least they report it and we can pick at it to reveal something approaching what might be true.
1 [deleted] 2014-03-30
There's no we.
1 butterbelieveit 2014-03-30
I believe he is a plant, much of his information will be correct. He will interact with many people in the movement gaining trust and will even give good advice much of the time and that is what makes him so dangerous. It's the "Robot Revolution" lol
1 burzum95 2014-03-30
There are too many divisions and fractures in the conspiracy community. Ever hear of divide and conquer? He's fun and entertaining. Also thought provoking. I agree he is a little too much sometimes. Make up your own mind, but he provides facts and opinions for a lively debate.
0 [deleted] 2014-03-30
[deleted]
1 WTCMolybdenum4753 2014-03-30
The mainstream media can be described in the same terms. Just saying.
2 Sachyriel 2014-03-30
That's just what I said in the 3rd sentence.
1 WTCMolybdenum4753 2014-03-30
I always get burned for skimming. Sorry for jumping the gun.
0 1776m8 2014-03-30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WkGyAqVmCk
0 SolomonGroester 2014-03-30
Disingenuous. Against.
EDIT: For clarity.