yup since censoring of Israel-Palestine on worldnews started people turned to worldpolitics and since it is currently active situation (Israeli bombing of Gaza) it is understandable - worldnews for example was full of Ukraine-Maidan-Russia topics when it was happening (Maidan-protests/coup)
but I switched from worldnews to worldpolitics long time ago and it is generaly speaking good alternative for worldnews
He's talking about AAT, who claims to be fighting the good fight on the /r/worldnews mod team. If you follow undelete drama you will see there is a campaign going on to discredit /u/AssuredlyaThrowaway, a campaign I am very suspicious of because I am not aware of any concrete examples of nefarious mod abuse by "our man" AAT.
The top mod was forced to add another mod by the admins; the mod he chose also mods a few other large subs. The conflict of interest being that any mod of undelete who mods another major sub could conceivably scrub undelete of posts from their other sub.
Your comment is a little over zealous.
The guardian is not the only news source with the snowdem leaks. Actually they don't even have the mast majority of them- I think Washington Post has a larger portion of the file-base.
Another thing you should consider is that the Guardian, bbc, washington post, even Wikileaks; These examples only include the ENGLISH language news sources. There are many german news sources that have exceptional leaks (in my opinion, many of the best ones have been from German sources and not the Intercept nor the guardian).
So maybe it is you that should use context instead of insulting people.
They seem to not get along like two wrestlers fighting in the WWE. Just like the democrats and republicans, it's a show to keep you distracted while they take your money. It's just business.
Your comment is a little over zealous.
The guardian is not the only news source with the snowdem leaks. Actually they don't even have the mast majority of them- I think Washington Post has a larger portion of the file-base.
Another thing you should consider is that the Guardian, bbc, washington post, even Wikileaks; These examples only include the ENGLISH language news sources. There are many german news sources that have exceptional leaks (in my opinion, many of the best ones have been from German sources and not the Intercept nor the guardian).
So maybe it is you that should use context instead of insulting people.
yup since censoring of Israel-Palestine on worldnews started people turned to worldpolitics and since it is currently active situation (Israeli bombing of Gaza) it is understandable - worldnews for example was full of Ukraine-Maidan-Russia topics when it was happening (Maidan-protests/coup)
but I switched from worldnews to worldpolitics long time ago and it is generaly speaking good alternative for worldnews
24 comments
16 Orangutan 2014-07-15
/r/worldpolitics is worth checking out as an alternative.
5 PericlesATX 2014-07-15
Apparently world politics consists entirely of Isreal/Palestine issues.
5 zenicaone 2014-07-15
yup since censoring of Israel-Palestine on worldnews started people turned to worldpolitics and since it is currently active situation (Israeli bombing of Gaza) it is understandable - worldnews for example was full of Ukraine-Maidan-Russia topics when it was happening (Maidan-protests/coup)
but I switched from worldnews to worldpolitics long time ago and it is generaly speaking good alternative for worldnews
-11 IOnlyLurk 2014-07-15
If all you want to talk about is evil Jews then sure.
7 whand 2014-07-15
They were irrelevant the moment they made a zionist a mod. This subreddit has always been the home of the truth on reddit.
8 Rockran 2014-07-15
Meanwhile a mod here is a mod there.
0 TheArabianKnightMC 2014-07-15
Do you mean /u/AutoModerator? That is a mod of over 4400 subreddits
8 IAmNotHariSeldon 2014-07-15
He's talking about AAT, who claims to be fighting the good fight on the /r/worldnews mod team. If you follow undelete drama you will see there is a campaign going on to discredit /u/AssuredlyaThrowaway, a campaign I am very suspicious of because I am not aware of any concrete examples of nefarious mod abuse by "our man" AAT.
9 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2014-07-15
There is indeed a snoonet campaign to do just this.
Started with this comment which was planned and orchestrated by one of the undelete mods, and then moved on to this submissions.
They're spreading malicious falsehoods to to accomplish the following agenda;
"im just trying to slowly destroy his reputation among conspiracy folks"
It's "punishment" for me calling out the conflict of interest in undelete.
The metasphere is stupid.
5 zonkerton 2014-07-15
Who added you to worldnews mod team? Just curious.
edit - phone fatfinger.
0 IAmNotHariSeldon 2014-07-15
Their weakness is that in order for their worldview to make sense, they have to believe they're cleverer than us ha.
Thanks for showing up to provide context, I figured it was something like that.
0 a9sdd8nas90 2014-07-15
it's everything but stupid
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2014-07-15
Vindictive and full of trolls may have perhaps been a better choice of words.
0 Veskit 2014-07-15
Pardon my ignorance but what conflict of interest is there in undelete?
4 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2014-07-15
The top mod was forced to add another mod by the admins; the mod he chose also mods a few other large subs. The conflict of interest being that any mod of undelete who mods another major sub could conceivably scrub undelete of posts from their other sub.
0 oblivioustoobvious 2014-07-15
Luckily the truth is the truth.
2 Target4Tyrants 2014-07-15
LOL I just came from that sub and it seemed to be sponsored by guardian/bbc! Great job pointing out what I & probably a lot of visitors were thinking~
2 smokinbluebear 2014-07-15
when i posted this 3 hours ago it actually went up to 13 articles by the guardian/bbc...now it’s down to just 10 articles--all by the guardian....
that’s what happens when mods OVERmod--the subreddit becomes HOMOGENOUS.
-1 [deleted] 2014-07-15
[deleted]
3 [deleted] 2014-07-15
Your comment is a little over zealous. The guardian is not the only news source with the snowdem leaks. Actually they don't even have the mast majority of them- I think Washington Post has a larger portion of the file-base.
Another thing you should consider is that the Guardian, bbc, washington post, even Wikileaks; These examples only include the ENGLISH language news sources. There are many german news sources that have exceptional leaks (in my opinion, many of the best ones have been from German sources and not the Intercept nor the guardian).
So maybe it is you that should use context instead of insulting people.
EDIT: you added---- before right as I posted....
1 TheKolbrin 2014-07-15
"..becoming" ?
-2 TheGayHardyBoy 2014-07-15
What is this Jew/British media relationship about, anyways? It's been quite a destructive fixture since the 80s.
0 [deleted] 2014-07-15
[deleted]
3 Strensh 2014-07-15
They seem to not get along like two wrestlers fighting in the WWE. Just like the democrats and republicans, it's a show to keep you distracted while they take your money. It's just business.
2 TheGayHardyBoy 2014-07-15
Oooh, you typed words, must be true.
-5 YouAintGotToLieCraig 2014-07-15
Congratulations, you don't understand how news works. Other news sites reported on those same stories.
3 [deleted] 2014-07-15
Your comment is a little over zealous. The guardian is not the only news source with the snowdem leaks. Actually they don't even have the mast majority of them- I think Washington Post has a larger portion of the file-base.
Another thing you should consider is that the Guardian, bbc, washington post, even Wikileaks; These examples only include the ENGLISH language news sources. There are many german news sources that have exceptional leaks (in my opinion, many of the best ones have been from German sources and not the Intercept nor the guardian).
So maybe it is you that should use context instead of insulting people.
EDIT: you added---- before right as I posted....
5 zenicaone 2014-07-15
yup since censoring of Israel-Palestine on worldnews started people turned to worldpolitics and since it is currently active situation (Israeli bombing of Gaza) it is understandable - worldnews for example was full of Ukraine-Maidan-Russia topics when it was happening (Maidan-protests/coup)
but I switched from worldnews to worldpolitics long time ago and it is generaly speaking good alternative for worldnews