Guccifer: Nuclear attack in Chicago in 2015.
40 2014-11-11 by [deleted]
Guccifer is a "...hacker who first revealed self-portraits painted by George W. Bush and plundered a trove of personal emails from politicians, military officers and celebrities..."
--- A potpourri of conspiracy theories about the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the 1997 death of Princess Diana and alleged plans for a nuclear attack in Chicago in 2015, it said: “This world is run by a group of conspirators called the Council of Illuminati, very rich people, noble families, bankers and industrialists from the 19th and 20th century.” ---
43 comments
19 s70n3834r 2014-11-11
I think they would like to do something like that, and maybe have even planned for it; but they know they can no longer pull it off. Too many people are aware of past false flags now, and scale is subsequently irrelevant; an unacceptable percentage of people will look immediately to the 1% and the occult state, not ISIS or whatever. They didn't know it at the time; but 911 was the tip of the terror pyramid, and they have had nowhere to go but down ever since. They are constantly doing little ones, but the sleepers forget too quickly; and ever more people catch on with each.
11 OnSpeakerCrab 2014-11-11
A massive disaster, like an actual nuke, would be enough justification for the government to go into full emergency mode, instate martial law over the country, and basically do anything they want. We don't have some massive underground resistance movement. When it happens, they will do whatever they want. Then maybe people will be willing to fight.
3 dromni 2014-11-11
Arguably that could have been pulled at 9/11 too. In fact, when the disaster hapenned and all that we had were some images without much context, some people in other parts of the world initially thought that it was an attack with a tiny nuke of something. (Remember that Internet and phone networks got awfully jammed.)
Heck, there are people nowadays who still think that it could have been a nuke.
2 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
And it will be too late, as people such as myself have said for some time.
If we get to that point, resistance becomes exponentially more difficult. Every second we spend posting on reddit, the feds deploy more hardware to local police departments, install more cameras, and destroy more rights.
We can't expect the football watching John Q Public to care or share in our concern.
1 s70n3834r 2014-11-11
Well there's that; but we're making the assumption of a continued attempt to rule by subterfuge here.
2 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
Agree. Once a nuke goes off, a very predictable series of events will happen in quick succession.
7 iamagod_____ 2014-11-11
We're already ready to hang them all. Try it fuckers. We dare you.
7 AndroydfoLife 2014-11-11
No god
2 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
Why do you WANT a nuke to go off on American soil, again? ಠ_ಠ
1 tron_fucking_harkin 2014-11-11
That made me lol
2 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
First of all, I don't necessarily disagree with your general point.
That said, if a nuke did go off, what would the 99% realistically do about it? I mean, before the security state clamps down hard, which would take 72 hours at the outside?
It's too late, I think, to react to something like that. And Americans are too scared to pre-emptively strike at this monolithic system. So there it is, we're left WAITING for the enemy to strike, and have no options for retaliation that won't also result in an unequal and opposing reaction from the State.
What to do, what to do....
15 4to6 2014-11-11
They should move it to Detroit. Really. Any Illuminati reading this ... think about it.
9 s70n3834r 2014-11-11
They already have a project going in Detroit.
5 RenegadeMinds 2014-11-11
Why would you nuke a ghost town? :)
1 TheExtroll 2014-11-11
So Haliburton can giddy up and rebuild?
2 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
I dunno. Orlando doesn't seem to have any redeeming value.
7 RenegadeMinds 2014-11-11
Please let it be Washington DC or LA... not Chicago... too close to Canada. :P
1 CB_the_cuttlefish 2014-11-11
Fuck you, buddy. Don't drop a bomb on me. (DC area)
7 dickie_smalls 2014-11-11
I'm not your buddy, guy.
2 archonemis 2014-11-11
I'm not you guy, pal.
1 CB_the_cuttlefish 2014-11-11
I knew one of these would be thrown at me, pal.
2 smileimhigh 2014-11-11
He's not your pal, friend
3 dromni 2014-11-11
Probably the bomb will not be dropped, but rather transported by a seemingly innocent car or truck (depending on the size).
3 Manaspider 2014-11-11
You know.. If you're gonna create a false flag event in this country like a nuke. Anywhere around the Great lakes would be pretty stupid. It's one of the largest areas of fresh water in the world. I'm sure it would screw with all those other plans for populace control in this country if they screwed up the water with radiation. I am not saying this to discredit false flags or anything like that; I know it might sound like I'm from conspiratard. It just seems like common sense. Granted TPTB seem to lack common sense but still.
15 [deleted] 2014-11-11
Oh, but how nice for Nestle'. Don't you want to pay Nestle' any time you consume a liquid? Nestle' thinks you should!
6 SonOfMan11 2014-11-11
Regards, from Nestle'
1 Manaspider 2014-11-11
Nestle and companies like it should shut down and apologize to the world.
-6 Findout246 2014-11-11
I'm a slave to those bottle companies.. drink bottled water everyday at home and work to avoid fluoride. I wish there was a reasonable alternative.
6 ridestraight 2014-11-11
You're probably drinking more fluoride in your Nestle bottled water and other bottled water than you know. Read up on the source for your precious bottled water.
IMHO every plastic bottle of water contributes more to the Water Wars and the Petro Dollar and the Landfill.
Get Fluoride out of your water locally.
1 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
If Israel can do it, so can we.
1 Findout246 2014-11-11
I do feel bad about the plastic waste, but for what it's worth I recycle all my bottles. I use poland spring which I know does not add fluoride to the water. It comes from sources which naturally contain fluoride, but in very small amounts (approx .10 ppm).
If you can point me to a better source of non-fluoridated water for home and work I will very much appreciate it. But until then, I need to drink a lot of water daily, and I refuse to ingest fluoride. Believe me, I'm not happy about supporting companies like poland spring.
1 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
Unless you're running that water through a reverse osmosis filter, you're better off drinking from the tap. The environment will thank you too for less plastic in landfills.
1 Findout246 2014-11-11
That's not true, poland spring does not add fluoride to the water, my city supply does.
4 s70n3834r 2014-11-11
If potable water was somehow made scarce; it would impart a great deal of wealth and power to those who hold what remains.
3 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
They're working on it, trust.
1 Manaspider 2014-11-11
Very true.
3 tsali 2014-11-11
Many of the TPTB own water rights in South America making such an action very profitable for them.
5 Manaspider 2014-11-11
This is a good point.
3 ronintetsuro 2014-11-11
The CEO of Nestle is proud of publicly stating that water is not a human right.
If you think these "people" care about destroying fresh water sources, you're gonna be very disappointed.
2 s70n3834r 2014-11-11
Fracking.
3 notabrahamlincon 2014-11-11
I wouldn't be surprised by this. It has been a long time since a false flag like 9/11. I pray for those near Chicago.
1 LetsHackReality 2014-11-11
According to Karen Hudes, they already tried to nuke Charleston late last year.
2 kit8642 2014-11-11
I think Karen was just taking a cue from Lindsey Graham.
1 deniedretried 2014-11-11
So, no loss...
-6 Findout246 2014-11-11
I'm a slave to those bottle companies.. drink bottled water everyday at home and work to avoid fluoride. I wish there was a reasonable alternative.