That's Snopes who still falls for the 9/11 Official Story

Snopes is just two people's opinion. I have caught them being wrong before.

They're regularly wrong, it's a CIA propaganda front

do you have proof? would love to see something on that

Care to share?

Well there is no snopes article to prove him wrong.

some of the their early UK stuff, outright lies supporting establishment rubbish.

Can you give specifics of these "outright lies"?

This one. It's easy to prove Snopes is run by shadow government.

Massive stock trades before 9/11 by people with foreknowledge - FALSE

Someone coming to a different conclusion in their analysis does not equal "outright lies" or "shadow government". Sorry.

They use the 9/11 commissions report as the proof! Comical

Snopes is straight establishment lies propaganda. They proved this time and time again.

Even the CDC remove their own incriminating documents from the Internet, fortunately they can't yet touch the Internet Archive

http://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2mw2vc/damaging_cdc_vaccine_document_which_shills_say_is/

They are very good at discrediting all kinds of "lies and propaganda". Do you really think the establishment has any kind of monopoly on those?

Using snopes =

I think these two people are better at using Google than I am

http://i.imgur.com/6jKrChs.png

snopes blows ass

It's every shill's favorite website

Snopes don't actually take a position on the medical side, so peer reviewed articles aren't relevant. They're looking strictly at the Kenya claims, and - rightly, it seems - find them wanting, because the tests alleged couldn't have taken place.

Snopes is just the CIA, they still say the 9/11 Official Story is true

How do you know they're CIA?

Because their opinions differ from his.

CIA or equivalent, one of the tentacles of the Elite

Nevertheless snopes isn't performing a rigorous scientific study and especially the public tend to take snopes as the final word on the issue. It's controversial because although the science of that report is under question, the claim itself is plausible. Members of the public are incapable of making this distinction so while technically correct, it seems that snopes could also put a disclaimer that, if someone were sterilizing women, this is certainly a method that has the potential to do that. (Of course we all know that snopes would be discredited forever if they did do that.)

snopes isn't performing a rigorous scientific study

Yup. Not really their job though. Their job is to assess the evidence as it currently stands - and, right now, there basically Is no evidence available to support the claim, and a number of good reasons to doubt it.

If that changes down the road, I'm sure Snopes will update the page, as they have done others.

I don't implicitly trust OP (or have time to go through the study) but he does make an assertion that I assume you are okay with:

using tetanus virus as a catalyst to trick your immune system into attacking HCG [...] does in fact cause infertility.

He also states that:

HCG shouldn't be present in a vaccine!

If these two claims by OP are correct then I would agree that there is more to the story. Since it's not a scientific study, claiming that they are just following the evidence is too convenient. Measuring their work as journalism, I find this to be somewhat irresponsible (pending confirmation of OPs statements).

I think we need to see if hcg is present in the vaccines first. Right now, the evidence for that is slim, at best.

It's also doctors and PhDs denying them.

This may be the first time /r/conspiracy has trusted what Catholic bishops say...

Quick heads-up, that website has an all-seeing-eye in it's logo i.e. don't trust it

http://i.imgur.com/qifGkme.jpg

Dude. It's a lamp.

Then you don't know what you're looking for

Pareidolia at work.

Says the obvious newnick shill

If "shill" is "not seeing tinfoil Illuminati everywhere", glad to be one.

Had a look through your comments, saw your game

Had a look through yours.

Not sure what your "game" is, but thanks for the amusement. Tell me, which are more common, shills or Illuminati? You seem to see both everywhere.

Somehow, I don't think anyone is going to take the obvious step of having the vaccine tested properly.

Easy enough to prove. Look at the test results released by the Catholic bishops to confirm their claim.

Well, except they haven't been released for independent verification. But one report says there was nothing abnormal.

Although the actual test results haven't been released to the public by the bishops, the Catholic News Agency says it has seen a copy. And, the wire service writes, while "copies of the lab results obtained by CNA do show positive test results for the presence of the beta-hCG, reference levels given on the lab reports show that levels present in the vaccines are within 'normal values' for healthy men and women."

While they refuse to release the results, it's an unsubstantiated allegation. UNICEF have said they're perfectly happy to have independent tests run on the vaccines. Hard to see what else they could do.

They will switch the vaccines to ones without HCG for the tests

The fact that weren't giving this Tetanus vaccine to males and old women gives the game away, this was an attack on female fertility.

Snopes is worthless.

Snopes = CIA, total shill site!

Snope's was started by a husband and wife team who looked the shit up on the internet. Joke

snopes is 100% under the control of big media.

only use for non-contraversial topics

of course you may not know when an item is politically charged...

so... i don't waste my time

Never trust a website with an Illuminati all-seeing-eye in it's logo

http://i.imgur.com/qifGkme.jpg

Pareidolia at work.