r/Worldnews in action: Sensationalist headline implying "the Russians are intimidating the airspace over southern Sweden", comment section filled with hate. Reality: "it happened over international airspace, no violation"- Swedish Defense Minister.
142 2014-12-14 by [deleted]
The r/worldnews article/comment section: For the second time this year, a Russian military aircraft turned off its transponders to avoid commercial radar and nearly collided with a passenger jet over Sweden, officials have said.
The Guardian article: Russian plane has near-miss with passenger aircraft over Sweden
Interpreting the media 101: This article immediately (2nd sentence) starts misleading the average reader:
Swedish authorities said that on Friday, a Russian military aircraft nearly collided above southern Sweden with a commercial passenger jet that had taken off from Copenhagen in Denmark.
The sad things is that it actually mentions that it happened in international airspace in 2nd to last paragraph. But try posting that in the comment section, see how much visibility it gets.
The "average reader" skimmed the article at best, at worst they just read the loaded headline. Now we have a front page reddit story, exposed to millions of people, giving one more strike against Russia. When the reality is that it happened in international airspace and even the Swedish Minster of Defense concluded there was no violation.
And that, ladies and gentleman, is how a propaganda machine works. Pumping out these kinds of stories regularly and slowly building a very biased narrative inside of people's heads. So that when they see the next level of propaganda, they are already ready to accept it as truth.
.............
Swedish Article: Confirmed: Military plane was from Russia
Source: The Local, Swedish News in English.
The passenger plane nearly crashed into a foreign military aircraft after military air traffic control reported an "invisible" plane was circulating in the area.
"It's about a Russian military jet. We have identified it via Swedish combat pilots. There are no doubts about what kind of government aircraft it was," Defence Minister Peter Hultqvist told the TT news agency.
He added; "This is serious. It's inappropriate. It's downright dangerous."
Initial reports stated that the incident took place in the Swedish airspace but Hultqvist claimed this was not the case
"It was over international airspace. There has definitely not been a violation," added Hultqvist.
................
And I am sure that I will be attacked for being "Pro-Putin". Since when do you have to either accept every anti-Russian piece as fact OR be "with Putin". Why are there only 2 choices? Why can't I be skeptical of both sides and point out when one is lying?
The amount of "Red Scare" logic used on reddit these days in alarming.
41 comments
21 turdovski 2014-12-14
It's fucking amazing how a story like this gets thousands of upvotes and insane massive hysterical anti Russian comments and hate. The PR machine is working very well.
Doesn't matter that the US is bombing countries, torturing prisoners, supporting terrorists, and their own government has just signed another massive bill to go oppress more countries, spy on their own citizens, and give banks more freedom to fuck everyone over, but fuck all that, a motherfucking plane in international airspace is literally a Putler terrorist invasion and the biggest threat to world peace.
*Edit: Even the airlines director is wondering what all the fuss is about " It happens in international airspace, and there have military plane allowed to be, so I can not understand all the drama that is about it here" He says even the pilots didn't care: http://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/cimber-direktoer-passagererne-maerkede-intet-til-kursskifte/5354423
5 murtokala 2014-12-14
But that's "whataboutism", thus not a real argument.
1 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell.
2 murtokala 2014-12-14
Yes
4 Amos_Quito 2014-12-14
You should ALWAYS mark sarcasm with an "/s".
Reddit is sarcastically retarded.
/Not sarcasm.
-9 Tchocky 2014-12-14
The difference between sovereign and international airspace in no way makes this incident less serious.
10 turdovski 2014-12-14
I was mainly commenting on the hysteria it caused. Something that is a drop in the ocean compared to the actual shit happening around the world. Perfect example of minuscule irrelevant bullshit to distract the idiot masses.
-7 Tchocky 2014-12-14
It's not exactly hysteria when you consider the rarity and frankly, extreme negligence on display.
2 turdovski 2014-12-14
Again, compared to what is actually happening in the world, this seems like a well made distraction. Yes it's an interesting news story, but not on the hysteria level the reddit posters make it out to be. You'd think Putin was gearing up for an invasion.
-8 Tchocky 2014-12-14
I've not read much about this on reddit so I couldn't say. There's enough wrong-headed hysteria in this thread.
Not yourself, just in general.
19 turdovski 2014-12-14
It's exactly the same narrative.
You are with us or you are with the communists.
You are with us or you are with the terrorists.
You are with us or you are a FSB Putin paid brainwashed zombie shill.
-5 [deleted] 2014-12-14
[deleted]
2 Amos_Quito 2014-12-14
In that case, I'm with "us".
-9 Tchocky 2014-12-14
Arse. Flying through congested civilian airspace with your transponder off and not in communication with controllers is dangerous and endangers lives. There's nothing Manichean about covering that kind of stupid behaviour.
EDIT - alright I'm not one to complain about downvotes but this really makes no sense. Is it disagreement or what?
2 ButMuhHITLER 2014-12-14
You've proven with your posting history that you're a Zionist scumbag so we take whatever you say with a grain of salt
1 Tchocky 2014-12-14
Go on then. Since you're so sure.
11 2daves1sock 2014-12-14
I don't see it as pro-Putin just anti propaganda. Getting a bit tired of all these apathetic brainwashed automatons believing we're the good guys, spreading peace and democracy, when all the evidence says otherwise. Not saying Putin isn't a corrupt scumbag as well but he's small fry compared to our emperors.
2 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
That is exactly how I feel. But being anti-propaganda these days means that you are personally collecting checks that Putin signs in kitten blood.
3 adwad2312 2014-12-14
accurate but the same is true here, you can be labeled zionist quick for simply not understanding money creation.
6 LordMandrake_ 2014-12-14
I'm getting really fucking sick of how we're painted as total fucking nuts who are in able of rational thinking. It's like people think that all conspiracy theorist are neo Nazis who deny the holocaust or believe that reptilians are in the white house.
If anything, we are the most sane! This nonsense is really making me angry.
Reddit is getting so bad now I don't even wanna use it anymore. I only come on here for r/occult and this site.
We should start considering taking our ideas and making a new website away from this cesspit.
2 oblivioustoobvious 2014-12-14
Nope. We leave they win. It's difficult to consistently combat but persevere.
2 LordMandrake_ 2014-12-14
That is true.
Well, I'm tired of just doing nothing about it. Maybe it's time I did. I am mad and hell and I'm not taking it anymore!!
4 BigBrownBeav 2014-12-14
I'm wondering, If the NATO countries instituted a draft how much resistance the people would put up?
Imagine getting a letter saying we're going to war with Russia, kit up soldier!. I'm willing to bet most of the commenters over in worldnews would be shutting the fuck up with all the war mongering.
4 Sek101 2014-12-14
Saw that, the followup thread was funny though... When antiRussia threads pop up riding on 4800+ it's bullshit Astroturf propaganda of the day.
I think some of the conversations in these sort of threads are fairly dynamic but not from an organic standpoint. Op Metal Gear
1 Balthanos 2014-12-14
Solid link.
0 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
Interesting link.
-4 Tchocky 2014-12-14
It's clear as day that Russia are in the wrong here.
I don't see astroturfing in stupid comments. I just see stupid comments.
2 daveywaveylol2 2014-12-14
it's not just /r/worldnews it's everywhere.
they should rename /r/TIL to /r/MilitaryHistorymostlywinkwink
1 psynnn 2014-12-14
Are you implying that users should read the article? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
0 [deleted] 2014-12-14
Maybe the swedes are just really paranoid about Russians invading?
-2 AutoModerator 2014-12-14
While not required, you are requested to use the NP domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-3 Tchocky 2014-12-14
No, no no no.
This is a massive misunderstanding of the difference between international and sovereign airspace, which leads to a dramatically wrong interpretation of what's going on.
The difference between "Swedish" and "international" airspace makes absolutly no difference to the severity of the incident. None whatsoever.
The fact that early reports label the airspace incorrectly is in no way making this an "anti-Russian" piece. The aircraft was reckless and extremely negligent, we're lucky there wasn't a collision. Saying that the "reality" is that it happened in international airspace is just weird and shows the misunderstanding.
"Swedish" airspace as a sovereign concept extends to 12 miles from shore, just like with sovereign waters.
Beyond that is international airspace that is split into Flight Information Regions (FIR). Responsibility for the safety of aircraft is split up according to FIR. In this case Malmo FIR, where Swedish controllers ensure that aircraft in international airspace do not collide. International airspace doesn't mean a free-for-all. It just means it's outside the 12-mile limit. Controllers are still responsible for separation, pilots are still obliged to follow clearances and instructions, and unidentified traffic that's not showing up on radar, closing in on civilian aircraft is extremely dangerous.
Example - in this incident the estimated distance was around 300 feet. Our minumum separation is 5 miles. It is not sensationalist to say that this was an extremely dangerous move by the Russian aircraft.
The Russian aircraft deactivated it's transponder, which makes it impossible for controllers to safely guide traffic in the airspace. This is an incredibly dangerous, foolhardy and unforgivable action, and the fact that early reports labelled it as "Swedish" airspace rather than "international" makes no difference.
For the severity of the incident keep reading the second article
"This incident in the spring was way too close, maybe 100 metres or less. In this instance we managed to avoid it getting that close," said Bydén.
OP - read up on how airspace structure works, if you like I'd be happy to type more. But what we have here is a basic misunderstanding leading to conclusions that aren't reasonable.
Source - ATC working in Western Europe. This kind of thing gives me nightmares.
4 turdovski 2014-12-14
But Ops post had this:
So basically what they did was not nice, but nothing like what the entire point of OPs post is: that reddit is hysterical with Putin hate over his plans of world domination and baby eating.
-4 Tchocky 2014-12-14
He's saying there hadn't been a violation of Swedish sovereign airspace.
Which makes no difference to the severity, as I hope I made clear.
0 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
I get that you know your stuff. But most people do not and it absolutely changes the tone of the story for them.
1 Tchocky 2014-12-14
No, the article is clear about the severity. Crystal clear.
Your post has the idea that saying it happened in Swedish rather than international airspace makes it an inherently anti-Russian piece. That's not borne out by the article at all. Neither is it borne out by the events.
4 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
The read the comments, particularly the top hundred or so. The proof is in the pudding.
0 Tchocky 2014-12-14
No, you're ascribing an awful lot of meaning to a mistatement of what is essentially aeronautical legal geography.
The details of the story that describe the aircraft turning off the transponder and coming within 100 metres of civilian traffic just might have something to do with people's response.
I've e-mailed in to the AP corrections slot. I'd suggest the same to you.
-3 Kh444n 2014-12-14
/r/conspiracy has a become west vs eat forum
1 putin_hates_cats 2014-12-14
Not really, it is and always has been an anti-propaganda forum.
-6 Dani_Californication 2014-12-14
Sweden have always been very neutral towards the Jews so it's no surprise to see them sucking up to the dominant societies of the Western world.