When will the people realise America is broken? In a democracy, the CIA torture report would have led to people being fired and prosecuted. Instead, the MSM defend forced rectal feeding with pine nuts as a medical procedure.
108 2014-12-19 by Fuckyousantorum
61 comments
21 fnordtastic 2014-12-19
Most people won't get mad about anything until cable tv and delivery pizza stop working.
5 logorogo 2014-12-19
This is really true. The next day everyone you know has forgotten about the torture report. The people on this subreddit are the last ones to forget.
1 holocauster-ride 2014-12-19
I bring it up all the time, and people look at me like I need to be committed.
2 logorogo 2014-12-19
Yeah, I stopped talking politics to friends and co-workers a few years ago. People just don't want to hear it.
1 EnoughNoLibsSpam 2014-12-19
These same people keep consuming mainstream media propaganda, so its not like they dont want to hear it, its more like they want the short version without too many conflicting details or inconvenient facts.
2 NochEinmalBitte 2014-12-19
Circus et panem. This is quite old tbh... nihil novi sub soli?
2 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-12-19
Or until cable TV tells them to.
1 fnordtastic 2014-12-19
That won't happen. The revolution will not be televised, or facebooked, or tweeted.
1 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-12-19
My point was that a lot of people take their opinions from the TV. If CNN told them to be outraged and take to the streets, they would likely do it.
I agree with you that no organic or actual revolution will be televised.
1 JamesColesPardon 2014-12-19
I hear the adage here about America being 72 hours away from violent revolution, I think we're about a iPhone6 battery charge away from people starting to freak out.
1 club-mate 2014-12-19
Or becomes unaffordable due to their currency losing any value. As is currently happening with the dollar.
-6 Kidgar 2014-12-19
are you mad?
4 HOLY_NAVINCI 2014-12-19
Are you deficient?
1 Kidgar 2014-12-19
i just asked a question. i didn't have any mean intentions about it. i just wanted to know if the user was mad.
i am deficient in money, and i am mad about that.
i didn't downvote the comment i asked my question on, why is my legit question downvoted? i was just trying to start a conversation; i guess it worked.
3 fnordtastic 2014-12-19
People probably think you were trolling or trying to disrupt. It's hard to tell intent from 3 words, but some probably saw it as a "u mad bro?"
To answer your question, I am mad. The more important question is are you mad enough to risk your home, family, job, or your life? I cannot say that I am there yet. I think most people who can read the writing in the wall are stuck in a difficult place. We are told that half the country doesn't care about torture, and judging by the attitudes expressed in reddit, it's probably true. We watch the encroaching police state while most people respond with "hurrdurr tin foil hattery". Eventually the reality of the situation will be obvious, right about the time you can't get a pizza delivered.....
No one wants to be the first one out of the gate, but there's huge risk in waiting too long.
1 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-12-19
I would say it's more than half, probably even a lot more than half.
1 fnordtastic 2014-12-19
It's hard to say. If you believe the media then those who don't support torture are in the minority.
If you combine the people who don't care with the people who support it, they're certainly the majority. Then again, it could all just be a media campaign to sway public opinion. It's hard to believe anything these days....
2 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-12-19
With you here. That seems to be one of the goals of mass media/social engineering these days. Information overload mixed with a hearty dose of disinfo to obfuscate and muddy the truth.
1 Kidgar 2014-12-19
i don't say much online as it isn't so secure unless you're behind a billion proxies and even then there are people who know more than me and can figure out who said what, where, when, and why.
i am mad about my financial situation. even looking for a job sucks. i found that the questions asked, if aggregated, can reveal information about you that you wouldn't want released. it feels like i'm being watched everywhere on the internet.
1 fnordtastic 2014-12-19
While I don't participate in Facebook, I'm also not worried about voicing my opinion online. I was probably already on a list for buying subversive literature online. I figure, if the government is going to round up dissidents, then I'm getting rounded up regardless, so why censor myself.
And while I can certainly appreciate your financial woes, the real issue goes much deeper than that.
10 hopefullydepressed 2014-12-19
Isn't a democracy majority rule? Don't the majority support torture?
Might be a case against majority rule, but this is what you get in a democracy. Gang rape is democracy in action. 9 out of 10 voted for it.
5 [deleted] 2014-12-19
[deleted]
3 bitbytebit 2014-12-19
neither does a republic, at least not ours .. so what govs do work? monarchys and for a brief time at least dictatorships
2 Nutricidal 2014-12-19
Oh, it works. What's been done to us was done in secrecy. We are currently in the process of correction. What other country would admit it's mistakes and have it's leaders lampooned by TV pundits? The American people will forgive the treachery as all good Christians do. At the same time we will point to the second amendment. It's a beautiful thing to see.
3 scruffybaubau 2014-12-19
Memorable analogy. Bravo.
2 hopefullydepressed 2014-12-19
So true since I've remembered it from another comment.
2 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
Democracy is majority rule subject to the protection of basic human rights.
1 hopefullydepressed 2014-12-19
yeah I hear that from people who constantly vote to take my rights away because they don't think I have that right.
8 4to6 2014-12-19
There is not and never was an excuse for state-sponsored torture. Anywhere. It's shameful that the American people have become so corrupted, they have forgotten this truth.
6 skekze 2014-12-19
Not all. I sound like a loon around the holidays. Ze crazy uncle.
1 _---__---_ 2014-12-19
Mention mooooslims, 911 or terrorist and the majority of Americans dont have a problem with state-sponsored torture or killing...
Nothing to do with shame... just how propaganda works... no different to when the Nazis did it... how do you think they got the majority of normal German people to hand over all those Jews...
1 _---__---_ 2014-12-19
Mention mooooslims, 911 or terrorist and the majority of Americans dont have a problem with state-sponsored torture or killing...
Nothing to do with shame... just how propaganda works... no different to when the Nazis did it... how do you think they got the majority of normal German people to hand over all those Jews...
6 ronintetsuro 2014-12-19
And then:
2 OmegaBrahman 2014-12-19
~ April of 2015...
1 MrToolBelt 2014-12-19
What's April 2015?
4 OmegaBrahman 2014-12-19
IRS reporting ;)
2 [deleted] 2014-12-19
I have long wondered what kind of shenanigans they're going to pull to distract the millions of people who suddenly realize they aren't getting a tax return. Or in 2016 after the fines quadruple and people end up owing money.
1 OmegaBrahman 2014-12-19
with current funding even congress is payed for a 1st Q only
So far This is all we got !
1 ENYAY7 2014-12-19
What happens after that?
2 [deleted] 2014-12-19
That is because we are a tyranny masquerading as a democracy.
1 JumpingJazzJam 2014-12-19
Thank you OP I agree.
1 BarcaDeLuna 2014-12-19
United States are not a democracy - and have not been designed to be one by the founding fathers, either. Democracy is mob rule with old money sitting behind. The Republic designed for USA was with best intentions to never, ever have a democracy (mob rule).
1 Thistleknot 2014-12-19
Exactly
http://www.apcrg.com/political-reform-sortition-a-lesson-from-ancient-athens/#comment-776
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
The concept of democracy as mob rule is not strictly accurate as most western democracies have minimum legal protections for minorities.
1 radicalextremetruth 2014-12-19
it really is the twilight zone isn't it? turn the page, kim has a new hairdo.
1 BatmanClubSandwich 2014-12-19
Funny thing is that citizens have known for a long time that America was broken. However, they'd never admit it publicly because America is all about competition. Everything is a competition, and to announce that America is broken would be akin to career- and social-suicide.
1 Portinski 2014-12-19
As an american, I feel democracy is a bit outdated being that the "majority" can pretty much be faked at any time through technology.
1 Rabbit_TAO 2014-12-19
Which media outlet/journalist has actually defended forced rectal feeding or any torture procedure for that matter?
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
Ex-NSA director General Hayden talking to CNN's Jake Tapper did that very thing:
Listen from 10 minutes to 14 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PglSxeRqxEk
Just listen to this whole episode to hear example after example of MSM apologists
1 Rabbit_TAO 2014-12-19
All that showed was Hayden defending it. Tapper didn't defend it.
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
As I said, listen to the first hour at least. It has MSM justifying torture several times.
1 Rabbit_TAO 2014-12-19
Dude, I listened from 10 to 14, but I'm not listening to an hour of that. I wouldn't be surprised if some MSM outlets and journalists let officials off the hook with easy soft ball questions, but I haven't heard any journalists actually defend the torture and you've failed to provide any examples of that.
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
Bless you. I can't force feed you the truth. I don't know how much more easier I can make it.
0 Rabbit_TAO 2014-12-19
Don't give me that bs, man. Provide proof to your claim! Asking me to listen to an hour long podcast is not providing proof. Earlier you said listen from 10 minutes to 14 minutes, but nowhere in that time period did Tapper defend torture. Give me a quote, a name, etc...
Look, I know the media works to propagate a pro government narrative most of the time, but journalists framing the debate on whether torture worked or not isn't the same thing as defending it. I haven't seen or hear or read any journalists outright defend torture as you so claim.
3 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
It's not difficult. It's there for you. It contains clips all packaged and analysed. If the truth isn't worth your time then forget it. You could have listened to it by now.
2 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
PBS: Shields and Brooks on CIA interrogation: Brooks says the whole country was involved in torture and is now rediscovering its moral center and no-one should be prosecuted as they were in difficult jobs and the decisions were political ones.
Link to video and transcript: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/shields-brooks-cia-interrogation-report-spending-bill-sticking-points/
0 Rabbit_TAO 2014-12-19
Thank you. This is what I'm taking about. I still don't think it proves Shields, Brooks, Woodruff or PBS are defending torture though.
Both Shields and Brooks acknowledge that "torture" is the word for it, not Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (ETI) and condemn the act as deplorable.
Brooks even points out how complicit congress and the White House were in signing off on those torture practices, and even mentioned how often the US kills people with drones.
I disagree with Shields that "this is not who we are" when history would clearly prove otherwise and I certainly don't agree with Brooks' caveat at the end that "those moral calculus should not be legalized except for in extreme cases." However, I do not think this example proves journalists are defending the act of torture.
1 xxCRM114xx 2014-12-19
Who are these 'people' you speak of? Is their ignorance simply the rationalization you give yourself not to speak out and do anything about it?
1 make_mind_free2go 2014-12-19
i think most people realize this, they've lost hope, probably some of these same people haven't done anything either, besides tune in to MSM and complain
0 Tech_49 2014-12-19
In a democracy, you get what you voted for, good and hard.
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
You get what the majority of registered voters voted for even if, that "majority" is less than 50%. For example:
Registered voters are usually 60-80% of eligible population, even less of total population. Then they vote:
- party a: 40%- winner - party b: 30% - parties c-f: 30%
1 NochEinmalBitte 2014-12-19
Yep, it's mind blogging. You can even see it when most states refuse to acknowledge blank votes.
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
You get what the majority of registered voters voted for even if, that "majority" is less than 50%. For example:
Registered voters are usually 60-80% of eligible population, even less of total population. Then they vote:
- party a: 40%- winner - party b: 30% - parties c-f: 30%
2 Ambiguously_Ironic 2014-12-19
With you here. That seems to be one of the goals of mass media/social engineering these days. Information overload mixed with a hearty dose of disinfo to obfuscate and muddy the truth.
1 Fuckyousantorum 2014-12-19
Ex-NSA director General Hayden talking to CNN's Jake Tapper did that very thing:
Listen from 10 minutes to 14 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PglSxeRqxEk
Just listen to this whole episode to hear example after example of MSM apologists
1 holocauster-ride 2014-12-19
I bring it up all the time, and people look at me like I need to be committed.