As I said:

I shouldn't necessarily call him "Mr. Evil" as if he's "the only one!" around doing fucked up shit. Of course not. I'd say he's involved with some of the upper levels of chicanery on the planet, however - especially as he is directly tied and supportive of a proven global threat corporation like Monsanto.

He's definitely not "the only one". Correct.

No surprise that there was no answer. I'd imagine that that question on that IAMA was met with a shower of downvotes too. I think it's not a horrible question. Scary for some to ask, but I think it is a valid question to ask him.

Someone as powerful and with as much money as him and who is as pro vaccine and GMOs as he is? Yeah. Valid question.

EDIT: And you were downvoted just for saying you asked that question. lol. Wow. Some people...

Wanted to hear your research, thoughts and opinions on a society (like TZM / TVP / Communalism / Anarcho Syndacalism / Ubuntu / etc) that Abolishes the Monetary System (any means of exchange) and government (any means of horizontally structured control of power away from the people).

Well, realize that these forms of society are not any form of system that NECESSARILY takes "power away from the people". In no way is that necessarily the case. They, of course, CAN take away power from the people if controlled incorrectly or negatively, but so can and do most systems - capitalism being zero exception. All the forms that you mentioned can, in fact, actually EMPOWER the people immensely if they are implemented correctly.

A society that promotes; automation and mechanization instead of human physical labor, cooperation and collaboration instead of competition, efficiency of labor and production instead of inefficiency, sustainability instead of consumption for profiteering, opensourcing and open sharing of all technology instead of patentship and private ownership of private technology, access to most forms of private property instead of ownership.

Okay...Wait a minute. Perhaps you might have just worded things incorrectly - or I made a mistake in interpretation - but this above statement on your part is, of course, a GOOD thing; something which goes directly against the interpretation I made of your previous statement that the aforementioned systems taker "power away from the people". These systems, again, don't NECESSARILY do that - which, it seemed, you were saying or implying that they do...And yet, your next statement goes on to list many good and positive things that could come out of such societies and systems...so...I'm a bit confused at this point here.

Maybe ELI5.

I meant to say "any means of structure where the power is spread vertically amongst the people and not horizontally creating a pyramid / means of control & slavery".

Okay. I can understand that. Definitely.

when there is more centralized power in a vertical session, there is more more inequality / tyranny / means of control over everyone else.

Hell this is almost a total inevitability when you structure things in this manner.

This is as opposed to de-centralized forms of socio-economic structures, where the power is spread amongst the people and people are not controlled / restricted / extorted.

Correct and agreed.

I essentially agree with the general direction of everything else you said. Definitely

okay now we've got a party of 2 then, 7.5 billion more to invite :D

Ha. Yeah. :)

btw, if you are interested in economics (thee most important topic for creating a just society), have you been following greece?

I pretty much have a natural abhorrence for economics actually. lol.

Don't know too much of anything about Greece either.

soalist

? ELI5?

I feel like very few people know this.

I certainly don't.

Ultimately, it seems to me that most if not all governments on this planet are ruled and controlled by some overarching global power that is NOT interested in helping the people/citizenry get better. Whether "democratic", "socialist", "capitalist" or whatever...they all end up fucking over the people. Every government in this civilization, it seems, fucks the people regardless sooner or later.

Yes. All this sounds about exactly what happened w/communism. Capitalism is turning out to not be too much better though.

If you are familiar with matters of essoteric / arcane knowledge you almost must be aware of the influence that masons played with the communist state in Russia.

Far before that even there were influences that had deeper hands in play.

Zionists are the rats in the cage that have been given slightly bigger pieces of cheese than the rest of us.

We are all of us still rats in cages, however.

That's a BIIIIG "if", however. Not super sure how likely that is to happen in this kali yuga we're in.

The only way we can beat the slavery and control is through massive education for as many people as possible.

I do not disagree with this one bit, sir. I think it is an education that definitely includes, but is by no means whatsoever limited to just economics, however. I know you yourself aren't disagreeing with this, but I tend to place a bit more of my investigative emphasis on philosophy and more esoteric subject matter than on economic ones. I think that economics is certainly important, but I also think that more arcane subjects are no less significant in the building of effective societies, civilizations, and people.

Sounds similar to how I feel, except my key deals more with philosophy and esotericism (both on and off planet).

with regards to off planet, can you share more details

I had experiences when young that many years later I discovered had many parallels with what other contactees have also described.

Since discovering this, I developed particular interest in the investigation of the subject and have researched quite a bit in the area of disclosure projects, whistleblowers, government and PTB coverups, etc.

I might have a question for you as I've ran into some obstacles / contradictions personally.

Ask away. Shoot. If I know anything that might help or be useful, I would definitely share it.

i have myself second guessing all these races that are supposedly visiting us.

Nothing wrong with that. There is much, MUCH disinformation and misinformation run amok on this planet. It confuses and muddies the waters of truth, which is what TPTB want. It makes things all the more difficult to effectively investigate. We’re all likely wrong about some specific aspects of the extraterrestrial dynamic. Ultimately, however, 1) the dynamic is real, 2) I would say that some races have contacted certain humans on this planet, and 3) I’d even say that they some ETs are currently here and have been for quite some time.

I can say there is a strong enough of an evidence to say yes, we are being visited for a long time, with good evidence of that the last century, but I cannot confirm the authenticity of the information of actual ET races/names.

Again, the specifics in terms of WHICH races there are may be erred here and there. The general, broad strokes, however, in terms of our being contacted period are likely entirely accurate.

This whole idea of the galactic federation, although sounds pleasants, could very well be all disinfo.

The GENERAL idea of a grouping of races that have cooperated with one another for the mutual benefit of all members in the group, I would say, does not seem a very far-fetched idea in the least to me.

If you have any credible sources let me know

I guess the real question here, however, is “who and what is a credible source”?

I, for example, have been doing pretty extensive research into an individual who seems to be a Captain in a special top secret “black” project of the Marines and his information, data, and testimony seems to be amongst some of the most compelling I’ve come across to date. Does this mean he can’t be lying? No. He seems to have all the earmarks of truth as far as I can discern, however.

Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project seems to provide pretty substantial - if not definitive - indication of ET presence on this planet also, as well as the Citizen Hearing On Disclosure.

Ultimately, and again, specifics may be difficult to effectively ascertain. The broad strokes, however, pretty directly point toward the truth of ET existence on and around planet Earth.

My history of debunking people have lead me to believe half the 'alternative media' movement are agents..

And many may be. Doesn’t keep the general truth from still being the case, however.

Given 95% of the UFO videos are hoaxes / fakes

Not that many. Over half not being genuine is likely true. Not as many as 95%, however.

the presupposition that a group of different aliens cooperating together makes logical sense to me, but I question that it's called 'the galactic federation', and i question their stories.

Yeah, well, that’s why you don’t sweat the small stuff - the particulars - like specific names/what it’s called or the stories about them. The words “Galactic Federation” are human, terrestrial, English language words anyway. It is EXTREMELY likely that the members of this galactic consortium don’t call it “The Galactic Federation” themsleves. The names are nothing that one should get too hung up on at all.

I also question steve bastony (however you spell his name), honestly the people that get behind him are highly questionable. He affiliates himself with many frauds which really let me down but it's the truth. I've spent many years following him, only to just be blown away the bullshit actors / agents he affiliates himself with, and that he gives credit to.

One has to understand what the final goal is here. The final goal is to show/prove/give evidence for the ET reality on and around this planet. If someone associates with 10 people and 7 of them are frauds, but 3 of them end up showing proof of ET life, then I’d say that person ended up on the right track ultimately. One shouldn’t expect someone to be right A HUNDRED percent of the time - especially on a planet like this one with so much disinformation and misinformation. Everyone’s going to get fooled to some extent. People’s overall intent and track record seems more important, it seems to me, and individuals shouldn’t be too quick to discard or discredit individuals who don’t get “100% of the information correct 100% of the time or else”. Uncovering the truth of hidden information on this planet is a process wrought with missteps and mistakes.

Just like steven gree, that guy is 99% certainly disinfo agent. Being sponsored / friends with the rockefeller family, a century old family that could have released the information single handedly all century, has fucked over humanity hundreds of times probably by now.

Steven Greer has done more for the popular dissemination of serious ET dialogue in recent times than most people. Being associated with the Rockerfeller family shouldn’t be any sort of immediate cancellation of a person’s credibility since that family’s influence is so ubiquitous over the entire planet in the first place. It’s kind of hard NOT to be associated with them if one deals with big projects in one form or another.

Additionally, the fact that Greer has had SO MANY credible witnesses means that regardless of whether Greer himself is compromised or not (which I don’t think he, for the most part, is) doesn’t mean that any of the many people that have been involved with his Disclosure Project are themselves compromised. One thing does not necessarily equate to the other.

Same with Stephen Bassett. He’s hosted dozens of people in his Citizens’ Hearing. If even ONE of those individuals is credible, then that goes a ways in helping the cause…and a LOT more than just one individuals involved in his Citizens’ Hearing was credible.

greer himself is a Fraud in my opinion.

I’ve heard this from many, yet not once have I ever heard an actual valid reason as to why people feel this way. It’s strange really.

I bought into greer's promises just like stevens basettes.

Well that was your first mistake right there then. Don’t buy into ANYONE’S anything. Just listen to the information and assess it on its own merit. Don’t believe anyone. Don’t champion anyone’s cause. Just go where the information and evidence leads regardless of who says it with the understanding that you may end up having to back track on that lead in the future. It’s not about any one person or “believing” them one way or the other. It’s about the data.

both have fucked over their communities many times

And I have yet to see how this has happened. I have heard people say things like this, but I haven’t actually seen anyone produce any actual real information in terms of HOW they did it.

I do hold a personal grudge against them. I've done my research on those two individuals many years ago and am more certain of them being agents as time goes, and for that I cannot let myself be fooled again by those guys.

Again, one should simply just go with the information presented. Some of it is valid. Some of it is likely not valid. NO ONE on this planet, it seems to me, has the “whole” story. Everyone is going to be erred about the data to SOME extent or another. It is erroneous to fault someone for being erred alone.

I also suspect they are exposing whistleblowers and real threatening initiatives of disclosure to the government or shadow government, so that we never get there, or at least not anytime soon.

Are you saying that Steven Greer’s and Stephen Bassett’s disclosure projects were really designed to single out and expose real whistleblowers to TPTB so that they could be tracked down and taken out?

…?

If greer and steven werent agents, then our government would have to be incompetent... but that's not possible given at least a century of secrecy on this matter and others.

I…don’t see why any of that actually follows. If Greer and Bassett weren’t agents, then the government would have to be incompetent? Why? I don’t follow.

All alternative media sources with large budgets, have to be questioned

Of course.

Also the problem of giving credibility to people with ludicrous claims is that those people can then be used to taint the original goal or rest of the team.

Okay, but who’s giving credibility to them and who is it that’s making the ludicrous claims? I’m, again, not following.

For example, when a president comes into office and immediately starts electing representatives for the government that are well known for enslaving society and continuing the status quo, would it still be reasonable to think that President plans on bringing change? If he was, then why would he do himself a disservice and create a team of known oligarchs/frauds?

Okay. This is agreed…but what does this have to do with Greer and Bassett? Who is it that they brought in that completely undermine what they’ve said and showd they’re trying to do?

I am not going to stop keeping tabs on steven, but him associating with highly questionable people is very worrysome.

Like who? Rockefeller?

Do you know who Aaron Russo is? He made this film. The man is one of the most serious investigators out there. His credibility is unquestioned. He likely got murdered for it.

He was very, very good friends with the Rockerfellers. Does that mean the information he gave was bunk?

Not in the least.

If he wants to build a movement of solid credible proof, then brings in team players that can have their lifeswork debunked in a few minutes, credibility goes right out the window for that movement.

But who is it that can do that and how exactly? No one has yet to answer that question. Who is it that is going to “debunk his life’s work in a few minutes” and how?

Listen to the pod yourself and base your own opinion on what you hear before you then let me know what you think.

What pod? You’ve offered no link.

Thanks. Will give a listen.

EDIT:

Having listened to the podcast, I’d say Stephen Bassett is on the up and up. I might not agree with everything 100% he’s said, but he’s a legitimate researcher that doesn’t seem to be into disinformation.

Regardless, however, it doesn’t really matter whether he is or isn’t “legitimate” (although, again, he does appear to be legitimate to me), as ET existence is REAL. I personally don’t worry too much about the minutia or who is or isn’t “real” because I have a pretty strong understanding myself and on my own - independent of any other external individual - that regardless of what anyone says, the existence of ETs on and around planet Earth is in fact a reality. Outside information doesn't validate or invalidate it one way or the other because I’ve had personal experiences that give me a good idea about the bigger picture in general. Do some people have a closer idea than others? Sure. Of course. Do I put people like Stephen Bassett and Steven Greer in the realm of “disinformation agents”? Not at all, and there hasn’t been as far as I’ve seen any good, justifiable real reason for people to see them as that.

I meant to say "any means of structure where the power is spread vertically amongst the people and not horizontally creating a pyramid / means of control & slavery".

Okay. I can understand that. Definitely.

when there is more centralized power in a vertical session, there is more more inequality / tyranny / means of control over everyone else.

Hell this is almost a total inevitability when you structure things in this manner.

This is as opposed to de-centralized forms of socio-economic structures, where the power is spread amongst the people and people are not controlled / restricted / extorted.

Correct and agreed.

I essentially agree with the general direction of everything else you said. Definitely

i have myself second guessing all these races that are supposedly visiting us.

Nothing wrong with that. There is much, MUCH disinformation and misinformation run amok on this planet. It confuses and muddies the waters of truth, which is what TPTB want. It makes things all the more difficult to effectively investigate. We’re all likely wrong about some specific aspects of the extraterrestrial dynamic. Ultimately, however, 1) the dynamic is real, 2) I would say that some races have contacted certain humans on this planet, and 3) I’d even say that they some ETs are currently here and have been for quite some time.

I can say there is a strong enough of an evidence to say yes, we are being visited for a long time, with good evidence of that the last century, but I cannot confirm the authenticity of the information of actual ET races/names.

Again, the specifics in terms of WHICH races there are may be erred here and there. The general, broad strokes, however, in terms of our being contacted period are likely entirely accurate.

This whole idea of the galactic federation, although sounds pleasants, could very well be all disinfo.

The GENERAL idea of a grouping of races that have cooperated with one another for the mutual benefit of all members in the group, I would say, does not seem a very far-fetched idea in the least to me.

If you have any credible sources let me know

I guess the real question here, however, is “who and what is a credible source”?

I, for example, have been doing pretty extensive research into an individual who seems to be a Captain in a special top secret “black” project of the Marines and his information, data, and testimony seems to be amongst some of the most compelling I’ve come across to date. Does this mean he can’t be lying? No. He seems to have all the earmarks of truth as far as I can discern, however.

Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project seems to provide pretty substantial - if not definitive - indication of ET presence on this planet also, as well as the Citizen Hearing On Disclosure.

Ultimately, and again, specifics may be difficult to effectively ascertain. The broad strokes, however, pretty directly point toward the truth of ET existence on and around planet Earth.

My history of debunking people have lead me to believe half the 'alternative media' movement are agents..

And many may be. Doesn’t keep the general truth from still being the case, however.

Given 95% of the UFO videos are hoaxes / fakes

Not that many. Over half not being genuine is likely true. Not as many as 95%, however.