Were the exploding train cars full of oil subliminal motivation from oil companies to help get the Keystone Bill passed?
47 2015-02-25 by [deleted]
Sorry for self post. I haven't seen a source for this yet.
I think it's an interesting idea
47 2015-02-25 by [deleted]
Sorry for self post. I haven't seen a source for this yet.
I think it's an interesting idea
22 comments
8 MelvinMole 2015-02-25
Photo Montage
3 dejenerate 2015-02-25
Don't forget the Mayflower, Arkansas pipeline breach in April 2013, though that was pushed behind headlines fast - not good for Keystone XL seeing what those people were having to deal with. Those people's houses are still...you guessed it...on the market...
2 AggregateTurtle 2015-02-25
Lac Megantic is my most familiar, which has sabotage written all over it.
Unattended train catches fire in the middle of the night in a siding, burning for hours as pressure builds up in the tanker cars... then the brakes just ''come off'' on their own, train rolls into town and boom. A BLEVE explosion. Just so much random coincidence for it to happen exactly as it did.
2 MelvinMole 2015-02-25
7 ShillinInTheNameOf 2015-02-25
Interesting. I heard that the man parked it on the tracks and fled. He was later found and taken into custody.... That's seems a little sketchy. Park a car on the tracks and flee? Beastie Boys "sabotage" is playing in my head right now.
6 DoctorMiracles 2015-02-25
John Dvorak at the NoAgenda podcast presented an interesting theory about those on their 697 episode. Check on 'Clips and Stuff', 'JCD Clips', the 'Tankers' clips. In a nutshell: the tanks used by companies are not suited for the type of highly volatile oil being transported, which is causing train accidents.Why hasn't this been reported on the media? They don't want to lose the advertising.
6 dejenerate 2015-02-25
It was reported, but just in Mother Jones as far as I know: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/05/oil-tank-trains-bakken-crude-accidents
3 one_cheek_sneak 2015-02-25
Very interesting idea, reminds me of the several oil spills that happened last year.
3 Oilfield__Trash 2015-02-25
Jesus Christ
2 revoman 2015-02-25
Wait, it passed?
5 nerhampton 2015-02-25
Vetoed
3 PoGuDu 2015-02-25
No. Congress passed it but Obama vetoed it. It won't go into effect
0 NorwaySpruce 2015-02-25
It was already out of congress by the time the train crashed your point is moot
1 PoGuDu 2015-02-25
There have been train car leaks and derailments for the past few years.
1 NorwaySpruce 2015-02-25
Suppose that's true. The bill is dead though so it didn't work
1 PoGuDu 2015-02-25
I bet it will be back in a year
2 dejenerate 2015-02-25
You may be onto something...141 "unintentional releases" of hydrocarbons from railroad cars last year - here's one of the best articles I've seen that may interest you: http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2015/02/18/tanker-cars-still-burning-burning-questions-about-oil-transport/
The fines being levied for the fuckups are a joke, too.
2 HorseThieff 2015-02-25
Everything we are exposed to is for a reason. The keystone pipeline seems one of a few reasons. Tptb like to kill multiple birds per stone. For this one: Obama seems like a hero, further pollution of fresh water by "leaky train cars", and of course further distraction from the issues that really matter. Not to mention $$$profit$$$ for the tycoons
0 MUHBISCUITS 2015-02-25
I think it may have been, which is why there hasn't been tremendous uproar for an overhaul to these outdated unsafe methods.
0 NorwaySpruce 2015-02-25
No because
1) It was already out of congress by then
2) It was vetoed
-8 69_Me_Senpai 2015-02-25
Actually the entire 2010 and 2014 elections were rigged by the oil companies to get a republican majority so that Keystone would pass. But they needed to throw the public off the trail so they also orchestrated the election of Obama in 2008, knowing he would veto it. In addition, they needed to ensure Obama's election so they sent Hurricane Katrina and convinced the Bush administration to invade Iraq so people would distrust a Republican. But also they needed someone who would invade Iraq, so they also rigged the 2000 election. Now they needed people not to question that so they also ensured Clinton won in 1992 and 96 so that the cover story in 2000 was that people wanted a change.
1 JamesColesPardon 2015-02-25
So meta. But needs more lizards.