Ever wonder what happened to the judge who ruled the the DuPont child molestation case? Where the judge said he was not a good candidate for prison after being convicted of molesting his own 3 year old daughter sexually?
51 2015-03-15 by [deleted]
This case really burns me. So I been stewing over it finally looked up some of the post sentencing goings on. WTF! SHE GOT PROMOTED DEC. 2014. Looking at her rulings she seems opposite of liberal denying most motions from defendants. Well except for Dupont. Dupont seems to own most of fricken Delaware. Plus very charitable. She is now the highest superior court judge in the state. Seems riddled with conspiracy. Any thoughts or more info?
7 comments
21 twsmith 2015-03-15
You could include a link or two, or even a name
http://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2014/12/16/senate-committee-oks-jurden-president-judge/20495029/
11 no1113 2015-03-15
Straight up corruption. This is the state we live in - the country we live in. This is 100% corruption right here. Nothing but.
9 Bacore 2015-03-15
Someone should have planted a joint on that rapist pedophile. THEN he might have gotten some jail time.
Rape your kids... just don't smoke pot.
4 cali_gunner 2015-03-15
I got downvoted by paeddit in r/news for pointing this out a while ago that this judge got promoted for protecting a rapist paedophile. Go figure.
2 tazcatlipoca 2015-03-15
This is what Fascism looks like. They have a different set of rules that applies to them. Doesn't get ANY MORE OBVIOUS with "rulings" like this, and after effects like this.
1 s70n3834r 2015-03-15
Even judges have to go along to get along; and if they go along, they can get along very well. I recall wondering at the time what more there was to the defendant than simply being a DuPont; with regard to secret societies and such. Didn't care enough to follow it up though.
3 compliancekid78 2015-03-15
It doesn't really matter these days.
The self-appointed rulers own the judges and courts so secret societies are more or less redundant.