A relevant paragraph of 1984
73 2015-04-03 by conradsymes
In some ways she was far more acute than Winston, and far less susceptible to Party propaganda. Once when he happened in some connexion to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened'. This was an idea that had literally never occurred to him. She also stirred a sort of envy in him by telling him that during the Two Minutes Hate her great difficulty was to avoid bursting out laughing. But she only questioned the teachings of the Party when they in some way touched upon her own life. Often she was ready to accept the official mythology, simply because the difference between truth and falsehood did not seem important to her. She believed, for instance, having learnt it at school, that the Party had invented aeroplanes. (In his own schooldays, Winston remembered, in the late fifties, it was only the helicopter that the Party claimed to have invented; a dozen years later, when Julia was at school, it was already claiming the aeroplane; one generation more, and it would be claiming the steam engine.) And when he told her that aeroplanes had been in existence before he was born and long before the Revolution, the fact struck her as totally uninteresting. After all, what did it matter who had invented aeroplanes? It was rather more of a shock to him when he discovered from some chance remark that she did not remember that Oceania, four years ago, had been at war with Eastasia and at peace with Eurasia. It was true that she regarded the whole war as a sham: but apparently she had not even noticed that the name of the enemy had changed. 'I thought we'd always been at war with Eurasia,' she said vaguely. It frightened him a little. The invention of aeroplanes dated from long before her birth, but the switchover in the war had happened only four years ago, well after she was grown up. He argued with her about it for perhaps a quarter of an hour. In the end he succeeded in forcing her memory back until she did dimly recall that at one time Eastasia and not Eurasia had been the enemy. But the issue still struck her as unimportant. 'Who cares?' she said impatiently. 'It's always one bloody war after another, and one knows the news is all lies anyway.'
11 comments
11 duckieducks 2015-04-03
Upvote. Animal Farm is your next read. :)
4 conradsymes 2015-04-03
already read it, just felt like getting some free Karma after this paragraph became relevant to a discussion on some other forum
5 duckieducks 2015-04-03
Your next read: "Steppenwolf". Get ready for your mind to be blown. If you have time to read "The Stranger", too, they work so well in tandem.
2 AlexandruBirsanu 2015-04-03
There's an interesting connection between this paragraph and the ability of the reader to build a better overall picture when multiple divergent views are brought to the table.
1 Apoplectic1 2015-04-03
Brave New World is a similar concept as 1984, but taken to the extreme opposite direction. Also a great read.
2 treerat 2015-04-03
Dont forget Kafka's "The Trial"
1 Flytape 2015-04-03
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/30kdws/so_am_i_the_only_one_when_reading_about_the/cpt9i5n?context=3
Tangentially connected conversation from a few days ago.
3 JamesColesPardon 2015-04-03
/Shameless plug begins
Also relevant is a great discussion from a self-post about 1984/Room 101 from a a week ago
/shameless plug ends
2 LetsHackReality 2015-04-03
Great damn post
1 JamesColesPardon 2015-04-03
Awww thanks buddy.
1 Potss 2015-04-03
Great excerpt, the entire book (and pretty much all of Orwell's works) are extremely relevant today.