An interesting e-mail from the Sony email leaks from Wikileaks
208 2015-04-20 by [deleted]
In an e-mail from vice president Steven to FOX, Disney, Viacom and Warnerbros, he is describing the steps to start censoring websites with the help of ISPs. The 4th step in the censorship process caught my eye:
Outreach to academics, think tanks and other third parties to foster the publication of research papers, white papers and other articles that tell the positive story of site blocking: e.g., it is commonplace around the world and working smoothly; it has not broken the internet; it is not incompatible with DNSSEC; it is effective; legitimate sites/content have not been blocked; etc.
It is interesting that he even lists the conclusions the supposedly scientific academics should arrive at ;)
53 comments
33 quantumcipher 2015-04-20
Nice catch. These leaks are becoming more and more interesting, by the day. Kudos for WikiLeaks, for having the balls to actually do this.
1 iHate_Rddt_Msft_Goog 2015-04-20
What doesn't Jullian Assange have the balls to actually do?
19 Irradiance 2015-04-20
Nice to know they intend to block a whole lot of "offensive" sites to create a case for blocking "copyright infringement sites." What will it be, another pedoscare? Or something new and imaginative?
14 ronintetsuro 2015-04-20
WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILDREN
3 DaneelR 2015-04-20
They are looking into ways of hindering discussions about children abuse by the elites, so in a way, they are thinking of the children.
2 7412147896327412 2015-04-20
I say they'll go after misogyny and racism, pedophilia is kind of played out at this point, the general public cares quite a bit more about discrimination. Hell most of the people here on reddit would be a-ok with the government censoring Westboro Baptist Church.
1 lolurwack 2015-04-20
they should go after misogyny when feminism, a movement that is literally hypocritical from the starting point of it's name, is gaining infinite steam the last few years? nahhh
1 rcglinsk 2015-04-20
Yeah, because it's the kids who don't realize clicking here will download malware.
19 Frontfart 2015-04-20
No. Academics used as political and corporate puppets? Say it isn't so.
7 txstoploss 2015-04-20
The State Science Institute: Not just in some old book any more.
8 KingContext 2015-04-20
Science Inc.
9 txstoploss 2015-04-20
It's more than .Inc. "Inc" can't keep your kid out of school or just take her. They can't Eminent Domain a fracking site. They can't SWAT an organic farmer or seed-trader.
EDIT: Eminent
3 Apoplectic1 2015-04-20
They can't yet.
4 KingContext 2015-04-20
Monsanto did subcontract Academi/Xe/Blackwater...
2 iHate_Rddt_Msft_Goog 2015-04-20
Also known as 3/4 the Reddit demographic. Scientifically illiterate science fundamentalists.
6 beauseph 2015-04-20
yeah remember when ten years ago all you had to do was pay a couple of American Psychological Association psychologists millions of dollars to condone and approve torture, and bam its suddenly a secret policy? funny how money has that affect, and still does to this day! Too bad those sociopaths will never be studied.
2 reconsideryourbelief 2015-04-20
Big tobacco showed us how it's done best; but snake oil salesmen have been around for centuries.
1 bashar_speaks 2015-04-20
Can't tell if sarcasm or not.
1 lookitsmeyay 2015-04-20
It's sarcasm. As someone that's had quite a lot of experience with research, every project is only funded if it 1) makes companies more rich or 2) fulfills some political agenda.
The shit people will do to be recognized by the scientific community is incredible. It's all about how many papers you can crank out and how effective the results are in vouching for your supporter. Most scientists have given up on just doing shit to see what happens.
12 Enochx 2015-04-20
Thanks Jews!
The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) is an American trade association that represents the six major Hollywood studios.
90% of the U.S. Media is owned by Israel First Zionist-Jews
Now, let us take a deeper look into the ownership, presidents, VP's and other board members of these 6 corporations. ( GE, Disney, News Corp, Via Com, Time Warner, and CBS )
CBS - is owned by Murray Rothstein. He changed his name to Sumner Redstone to pass himself off as a blue-blooded Gentile.
http://www.cbscorporation.com/ourcompany-board.php?id=118&member=109
NBC - owned by Brian Roberts
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-13/comcast-s-nbc-purchase-pushes-roberts-into-entertainment.html
ABC - owned by Sydney Bass with Robert Iger as CEO, successor to Michael Eisner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Iger
CNN - under the umbrella of Time-Warner (which includes Time and People Magazine) primarily owned by Israeli multi-millionaire Aviv Nevo who hired a public relations company to shield him from public exposure. CNN’s CEO is Jeff Zucker, former CEO of NBC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviv_Nevo
Fox News - owned by Rupert Murdoch—born to Jewish mother Elisabeth Greene—making him by Talmudic law, a Jew. Murdoch also owns the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post.
Read Murdoch's own words as he spews the complete laundry list of propaganda points of Zionist-Jews.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/I-am-not-Jewish-but
March 4 speech to the American Jewish Committee by the chairman and CEO of News Corporation on receiving its National Human Relations Award.
Newsweek - owned by Jane Harman and Barry Diller.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Harman
Yes... Jane Harman the Zionist-Jew caught on tape by the FBI making deals with known Israeli Mossad Agents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Harman#2009_Wiretap.2FAIPAC_Allegations
The Washington Post - owned by the Meyer-Graham family, with Donald Graham as Chairman. Dave Goldberg is CEO and Barry Diller is Senior Executive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_E._Graham
2013 - purchase of The Washington Post by Amazon’s Jewish CEO Jeff Bezos is not the first time a Jew has bailed out the newspaper.
http://www.jewishpress.com/tag/jeff-bezos/
The New York Times - owned by the Sulzberger family, with Arthur Sulzberger Jr as Chairman of the Board.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Ochs_Sulzberger
Facebook (formerly [thefacebook]) is an online social networking service headquartered in Menlo Park, California. Its website was launched on February 4, 2004, by Mark Zuckerberg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
Reddit.com - Reddit became a direct subsidiary of Condé Nast's parent company, Advance Publications, in September 2011. As of August 2012, Reddit operates as an independent entity, although Advance is still its largest shareholder.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit
Samuel Irving Newhouse, Sr. (May 24, 1895 – August 29, 1979) was an American broadcasting businessman, magazine and newspaper publisher. He was the founder of Advance Publications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Irving_Newhouse,_Sr.
Comcast Corporation, formerly registered as Comcast Holdings,[note 1] is an American mass media company and is the largest broadcasting and cable company in the world by revenue.[2] It is the largest cable company and home Internet service provider in the United States,[8] and the nation's third largest home telephone service provider
Comcast is sometimes described as a family business.[23] Brian L. Roberts, Chairman, President, and CEO of Comcast, is son of co-founder Ralph Roberts. Brian owns or controls just over 1% of all Comcast shares but all of the Class B supervoting shares, which gives him an "undilutable 33% voting power over the company".[24] Legal expert Susan P. Crawford has said this gives him "effective control over its [Comcast's] every step".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast
4 x6r 2015-04-20
Post this comment as a new post, it's pretty good. It should piss off the Jewish shitposting lurkers around here.
-4 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
Is conspiracy anti-Semitic? Obviously not!
7 Dornerthecoroner 2015-04-20
Reality is anti semitic
-1 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
Facts are not anti-Semitic, but pointing out the number of Jews in power in order to paint them as evil is pretty anti-semetic.
3 rustyjames13 2015-04-20
That does not make you an anti-Semite.
I hate the Jewish religion because I hate all religions. I hate when Jews collude to disenfranchise others because I hate collusion to disenfranchise others. Yet I am not an anti-Semite because I do not hate people for having a Semitic heritage.
-4 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
The point is that you think that Jews are colluding. Nobody ever thinks this about the vast majority of Christians in congress. They don't say it is a Christian conspiracy.
0 rustyjames13 2015-04-20
What you call the "Christian conspiracy" really falls under the "Jewish conspiracy." The power in pluralist democracy doesn't come from the politicians, it comes from big money. The vast majority of big money influencing the West is Jewish and Zionist Jews in particular openly talk about their goals. These goals disenfranchise our citizen's financial, social, and privacy freedoms across the board, let alone support the terrorist "Jewish nation" of Israel. That's not racist or bigoted, just unfortunate facts.
-2 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
Never mind, there is no point in arguing with you about Jews based on your post history. Every other post is something bashing Jews.
1 Enochx 2015-04-20
0 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
What did I say that was wrong? The poster is clearly anti-Semitic. Read the post history
1 Enochx 2015-04-20
You clearly attempted to claim that "Every other post is something bashing Jews." Which is the very definition of poisoning the well.
So in your mind is telling the ugly truth about "Israel First", warmongering Zionis-Jews ACTUALLY bashing them, or is it really a truth that you can't accept?
Here is a bit of truth for you...
Checkmate.... you fucking weasel.
0 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
No, I don't care if you bash Israel. Using "jew" as a pejorative as is clearly used in the comments is anti-semetic. There are also racist comments in there describing black people as chimps. So I guess the bar is not very high.
1 Enochx 2015-04-20
Let me guess... You are going to attempt to apply "The Jewish Double-Standard" here?
Goy, Goyim, Goyum A Hebrew biblical term for "Nation" or "People".[104] By Roman times it had also acquired the meaning of "non-Jew". In English, usage may be controversial, it can be assigned pejoratively to non-Jews.[105][106][107]
Schvartse, Schwartze Literally "black", a Yiddish or German term for someone of African descent.[207]
Shiksa (Yiddish) a non-Jewish woman. Derived from the Hebrew root Shin-Qof-Tzadei (שקץ), meaning loathsome or abomination.[210]
Shkutzim (Yiddish) non-Jewish men, especially those perceived to be anti-Semitic. The singular is sheigetz.[104]
Also, Is not the Talmud the first historical race-based legal system which actually codified the overt bigotry of that culture?
1 Enochx 2015-04-20
Can't dispute the facts? ... then falsely cry "Antisemite"!
8 Dysnomi 2015-04-20
But censorship is scientifically proven to keep us smarter, haven't you seen the peer reviewed papers on it? Are you anti-SCIENCE?
Nope, just anti-Zcientist.
5 a_shill 2015-04-20
There was another discussion here the other day about this. Some interesting comments and viewpoints; might be worth checking out.
6 [deleted] 2015-04-20
[deleted]
5 a_shill 2015-04-20
I think this is the first time anyone's thanked me on this sub. You are most certainly welcome. :)
5 Dornerthecoroner 2015-04-20
THANK YOU MERCHANT YOU ARE MY GREATEST ALLY
4 KingContext 2015-04-20
Thanks for posting this.
3 FranktheShank1 2015-04-20
Got to love "science" in this country.
3 Flytape 2015-04-20
Its not just this country.
3 shadowofashadow 2015-04-20
Haha wow, the irony. What we used to call "the great firewall of China" and a human rights abuse is now something to look at in envy and amazement.
3 muh_holocawst 2015-04-20
"Legitimate".
Of course, they will determine who is and is not "legitimate".
2 toontoon3 2015-04-20
burning books is commonplace around the world and working smoothly; it has not broken the library system; it is not incompatible with free speech and a free, democratic model of society; it is effective; legitimate books have not been burned.
1 ronintetsuro 2015-04-20
Who do you work for and who gave you the authority to make this call??
2 JTMTL 2015-04-20
This was already done with academics in the finance industry. Here is one that keeps telling the truth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic:_The_Story_of_Modern_Financial_Insanity
2 brownestrabbit 2015-04-20
Standard Operating Procedure.
2 heracleides 2015-04-20
You know something is full of shit when you have to justify it by any means necessary.
2 chowdercrotch 2015-04-20
As an academic, i find this repulsive. :x
1 Dysnomi 2015-04-20
And they want us to doubt these sorts of emails exist over vaccines, GMOs, fracking, you name it...
1 txstoploss 2015-04-20
What? You want people starving while dying of swine flu, while waiting in 24-hour gas lines?
1 Dysnomi 2015-04-20
¿
1 yyhhggt 2015-04-20
That's how all of economics works. Why do you think the Bank employ them for?
4 x6r 2015-04-20
Post this comment as a new post, it's pretty good. It should piss off the Jewish shitposting lurkers around here.
-4 crazygoalie2002 2015-04-20
Is conspiracy anti-Semitic? Obviously not!
7 Dornerthecoroner 2015-04-20
Reality is anti semitic
1 Enochx 2015-04-20
Can't dispute the facts? ... then falsely cry "Antisemite"!