Hello?? Think McFly, think.

Its the magic fireball. You know how one bullet caused 5 wounds between JFK and Connely? Same principle.

Couldn't be more obvious than that.

High heat.

Dr. Judy Wood wrote a whole book about it:

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Haha

I think Dr Wood has done excellent research on the issue, and feel she has a lot of good points and valid questions. I think a new investagation will provide answers to them.

I don't think the exotic theory is the way to get the typical person believing the official theory on board with the demand for a new investagation. Its obviously been hard enough for them to accept what most people see with common sense, in that the official story is bs. It is a lost cause if you are trying to convince them something exotic was used, when no one knows exactely what it was.

I dont think her work is BS, I think if trying to convince someone we need a new investagation, that there are more believable hard to get around arguements to get them on board. Imo anyway

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qYm1AnUKi8

What were there radiation levels on "Ground Zero"? Why was it even called that? What is usually described with that term? What actually provided the explosion that emitted white smoke that could've never come from the plane, office fires or thermite? Might as well have been mini-nukes.

http://www.reopen911.org/ReOpen911_2007Archive/GZero_Sample.pdf

Edit:

https://youtu.be/Nbh_Z6lU4QU?t=19m25s

hmmmmm

Hurricane Erin might have been used as a Tesla Coil to produce a directed energy weapon. Please check out http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

*** lots of disinfo agents will turn you away from this... but don't judge till you watch the videos/lectures... eyes opened***

I believe Dr. Woods theory more than I do the controlled demolition theories.

I have put it out there just like you have and yes the disinfo agents come out in hordes.

Dont be discouraged by them, see them as evidence that you are getting closer to the truth.

I think her studies have merit, however, trying to convince someone that doesn't want to believe the theorys other than the official one of Dr. Judy Wood's analyis...... Might want to use a different arguement. Hutchinson doesn't even have a full handle on his expirements, so trying to explain something he himself cannot fully do, is definetely an up hill fight.

The fact they haven't released the tapes from the pentagon, not whats on them, just they haven't released them, is hard for people to rationalize. And the physics of the "collapses". Without Dr. Wood's theories. Which again, I think there is something too. But never use that when debating anyone on the issues.

Were they moved to give access to the site for clean-up crews?

Emp blast from a nuclear explosion.

If it was an EMP strong enough to melt a truck, there would have been a lot more dead electronics.

... and people.

No, not necessarily. A clean nuke doesn't necessarily dump a lot of fallout, although there is some. And there is a growing surge of cancers of various kinds among the 9/11 responders.

But if there was heat enough to melt cars that would have nothing to do with fallout. It would be thermal radiation or the thermal shock wave. Both of which would have "melted People" if it was strong enough to melt cars at the same distance. Are you suggesting that a nuke could melt a car but people in the same radius would be fine? Come on...

Also define "clean nuke". Are those capable if getting hot enough to melt metal but nothing else? That sounds ridiculous.

I gotcha, I thought you were talking about radiation deaths. No, anything hot enough to melt a car should incinerate a human. And indeed, I remember seeing a picture of the outline of a human burned into the side of a fire truck, but I can't find it now.

A clean nuke is one that converts most of its mass into energy, leaving little mass behind as radionuclides. As compared to a "dirty" nuke which dumps fallout everywhere.

Even if this were true, an EMP blast has zero effect on anything more than electronics. No heatwave is produced by an EMP blast. None.

This is trolling on several levels. Well done

Not really. there's good evidence to suggest that. I'm not going to do the work for you I could care less if you don't want to find it

u do know what emp is right?

My bad.

In my defense sometimes it's really hard to differentiate between a troll and a fool

Ah the old "the info is out there go look" defense. EMPs don't create heat. Period. Even if you think one did go off that's not how physics works.

I heard they will fry the electronics.

They do. But they don't create heat or melt metal. It's an electro magnetic force, not a thermal one. They ruin electronics but not because they melt them.

Thanks for trying to be helpful rather than all the rude assholes in here.

Dude people who play call of duty have a better understanding of EMPs then you do

Haha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qYm1AnUKi8

I think Dr Wood has done excellent research on the issue, and feel she has a lot of good points and valid questions. I think a new investagation will provide answers to them.

I don't think the exotic theory is the way to get the typical person believing the official theory on board with the demand for a new investagation. Its obviously been hard enough for them to accept what most people see with common sense, in that the official story is bs. It is a lost cause if you are trying to convince them something exotic was used, when no one knows exactely what it was.

I dont think her work is BS, I think if trying to convince someone we need a new investagation, that there are more believable hard to get around arguements to get them on board. Imo anyway