It was advertising for the movie. Look up who owns the theater and then pay attention to the stock clips piled together to produce the official story. They also never showed the inside of the theater after it had been shot up, red flag.

Yeah that's perfect advertisement: Make people scared to see a movie they were already going to see! The previous movie made millions and millions, meaning they wouldn't need a publicity stunt to promote the most-anticipated Batman movie ever.

I remember the hype at the time people were all excited to see batman and making jokes like I hope I don't get shot. Brilliant scheme to get the sheeple out to the movies once again.

Brilliant scheme to get the sheeple out to the movies once again.

So the shooting was to get people to see a movie they weren't going to see because of the shooting?

It wasn't a real shooting if you understood how hollywood's non linear timeline works it would be easier to grasp the concept of media fakery. Like i said look up who owns the theater and follow the money, i won't hold your hand with this... If you want to research it you can if not then that is your business.

How do shitposts like these get upvoted?

They looked up who owns the theater and followed the money.

So let me get this straight

The most anticipated movie of the year

Is further helped by people who were going to see it being discouraged to see it because of potential violence

And by people who were not going to see it, not seeing it because of fear of potential violence

What is the gain here vs. Staying course and not doing a shooting?

they were TALKING about the movie

Everyone was already talking about the movie. The shootings didn't make the most anticipated batman movie any more talked about.

in a negative way that discouraged people from seeing the movie that was already the most anticipated movie of the year

i cant believe you guys actually believe this crap

If you can't grasp the concept of insider viral marketing then so be it.

if you cant live in reality and prefer your conspiracy bubble then so be it

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/?yr=2012 $$$$$$$$

Your point being

Aaaaand this is why everyone thinks conspiracy theorists are nut jobs.

Look up who owns the theater and follow the money.

It would be pretty much impossible for anyone to shoot up a public place without someone being able to say "look up who owns X and follow the money".

It doesn't mean anything. Rich people own things.

nobody shot it up

Why because of ad hominem attacks?

You're kidding right? Why do you people believe absolutely everything is a cover up or fake? Can nothing bad ever happen and it just be a bad thing that happens? What news outlet would show a bloody movie theatre? What good would that do? Give me a break man.

First off I am obviously NOT kidding and you know that. Next you ask a loaded question. Then you ask another loaded question but it is poorly worded. What good would what do? A break on what?

I never even thought about this; I'll have to add it to my list of things to look into on the weekends.

Also keep in mind that if the media can fake stuff like this... Then they can also use their media assets for advertising in ways you wouldn't expect. For instance sketchers is owned by an elite family that intertwined with the main stream media. The news can then put out a story "police man gives shoes to homeless man" and the shoes are sketchers shoes. Easy Advertising for your company and the people eat it up as reality.

I did not know that about Sketchers! You learn something new here everyday! Thanks :)

[deleted]

I remember a story going around about a police officer giving a homeless man some shoes, I don't know if they were sketchers or not, I think he gave him his boots. I get what he was saying though and it makes sense. I just had a blonde moment lol.