Why isn't more being done by the world to fight IS?
0 2015-05-17 by [deleted]
The threat of IS is constantly pushed in our face. If it is such a threat to our way of life, why isn't more being done by world leaders to combat it? All the West seems to be doing in the Middle East is pointless skirmishes, e.g. news headlines 'Top IS commander killed in Syria'. Are we just waiting for a 9/11 before our governments get their ass into gear or is there a reason why there isn't a full crackdown/retaliation to IS yet?
edit: assholes
29 comments
7 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
They are the US's new boogieman, which happen to be funded by the CIA, MI6, and Mossad. Just another way to keep the world in terror, in order to justify a never ending war on terror. Gotta keep that MIC chugging along because it's the only thing propping up the US economy.
4 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
I was about to post the same thing, but I would also include the House of Saud in that mix, since they have the same skin in the game and assist all three of these intelligence agencies. There isn't more being done to fight them, because they are working exactly as designed by the ruling world powers.
1 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
I agree. They are definitely also being funded by many US friendly Arab countries (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc).
0 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Jordan, for example, provides the training grounds for Syrian rebels (many of whom have become ISIS), which is a US operation. They are flown out from Turkey in small groups os 20 or so. PBS Frontline did a great report on this. I'll try to find it.
2 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
Correct. The US government is funding the Free Syrian Army which is spawning IS fighters and they are interchangeable in the ranks. Fight in Syria, fight in Iraq. Warmongering McCain, actually met with these fucks and openly spouts we need to fund them to topple Assad. Most of the FSA are not Syrian, but international mercenaries (IE. AQ and co). CIA textbook strategy at show here.
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
And then the real question is....why? Well, I have an answer for that. The war in Syria is a battle over the US wanting a gas pipeline running through it from Qatar to feed Europe, while Russia already feeds gas to Europe. That's why Russia is supporting Assad and the US is supporting the rebels. Follow the money, right?
US news headlines: RUSSIA IS BAD
2 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
I agree, also...Russia actually just signed a deal recently to bypass EU pipeline and make EU export gas via Turkey (at their own cost). Israel and the West are not very happy about this.
-1 [deleted] 2015-05-17
[deleted]
3 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
I/we cannot give you hard proof because it's a CIA clandestine op. But, what we can give you is... The CIA funded the very organization and people which brought you Al-Qaeda via the Mujaheddin, in the Afghan/Soviet war. OSB was a Saudi (radical Wahhabi) not an afghan, and we funded and trained them to fight the soviets. These very same people went off to create havoc/terrorism in Chechnya, which was another clandestine op against the Russians. This has been going on for a long, long time.
End goal? I honestly do not think they have one. Get while the getting is good. Lots of people are making a shit tonne of money off all this. Bomb a country, hire your contractors to rebuild while installing a puppet government which will sell their country out to corps seeking natural resources. There is also the drug trading, weapons trading, etc etc. Lot's of money in this.
In my opinion, there is never 1 specific purpose. They do these things for many different purposes, one of which (I think), is the NWO coming to fruition via WW3.
3 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
I can add to this: The end goal is clearly stated in this book, The Grand Chessboard. The author, Brzezinski, is on all kinds of foreign policy boards along with Kissinger and the likes. There is most definitely an end game, but I sincerely doubt they will get there. The BRIC alliance is determined to stop them. (Brazil, Russia, India, China).
2 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
Brzezinski and Kissinger deserve a filthy place in hell when their time comes, that's for sure.
However, that is if the BRICS aren't apart of the scheme. It just seems too good to be true. I hope a new paradigm shifts, but, I'm worried that this is just the game going as planned...sigh... Not too mention, this would be like a shotgun wound to the US... Crazy when you think about it.
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Try not to worry too much. BRIC is real and they are afraid, so they are making moves. I think we have to have a little hope, buddy. :)
2 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
I try to have hope, but you have to realize.. Big dogs do not go down without a fight. If the BRICS are legit, there is a major fight ahead of us.
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Indeed. But let's try to stay positive. Raise a fist every now again if you need to feel your own strength.
2 Putin_loves_cats 2015-05-17
Indeed and cheers. This Guinness swig is for you!
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
This Sierra Nevada swig is for you! :) haha.
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Here is just a start to your rabbit hole journey. Start with Al Qaeda:
Al Qaeda, CIA and Afghanistan
Al Qaeda, used in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Al Qaeda has now been tied to 9/11, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and whatever country's crisis will come next.
ISIS is the new Al Qaeda now that Bin Laden is dead....the new boogie man to fight. Haven't you noticed how many times Al-Baghdadi, the supposed head of ISIS, has apparently died? I think we are now working on 9 scenarios and he keeps rising from the dead.
-1 citation_needed- 2015-05-17
[citation needed]
3 no1113 2015-05-17
Because ISIS is a creation of the two most bullying militaries on the planet: The United States and Israel.
-1 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
You've got half of it right, but you are missing a few others. This isn't just a US/Isreal plot. To say so lets the other guilty parties off the hook.
0 no1113 2015-05-17
I agree. I was just bringing to light the two biggest culprits. But yes, you are correct. There are definitely others in cahoots.
-1 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
I'm sure you think Israel is the 2nd or 1st bigger culprit, but wow, their GDP accounts for nearly nothing enough to pull their shenanigans off without support. They would be crippled in a second without the US's support. They are no match for the UK, for example, who is a far bigger culprit.
My favorite quote about the US and Israel as of late: "Empires don't have friends. They have subjects."
1 no1113 2015-05-17
Israel isn't the strongest, but it may be P4P the worst, as it has control of the biggest bully on the block: The U.S.
Yep. This 100%.
I wouldn't doubt that the UK is more evil in terms of the depth of its nefariousness...but the U.S. is by far the most overt in its aggression at this point...and Israel, well...again, they have control of the U.S. pretty much.
Yeah. "Who's the subject of who?" is the question. Not sure the U.S. isn't the subject of Israel at this point. :/
-1 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
You think Israel has control over the US??? I'm sorry, but I can't help but laugh. You don't understand that Israel is doing what the US wants not the other way around???
2 no1113 2015-05-17
Hell yeah.
Is that why Zionists are in just about every single position of power in the civilian sector as well as politically?
-1 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Oh goodness. I'm sure I can't convince you, so maybe you can convince me? Show me the money! (lol) Show me the money source going from Israel to the US. I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way.
1 no1113 2015-05-17
Wow. Seriously? You actually DON'T think that Israel is in control of the US? You actually DON'T think that US money doesn't flow nonstop through Israel? O_o. You must be new around here.
Just read this for starters.
...and this.
...and this, and this, and this. And that's only for starters.
...then get back to me.
1 Rockran 2015-05-17
If you had command of a sizeable military, what would you do?
How would you differentiate between civilians and ISIS members?
How would you obtain the precise location of ISIS members?
1 bitcoin_noob 2015-05-17
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11380705
1 JoemeatballsSC2 2015-05-17
Why doesnt IS attack israel or the tony hayward pipepline?
1 Dasinol 2015-05-17
Because it always WON'T BE what it WAS?????????
By definition any 'all out' War on The Great Beast of Metamorphosis IS IS always going to be BECOMING an increasingly non-linear war.
Why? You don't hate trans people do you OP?
2 2ndlinesteps 2015-05-17
Try not to worry too much. BRIC is real and they are afraid, so they are making moves. I think we have to have a little hope, buddy. :)