Remind me: when did someone claim any steel building on fire will collapse, regardless of design or circumstances?

[deleted]

building 7 ...

Your comment does not constitute an answer to my question.

[deleted]

Do you understand the difference between "any building" and "a building"?

[deleted]

So literally every single building ever has identical properties in every single way?

[deleted]

somehow defy physics.

What physics were defied?

[deleted]

[citation needed]

[deleted]

Wow. You couldn't even come up with the tiniest amount of proof or evidence that any laws of physics were somehow "defied," and yet I'm the hopeless one? That's rich, mate.

Maybe Chinese fire isn't as hot as the fire in NYC? Or maybe it just didn't have enough office furniture in it to cause thermal expansion. oh, I know... it didn't have a jet impact it and knock off all the fireproofing. That must be why it still stands.

it didn't have a jet impact it and knock off all the fireproofing. That must be why it still stands.

You should read the NIST report on WTC 7. It suggests that buildings can collapse spontaneously from office fires. No impact necessary.

[deleted]

Yes, they build stronger buildings apparently.

A plane flew into it, too?!

No plane flew into WTC7.

Obfuscate better.

WTC7 still took massive damage from falling debris.

That sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.

NIST concluded that the damage caused by that debris played no role in the collapse.

NIST concluded that the damage caused by that debris played no role in the collapse.

No they didn't. They said it played no role in the initiation of the collapse.

The debris impact damage did play a secondary role in the last stages of the collapse sequence, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located

Do you believe everything the government tells you?

Ironic..

Show us "massive damage"

Have you never seen it?

A superficial flesh wound with no damage to key structural supports?

Source?

Not with you, my friend.

You have no source for your claim that it was a "superficial flesh wound with no damage to key structural support"?

This, kids, is why the "Truth" movement is almost gone.

Nah, we simply don't waste our time with known operatives. Ones not even appreciably trying.

Then why are you responding to my comments? ;)

What's the term you use? Concern trolling?

known operatives

lolwut. How childish can you get?

[deleted]

Stop spamming the same shit video. It answers no questions, and just makes you look foolish.

[deleted]

Then show a better video. The one you show ignores the collapse of the east penthouse and fails to give a proper perspective on the collapse of WTC7.

I'd also suggest not spamming it on every response you don't like, because it certainly doesn't help your case.

So literally every single building ever has identical properties in every single way?

Nah, we simply don't waste our time with known operatives. Ones not even appreciably trying.