Evidence for is published papers and lack of retraction.
Arguments against is an unpublished paper.

It's not some exotic weapon that takes a lot of imagination to understand.

What's been developed since 1993?

A composition of this invention is termed a metastable interstitial composite (MIC). MICs are a new class of energetic materials which provide much more flexibility in their use than unimolecular energetic materials. MICs will be useful in explosives applications and in applications where a source of gas or heat is needed.

I know I can't, but this is a wonderful question.

This four year nano battle at wikipedia is a good read.

[deleted]

Painfully interesting read thanks.

You're welcome. Very tough without the trusty reddit "reply" available. :)

The steel was found to be heavily corroded. The air contained the components of thermite. Molten steel was reported by many. Dust samples showed it.

I personally believe this is how it went down, it seems to make sense to me. I believe explosives would have been far too obvious and a lot more messy. People did report hearing pops all around in initial interviews and I guess that could have been some form of detention caps used to ignite the thermite if it was used.

I did see something where a woman gathered up dust samples to inspect when it happened, seems a bit of a strange thing to do straight after and during the event but I guess if she worked in that field then it might have held interest to her and she might have been thinking ahead for whatever reason. The samples where said to contain small spherical metalic pieces consistent with by product from thermite. Thermite consists of iron and aluminium and I can't see the world trade centres holding any iron of quantity, so it does make it difficult to explain away.

The fact that ground zero was said to be giving off serious heat for a couple of weeks afterwards might give indication of something like that too. I have seen no one giving any arguments against the possiblity, but at the same time as much as I believe in it I haven't seen any hard evidence to back it up, if there is any I haven't seen it out there.

...I haven't seen any hard evidence to back it up, if there is any I haven't seen it out there.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Paging /u/HaltNWO

Eh. Tired of posting stuff that's just a Google search away.

How "convenient."

You post all the time without a care in the word, that is until someone calls you out on your bullshit.

I don't recall commenting in thread until you paged me. Are you confusing me with someone else?

You post all the time

I didn't say "in this thread."

Im saying, in general. You post about 9/11 shit all the time and have no problem with it. Now you're "eh, tired." How convenient

Oh I gotcha. Just kind of tired of the "nanothermite" bullshit. Just gonna let it go the same way as the rest of the 9/11 Truth movement: Down the drain.

If you dont believe in it, and it's believers are delusional/schizophrenic or what ever mental illness you, or just the public in general, like to place on 9/11 truthers, then why do you spend so much time trying to convince otherwise? Why do you care so much? Why not let them believe in it? Do you believe in God? If not, do you harass Christian subs? You see where im going with this? Why cant you let people believe what they want? Is it hurting you that over 50% of Americans now do not believe the official narrative of 9/11? Is over half of America schizophrenic or delusional?

You've still yet to answer me when I've asked what conspiracies you believe in. You say "us" and call yourself a conspiracy theorist. You should have no problem telling me which conspiracies you subscribe to.

Im just trying to figure you out bruh. Everything inside me tells me you're a government paid troll. Which also leads me to believe you wont answer this question thoroughly. Or you'll say you dont feel like explaining yourself.

I see you denying nanothermite, and I've seen you support the office fires collapsing WTC7. Can you debunk the missing $2 trill, the Pentagon, Pennsylvania, the unscathed passport (hahahaa you gotta be literally stupid to believe that one), the dead/missing ground zero witnesses. Can you seriously tell me those witnesses not being able to testify is just a coincidence? If so, you are gullible as fuck and put too much faith in the very people that enslave you. Can you debunk the foreshadowing of 9/11 in movies, WCW/WWF, music? Osama bin Laden's death? The training exercises that day? Dude I could go on and on. Debunk. Lets go.

Is it hurting you that over 50% of Americans now do not believe the official narrative of 9/11? Is over half of America schizophrenic or delusional?

[Citation needed]

Are you ok? You seem quite irate that someone chooses to form their own opinions and do their own research instead of believe whatever an anonymous blog says.

Im perfectly fine. But like I said, you wont reply to this thoroughly.

Here's your link sweetheart

It's because I don't feed trolls; I slowly starve them and leave them to die.

Im not trolling. And you're dodging questions lmao. If it walks like a shill, talks like a shill, it must be......

What have I dodged? You've asked way too many questions to have been serious.

Still dodging

Dodging what?

Still dodging.

against? well none! it's mostly.. DERRRRRR popular mechanics said no.. DEURURURRRRRR NIST Report didn't mention it .. DEUURURURRRRRR

Has thermite [not even nano-thermite] ever been used anywhere else to carry out the controlled demolition of an entire building? If not, its sudden awesome performance on 9/11 in this field seems unlikely. If it was that good, I think the private sector would be using at least some independently-developed version of it by now, 14 years later.

Has thermite [not even nano-thermite] ever been used anywhere else to carry out the controlled demolition of an entire building?

Not that I know of.

...If not, its sudden awesome performance on 9/11 in this field seems unlikely.

Nobody thought to make use of Nanoengineered explosives from 1996 to 2001? Unlikely.

Im not trolling. And you're dodging questions lmao. If it walks like a shill, talks like a shill, it must be......