Dr. Tracy,

Many of us know that the 2012 Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" includes a scene with a map which references Sandy Hook (with the relative location of Sandy Hook Elementary School circled in red pen).

http://zazenlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/23045gotham-map.jpg

Edit: Here is a short video showing an overlay with Sandy Hook Elementary School in google earth.

This "coincidence" is all the more extreme when you consider the 2011 movie "Dream House" also has a prop which references Sandy Hook.

http://illuminatiwatcher.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/IlluminatiWatcherDotCom-Dream-House-Sandy-Hook1.jpg

This is a screenshot of one of the film's characters' business card, a Dr. Greeley, who works in Sandy Hook, CT with the same zip code as the Elementary school (CT 06482). Even more disturbing is the fact that GREELEY is a town in Colorado which saw one of the worst school disasters in US history in 1961 - an incident in which 20 children were killed (the same number as Sandy Hook) on 14 December (same date as Sandy Hook).

So my question assumes the premise that these film props are signposts to a contrived, pre-planned school shooting event that was to take place in December 14, 2012 in Sandy Hook. However, they are not specific enough to constitute a warning, so what might the purpose of these messages be?

EDIT: In terms of "signposts", I could have included the media references to the "Sandy Hook hoax" in which a boat was reported lost with 20 people in the water off the coast of New Jersey in June 2012.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/06/sandy_hook_boat_explosion_hoax.html

EDIT 2: Talking about "signposts", there is a very interesting geographic signpost which I discovered in Google Earth, which clearly suggests that Sandy Hook was planned many years in advance by an element of the US elite (freemasons and politicians). I have posted the details here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3e3sqm/the_true_perpetrators_of_sandy_hook_left_a/

Great question

Not really

Might be a little far-fetched, but maybe subliminal messaging to make the attacks more impactful? I mean if some random guy died, you wouldn't care that much. But if you saw that guy somewhere else before, you automatically "connect" to that person and thus care more about it

Yes indeed, this is certainly one of the key reasons, in my view. I was hoping James Tracy would say something on these lines, but sadly my question wasn't answered.

The subliminal effect of being pre-exposed to the name "Sandy Hook" helps anchor it in the subconscious - like a meme. Then when the actual Sandy Hook incident hits the news, it already feels "real" and significant because it is linking with something that has been stored away in your subconscious.

If you recall, there was a destructive meteorological event on the East Coast in (just before Sandy Hook in 2012) called "Hurricane Sandy". This is perhaps more likely a coincidence, but at this point I don't rule anything out.

The Sandy Hook boat hoax is slightly different, because I believe this was partly organised to get the the search term "Sandy Hook hoax" plenty of hits in google, to sidetrack anybody looking for evidence that the school shooting was a hoax.

Great breakdown. I think you are right on the money with your analysis. One thing to consider is that a lot of this stuff could simply be red herrings thrown out there to confuse and sidetrack people. Think of the amount of time and energy wasted trying to figure all of this stuff out. In the end, it doesn't matter why it was put into the movie or by whom because in the end it has no direct connection to the event. It distracts valuable energy from what's important, which is the actual crime itself. There are too many people in this "movement" who are far too obsessed with these things. It is counterproductive and does nothing to help the situation. Many of the people who obsess over these things are into this movement more as a hobby than anything else. It's like a mystery-themed video game or something to them. They gather and endlessly ponder all of these useless tidbits of info that seem to connect with an event but which accomplish absolutely nothing.

In the end, it doesn't matter why it was put into the movie or by whom

My contention is that Sandy Hook was a simulated event planned many years in advance. These film pointers are evidence of prior knowledge, so it does matter who put these props in those movies, because the individuals responsible should be investigated (assuming they are still alive).

There are also various 9/11 references in movies throughout the 90's.

I agree, something is fuckey.

In addition to SH, the plane crash scene in TDKR had some uncanny resemblances to a real plane crash that happened year later. Here's the 4chan thread linking the evidence. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/938/183/754.jpg

The fire rises!

Unraveling the truth in any way is helpful. I say let them have fun while they are doing it. Others will focus on other aspects.

You do realize there are many many many places in New York City (on which Gotham is based) named Sandy Hook? Your ridiculous question based on some YouTube video makes it difficult to take anything in this thread seriously, considering it's at the very top. (Not that anything in this thread necessarily deserves to be taken seriously.)

I guess you're one of those nutjob coincidence theorists?

So explain the Dream House business card which is a much more elaborate connection to Sandy Hook. And the Sandy Hook boat hoax.

I wonder if its the same person working on all these movies. There must be a way to find out.

Scott Getzinger was the Master of Props for "The Dark Knight Rises". He was killed in a car crash shortly before the film premiered.

http://www.freedombrief.com/the-dark-knight-rises-prop-master-dies-in-car-accident-buried-in-newtown-connecticut/

Well isn't that something. Buried in Newton, Conneticut.

I went to school in Litchfield County, Connecticut. Kids would always talk about some kids' parents being witches and Satan worshipers. For what it's worth.

[deleted]

Wat

This is where a documentary happens...

that's just fucking forewarning

Perhaps Getzinger's map was not "authorised". The elite are lovely, but they don't tolerate whistleblowers, and those who squeal are punished severely - as as lesson to others who might be thinking of doing the same.

But I mean there HAS to be a way to infiltrate these groups, but how?

Sadly not. For most it's a birthright, otherwise it's very much a case of "don't call us, we'll call you".

Why some stupid question about movies the most upvoted? Maybe to discredit more easily this thread?

It's not "a question about movies" - it's evidence of foreknowledge of the events of Sandy Hook.

It would not be possible to know about Sandy Hook in advance UNLESS it was a planned, manufactured event - ie NOT a random killing spree by a disturbed teenager, as the media would have you believe.

I'm not saying sandy hook wasn't a false flag. I'm saying that all this bullshit about movies predicting shit can be easily thrown aside by any statistician, even if sandy hook was NOT a false flag, there would STILL be movies pointing to it. why? because coincidences do exist when you're talking about thousands and thousands of movies being published about the most known and talked about country in the world.

There is literally THOUSANDS times stronger evidence than this sort of bullshit, and people attaching importance to this sort of shite instead of real provable evidence simply helps to discredit conspiracy theorists as those stupid kids in south park who see numbers everywhere.

You should be thinking more in terms of balance of probabilities - and the Sandy Hook references in those movies were very specific - the circle on the map clearly marking the location of the school, and the zip code of the school (with a reference on the same prop to another traumatic event which occurred on 14th December where 20 children died).

Analysis of a false-flag event can broken down into three separate categories.

• Evidence of prior knowledge
• Evidence during the incident that contradicts the official narrative
• Evidence of an official cover-up after the incident

Of these, a single provable incident of prior knowledge completely destroys the official narrative (of a crazed teenager acting alone) more effectively than the other categories. Since the authorities had total control of the crime scene (SHES), it is much harder to contradict their account with firm evidence. As for cover-ups - clearly there was one at Sandy Hook but there are different reasons for cover-ups, and they don't prove a false flag.

I am not saying that these film references, or the Sandy Hook boat hoax etc are proof on their own, but collectively they strongly suggest that Sandy Hook was an event planned for a long time, and ratified at the highest levels of the US establishment.

That map bears no resemblance to the actual Sandy hook, ct.

But it's really not evidence of much. It just shows a prop master, who came from a certain area (and was buried there) used locations he was familiar with in creating props. As one who has worked in video and stage, that is really, really common.

The map in TDKR specifically highlights the location of Sandy Hook Elementary School, if you superimpose a real map over the prop, with the Interstate 84 as your point of reference.

The film Dream House had a different prop master, suggesting that the prop references to Sandy Hook may be attributable to an individual higher up the food chain.

I can't say anything about Dream House; I've never even heard of it. But a map in TDKR only means he circled a place he knew. There are such things as coincidences, and had he circled virtually any other place in the country no one would be discussing this now.

http://subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.com/2013/01/tdkr.html

Dark Knight map: http://batmangothamcity.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Gotham-map-Dark-Knight.jpg

Dark Knight Rises map: http://batmangothamcity.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Gotham-map-Dark-Knight-Rises.jpg

Pretty weird to change the established names of most areas.

edit: Huge (23MB!!!) scan of the Sandy Hook map: http://thebatmanuniverse.net/image/Movie/News/01-Live%20Action/11-The%20Dark%20Knight%20Rises/Viral%20Marketing/03-Event%203/Map%202.jpg

Here is short video with an overlay of the red highlighted zone in "Sandy Hook" in The Dark Knight Rises and an image of Sandy Hook Elementary School from google earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOR67DOM-ZQ

I was unaware of the 2011 movie Dream House... but was very aware of the Sandy Hook missing boat explosion (I have the recorded may-day calls) as well as the Batman movie reference. I would certainly like to hear Dr. Tracy's take on these items.

THE FIRE RISES

Holy crap is this guy serious?

Sounds like it's a coincidence most likely. In order to sneak a map into the prop departments of these movies you would need more conspirators and that just makes it riskier. Still it is creepy how connections in major blockbusters keep popping-up to mass shootings. Could it be a sort of energetic resonance going backwards through time or something?

[deleted]

sadly some people on this sub seem to be easily taken in by all this incredibly easily dismissible shit.

Several doctors have been murdered or have come up missing within the last few weeks.

Most, if not all of them had ties to, or practiced alternative medicine. Some were believed to be anti-vaccination.

Do you think this is a strange coincidence, or is there a story here that the main stream media refuses to report?

edit:

including articles for rerefence.

Dr. Teresa Sievers, practiced holistic medicine, murdered with hammer

Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, claimed vaccines lead to autism, "self-inflicted wounds to the chest"

Dr. Lisa Riley, holistic medicine, gunshot wound to the head

Dr. Patrick J. Fitzpatrick, holistic medicine, "missing"

There are several more including 3 people in Mexico that practiced an alternative to chemotherapy.

Here is a timeline

I'd be very interested seeing sources for this. I've heard of the one doctor who ended up in a river, who supposedly was an anti-vaxer, but no others.

http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2015/07/5th-doctor-found-dead-in-florida-making-5-dead-and-5-more-missing-2492824.html

The authorities have been investigating for two weeks “around the clock” and now say that it was targeted, not random, not a home invasion, and when the facts come out “books and movies will be written about it” it’s that huge of a story.

source (questionable)

i went on a few news posts and even emailed a reporter about all of the dead and missing doctors and their connection, i hope some good people can get the story out before it gets shut down

you got it. i'll update my comment

Excellent work on the Aurora theater shooting. (example for those who missed it) It's a shame to see that young man, James Holmes, being railroaded. Have you made the connection between Alex Milano and "DJ" from Bowling for Columbine?

Witness Corbin Dates told Hardball with Chris Matthews that there was a second shooter, a man with a goatee (Holmes did not have a goatee), who was lingering near the emergency exit.

• Corbin Dates appears on Hardball to describe "Man with Goatee" - Possible Accomplice

A "man with a goatee". A goatee. Like Alex Milano, a noted gun-control advocate, who just happened to be present at the shooting and coincidentally interviewed on local news:

• Aurora Theater Shooting Eyewitness Alex Milano Interview

Alex Milano appeared in the gun control advocacy movie, Bowling for Columbine, as "DJ", although he's been scrubbed from the IMDB credits for some reason.

Screenshots/portraits:

• "DJ" from Bowling for Columbine

• Alex Milano from the Aurora Massacre interview

Side by side comparison:

• Alex Milano from Aurora Massacre vs "DJ" from Bowling for Columbine

My question about all this, and I'm serious, is if these shootings were staged in order for the gov't to push gun control, why do we not see more gun control? Has there not been enough mass shootings yet to justify a gun grab or even stricter qualifications for purchases?

Maybe they didn't get the scared reaction they hoped for. Easier for them if the people just disarm themselves.

Yep. Its not like a band-aid - you can't just say "Gun Control" really fast and take erryone's guns in the Take Everybody's Guns Act of 2020. Their would be crazy resistance.

But slowly and constantly plant the idea that assault rifles are bad (but pay no attention to the tanks your local SWAT has - that's for their protection), and you'll get what you want.

Eventually.

Well put, Jim. I think it will be a long term plan--can't believe Holder and his brainwash plan. But TPTB want resistance, I think, and I expect Jade Helm to present some FF's meant to trick militias into conflict.

I'm surprised the whole Oathkeeper's outfit hasn't been hrard from in awhile, now that I think about it.

Hmm...

You're right though - eventually you have to use the equipment or you jave to give it to a lower level of government to pass off the maintence.

But when the locals have MRAPs...

Shirkey Principal: "Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution."

Heck. Even the fraudulent "War on Terror" is a great example of this.

Awesome AMA the other night!

Still going through it but I thought it was solid.

Hahaha, such a great comment.

Gun sales go up, up up after these types of events.

The shootings will continue until the general public begs for gun control.

Change doesn't happen over night. They won't ram it down our throats.

The will continue to turn up the heat until we ask to be protected.

Gun ownership is actually on the decline, unless that's changed drastically in the last 5 years. Last time I read up on it, only about 35% of US citizens own guns. In the 70s, it was in the 50% area. I think that the number of guns has increased because the 35% of people that own guns are building their "collections", but the number of people that own a gun isn't very high. Especially when you consider that the biggest cities, therefore the highest concentration of population, have all voluntarily surrendered their guns. It's either illegal or very expensive/impractical to have a handgun for self-defense in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington D.C., New York City, and Baltimore.

That's ridiculous, a Glock costs $500 no matter where you are.

Yes, the prices of guns are the same.

The prices of licensing, etc. can be high in areas with strict control.

It costs about $650 to get a concealed carry permit in Chicago, which means the people that are most in need (law-abiding citizens living in high-crime areas) are the least likely to be able to afford a handgun. $1000+ is a LOT of money for someone who only makes $35,000 a year.

You are misinformed. The cost of a permit for the state of Illinois is $150. CCL training classes vary from cost from $50 - $300 depending on how fancy you want to get.

I was basing that number on a Washington Times article and what I remembered when Illinois first passed their CCW law, and the cost was in the realm of $650 at that time. Probably due to no competition for training classes.

$300 is still a lot of money for some people, and nothing you've said has any bearing on the fact that many of the biggest cities in the USA make it prohibitively expensive or impractical to carry a handgun for self-defense.

Owning/carrying a gun is a privilege, not a guarantee. If you cant afford a gun or the training required to carry one, you shouldnt have one. You inflated the price of CCL training in Chicago by over 200%, and I addressed that.

Owning/carrying a gun is a privilege, not a guarantee.

Actually, it's a right. And that right is protected by the United States Constitution.

If you cant afford a gun or the training required to carry one, you shouldnt have one.

I agree that nobody without proper training should be carrying, or handling, firearms. But the state doesn't need to make it prohibitively expensive.

You inflated the price of CCL training in Chicago by over 200%, and I addressed that.

No, I used outdated information. At one point, less than 2 years ago, that number was correct. I haven't kept up on the costs of training to obtain a CCW in a state I've never even been to. Sorry. The point that laws have made it prohibitively expensive to carry a handgun still stands.

$150 is "prohibitively" expensive? Some of that money goes to paying the trainers a living wage. Do you think the gov't should absorb that cost and pass it on to tax payers? What price would you think is appropriate, $20?

http://www.illinoisconcealedcarryllc.com/concealed-carry-training.php#illinois

do you have a source on large cities voluntarily surrendering guns?

Here's one I found after 3 seconds of Google searching.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chicago-gun-turn-in-yields-5500-firearms/

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=voluntary%20surrender%20gun

His brows are manicured in the aurora interview. Funny.

You realize the Aurora and Bowling for Columbine were ten years apart right? DJ would look significantly older not to mention Alex has acne and looks to be in his twenties. They just look alike.

Dude, that is the same person. Some people age really well. Look at Keanu Reeves or Jennifer Aniston.

Looks to me like he blew through a million bucks in partying; not great for the skin. Note the manicured eyebrows -- dude knew he would be on camera. Even has damn near the same black backwards hat for God's sake. It's an immature look he hasn't bothered to update since then.

And I'm 44yo, get mistaken for upper 20s all the time; could easily pass for 34. (I need a fake ID that says I'm 10 years younger heh...)

Just listening to that interview made me remember how much I fucking hate Michael Moore.

It all makes sense now, eh?

Also seems like the dialog was sped up -- everybody is talking really fast. Maybe I'm just from the south..

No, I noticed that too. It seemed like MM was spitting out questions like he had just taken a giant hit of meth.

It's absolutely unbelievable to me that you think those two people are the same. Why are you lying?

Ignore him. We get a lot of PR shills here trying to play their dumb mind-control games. Might even get a brigade of em.

(Start bad-mouthing GMOs or RoundUp and see what happens..)

I mean, they look the same?

Why are you LYING?!?!?!111!!

[deleted]

Do you know anything about the allegations that George W. Bush was somehow involved with the death of JFK Jr.?

What do you think about RFK Jr. and his stand against Big Pharma and the vaccine industry?

Great answer, thank you!

I have definitely noticed that the big boys are taking advantage of "alternative media" similar to the big brewing companies taking advantage of the microbrew market.

similar to the big brewing companies taking advantage of the microbrew market.

Somebody needs to tell them that adding alcohol and four scoops of hops does not make the beer better or equivalent to a microbrew.

And jack up the price $4.00/6 compared to their NFL watered down swill version.

And to think I used to have contests with my buddied to drink 30 in 24 hours every summer.

And now I'm thinking if I was the victim if a viral marketing campaign to the college scene to increase sales.

O.o

I shall embark on this endeavor before this summers pass.

But but IPA!!! ugh.

If JFK jr was in fact murdered then they killed 3 generations of jfk'a

'S

Actually as a professional pilot I'm entirely not surprised about JFK Jr's death. To be perfectly honest when you add hubris to inexperience (and he was certainly inexperienced - the man didn't even have an instrument rating and he was flying around at night over water!) and you get loss of control accidents like this a lot.

The accident is a textbook case.

Wow buddy you've been flying so high for 15 years you haven't looked at this thing; the rescue anomalies scream cover-up, but all of it is so suspicious with the clearly shoddy investigation I wouldn't rule out a possibly missing flight instructor having fallen off the radar with the others the "investigators" say were on board. I think I saw you piloting that train around the zoo.

welcome...any thoughts on Stanley Kubrick or the Apollo moon landings?

Good plug, fellow Jim.

You are doing well here. I am pleasantly surprised.

How many shills u find in here?

Not enough.

Do u like me

To be fair, it wasn't in complete silence. There was at least one Ruskie spy spilling our toppest secrets. Whether he did it for love or money, ultimately doesn't matter. What matters is, the commies got "The Bomb", and they got it from us.

So... do you think the moon landings were a hoax or not? I didn't hear a definite answer in that.

Aliens? Do they walk among us? Have they been here all along (as some would have us believe)? If so, what do they want?

I'm James Tracy of MemoryHoleBlog.com . I have been invited by reddit administrators to be here this evening for a "Ask Me Anything" session, so please feel free to do so. I cannot profess to be able to respond to every question, but will do my best to answer as many as possible if I can provide accurate and helpful information.

Well, that's interesting.

*/r/conspiracy moderators

At the same time as the big one with spez? That's unfortunate timing at the least.

It's my understanding that the date was picked well before the spez AMA was announced.

Fair enough, I'm guessing a lot of people are over there though.

The way I see it, the usual suspects are too busy with that debacle to disrupt the AMA here.

I'm content to let this fly slightly under the radar so legitimate questions aren't drowned in fluff (great questions so far too!).

Good point, and yes, good questions too.

I know man - juat having fun.

juat you tryin to say

[deleted]

Just a weird sense of humor. I'll be around ;)

[deleted]

You're telling me. I feel like I'm losing my mind half the time. Takes a bit for things to sorta 'stabilize' if I tread on this sub too long.

But thank you for doing the time to do this AMA. I must admit, I'm not too familiar with your work but I've been reading up a little earlier today. Definitely interested. Will try and come up with a halfway decent question

This is the kind of paranoia that I find often plagues conspiracy-related forums.

On the nose.

Sure nose his audience, amirite?

That's ignorant.

Many people are paranoid because someone impersonating Richard Gage did an AMA on here, and successfully made a complete fool out of the /r/conspiracy moderators that were involved in setting it up. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/2okqh4/remember_the_time_fake_richard_gage_?

No worries, regular reddit users get confused by this all the time.

Reddit's employees are called admins (they are paid).

Individual subreddits are run by "moderators" (they are unpaid). Anyone can start a new subreddit and become its moderator.

You were invited by the /r/conspiracy moderators (and some members of the community) to host this AMA.

He means /r/conspiracy mods, not Reddit Admins. There's a huge difference.

Or is there...?

What do you think of the idea that the basic conspiracy is satanic in nature, as satanism is understood by christianity?

Please quote what you're quoting.

yeah, i'd echo this one.

Thanks for doing the AMA

Are you aware of the connection between SSRI antidepressant drugs and mass murders?

http://ssristories.wpengine.com/old/index1.php

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26e5PqrCePk

Studies have already nonchalantly confirmed "anti"depresant drugs numb all emotions including good ones like love and empathy. And that they've been shown to be able to make even health non-depressed people suicidal. Yet it seems not many talk about why that's a problem. Is it any wonder why people exposed to these drugs are so depressed?

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/833484

While I agree that pharmaceutical companies definitely push way too hard to sell their drugs to people that don't need them, I will say that depression is real. Just like schizophrenia, just like OCD.

You sound like a fucking idiot. All disrespect meant.

Depression isn't real? Tell that to all the suicides throughout history or different languages and eras way of describing it.

Just because you don't have to suffer with it daily doesn't make it any less real.

WELP, time to go cold turkey on 2 SSRIs at once. Should be fun.

edit: maybe not

don't be stupid, you will go off the deep end if you do that. if your going to quit them gradually lower the intake until you stop taking them all together.

Never go off you meds without your doctors help. This dude doesn't know what he's talking about.

and doctors dont know what their talking about either since their field of study is based on the pharmaceutical industry. Personally I think all depression can be cured by sunlight, plant life, listening to yourself when something is wrong inside of you, and expressing your depression in other forms like art and movement.

Hey man. I have clinical depression. There is no debate. I have it. No weird sedo-science can deny it. I have gone through the fucking wringer in terms of medication, since I was and I sure as fuck know more about how this whole pharma-horseshit works than someone from the outside could possibly know.

There is always a debate, you have something, but I wouldn't go so far as to label it based on what medical academia is classifying it as. Im sorry you identify with the term clinical depression. I have few people in my life who have similar issues and it really all boils down to being manipulated by this system so they can tell you how to fix your problems instead of working on fixing them yourself. The medical and pharmaceutical industry is a complete sham. People were healing themselves way before modern science came into the picture. You just don't hear about it because of how controlled our society really is.

Not to pry, but have you ever experienced psychedelics?

Besides weed, none.

get off the pharmaceuticals

drug addict

Well, I was suicidal until I took medication, so I guess you want me dead basically. Its funny to hear from people who haven't experienced real mental illness. You cannot shake it off. I'm stuck with it for life friend. I almost dropped out of college because I stopped taking anti-depressants for a year. We actually need them. I know it's hard for people who have no clue what it's like be it is true, sorry to burst your bubble buddy. They fucking work. Yes the companies behind them suck but they actually work regardless.

All I hear are excuses

Do you have any recommendations about a single starter book, or starter video, or starter webpage to expose the loyal multitudes to the concept of our government waging psychological warfare upon us citizens which minimize the cognitive dissonance and trauma effects?

Thanks for joining us today!

I'm curious, what do you think about the work of Ed Haslam and Judyth Baker?

In a completely different realm, what do you think about Judy Wood?

Dr Tracy,

Excellent article depicting the state of research on climate change behind the headlines. With the Pope and big oil now pushing for a global carbon pricing solution, a global enforcing and carbon-tax funded body seems inevitable.

I try to point out existing solutions, like the thorium plant which India has had on hold due to:

"In October 2013 BARC said that premature deployment of thorium would lead to sub-optimal use of indigenous energy resources",

are readily ignored by climate scientist. To me, their lack of interest in promoting methods of resolving what they describe as a serious thing, suggests they are more focused on securing a carbon tax than pursuing what that tax is supposed to be used for.

What's been your most successful strategy for getting people to look beyond the smoke and mirrors posing as science that is the "consensus"?

Thanks.

After all, "climate change" or the "denial" thereof has all of the characteristics of a religion--initially for secularists, but now for those with religious inclinations.

Secular progressivism is the memetic descendent of Puritan Calvinism. Blasphemy, inquisition, indoctrination, and brainwashing still occur from the perspective of the progressive religion. Therefore, progressive culture is referred to as “the Cathedral”. The Cathedral consists of influential people in politics, journalism, academia and education acting in an uncoordinated manner to advance progressive principles in society; often deceptively.

Also, /r/climateskeptics

I think it's very fitting that the pontiff has come out in favor of climate change, as global warming is truly a religion to many people. How do you persuade people into thinking about it as basic science when they treat it so religiously?

I just posted this on another discussion: http://twoheartspress.com/blog/how-to-respond-if-pope-francis-is-the-false-prophet-2/

Have you ever been tailed by the FBI/CIA/men in black suits before? It may seem like a dumb question but I'm curious as to what lengths of political "physical" scrutiny you've been subjected to

The notes I took on our conversation, along with several other documents, disappeared from my home shortly thereafter.

That would have been it for me. Did you set up security cameras or something. There's no way you just let that go

The notes I took on our conversation, along with several other documents, disappeared from my home shortly thereafter.

Aaaaaaand what happened? If you're telling the truth, you're clearly been compromised. Time for cameras or alternative methods of security? You seems rather calm and nonchalant about that. I'd be pissed.

Hey James, what do you think about the most recent massacre in Charleston?

Hey mr. Tracy! What event in your life propelled you into the conspiracy community? Was it a person even or were tou always that kid who "asked too many questions?"

Thank you very much!

For those who are interested, here is a list of /r/conspiracy AMAs.

What are your thoughts on Alex Jones and the Infowars programming?

Who are some reliable sources in the alternative media who you deem credible?

Aliens, dimensions, nibiru, ancient advanced civilizations....

Thoughts? Concerns? Anecdotes?

First of all: Thanks for taking the time, James!

Do you think the arts (cinema in particular) are reflecting todays societal problems? And what do you hope to see in the future in terms of topics and methods in which said problems could be portrayed/dealt with.

Do you currently teach any online courses in which anyone who wanted to attended could?

There are incentives at my employer to teach online courses that I've never availed myself.

I'm very sorry to hear this. Please know that your courage is absolutely contagious. Your willingness to call it like you see it, regardless of how politically incorrect or inconvenient it may be, is such an inspiration to me, and no doubt to many others here. You have an incredible mind and perspective on reality Dr. Tracy. I would join an online class you taught in a heartbeat, and I'm positive I'm not alone either.

Thank you so much for your time tonight, and all that you have done so far sir. I feel that if this great nation had more people and teachers like yourself we would not be in the predicament we are all facing now. May God Bless you in all things you do James.

I don't know who you are, but you seem like a decent dude.

Thank you so much for taking the time for this AMA. I am a huge fan of your work. Your research on so many recent "events" has been an inspiration to me personally.

My question to you is, who has had the biggest impact on you personally, and what event in history has the biggest impact on who you are today?

Thank you for such an honest and sincere answer about your father's impact on you.

If one looks to US history as one involving the struggle over national versus "central" banking such events become rather apparent.

Very well said.

"If one looks to US history as one involving the struggle over national versus "central" banking such events become rather apparent."

Darn, I love that and would love to hear much, much more on that.

Thanks for taking the time. Who shot JFK?

the guy in the fucking storm drain.

And which yale secret society was he in?

haha. I think the storm drain shooters were shooters six and seven. they were the back up shooters in case the previous five failed. They were hitmen.

Thanks Dr. Tracy for your time here. I'm curious about your thoughts on what the purpose of Operation Jade Helm is, and why the alternative media seems to be so fixated on it?

What do you think is the biggest untold conspiracy that no one talks about?

Have you come across anything in your research/work, either regarding Sandy Hook or any other subject, that points to or suggests the existence of secretive groups of child abusers/murderers protected to any extent by law enforcement and the media?

Is President Putin of the Russian Federation really the evil man we think he is? Or is this simply the succesful manipulation of the masses?

Thank you so much. On my last topic post I was literally attacked for just defending Putin. Sure, not all of his policies are acceptable, but why does the west criticise him (and China) but completely ignore Saudi Arabia or India?

Under Putin, from 2001 to 2007, the Russian economy grew at a rate of 7% per year. Russian Domestic Product (GDP) increased 6 times, climbing up from the 22nd to the 10th largest in the world. Average wages had almost increased tenfold. The percentage of people living in poverty was cut in half. Once totalling nearly 150% of GDP, nearly all foreign debt was paid off. Moscow also became home to the fastest growing group of millionaires. And everyone still thinks Putin is the "bad" guy.

They're all bad guys, being less evil doesn't absolve someone from their own sins.

Putin isn't the worst leader in the world but that doesn't make him a misunderstood innocent by any means.

What effective leader can be an innocent in this world?

None that's for sure, I'm not saying Putin isn't extremely vilified in the western world beyond reality.

Only that he is, regardless of what the MSM says, perfectly capable of being an evil leader with what he actually does do.

He could be great but he sees himself as a new Stalin way too much for that to happen.

Dr. Tracy, why is it that you have never once on your blog discussed Leo Strauss's theory of esotericism and the interlinkable academic phenomena of "deconstruction" and epistemological relativism in general, all which seem to determine, inform, and illuminate the manner in which the mainstream media, both "leftish" and "rightish" distorts economic and political reality and tonally and substantively seeks to mold the consciousness of its readership? Thank you.

/r/iamverysmart

What do you think of the origin of Chris Dorner's facebook page, the package to Cooper, and the likelihood of any of us being set up in similar ways? Even if you leave facebook, they have a profile for you.

I feel like you didn't answer my question, but took every opportunity to promote yourself.

What would you recommend the community do in order to keep seeking the truths of this world and move humanity towards a better existance for all?

(I realize we don't have all the answers, but what can we do in your opinion to tie us together to form a stronger and more able human community?)

I agree so much, the school system is teaching us to be subservient, not to think on our own. Its designed to keep the majority of the population in long meaningless labor (such as manufacturing) to seperate from the family structure and thus rely on government provided "education". We need to get back to our familys, question and learn all we can.

Jim, do you think we can break thru the media veil to alert the masses about how lied to we are or is it a 'opeless fancy???

Dr. Tracy,

How do we reach awareness critical mass, so that the psyop just stops working because people know better?

Jim, you are my fucking hero, I love you man!

How did you stay sane with all the fallout from Sandy hook?

Are you still in contact with your buddy Anderson Cooper???

I post MHB articles on reddit regularly--glad to see you don't mind!

Is running that blog and writing your books a full-time job?

Does your blogging interfere with your work?

79 upvotes for 110 comments? This looks legit reddit... Anyway thank you for this AMA, it is leaps and bounds beyond other topics seen on this sub

I've come across a potentially big video about an incoming financial crash. It seems like a concealed advertisement, yet has quite a bit of info to back it up. I've yet to form a solid opinion on it. What about you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkELgi6EkNo

Was 9/11 r34l

James, What are your thoughts on Edward Snowden, Glen Greenwald, and the overall effect the leaked information has had on people?

Do you believe you were invited to do this ama at the same time as the CEO's one to dilute the presence of this subreddit in the precedings?
Edit, thanks for being here regardless.

Thoughts on the recent emergence of the topic of flat earth? A huge explosion in interest including some clearly controlled opposition. Do you believe there is anything to it, or do you think the official spinning globe model is entirely correct?

There's five of you here.

never heard about this usually I keep an open mind to everything but do you have any info i can read into this

This is an intro to the subject created by another user: https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3cowhi/intro_to_flat_earth_a_basic_primer_v20/

Judging by the downvotes someone really doesn't want this seen. Come on, I thought censorship isn't cool here?

Question:

Why do you keep posting fabricated information and outright lies on your blog?

For example, this post from 2014: "Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook Was an Elaborate Hoax."

1. Proof of death has been suppressed

Can you cite a single mass shooting in the past 10 years in which police have officially released gruesome autopsy photos of dead kids?

As for parents not seeing the bodies and having closed caskets, thats probably because there was not much left of their kids to see. Do you have any idea what a round fired from the rifle Lanza used does to a kid's skull? It explodes. You don't have an open casket of a kid missing half their head.

1. Emergency protocols were not followed

Can you explain why an EMT or police officer would waste time tending to a kid with half of his head blown off and his brain matter all over the carpet? That's why you didn't see any "frantic" rushing kids to hospitals. They were all very dead and if you knew anything about emergency protocols you would know triage procedures call for classifying a person's chances of survival immediately to determine who gets urgent treatment. A kid with his brain exploded outside of his head isn't going to be rushed to a hospital.

Check out the police reports, officers and EMTs entered the school to conduct triage, but most of the people they encountered were so obviously dead they did not move them.

1. Drill protocols were followed instead

Here you are misrepresenting the check-in setup that was established to control the crime scene with a drill check-in that is usually set up hours before the supposed drill.

You also falsely claim an emergency preparedness drill was running in Bridgeport, CT that morning. It was not a drill, it was a class, with people sitting at desks talking about stuff. Moreover there are at least 50 of those drills running at any given time across the country, chances are within 100 miles of your location right now. Does that make any shooting that happens within 100 miles of you a flase-flag?

1. There was foreknowledge of the event

Here the article you cite returns a 404, but its from Veterans Today, another source infamous for publishing outright lies. The other article you cite, to prove Sandy Hook tweets and webpages were sent before the actual shooting, misrepresents the timezones the articles and tweets are being viewed as. Those tweets weren't sent before the event, the screencaps just show the tweet in a different timezone. Another lie you publish as fact.

1. There were contradictory reports about the weapons

Media reports are always changing and evolving. You can't just claim this as proof. People like talking out of their ass to the media. Reporters rushing to break news before anyone else reports that information.

1. Adam Lanza cannot have done the shooting

Ah yes, the tired old "nerd can't carry guns" claim. Have you ever held a rifle before? They don't weigh 100 pounds you know. And the ammunition he was carrying would not have added as much weight as you falsely claim.

As for his marksmanship, he was shooting at kids from between 2-20 feet. You don't need to be an expert marksman to make those shots.

1. Key participants displayed inappropriate behavior

Adrenaline, shock. I've seen people laughing and having a good time right after their family members died. Do you have the qualifications necessary to deem their behavior "inappropriate?" Can I see your psychology degree showing you are qualified to make such claims?

1. Photos at scene and of victims look staged or fake

"My own cognitive bias makes me think these photos look staged."

I see no proof of photoshopping in any of the pics you mention and I have been working in photography for over 10 years.

1. The crime scene was completely destroyed

If it wasn't destroyed, you think what, the town would let a bunch of conspiracy theorists in at any time to "inspect" the old crime scene?

1. Deceased children sang at the Super Bowl

This is one of the most laughable claims I've ever seen about Sandy Hook. Tons of kids look similar, the video relies on cognitive bias to fill in the blanks. While some basic facial features like noses look similar they are clearly different people. Can you even explain why the government would be smart enough to orchestrate such a massive conspiracy, with tens of thousands of participants, and then be dumb enough to risk blowing the cover by parading dead kids on national TV?

This particular post is not an outlier: I frequently see similar articles posted on your site which rely heavy on cognitive biases and faulty logic to arrive at the conclusions you use to further your agenda.

I would be very interested in hearing Mr. Tracy's replies to these questions if he can muster the courage.

how much do conspiracy types resemble religious fanatics with our blind chasing of single ideas?

Sure nose his audience, amirite?

Yep. Its not like a band-aid - you can't just say "Gun Control" really fast and take erryone's guns in the Take Everybody's Guns Act of 2020. Their would be crazy resistance.

But slowly and constantly plant the idea that assault rifles are bad (but pay no attention to the tanks your local SWAT has - that's for their protection), and you'll get what you want.

Eventually.

But I mean there HAS to be a way to infiltrate these groups, but how?

Gun sales go up, up up after these types of events.

Here is short video with an overlay of the red highlighted zone in "Sandy Hook" in The Dark Knight Rises and an image of Sandy Hook Elementary School from google earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOR67DOM-ZQ