As to your last paragraph i highly recommend reading Legacy of Ashes: A history of the CIA by timothy weiner. It is a highly informative book that details the organizations beginnings from the oss to the last bush administration. Its incredibly well sourced and an eye opening read. Killing Hope is another excellent book, by William Blum who is another excellent critic of our militaristic foreign policy.

Can't recommend Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins enough. Great insight into how the CIA operated in South America and elsewhere. Also very easy and quick read. For how the CIA was bankrolled post WWII and beyond check out Gold Warriors: America's Secret Recovery of Yamashita's Gold by Sterling Seagrave.

Perkins has another great book I've read called The Secret History of the American Empire. I havent read Confessions, but this book was enthralling.

Also look into Strategy of Tension and Operation Gladio.

Thanks for scratching the surface in the mountains of evil government cover-ups and all, but you should figure out who LBJ was to understand this Lyndonian age in which we live; Roger Stone, Barr McClellan, and Douglas are modern but my favorite is J. Evetts Haley. The government-sponsored murder of MLK is being covered up today and every day by the Lyndonian real-time klansman-in-chief, who also continues the cover-up of the Lincoln assassination in matters which are still as "classified" as Oswald's tax returns.

Fascinating. Not one mention of NSA surveillance. Guess the disinfo worked.

But it's no longer a conspiracy, it's a fact.

Doesn't mean we should stop wanting to know more about it.

All they wanted to do was let you know you're being watched and to act accordingly. Self-suppression, etc.

exactly. Mission Accomplished.

When did conspiracy and fact become mutually exclusive? CIA did a fine job changing the definition of the word I guess

Pretty much

9/11 - Check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk 'September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor' 5+ hours but it is an 'excellent' documentary. Currently the best on 9/11 imho. Also check out this excellent series of audio interviews with Kevin Ryan @ Guns & Butter from his book 'Another Nineteen...' Here is the link to Part 1 of 5. https://soundcloud.com/guns-and-butter-1/another-nineteen-part-one-kevin-ryan-288

JFK/RFK/MLK - Check out 'Evidence of Revision'. 8+ hours of amazing documentary. What makes this unique is the actual footage,recordings,photos from so many events and interviews surrounding these assassinations. 6 Parts; first 3 are JFK, 4 - RFK, 5 - RFK and Jones Town, 6- MLK. Here is Part 1; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pGg-rS26c4

Moon Landings - I was skeptical of this until I watched the Press Conference following the Apollo 11 mission. If you watch it, and you frankly you only need to watch 5-10 minutes, do this first. Think about how you would expect someone to be acting after just going to the moon, landing, walking around, and returning. Think about what they would look like; body language, behavior, facial expressions. Now fire up the press conference; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKl_oXxsQiA If you want to get into some serious reading online check out Dave McGowan's 'Wagging the MoonDoggie', 14 Parts; http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html

Pearl Harbor - check out Robert Stinnett's 'Day of Deceit'; http://www.powells.com/biblio/17-9780743201292-9

Vaccines - check out Episodes 320, 321, 324, 325 at Guns&Butter; http://gunsandbutter.org/archived-show-list Be wary of any person or organization who wants to give you something to 'help' you. There is NO money to be made from healthy people, but TONS of money to be made from sick people via by the Pharmaceutical Companies and the entire health industry.

I have watched or read all of the above reccs.

Your aliens theory. Most will never believe it until they see it for themselves. However, in that case, you don't believe it, you know it, there is a difference. NASA hides the truth.

Read over and all seems somewhat on track. The one topic I really can't agree with is moon landing. There is really no reason to fake that and I'm of the impression it happened 100%

They didn't launch that rocket in a sound studio and half the population of FL saw them taking off. The quote from Von Braun was made a decade before the initiative was started to go to the moon so I'd have to assume advances had been made in fuel and requirements. Also the SatV rocket is 1/3 the height of the Empire State Building so it's not "small".

EDIT: The Saturn V was also designed under the direction of Von Braun himself.

You lost me at the moon part. You should know that there are retroreflectors on the moon that were left during Apollo 15

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA

edit: In all honesty, if you believe that we did not visit the moon, then you really need to consider taking a break from conspiracies. Seriously. It's not an insult, I'm honestly concerned. You really need to save your mind.

You should know that there are retroreflectors on the moon that were left during Apollo 15

The presence of lunar retro-reflectors are not in themselves proof that NASA put men on the moon, because the UNMANNED Russian Lunokhod missions also put retro-reflectors on the moon (and the Lunokhod 2 rover/retro-reflector is still working to this day).

Do you understand the distinction?

you worry about your own sanity my friend. We are doing just fine, and we have as much proof as you if not more (since all yours was destroyed conveniently).

You're too easy.

like sunday morning.

Still have some work to do on vaccines, but otherwise great summary!

Boston Bombing

Look at any pictures or videos of the immediate aftermath and you will clearly see that there aren’t hundreds of victims as reported.

Weird, because I think there are as many injuries from the pictures and video. How can we arrive at different conclusions?

you need to look closer. You will see people who supposedly had severe injuries up moving around right after the blast. Acting totally normal then later getting wheeled off as if they are death's door. Jeff Baumann is the most obvious impossibility and ridiculous story, but most of the people at that site are clearly not injured in a way consistent with a shrapnel bomb, if in fact they are injured at all.

There is footage of a fireman ripping up Hulkman's pants to make them look better after he walks around aimlessly with supposed traumatic leg damage. He doesn't treat Hulkman, he just rips his pants more and then goes about other business.

Jeff Baumann is the most obvious impossibility and ridiculous story

Because he lost his legs?

Vaccines: I believe vaccines have done humanity a great service. Eradicated smallpox and have almost eradicated polio. Measles is almost a thing of the past in America, and when we don’t vaccinate, disease like Pertussis have sprouted back up on the West Coast where ‘hippie parents’ vaccinate at lower rates. We probably get more mercury from eating fish than from vaccines. However, the recent ‘CDC whistleblower’ did suggest that any negative information about vaccines will be silenced/ignored...for obvious reasons.

When that shot contains Immortality, then I'll believe.

Sandy Hook: Wolfgang Halbig has done some good work here. The dashcam footage showing no kids exiting the school. The videos of police first responders running in the wrong parking lot. The lack of any footage of Adam Lanza, despite the school’s reported recent security upgrades. No bodies.

1. Wrong
   
2. Wrong
   
3. irrelevant
   
4. irrelevant
   
5. irrelevant
   

Got any evidence? Just one single piece of evidence indicating a government plot will be plenty. Thanks in advance.

no bodies is irrelevant?

And how about you show us video footage of the kids getting evacuated since we have dashcam footage looking at the school in the relevant time.

No bodies is irrelevant because the photos of them are redacted by law. If there were photos of the room and no bodies visible, that'd be one thing.

The dashcam you refer to was not pointed at the exit used by most of students. Refer to the official report. Even so, children are visible at several points in various dashcams from the scene. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sandy-Hook-Exclusive-Neve-by-keith-johnson-Connecticut_Police_Sandyhook-Shooting-150522-719.html

I see one kid, not 600. There were multiple dashcams. None saw kids evacuating in the manner described. The fact no one was treated for injuries (all shot children died immediately we are told) and no parents were allowed to view the bodies of their own children, but only alleged photos shows the official story is a lie. There are many many other contradictions, but it is hardly irrelevant unless you are trying to sweep something under the rug.

Again, the dashcams are not pointed at that exit. They aren't going to show something that is not in their field of view. What fantasy shooting can you think of where every person involved was individually photographed and fingerprinted and DNA tested on live TV just to satisfy morons?

The fact no one was treated for injuries (all shot children died immediately we are told)

not true. Why are you feigning being upset about this event when you haven't even bothered checking a single fact?

no parents were allowed to view the bodies of their own children

again, not true. Bodies were not identified in person, but that's standard practice these days. The fact that reality is not a cop show is not a conspiracy.

There are many many other contradictions

You've yet to name a single one.

You are the one that is wrong haha. I watched every press conference, followed it every day, with all the fake stories they trotted out, all the inconsistencies. You aren't fooling anyone bud. You can just say "wrong" about anything you want, but obviously you have no interest in anything except arguing, and you have no facts to back you up.

Really? How am I wrong? Please be specific. What "fact" do you have that I do not? I am still waiting on one single shred of evidence that the government staged the event. You can't produce even one? Why would you base your beliefs on a scenario that is completely unsupported by even a single piece of evidence?

You're not wrong, Walter, you're just an asshole.

calmer than you are.

"the government"? Someone is grasping at strawmen.

and yet you issue no correction.

You are obviously just trolling, I gave you some problems, you said wrong without disproving them. I only reply to waste your time so you can annoy less people during your day. The whole thing is a complete obvious clusterfuck, everyone pretty much agrees on that no matter who you think did what, where and to whom.

Just to leave a record of your utter failure to understand basic concepts:

The dashcam footage showing no kids exiting the school. The videos of police first responders running in the wrong parking lot.

As I very clearly explained, the dashcams were not pointed at the exit in question. It doesn't show an evacuation for the same reason it doesn't show the area behind the camera. Dashcams showing the mass evacuation have been redacted.

The videos of police first responders running in the wrong parking lot.

The videos of St. Rose of Lima show police at St. Rose of Lima. What are they supposed to show? Be specific and clear in forming rational thoughts.

The lack of any footage of Adam Lanza, despite the school’s reported recent security upgrades.

There was no security camera with the ability to record, anywhere in the school. Only a closed-circuit showing the front entrance. If they had footage of Lanza at the school, THAT would be suspicious. I have no idea why you've decided to believe otherwise, but you're 100% wrong.

No bodies.

That would be illegal. The children's bodies cannot legally be shown under CT law. Period. Someday I'm sure they will release a photo of the shooter, and your fellow stupidity cult members will immediately declare it a fake no matter what it shows, demonstrating why there is absolutely no point in releasing it to you.

Yeah I thought he was joking. Wolfgang is a con artist.

Eradicated smallpox and have almost eradicated polio.

Nice, you have more to research in this area! Start with the following (that I put together):

Smallpox Shenanigans

Paralysis and the Politics of Polio

Smallpox and polio were not eradicated because of the vaccine.

In both cases, the vaccines increased the number of reported cases of these disease.

Enjoy!

Actually over 200 people were injured, they may be minor, still injured. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/23/boston-marathon-bombing-injury-total_n_3138159.html

The points i'm somewhat versed in indicate to me you're a complete novice, given you make noob errors.

The Zapruder film showed Kennedy’s head jerking backwards

Jerking backwards is not indicative of the direction of a shot from the front.

testimony of ‘explosions’ at the WTC buildings from multiple sources

Testimony which is contradicted by video evidence.

Moon landing: Unlikely, and I am not so familiar with some of the arguments about the ‘lack of stars in the window

You're not familiar with the most basic of conspiracy theories regarding the moon landing? Jeez.

What makes me skeptical is Werner Von Braun’s claim in 1953 that the fuel needed for a trip to the moon would necessitate a rocket the size of the Empire State Building.

1953, that's the clue.

16 years prior to the moon landing - 16 years is a substantial amount of time for technology to advance.

How did the lunar lander launch from the moon and dock with an orbiting spaceship?

By launching from the moon to the orbiter? How else...

The fact we haven’t ever seen a photo of the lunar landers on the moon...seems like our telescopes would have been pointed there by now, right?

We have flyby photo's of the landing site.

Earthly telescopes would have great difficulty spotting something small so far away.

Religion: Sun worship, ‘Sun’ of god.

Zeitgeist film nonsense. I'm done, I can't take you seriously anymore.

Ignore Rockran - he just hangs around here criticising other posters without ever offering anything himself.

I think you're spot on with all your assessments, for what it's worth.

I agree vaccines and modern medicine generally have transformed our world, very much for the better. However, Big Pharma is a profit-driven industry like any other, and they pretend to couch themselves in "science" whilst cleverly subverting the scientific process - like only publishing trial results that suit their bottom line. And "peer review" - this would be great if your peers weren't also in the pay of Big Pharma.

Big Pharma don't want to cure cancer - they don't want to cure anything if they can make billions by keeping sick people "alive" and paying for medicines which alleviate the symptoms of disease.

So vaccines, whilst scientifically sound in principle, would make more financial sense for Big Pharma if they had long term negative side-effects built in, if you get my drift.

Ask yourself how Bill Gates' driving passion for global population reduction can possibly be compatible with spending billions of dollars on vaccinating people in the third world. Unless these vaccines, whilst preventing disease, are part of a covert sterilisation programme...

Ignore Rockran - he just hangs around here criticising other posters without ever offering anything himself.

I've actually found him to be a breath of fresh air and logic on several occasions. Just because you disagree with him doesn't mean you should slander him.

He's a "breath of a fresh air" because you inhabit a planet with a cyanogenic atmosphere, 12 day tard.

It's the same atmosphere you live in.

There's an oxygen deficiency in your neck of the woods.

Yeah it's probably from all the CO2 and global warming, am I right?

Hey, I appreciate you drawing your own conclusions.

My mind is not made up on 9/11 or JFK, but if there is one thing I'm sure about, it is that Sandy Hook was dead real.

I graduated from Joel Barlow High School in Redding, Connecticut. It is the 2nd closest high school to Sandy Hook Elementary, after Newtown High School. We found out on our phones while eating lunch that there was a shooting in Newtown, but it wasn't until we got home that the details really emerged on how bad it was.

It honestly disgusts me that people would just blame the government for such an act just to push their narrative. A lot of people knew those kids personally. Do you really believe that they were all hired? I just don't get it...

You haven't said anything about the anomalies in this other than saying, "I believe" with a fervor appropriate for a revival tent. If you're a Connecticut person, you know what's getting said about anomalies and are playing dumb/first-hand insider smart at the same time. Are you a shill?

Of course I'm not a fucking shill. This sub uses that word to justify their own sense of importance.

If you're a Connecticut person, you know what's getting said about anomalies

Yeah I'm from Connecticut. The anomalies only exist in little blogs that try to uncover "the truth". If you lived here for a few days, you'd see how shitty and offensive those blogs really are. Come. See it for yourself.

Why no video? No fair or reasonable reporting? It seems curious to me that the reported details don't add up and a lot of people who go to Connecticut say a bunch of shitty and offensive cops are supporting the evil cover-up there. Have you personally really checked into it?

people who go to Connecticut say a bunch of shitty and offensive cops

Specifically connecticut? I hear this everywhere.

This one "conspiracy" really ticks me off because people use it to push their own narrative, and I know people on town over who were severely affected by this tragedy. How can you deny that a human once existed? People that have no connection to this have no right to tell others how they should feel.

No offense to you specifically, but this sub in general.

Well, you still are only saying "I believe" with the fervor of a snake-charmer in a revival tent. And you seem to have a cognitive closure that works against talking about wolfgang and the others contentiously pitted against Connecticut masonic cops and obviously you haven't checked into this thing but it's not too late. They are not saying that no humans ever existed, just that the tragedy narrative is full of deceit you would say is needless if you checked into it, but then we're back to your holy-roller cognitive closure. Did you know these Newtown folks you lived near and have you checked the real estate crud there?

I don't see what real estate crud has to do with a mass shooting.

Mass shooting? Like I say, you're not someone interested in what happened and I'm not a big enough expert to know how much of what stuff I've heard is true other than the massive cover-up of Sandy Hook portends an evil purpose. Actually, I thought you'd be a Connecticut resident who might know more than, say, David Letterman.

THERE IS NO EVIL PURPOSE OTHER THAN THE ONE ADAM LANZA HAD.

Get that through this subs head.

It pisses me off how you think literally everything is a false flag.

Adam Lanza? You mean the photo-shopped bug-eyed fake person?

You're kidding. Please tell me you're kidding.

Was Adam Lanza a friend of yours?

With your comment history you seem to really enjoy tearing things down with misdirection especially how you didnt even acknowledge OP's various other points. Also he posted this with some open ends as to how much he knows you just come off as mean.

It's not misdirection if it's true.

you didnt even acknowledge OP's various other points.

I get tired after addressing as many as I already did. I try keep to the points I can address to the best of my knowledge. Have you seen how long that post already got?

you just come off as mean.

I only care if i'm right.

Not if you're cute?

wut

The moment you see the words "that's cute" or "you're cute," the poster should be immediately defined as a paid shill. That term is one suggested for use by manipulators of online conversation to undermine debate.

Not cute at all.

What are you talking about?

Really noob errors? You are treating real conspiracy knowledge like its insider world of warcraft info. You should probably look into some professional help.

Which example of mine are you addressing?

I assume this is a rhetorical question designed to imply that I should be focusing on content and not tone/attitude etc...? If so, you should take your own advice

That wasn't the intention but that's a good idea. You should focus on the content.

You haven't said anything about the anomalies in this other than saying, "I believe" with a fervor appropriate for a revival tent. If you're a Connecticut person, you know what's getting said about anomalies and are playing dumb/first-hand insider smart at the same time. Are you a shill?

people who go to Connecticut say a bunch of shitty and offensive cops

Specifically connecticut? I hear this everywhere.

This one "conspiracy" really ticks me off because people use it to push their own narrative, and I know people on town over who were severely affected by this tragedy. How can you deny that a human once existed? People that have no connection to this have no right to tell others how they should feel.

No offense to you specifically, but this sub in general.

calmer than you are.

You are obviously just trolling, I gave you some problems, you said wrong without disproving them. I only reply to waste your time so you can annoy less people during your day. The whole thing is a complete obvious clusterfuck, everyone pretty much agrees on that no matter who you think did what, where and to whom.