Look, unless youre flying up there yourself and taking samples of these "chemtrails," then your claim is just speculation regardless if chemtrail spraying is a real thing. These trails fit all of the characteristics of contrails.

It takes a special kind of logic to both believe that chemtrail spraying is done to "save the world" from global warming, then also believe they spray poison they themselves couldn't avoid while willfully ignoring the health risks.

Contrails don't spread out and cover the sky in a visible disgusting film

Very untrue.

Contrails are water vapor and behave much like clouds, so yes they can spread out over the sky, and do.

The thing about water vapor is it tends to melt in the sun, which contrails do. Chemtrails on the other hand get larger over time.

Look, anyone that says that the trails planes leave behind are the same as they've always been are either too young to know what contrails used to look like, lying, or morons.

The thing about water vapor is it tends to melt in the sun, which contrails do.

Im going to assume by "melt" you mean something along the lines of dissipate, disperse, or even disappear... Either way, contrails are fundamentally still clouds. Obviously clouds hang around for a long time, and so can contrails (as they are mainly water vapor/ice crystals) in the right conditions, altitude, and temperature.

Look, anyone that says that the trails planes leave behind are either too young to know what contrails used to look like, lying, or morons.

So what you're saying is that ALL planes now spray "chemtrails" and you even wrapped in a classic false dilemma argument, nice.

So we have an unmarked plane flying around in grid patterns that you can visibly see a spray being deployed from and you conclude that it's commercial air traffic causing water clouds by flying by? In a grid pattern? Sorry, this explanation doesn't fit what we can observe

Considering you are making up the fact that you can see the plane, that its flying in a grid, and that you can see the spray "being deployed", yes I can say it very much fits with what was observed.

Not ONE of those pictures even shows a plane.

The grid is in the pictures. And you can tell there were planes by the third picture - you can see a fresh trail. This is like coming upon a freshly manicured lawn and knowing they used a lawnmower. It follows logically.

What youre assuming is that it is the SAME plane, and that does not follow logically. You said an unmarked plane, which none are even directly visible or discernible. You also said its flying around in a grid, which is also improvable and an ASSUMPTION. Its public airspace and there are literally hundreds of flights a day.

As for your lawn mower analogy, a more accurate equivalent would be coming upon the scene and saying, "Those aren't grass clippings its thrown out, they are poisonous chemicals that look exactly like grass used to control the grass' mind!"

The pictures show a grid formation and the trails that look exactly like those that form in the skies above me (no matter which part of the US I happen to be in) and always come from unmarked whitish planes. I know it's the same stuff because you can make out the layers and a new track from the pictures. They are clouds, yes, but not clouds of water.

Edit: I've also seen as many as 5 of these planes at one time so it's not necessarily the same plane going back and forth

I appreciate you confirming that your points were nothing more than speculation and assumptions.

I didn't really confirm that - thanks for confirming you're not reading my posts

Oh no I read it clearly. You stated that you're basing your opinion on other assumptions you've made at other locations around the US. None of which were based on any actual information, evidence, or testing. Good work detective.

Chemically mobile aluminum can have many detrimental neurological effects and could be partly responsible for the rise in autism and Alzheimer's among others. Geoengineeringwatch dot org has a ton of info. Chelating during spray days can be advised to avoid the immediate damage.

Damn. That's pretty heavy. Redmond clay and vitamin D are supposed to be chelating agents so maybe try that out...

look up smart dust

This Is about how it looked near NASA today.

Hi all, as we are all aware, Chemtrails are an actual thing.

Fail on the first sentence. Chemtrails are a myth.

Is that Nibiru in your last picture?

Using airplanes to slowly poison the population at an atmospheric level seems to me to be VERY inefficient especially when you consider the other ways they could introduce toxins. (vaccines, drinking water, GMO's etc.)

It seems to me that TPTB wouldn't bother with a project that was so inefficient and costly. It leads me to believe that the chem trailing has another primary purpose that isn't population control.

Merely speculation but perhaps they are introducing a layer of a certain gas or combination of gasses to make holographic projection easier?

Again I have no evidence, I just question why the super elite would suddenly adopt such a costly and redundant method of introducing toxins, when it seems that everything else they do is so calculated.

I don't think it's so much for introducing toxins as it is for controlling the weather.

Here's a short list of government documents regarding weather modification/geo-engineering dating back to the mid '60s...

A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification - 1966 (NASA)

An Introduction to Weather Modification - US Air Force, September 1969

Weather Modification: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate - January 1, 1974

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

Atmospheric Aerosol Properties and Climate Impacts

And from the USCode: 15 USC Ch. 9A: WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS; REPORTING REQUIREMENT

edit: a word

bingo

I know that if I truly didn't believe the skies are being purposely sprayed, and stubbornly refused to entertain the thought, and I wandered up on this thread, I would perhaps make a snarky comment about tin-foil hats, downvote, and not bother clicking on any more "chemtrail" posts.

However, there is a person, a certain dick pest, who has shown up on practically every chemtrail thread on /r/conspiracy and /r/chemtrails for a couple of years now, downvoting all shared information and harmonious comments, and attempting to derail the conversation.

The person is either a fucking idiot or an obvious shill.

Are you mad people prefer facts

Pleases present some peer reviewed studied supporting your claims about chem trails

What do the majority of scientists think about this issue?

What's nibiru

Side note: peer review doesn't guarantee truth or falsity, (though it can be nice to have) the following did not avail themselves of peer review to disciminate their most imporant ideas: Darwin, Newton, Copernicus.

So I'm guessing there's no peer reviewed research supporting those assertions presented

beats me, my point is about peer review as such. A majority opinion by itself doesn't guarantee the truth that's all.

I mean I've seen a ton of documents and reviewed them with my peers and I've conducted endless field testing with my own equipment (eyes) and I've compared it to similar tests of my peers and we have concluded that chemtrails are obviously real and happen just about daily, at least across most major population centers. Did that convince anyone? Then why do people always ask for peer reviewed journals? Truth should be evident and explainable, trust your eyes if you don't trust the pictures, there is a good chance that you live in an area that gets sprayed and just don't know what to look for

Because your eyes don't muster to actual scientific analysis of compounds.

So I'm guessing the answer is: no you don't have any peer reviewed studies supporting your assertions

I have peer reviewed studies every day that support my assertions

Please present those studies

Do your own - look at what you see in the sky and pictures like these and think critically. Do these pictures really look like natural formations? You don't have to rely on "experts" to tell you what to think

Lol

Like I thought, you don't have any peer reviewed studies supporting your assertions

Don't be mad that people prefer facts and verified studies that can actually be quantified and the data reviewed over: hey I looked at it with my eyes and 9/11 was an inside job coz I looked at it with my eyes

Troll harder

Use actual science next time

I have been and will continue to do so, please do the same so next time you have something to contribute other than pointed skepticism

you consider you eyes scientific analysis

I mean it is no "secret" anymore at least not for me and never was. I even remember a newspaper commenting about chemtrailing. Chemtrailing is widely used to make "nice weather" but in some countries in the EU it is forbidden like Germany.

Cirrus clouds..?! HAZE! TERRIFYING!

Liquid Zeolite will remove heavy metals from your person. I used to get mine at Amazon but they stopped selling it there. I found it at ebay, better prices for larger purchases.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=Liquid+Zeolite+1oz&_sacat=0

Just buy some kitty litter FFS. It's made from Zeolite. What, you thought it was some rare wonder material? It's not. It's just very absorbent, and very common.

One thing I recently realized is that these trails don't exist at night no matter what the conditions are.

Actually they do.

As a night worker, I see a lot of night sky in a heavily sprayed metropolis and I agree only in that they can be seen early as residual left over trails. Virtually all of these pictures are very early with sparse coverage.

Very untrue.

Contrails are water vapor and behave much like clouds, so yes they can spread out over the sky, and do.

Do your own - look at what you see in the sky and pictures like these and think critically. Do these pictures really look like natural formations? You don't have to rely on "experts" to tell you what to think