In WW1, we were fighting with the ottoman empire. Seeing their opportunity, Zionists asked us to take palestine and hand it over to them. As rothschild was one of the richest men if not the richest in the world at the time, and we were desperate for funding, it seems it was quite easy for him to convince us to sign the balfour declaration, "agreeing" that palestine belonged to Zionists.
Less than two weeks later, we attacked Jerusalem.
Its possible that when we were losing the war in 1916, zionists offered to try and use their influence over the US to bring them into the war on our side, in exchange for palestine.
Basically it seems clear than we acted as the zionist's attack dog, or mercenaries, and cleared out palestine so that they could move in.
The only reason Israel exists is because Zionists bribed the British Empire to conquer the region off the Ottomans in WW1. In return we got the financial backing we required to win the war. Clearly this was unfair on the people who were living there but modern day Zionists just completely gloss that over. I've actually been told that the land "never belonged to the arabs", or that they "left on their own". Why don't Zionists ever mention the British Empire's "Jerusalem Operations" or the "Battle of Jerusalem"?
Spoiler alert: the arabs didn't leave on their own. We encouraged them to leave, with machine guns. Although Zionists have done everything possible to muddy the waters of legality, somehow claiming this entire operation was legitimate and legal (obviously, in the eyes of the British Empire, for whom the slave trade was once legal, and so was massacring Indians who didn't get in line) The holocaust was legal so clearly legality is irrelevant because it is defined differently by different sides.
The only perspective we can take on these operations is a moral one. We were paid to wipe out a population so that Zionists could move in, because they believe they inherently deserve the land more than the natives, due to their race.
Whichever way you look at it, it was hideously unfair on the native population and modern day Zionists would do very well to remember that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jerusalem
Modern day Zionists are brainwashed from the day they're born and every day after to see Palestinians as lesser beings than them, as evil stupid dangerous savages whose mere existence threatens their very lives. I imagine it's quite difficult to break that mind control when it's so ingrained in the culture and reinforced constantly while Israelis are growing up.
I was thinking about the Syrian refugee crisis and it got me thinking. Why not pick out a nice spot for them somewhere and give them their own little country?
It sounds crazy but it's been done before.
If that gets you thinking about things, good. Seriously, in the entire history of the world, when has anyone ever gotten together and given someone their own country in order to solve a refugee problem?
Some people think of Israel's existence as some sort of miracle. I see it as evidence of something else.
Zionist Jews are also responsible for the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Debatable. Your definition of a "Zionist Jew" seems to be anyone who was involved in the history of politics or finance who was Jewish...
The "Fed" is the private corporation that prints the U.S dollar.
Nope. That's the US Treasury. The Fed requests printing from the Treasury, but they are not the same organization.
The Federal Reserve then charges Interest to the American Government.
No, they don't. They mediate bond issues. That's not the same thing. The US Federal Government is under no obligation to issue bonds.
This creates perpetual debt to the American People, and since 1971 the Dollar is no longer backed by Gold. So now the Fed can print unlimited amounts of money that are essentially worthless.
Well, before 1971 the gold standard didn't prevent the US from printing money, it simply devalued the currency in a different way.
Mossad (the Israeli Government) has been holding the United States and the World Hostage with Nuclear Weapons
Freemasony is indisputably jewish, the 33 degrees of the Scottish Rite are derived from kabballah and a publicly stated overarching goal of Masony is to rebuild Solomons temple in Jerusalem.
I know, how dare they criticize the institutional and cultural bigotry of Ashkenazi Jews, God's Holy People! Damn /r/conspiracy dares to criticize their betters.
It's all so black and white to you guys. It's either or, with no room between. Your sarcasm seems aimed at someone else, because you're not representing my position at all.
Yes, in fact. Every time you reply to me I sacrifice a baby to YHVH. It's all part of the plot. Soon we'll have accumulated enough power to resurrect the entire Rothschild family. My white Irish protestant ass can't wait until you sheep get what's coming to you.
Well then you won't mind moving along and keeping shitposts like this to one of the defaults then, right? If you do decide to continue posting here, please read the rules on the sidebar. Comments like this one I'm responding to are worthless and bring nothing at all to any discussion. Consider this an informal warning.
Yes, in fact. Every time you reply to me I sacrifice a baby to YHVH. It's all part of the plot. Soon we'll have accumulated enough power to resurrect the entire Rothschild family. My white Irish protestant ass can't wait until you sheep get what's coming to you.
28 comments
7 jacks1000 2015-10-14
No it's anti-semitic to say anything negative about Jews.
But it's a-ok to complain about Catholics or Christians in general - especially Whites. That's kosher.
6 Vapourtrails89 2015-10-14
In WW1, we were fighting with the ottoman empire. Seeing their opportunity, Zionists asked us to take palestine and hand it over to them. As rothschild was one of the richest men if not the richest in the world at the time, and we were desperate for funding, it seems it was quite easy for him to convince us to sign the balfour declaration, "agreeing" that palestine belonged to Zionists.
Less than two weeks later, we attacked Jerusalem.
Its possible that when we were losing the war in 1916, zionists offered to try and use their influence over the US to bring them into the war on our side, in exchange for palestine.
Basically it seems clear than we acted as the zionist's attack dog, or mercenaries, and cleared out palestine so that they could move in.
5 Vapourtrails89 2015-10-14
The only reason Israel exists is because Zionists bribed the British Empire to conquer the region off the Ottomans in WW1. In return we got the financial backing we required to win the war. Clearly this was unfair on the people who were living there but modern day Zionists just completely gloss that over. I've actually been told that the land "never belonged to the arabs", or that they "left on their own". Why don't Zionists ever mention the British Empire's "Jerusalem Operations" or the "Battle of Jerusalem"?
Spoiler alert: the arabs didn't leave on their own. We encouraged them to leave, with machine guns. Although Zionists have done everything possible to muddy the waters of legality, somehow claiming this entire operation was legitimate and legal (obviously, in the eyes of the British Empire, for whom the slave trade was once legal, and so was massacring Indians who didn't get in line) The holocaust was legal so clearly legality is irrelevant because it is defined differently by different sides.
The only perspective we can take on these operations is a moral one. We were paid to wipe out a population so that Zionists could move in, because they believe they inherently deserve the land more than the natives, due to their race. Whichever way you look at it, it was hideously unfair on the native population and modern day Zionists would do very well to remember that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jerusalem
3 Ambiguously_Ironic 2015-10-14
Modern day Zionists are brainwashed from the day they're born and every day after to see Palestinians as lesser beings than them, as evil stupid dangerous savages whose mere existence threatens their very lives. I imagine it's quite difficult to break that mind control when it's so ingrained in the culture and reinforced constantly while Israelis are growing up.
5 OB1_kenobi 2015-10-14
I was thinking about the Syrian refugee crisis and it got me thinking. Why not pick out a nice spot for them somewhere and give them their own little country?
It sounds crazy but it's been done before.
If that gets you thinking about things, good. Seriously, in the entire history of the world, when has anyone ever gotten together and given someone their own country in order to solve a refugee problem?
Some people think of Israel's existence as some sort of miracle. I see it as evidence of something else.
3 toothofwisdom 2015-10-14
Nice first post. I still think it has deeper tentacles than what you limit it to.
Wonder if thats who JFK was talking about in this speech,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A good listen if you have the time.
2 aaronsherman 2015-10-14
Debatable. Your definition of a "Zionist Jew" seems to be anyone who was involved in the history of politics or finance who was Jewish...
Nope. That's the US Treasury. The Fed requests printing from the Treasury, but they are not the same organization.
No, they don't. They mediate bond issues. That's not the same thing. The US Federal Government is under no obligation to issue bonds.
Well, before 1971 the gold standard didn't prevent the US from printing money, it simply devalued the currency in a different way.
This is a very strange definition of "hostage".
1 shadairsst 2015-10-14
Freemasony is indisputably jewish, the 33 degrees of the Scottish Rite are derived from kabballah and a publicly stated overarching goal of Masony is to rebuild Solomons temple in Jerusalem.
Just saying.
1 papipapichulo 2015-10-14
How do Jews control or dominate the college system
0 1nf3ct3d 2015-10-14
Schild = sign, not child
1 shmooly 2015-10-14
always thought it was red shield... like the red shield in the beginning of the pet goat video..
2 Geralt23 2015-10-14
It is indeed shield. OP should edit his 'sign' into 'shield'.
1 1nf3ct3d 2015-10-14
yes, schild can mean both sign and shield. in this context its obviously shield.
-9 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Good lord, this is the worst place on reddit.
8 SimpleManofPeace 2015-10-14
I know these conspiracy theorists with their cold hard irrefutable facts. This is the worst place on reddit!
-9 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
It's a Gish Gallop.
3 jacks1000 2015-10-14
I know, how dare they criticize the institutional and cultural bigotry of Ashkenazi Jews, God's Holy People! Damn /r/conspiracy dares to criticize their betters.
-3 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
It's all so black and white to you guys. It's either or, with no room between. Your sarcasm seems aimed at someone else, because you're not representing my position at all.
0 [deleted] 2015-10-14
[removed]
-2 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Yes, in fact. Every time you reply to me I sacrifice a baby to YHVH. It's all part of the plot. Soon we'll have accumulated enough power to resurrect the entire Rothschild family. My white Irish protestant ass can't wait until you sheep get what's coming to you.
3 jacks1000 2015-10-14
I'm a Black Muslim.
As-salamu alaykum!
1 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
That sounds about right. That was one of three guesses I had in mind.
2 Geralt23 2015-10-14
Go away and never come back.
-1 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Why?
0 Ambiguously_Ironic 2015-10-14
Well then you won't mind moving along and keeping shitposts like this to one of the defaults then, right? If you do decide to continue posting here, please read the rules on the sidebar. Comments like this one I'm responding to are worthless and bring nothing at all to any discussion. Consider this an informal warning.
-2 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Got it. "Jews are evil" is quality information, but befuddlement is strictly "verboten." I'll try to do better next time. Sorry for disrupting things.
1 CantStopWhitey 2015-10-14
You have now been banned from posting to /r/conspiracy.
1 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Wouldn't be the first time.
-2 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
Yes, in fact. Every time you reply to me I sacrifice a baby to YHVH. It's all part of the plot. Soon we'll have accumulated enough power to resurrect the entire Rothschild family. My white Irish protestant ass can't wait until you sheep get what's coming to you.
1 ComcastCSR 2015-10-14
That sounds about right. That was one of three guesses I had in mind.