I'm up voting this for the sheer fact that it contains no political agenda. Nothing about Russia, nothing about Israel and Palestine, or anything to do with world politics. While all that stuff is interesting to read against a conspiracy theme I feel like the more outlandish stuff gets buried to easily by political posts that basically say the same thing. Thank you for posting something different. This was a sight for sore eyes. Bravo.

Amen... The Russian thing is getting weird.

I havent been on here in a few weeks. What's the russian thing?

"The Russian thing" is a move from Putin to aid Assad in keeping his country his and allowing Russia to keep their biggest ally in the region a float. This move is described by Russian sources as a means to take serious action against Isis which claims American forces have not taken seriously against American claims that they have in fact been dealing with the threat. If you believe that the west is the root of all modern day problems then Russian actions seem to justify a need for change and are acting out against the evil empire that is the west.

It all comes down to who you support or rather who you don't on the world stage that is causing people to choose sides. Its interesting, sure. I just feel its getting a bit out of hand with the propaganda pouring in from both sides.

It's more about Russia showing the world that the ISIS fight is a sham.

Ding Ding

AFAICR Russia is fighting "terrorist groups" in Syria, which includes ISIS, Al Nusra, and as Assad decides who's the terrorist there: every other opposition group.

There's a sole reason why I support Assad: the JewSA would remove him way before they'd lift a finger against actual terrorists.

Russian propaganda has invaded r/conspiracy .

People just feel that the Russians are a countrbalancing force to the US/Saudi/ISrael policy on the middleeast and the world more generally., and support them because they oppose the US's actions. You think that even the US, the richest country in the world, would spend money influencing a foreign language website not frquented or know to its citizens?

You're making assumptions from something very simple I wrote. Are you asking if Russia is involved in Reddit? The answer is yes, https://www.reddit.com/comments/3grpdf/

People just feel that the Russians are a countrbalancing force to the US/Saudi/ISrael policy

You might even say they're the anti-thesis to the west's thesis...

It has also invaded /r/worldnews since Putin bombed Syria. It is definitely deliberate

Russia has "apparently" nearly crippled the Isis regime in a few days time. The U.S. has reasons not to support this but haven't been stated other than "only we can bomb the shit out of people".

Frankly I don't give a fuck. Gas is cheap, interest rates are low....let those sandy ass fuckers duke it out and when they reconnect to the world with a stable internet connection then we will talk.

They have absolutely not nearly crippled ISIS what so ever and that's a fucking lie.

They're doing fine but have not done much damage to ISIS at all, in fact ISIS was making gains as recently as last week because Russia is bombing other rebel groups and ISIS is taking advantage of it.

Iranian troops might fix this problem though.

The US has been pounding ISIS for over a year and killed many times more than Russia has, the difference is /r/conspiracy ignores all of that and spams Russian propaganda to make it seem like ISIS is getting crushed.

This entire sub is infested.

Not weird at all. Russia's internet propaganda apparatus has fully infiltrated /r/conspiracy and made it its little bitch.

It's very obvious just how much Russia propaganda gets posted and brigaded to the top here, but the mods just can't handle it fast enough.

Haha, no. The mods are posting Russian propaganda regularly.

[deleted]

People have multiple accounts. Many burn their accounts periodically.

We need more ACTUAL /r/conspiracy content.

I get that political acitivites and doings are a big part of that, but I miss UFO/Alien/creature fuckin whatever posts. Want my mind and opinion to be challenged

isn't there like a war going on between us china and russia thats getting covered up right now?

No?

naw, still all part of Da NWO Playaz Club

Not to downplay this but this isn't breaking, it's been around a while and people are generally unable to agree upon what it is, although most agree that it's a flying object that we are unable to identify.

Most 'debunkers' say it was a bird, but if you check out /r/ufos where people take this stuff pretty seriously basically everyone agrees that it's a UFO in its purest sense.

Yeah... I don't think a bird can spilt into two equal parts and fly underwater without slowing down.

If I remember some people said that was a second bird. In fact most people specifically say it was a pelican for some reason. I've read that more than once.

I don't get how people can be so sure of themselves on these things.

There were clearly no wings on the object and its average speed was 80 mph, maxing out at 120 mph. The fastest bird in the world is the Peregrine falcon and it maxes out at 242 mph. The next fastest birds that can fly over 120 are the Golden Eagle and Gyrfalcon. None of these birds dive into water, and none of these birds live near the coast. They live mostly in tropics, woods, and tundras. The Golden Eagle can skim the top of rivers for easy fish to catch but doesn't actually go under. Pelicans don't fly nearly as fast as the object was flying and birds just simply don't act that strange. Also, if it was a bird, then it would have slowed down much more drastically when it went underwater. It wasn't a bird.

And those top speeds are for diving only. The fastest flying bird in flapping flight would be the White-throated needletail, clocked at 69MPH.

^{Mouseover or click to view the metric conversion for this comment}

Not to mention it was a government helicopter, meaning that the pilots were experienced and would have recognized a bird in most situations.

There are still debunkers out there? Wow.

Practically every astronaut has admitted that UFOs exist, there are mountains of evidence to substantiate the endless claims... hell, a former Canadian Defense Minister went on record about this just a short while ago.

It's a controversial subject to be sure, but I'm continually surprised that people don't believe at this point. Then again some people believe that climate change is a liberal hoax, so maybe I'm putting too much faith in them.

Practically every astronaut has admitted that UFOs exist

Several astronauts have said they have seen some weird, shit, man, and that's about it. I don't doubt it.

Doesn't mean aliens.

there are mountains of evidence to substantiate the endless claims

If by "evidence," you mean "stories," then yes. But you don't back up a claim with an anecdote, okay?

a former Canadian Defense Minister went on record

Dude, you can't even talk about that guy on /r/ufos anymore. Even those guys are tired of hearing about him.

He saw nothing while in office. Nothing. His interest in UFOs came about from watching a Peter Jennings special after he retired. He has no more knowledge than you or I.

I'm continually surprised that people don't believe at this point.

It gives me faith in humanity that they look at a bunch of hoaxers, scammers, and old men telling stories, and do not conclude that the aliens are here, man.

Here is what the entire UFO thing boils down to:

"We saw some shit that looked like it might have been flying, but we don't really know, and wouldn't know what it was if it were."

The end. Everything else is just speculation.

Doesn't mean aliens.

I never said anything about aliens; I said UFOs.

If by "evidence," you mean "stories," then yes.

There's plenty of photographic and video evidence of UFOs, what are you on about?

We live in a world where pretty much everything is filmed in decent quality. Yet this right here, is some of the best UFO "evidence" I've ever seen, and it's so shitty we can't tell if it's aliens or a fucking pelican.

We live in a world where pretty much everything is filmed in decent quality

Patently untrue. Most people reduce the level of recording quality to store more footage in the same amount of space.

Now even assuming they have a decent camera and were recording at optimal fidelity, how many of them have the first idea how to operate a camera properly, video or otherwise? Have you seen the average cellphone camera video?

Now take that number of people and divide it by how many of them take the time to actually look into the sky, then take that number and divide it by their chance to be in the presence of an anomalous event in the first place.

There's a reason most of the compelling evidence comes from the Air Force; they're in the right places with expensive gear operated by people trained to use it.

we can't tell if it's aliens or a fucking pelican

Probably because most people don't wander around with DSLR cameras sporting telephoto lenses or thermals.

Thumbs up, friend. Who knows who's piloting these things.

thats like saying people on the green bay packers subreddit were talking about how great green bay is this year.

Reminded me of the Nellis test range UFO from 95

Whats the story behind this?

Wouldn't it seem more likely that the second one popped up out of the water - meeting up with the other one? You can't really see it split in two. Either way, its some pretty good footage.

Check out the big brain on Brad.

Lol yeah I agree, that's the more likely scenario since the craft is clearly amphibious.

A refreshingly clean and simple report on suspected UFO activity with little bias and no spin...

SORCERY! Thank you for this.

Reminds me of the craft William Cooper claimed to have seen fly straight out of the water (and this was decades ago).

Interesting stuff...I like Nick Pope too and I share his sense of reserved excitement.

Many believe there is a alien civilization living underwater. I myself seen something flying in and out the ocean once. I was in Cape May NJ on the beach watching the sunset with my girlfriend. We both spotted 1 bright light about 5 miles into the ocean. At first we were both sure it was a flare because of the red and orange glow it was giving off and how it just floating up towards the sky. Then things got weird. The 1 single light turned off and then turned back on. At this point we still believed it to be a flare but then 3 more shot up to the sky. They stopped midair, flew back up and then back down to the water. One of them was going to the left and then to the right. At this point we knew flares couldn't do this. It only lasted about 4 minutes. Just enough for a small crowd to join around us and make us all scratch our heads trying to figure out what the hell it was.

Also I have family in PR and have visited. Lots of UFO activity over there and I have stories for days. Personal experience to stories from my grandma and uncles who lived there all their lives.

I remember back in 2011 or 2012 there was this big circular cloud formation that was symmetrical, I even took a flick of it.. it all happened when a beam of light was filmed going into a volcanic mountain somewhere in mexico.. coincidence?
youtube.com/watch?v=hexVyUvQ1fg youtube.com/watch?v=jSMujo69ob4

This video pisses me off because every time it shows the beam of light, it's in slow motion. Why couldn't they show the dang thing at normal speed at least once.

i know but look at the dates its just a weird coincidence.. shit flies into a volcano then a day later a weird weather sphere appears, with the volcano being almost in the centre..

Check out admiral bird. Agartha. fun read and not really about politics, just pure conspiracy.

I seen one in Gulf Breeze Florida when i was 12 years old. Hovering over the bay. There had been a Blue Angels show over the beach a few days before the sighting.

Completely. Wow, glad I saw this.

It was swamp gas reflecting the light of Venus.

This is quite interesting. Not sure what to think of it. When they lose sight of them both, the camera just kind of moves around.. I imagine the videographer was like, "WTF!?"

And disappear into another light spectrum.

I was thinking the same thing.. right before it splits it looks like it was in some cloaking apparatus..

To me it seems more like military technology. It's small looking. It's fast and from the looks of it, it has stealth as well.

This is probably testing real life scenarios for the technology. Remember, the private sector gets the technology that is obsolete for military standards.

With the threat of aliens, there will be justification for a united world government

Looks like we'll have a good first impression to the galactic community /s

Looks to me like a drone using some variant of CIRCM. What appears to be a craft splitting is a false heat signature reflected off water.

Or so I assume.

But how do you explain the submerging into water and coming back out. Plus I've seen drones small and big, and none, so far, have that level of aerodynamic and stability in the air at that low altitude. They seem to wobble or need stabilizers like a helicopter tail rotor. This seems to flow very smoothly through the air, almost like it does not need propulsion to move. I've never seen anything like that before.

Two possibilities:

1. It never actually goes into the water. What looks like a craft going into the water is just an infrared-optical illusion -- similar to the way it appears to split in two. It's a false image. It's meant to be a false image.
2. It's a variant of the flimmer, which is a drone that operates in the air and underwater. Turn to page 6 of this pdf for an article about the flimmer.

I've never seen anything like that before.

I had never seen anything like the F-117 when I saw one in 1987. I was unable to get anyone to believe my description because it's quite impossible for something with that shape to fly.

Wow, this is great information.... Thank you for sharing.. I was not aware these existed. This PDF does put into question that footage. I have to research a little bit more. But great stuff thanks! I found a youtube video of the project

With today's technology, it's possible to make anything look real.

June 2014: Original post from r/ufos with comments and updates from John Greenewald, Jr. of the BlackVault.

Not totally new, but definitely an unknown,... although I would lean heavily towards one completely of human manufacture,...

While not required, you are requested to use the NP domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I'm real tired of this bot. If it's so important to put NP then why can't they program a simple one line of regex instead of harassing everyone?

[deleted]

http://www.explorescu.org/#!about/cee5

well wouldn't be surprised ask what scientists think about mind control they think you are crazy.

Wow. I have a teacher at my school Who is a life long expert at ufology and aliens. I was not a believer for a long time but the evidence is undeniable at this point. Extremely interesting video

The video is of a UFO, period.

UFO 100%. Alien or object from space flying, 99.9% sure, there is nothing it can possibly be and it looked like a space rock manipulating gravity In my opinion. Lots of people say they live underwater

It went from 180 to 90 miles an hour (UNDERWATER); this is impossible using current technology.

You have any more extremely credible videos like that? I wonder what they look like. How much they have been here and why hide them? Are we trying to Acquire their technology?

I don't know if you realize how special that video is... You were never supposed to see it; neither were we at Noble Savage TV.

At Noble Savage TV we are here to Informa la Gente! This is just the beginning...

Truly incredibly thanks for sharing. I hope we make contact and you continue to post things like this to make the public want it and get Congress to fund it

Its clearly an unmanned small drone, you can even see the rotors spinning.

Maybe you missed the part where it goes just under the surface of the water and resurfaces repeatedly and with basically no change in speed? I was thinking basic small drone too until I saw the second half of the video.

I would call going from 120 over land to 90 in the water a drop in speed, wouldn't you?

Please, enlighten me with a source to your data. It appears to be increasing in velocity as it hits the water.

Regardless, do you presume to understand or comprehend how such a thing is even possible.

Am I the only person that actually bothered to read the fucking article?

And yes, I do presume to know that 90 is slower than 120, in fact, I'm pretty sure it's a 25% change which is substantially more than "basically no change in speed".

I don't disagree with you, but the engineer in me says that the rotors would turn horizontal to propel it through the water. The change of angle from vertical to horizontal blades would also explain the speeding up.

Again, this is me playing Devils advocate for the sake of thinking stuff through, don't take offense or read into it

You do know the Navy has drones that do that, right?

R&D for newer units. Military Tech is 10+ years more advanced than civilian. where you think all that budget money goes?

You do know they are referring to Unmanned Underwater Vehicles, right? Like these, I don't think they are referring a drone that can fly and be submerged.

They're talking about both -- you didn't read far enough:

For example, the Naval Research Laboratory is testing a drone (“The Flimmer”) that can operate both in the air and underwater and can attack enemy submarines. The Upward Falling Payload program run by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and experimenting with launching aerial drones from ocean floors is another example.

No, I didn't, hence my comment. I'll have to read up on them.

I forget what company but there's a company that made an amphibious drone that can go underwater. It was on the front page a few weeks ago.

The US Navy.

Please take a screenshot of the rotors for us.

People see what they want to see to confirm their preconceived notions. Do you want it to be a UFO? It's a UFO.

To me, it's a drone. Then again, I believe in Occam's razor.

Edit: Thanks downvote brigade! Censor anyone who doesn't agree!

I've never seen any physical object, let alone a drone, increase in velocity when submerged. Not to mention it cloned, duplicated, split, or met with another UFO near the end of the video. I've never read or seen of any drone capable of breaking the laws of physics.

You sir are willfully ignorant or a useful idiot.

Weird. You are calling someone ELSE willfully ignorant when the story itself says the object slows by 25 percent when it submerges.

Idiot eh?

Or, or... and bear with me here... I'm not willing to jump to the conclusion that aliens have come from outer space or under the sea when there are thousands upon thousands of more plausible explanations for this. It's a grainy, blurry, video shot from a moving vehicle of another moving vehicle where scale and distance are anyone's guess.

So, no. I'm not willfully ignorant. I just require actual proof of things before I buy into them wholesale. Sorry!

Edit: Just watched the video again. I'm not convinced it actually goes underwater. At the 1:42 mark, you can see it "disappear" when it's clearly over land. I'd attribute this to the video quality, distance, etc. So no, I don't think it's aliens.

Who said anything about aliens. This is the definition of an Unknown Flying Object.

The assumption that it is a drone, however, is ridiculous.

The post. The original post talks about it being possibly being aliens. That's who said aliens.

UFO, colloquially, means "extraterrestrial phenomenon." The origin of the term stems from flying saucers and sightings of "alien" ships. So yeah, when you start talking about UFOs, people are going to assume you're talking about aliens.

Feel free to make that assumption but it is speculation to say this is Alien.

Where does the original post mention aliens? A UFO could be anything that's the whole point, it's unidentified. I would guess 50% of those interested in UFO's believe it's actually governments testing their new tech so I'm not really sure why you are so determined to make a connection to aliens.

The almost 4 minute long video is being taken seriously by UFO and alien researchers all over the world and was placed online by a group calling itself the Scientific Coalition for Ufology (SCU).

and

Something which makes this object appear very ‘Alien’ to this world as there is no ‘known’ technology out there that is capable of this!?

and

Could this ‘unknown object’ of been an Alien Scout type craft?

PLUS when people say UFO, they generally mean aliens. That's like when I say "burger" I may mean an ostrich burger, but people automatically assume "hamburger made of beef." Plus, look where we are... /r/conspiracy. It'd be like if I chided you for assuming I meant a beef hamburger when we were sitting in a beef-only restaurant.

I'm not making a connection to aliens. I'm saying, again, that this is a terrestrial drone.

A UFO means you don't know what it is. Unidentified. You're going to have to provide some evidence if you want to claim it's a drone.

Like the shape and the movement and the rotors. Ok.

A curious observation: why is there no splash or wake when it allegedly enters the water?

Because it doesn't enter the water. You can see at the 1:40 or so mark where it's clearly over the ground that it "disappears" in the same way it does when it's "underwater."

it may not have submerged. I don't know much about the cameras these things use, but is it possible that when it splits that its filming the object and the reflection at the same time?

I want to sort of clarify something about people assuming UFOs are operated by aliens. The reason so many people automatically think aliens is because flying saucers have been sighted since the beginning of time. So these things definitely had to have at least originally been from outer space for obvious reasons. I don't know why people try so hard to deny that aliens have visited our planet. It's not that far-fetched. However, I'm not saying that the government doesn't have secret technology either. I think it's very possible that governments have reverse-engineered these crafts in secret. Again, UFOs have been sighted since the beginning of time, so aliens are the only the really plausible answer if you look at it historically. Just my contention anyway.

They're real dude and the U.S. Government might know about it. I don't think they have them in chambers in some underground base but there has been many instances of sudden electrical failure of equipment and missing time in the military.

oh good god do we need this much of an intro? just post the source. the vid is not new. and enough with the Russian conspiracy. its a valid sighting. it sticks with me because im familiar with the ir spotting involved. its pretty damn hard to fake.

I always figure since the US government has tech more than 10yrs before civilians see it, its just kind of next gen drone. Cool

You're shadowbanned unfortunately.

Yeah real cool! I'm with ya, my guess is some gravity manipulation propulsion system.

unidentified yes doing anything otherworldly not really

I would like to see a video of an airplane flying that same path being filmed from the same altitude with the same camera to compare it to

Please understand...I'm not saying that there are not aliens. I'm saying that this isn't. It's a drone. You can see the rotors at each corner. Keep looking and good luck.

How does it go under water and resurface so effortlessly?

And increase velocity while doing so.

It might not be aliens but it definitively is a UFO, you know Unknown Flying Object...

id like to see your definite proof its a drone... as id like to see the proof of people saying its Aliens...

Its a UFO that much is clear.

The second link is a video of a drone. Looks to be about 3 feet across. it crosses roads several times and passes behind and in front of buildings, so the scale is easy to judge.

So if its aliens, it's tiny little aliens.

Aliens can also have drones.

The only time we have visited other planets have been with drones.

I'm not saying this is an alien ship, but assuming there has to be one inside for it to be so is underestimating an interstellar species.

That is certainly true. But an object that is clearly human-made-drone size, traveling at human-made-drone speed, and filmed in the cosmic neighborhood known to be inhabited by humans, is probably going to end up being a human made drone...

Most likely yes.

I feel like advanced aliens could just make shit that looks like the shit we have. Why observe a planet in a foreign vehicle that will arouse suspicion. Just make your spaceship look like a plane or a drone. Fuck even a bird if they're advanced enough. Or a bug. Imagine a bumblebee that was actually a small alien drone buzzing about recording shit.

Couldn't help but imagine the death bee from Invader Zim_

Why would it be aliens when we have drones?

Simplest explanation....

Explain to me how it increases velocity while submerged. Don't presume to know everything.

point out a spot where it is clearly submerged and not just flying low over water.

Furthermore, if it did submerge it would disappear from the IR camera.

If you are basing the premise of your argument that this UFO never submerged, and you watched the entire video, there is no point trying to logically argue anything with you because you are an idiot.

I've watched it 5 times now and I don't think there is evidence that it ever submerged. From the angle, distance and quality the video was taken I can see this flying low and going behind a swell where the angle of the video would make it look submerged because the water in debt is higher. Also I can easily see the quality being so bad that the object just blends in with the background due to loss/compression.

I'm willing to change my ideas just please point me to a spot in the video where it is obvious that it is submerged.

I also find it hard to tell if it did go underwater. It's looks like either it did go underwater (which is impressive) or it was compression / blending in with the background.

Just a case of you combining not knowing what the fuck you are looking at with wishful thinking, Don't sweat it, happens a lot in here.

Im not sayi g it is or isnt a drone but dont you think the military has the ability to create a drone that goes in and out of water?

It is a UFO in it's purest form. To say anything else is speculation.

Apparently they do, but the top speed for it is much slower than the object in the video.

it's a bespin cloud car.

Saw this ages ago and assumed it was some sort of drone.

Must just be a weather balloon. Did I say weather balloon? I meant swamp gas. Actually no, clearly just some flares...

It's anything but the obvious when we cannot accept the truth.

clearly
Clearly...Venus. I mean Venus shaped weather balloons filled with swamp gas.

With everyone having cameras these days, you'd think we would have gotten a better video by now.

Breaking news? No. Aliens? No. (IMHO) Gov secret experiment? Likely..

OP here: I think we can agree it is an actual UFO, and it's from the last 18 months. Anything else is speculation.

Exactly, UFO != alien

Video was posted this year, but the video was taken April 26, 2013.. top left of the video

It's a Navy drone, brother.

Since when do many drones split in half in mid air? Well since we have no way of knowing if we do, this is the definition of a UFO. Unidentified flying object. It's a flying object that's not identified.

I'm pretty sure we're seeing a false thermal image throughout the video. In fact, I think the purpose of the video is to demonstrate this capability (military helicopters project false thermal images too).

The times the drone disappears and the times there are double images are very likely due to the thermal image reflecting off the water. So it never splits in half. And it never goes underwater. And in fact, when it's near the water it is never where it appears to be at all.

It is almost certainly a military UAV. Unidentified solely because military research is meant to be kept secret.

To date, the only time I ever saw something I was absolutely certain was a UFO (in 1987) -- because it seemed like there was no way in hell something shaped like it could fly -- and it sounded like nothing I had ever heard -- well, I learned a few years later that what I had seen was an early stealth aircraft.

And the thing in the video? You'll know precisely what it is within the next few years.

Edit: It's probably a video of one of these.

Thank you for taking the time to just explain your thought process to me. I will look into what you have presented. It has always made sense that regardless what the truth is about alien life, it's in the governments best interest to just let UFOS be UFOs, which provides an easy cover for military projects that aren't public knowledge yet.

Side note: I'll forgive ya for posting a link to foxnews :p

Here's the (pdf warning) Naval Research Laboratory magazine where faux news got that picture. The article about that vehicle begins on page 6.

[deleted]

You've got the same internet I do. There have been lots of articles about them -- here's an actual US Navy research page, and here's what I suspect we're seeing in those videos, and here (pdf warning) is a full-color magazine issue dedicated to navy drones.

So... you don't even read the stuff you copy/paste and pass off as your own work in self.posts?

I suppose people with a week old account shouldn't be expected to understand the intricacies of posting articles on reddit.

[deleted]

Did you read it before or after editing your above comment where you said it was from 2015?

That was a genuine question I asked you yesterday. Either you don't know what you are doing, or you are trying to mislead people into thinking you are the author of the articles you don't even provide a link to. I'm sure you do have more link karma than me since I have hardly posted any topics in the two years I've been here, but the fact that you have any link karma at all tells me you do know how reddit works.

[deleted]

I'm well aware of what you put at the end and it's not a source. That is the name of a random website, and you couldn't even be bothered to hotlink it. Even if you did hotlink it, a reader is still given the impression that you are the author right up until the very last few words. That is misleading. Self.posts are for things you yourself wrote, not for copypasta. If you have an article to post then fucking post it.

[deleted]

Let me re-iterate my first question: You don't know how reddit works, do you?

Press the button that says Submit New Link. Compose a title. Copy/paste the link to the article into the box. Done.

Reddit is a glorified news aggregator, not a BBS forum.

EDIT:

we here at Noble Savage TV... stand by our posts!

How many extra hits has your site gotten in the last week from people going there to find the source of your copypasta?

This reminded me of the small silver spheres filmed making crop circles in the 90s.

Loos like a bird at first glance

Sound like 100% complete bullshit.

This is one of them types of posts, done by new users predominately, in the hope of trying to discredit /r/conspiracy, by way of outlandish conspiracy theories.

Most of yours look like shitposts, too dude. Sad thing is you're actually trying to seem edgy, while ordering people around regarding who to vote for.

Sorry but I really don't see any type of hypothesizing over ancient reptilian new world order bullshit or claims that this is from a race of aliens from planet Zoidberg in the Moondingle galaxy.

It's a video of a strange object. I don't understand your objection to this simply being posted.

[deleted]

[removed]

[removed]

Then why waste your time being here? you make yourself look idiotic and discredit yourself.

I'm not sure how making rational comments makes me look idiotic and discredited. I come for the entertainment factor. Conspiracies are fun to think about even if they're not true.

Sorry, but defiantly see a two birds flying next to each other. Its even has a flapping motion, as if with wings. The only alternative, would be a drone, but unlikely, because the diving in and out of water.

But to give some credit, maybe an alien drone? 3-5 feet long wont provide much cabin space for anything alive that could operate it.

So which is it, a drone or a bird, because drones don't flap.

Geeze, get your own head straight.

You should be sorry. You "defiantly" see two birds flapping (at over 120 MPH, faster than any living bird on the planet) but it could also be a drone.

How about we label it what it is, a UFO.

...but I identified it! Now its just an F.O.

Feel free to make that assumption but it is speculation to say this is Alien.

Where does the original post mention aliens? A UFO could be anything that's the whole point, it's unidentified. I would guess 50% of those interested in UFO's believe it's actually governments testing their new tech so I'm not really sure why you are so determined to make a connection to aliens.

^{Mouseover or click to view the metric conversion for this comment}

Not to mention it was a government helicopter, meaning that the pilots were experienced and would have recognized a bird in most situations.

And those top speeds are for diving only. The fastest flying bird in flapping flight would be the White-throated needletail, clocked at 69MPH.

Looks like we'll have a good first impression to the galactic community /s

I don't know if you realize how special that video is... You were never supposed to see it; neither were we at Noble Savage TV.

At Noble Savage TV we are here to Informa la Gente! This is just the beginning...