While not required, you are requested to use the NP domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.
If there was a celestial object of that size anywhere near us, the Earth's orbit would have already been severely affected long before it was actually visible.
Given the face nearest us is lit up, it must be on the other side of the solar system and not between us and the sun.
I see what you're saying, but it's not impossible for objects to reflect reflection - i.e. the light from the object in question doesn't necessarily have to be coming from the sun's direct light itself.
The lack of light reflection on the water for such a bright object indicates fakery
I wouldn't be too super sure about that because if you pay close attention to the waves themselves and how the sun's rays reflect off of those waves, the reflection itself is so extremely diffuse - and there are SOOO many waves - that it seems difficult for an object of even the size of the planet in question to create too much of a noticeable reflection on the water next to the sun's glaring reflection.
The moon face doesn't quite match up with the suns location.
That assessment I don't quite know about, as it seems pretty normal and standard to me actually.
For it to be that far, and that large, puts it close in size to the sun.
uh. You know if there was another sun-sized object just chilling in our immediate solar system, it would completely alter the orbits of all the other planets, right.
noun, plural ironies.
1.
the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning:
the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.
2.
Literature.
a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated.
(especially in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes, etc., especially as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme, or emotion.
3.
Socratic irony.
4.
dramatic irony.
5.
an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
6.
the incongruity of this.
7.
an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing.
8.
an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc.
Not saying that chem spraying doesn't effect what's being seen, but it's been known for quite some time even in common MSM science (though the information is not widely promulgated) that some planets can generate their own heat source and energy...so some can in fact actually glow. Not saying that Mercury is one of those planets that can, but A) I'm also not saying it's impossible (for we know so little and are generally lied to about the tiny bit that is known), and B) even if Mercury can't in fact generate its own heat energy and glow, this image may not ultimately be of Mercury after all regardless.
Ever bother asking yourself who's actually responsible for the wars and political manipulation that you likely think are the "real" things that matter?
I'll give you a hint: Not all those forces are exclusively Earth-based.
What you're thinking are "the things that matter" is little more than superficial icing layering the outermost level of a cake of deceit that the vast majority of humanity doesn't know even exists in the first place.
We've had this debate already. Aliems still be fake as fuck. A convenient cover story for the soulless assholes in control. The while reptilian thing used to be an accurate means of describing these psychopath fucks.
Your stark ignorance doesn't make the truth any less the case. Your obstinate "nope...not listening" perspective doesn't keep what's really happening on and around this planet from happening any less real.
It's not obstinate. As has already been plainly and clearly stated, aliems don't exist. They are fictional beings. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And so far, nothing of substance has been provided.
You always seem to have those. Strange that it doesn't contain that extraordinary evidence we spoke of. You're selling this whole aliem bullshit a little too hard.
According to one of the users on /r/ufos the effect created is due to lens flair. The user linked this article to explain the effect.
Users over at /r/ufos seem to agree. Here is another comment supporting the lens flair idea:
This is the right answer. If you look at the 'planet' in the video, it is not perfectly round. The top part of the 'planet' is shaved off a tad, so it is less than a perfect sphere (like a gibbous moon). This is because it is a lens flare as the sun is just beginning to dip below the clouds on the horizon. The lens flare is an inverted image of the sun. So the flatter (less round) side of the 'planet' is on the top, while the cloud obstructed portion of the sun is on the bottom. Science!
It...totally doesn't look anywhere near like a lens flair to me. It looks like a round, well dileneated object - not anything diffuse like a any sort of lens flair.
This is not to say that these other posters don't have valid points, but it doesn't seem to appear to be that from my perspective.
It...totally doesn't look anywhere near like a lens flair to me. It looks like a round, well dileneated object - not anything diffuse like a any sort of lens flair.
This is not to say that these other posters don't have valid points, but it doesn't seem to appear to be that from my perspective.
38 comments
2 rockytimber 2015-10-23
from the YT comments
1 no1113 2015-10-23
Doesn't look like that at all to me. But okay.
1 AutoModerator 2015-10-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 nonorat 2015-10-23
If there was a celestial object of that size anywhere near us, the Earth's orbit would have already been severely affected long before it was actually visible.
2 SleazySnake 2015-10-23
how can you tell its size without knowing the distance it is away from the camera?
0 Rockran 2015-10-23
The reverse is true, we'd see it long before it got close enough to affect our orbit.
0 nonorat 2015-10-23
Hmm... I suppose that's the case if it was a sun, but I was really considering a low albedo planet of some sort, like Nibiru is often claimed to be.
Either way, this video is not showing a physical object.
0 no1113 2015-10-23
One would think. I wouldn't disagree with that assessment.
0 metabolix 2015-10-23
I think that video was edited to put it in there. Why has no info or context been provided?
1 no1113 2015-10-23
I've edited a lot - two feature length films, various shorts, etc, etc...and this doesn't look edited...at all. Just saying.
No idea. It's the only video in that yt user's channel too.
I don't know what's going on, but it does look...strange/weird/anomalous/intriguing. Take your pick. ;)
0 Rockran 2015-10-23
Given the face nearest us is lit up, it must be on the other side of the solar system and not between us and the sun.
For it to be that far, and that large, puts it close in size to the sun.
The lack of light reflection on the water for such a bright object indicates fakery
The moon face doesn't quite match up with the suns location.
1 no1113 2015-10-23
I see what you're saying, but it's not impossible for objects to reflect reflection - i.e. the light from the object in question doesn't necessarily have to be coming from the sun's direct light itself.
I wouldn't be too super sure about that because if you pay close attention to the waves themselves and how the sun's rays reflect off of those waves, the reflection itself is so extremely diffuse - and there are SOOO many waves - that it seems difficult for an object of even the size of the planet in question to create too much of a noticeable reflection on the water next to the sun's glaring reflection.
That assessment I don't quite know about, as it seems pretty normal and standard to me actually.
Valid observations though, sir. Thank you.
0 Autocoprophage 2015-10-23
uh. You know if there was another sun-sized object just chilling in our immediate solar system, it would completely alter the orbits of all the other planets, right.
0 Rockran 2015-10-23
Yep.
0 zeropoint357 2015-10-23
Lens flare. Or a mystery planet that only shows up for Nibirutards to film.
-1 no1113 2015-10-23
My only hope in all of this is that this comment of yours didn’t completely take up the use of your single functioning braincell.
-3 zeropoint357 2015-10-23
irony1
[ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]
noun, plural ironies. 1. the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend. 2. Literature.
3. Socratic irony. 4. dramatic irony. 5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected. 6. the incongruity of this. 7. an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing. 8. an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc.
4 no1113 2015-10-23
Apparently, it did.
3 HAESisAMyth 2015-10-23
Are you saying your first comment was ironic?
2 zeropoint357 2015-10-23
His post was the definition of irony. But I'm among the Elinin/Nibirutards, and my humour is wasted.
0 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
Planets don't glow like stars. This is refraction, likely thank to chem spraying.
0 no1113 2015-10-23
Not saying that chem spraying doesn't effect what's being seen, but it's been known for quite some time even in common MSM science (though the information is not widely promulgated) that some planets can generate their own heat source and energy...so some can in fact actually glow. Not saying that Mercury is one of those planets that can, but A) I'm also not saying it's impossible (for we know so little and are generally lied to about the tiny bit that is known), and B) even if Mercury can't in fact generate its own heat energy and glow, this image may not ultimately be of Mercury after all regardless.
0 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
Not to that degree. The luminescence you're speaking of is not visible through the the human eye. Big difference.
Stuff like this tends to be a date on this sub. Inconsequential fluff and filled, serving only as a distraction from the things that matter.
0 no1113 2015-10-23
Ever bother asking yourself who's actually responsible for the wars and political manipulation that you likely think are the "real" things that matter?
I'll give you a hint: Not all those forces are exclusively Earth-based.
What you're thinking are "the things that matter" is little more than superficial icing layering the outermost level of a cake of deceit that the vast majority of humanity doesn't know even exists in the first place.
-1 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
We've had this debate already. Aliems still be fake as fuck. A convenient cover story for the soulless assholes in control. The while reptilian thing used to be an accurate means of describing these psychopath fucks.
0 UFOsExist_DealWithIt 2015-10-23
The word you were searching for is spelled: A.L.I.E.N
0 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
Aliem?
0 UFOsExist_DealWithIt 2015-10-23
The word you were searching for is spelled: A.L.I.E.N
0 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
Nah, I still think you're incorrect. We're taking about proper fictional entities here. You can paint these with a much larger brush stroke.
0 no1113 2015-10-23
Your stark ignorance doesn't make the truth any less the case. Your obstinate "nope...not listening" perspective doesn't keep what's really happening on and around this planet from happening any less real.
-1 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
It's not obstinate. As has already been plainly and clearly stated, aliems don't exist. They are fictional beings. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And so far, nothing of substance has been provided.
1 UFOsExist_DealWithIt 2015-10-23
The word you were searching for is spelled: A.L.I.E.N
0 no1113 2015-10-23
lol. Okay. Here's an extremely relevant response for you.
-1 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
You always seem to have those. Strange that it doesn't contain that extraordinary evidence we spoke of. You're selling this whole aliem bullshit a little too hard.
0 no1113 2015-10-23
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/3pvhkw/crosspost_from_from_rufos_relevant_here/cwbxl2w
-1 iamagod_____ 2015-10-23
LOL
-1 Bill_Murray2014 2015-10-23
According to one of the users on /r/ufos the effect created is due to lens flair. The user linked this article to explain the effect.
Users over at /r/ufos seem to agree. Here is another comment supporting the lens flair idea:
1 no1113 2015-10-23
It...totally doesn't look anywhere near like a lens flair to me. It looks like a round, well dileneated object - not anything diffuse like a any sort of lens flair.
This is not to say that these other posters don't have valid points, but it doesn't seem to appear to be that from my perspective.
1 no1113 2015-10-23
It...totally doesn't look anywhere near like a lens flair to me. It looks like a round, well dileneated object - not anything diffuse like a any sort of lens flair.
This is not to say that these other posters don't have valid points, but it doesn't seem to appear to be that from my perspective.