WMR breaking report: Civilian aircraft may have been "droned" at CIA facility in Arizona prior to 9/11. Author and pilot Phil Marshall may have paid with his and his family's lives for having this information....

32  2015-10-28 by [deleted]

[deleted]

19 comments

Stopped reading at "60 decades"

This sounds like you just pulled a bunch CIA shit from various movies all into one story

Great story! Too had its fabricated. Sounds like a John Grisham novel.

Too had its fabricated.

pretty bold statement for someone with a 6 day new account.

I probably reek of shill to you don't I. Well, for a couple years I would just look at reddit, never comment, but now I do. Believe me if you want. I don't care, I'm just here for the truth.

Welcome to /r/conspiracy

...post some links pls

Sounds like something a shill would say...

Caught me!

TL;DR:

blah blah blah

WMR learned that Pinal has the capability to enable large planes to be remotely operated.

blah blah blah

In other words, an assertion with zero evidence.

Kinda like the final NIST report on the "collapses'" at the WTC. Assertions with no peer reviewed backing or "evidence" backed by the scientific community.

There is a lot of info they wont share with the ones who design the buildings. They also wont share the computer models data or software on how they came to their conclusions.

There are MANY peer reviewed papers on the controlled demolition of the WTC. Google it. Or Duck Duck Go it.

So about your blah blah blah..... That is how you sound to the ones smart enough to realize that steel framed buildings don't collapse from fires.

I have been looking for a long time to find a documented case of a steel framed modern building that has collapsed from office fires.

Show me that National Geographic hit piece and I will LMAO, then buy you dinner, dessert, and blow in your ear while you lay down and like it and take it like a champ.

XOXO

Peace

I find it interesting that you would write a whataboutist comment invoking unrelated 9/11 demolition stuff on a 3 day old, deleted post. No one is going to read that.

Just saying hello baby, see you in debate conspiracy.

In other words, a n assertion with zero evidence conspiracy theory.

FTFY

[deleted]

My point exactly.

thank you for standing up against this stuff...

wish there were a better way to ward-off newbies.

[deleted]

[deleted]

No evidence, no citations, no source. 100% bullshit.

Me: "Barack Obama is president of the US"

DJ_Chaps: "No evidence, no citations, no source. 100% bullshit".

Huh? Come again?

Me: "Barack Obama is president of the US"

DJ_Chaps: "No evidence, no citations, no source. 100% bullshit".

Sounds like something a shill would say...

...post some links pls

Welcome to /r/conspiracy