Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11
59 2015-12-23 by DronePuppet
- An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
- The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
- One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
- Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
- Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them.
- The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
- Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
- A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
- News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
- Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
- Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
- AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
- The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.
There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.
17 comments
3 krafty66 2015-12-23
Biggest one for me is the perfectly round hole in the pentagon with no sign of plane debris. Yeah right. Only one poor video of it too. Oh yeah, another plane crashes in PA and there is only a steaming pile of dirt. What a joke.
1 nonorat 2015-12-23
Exaggeration of this type doesn't do your argument any favours.
1 krafty66 2015-12-23
OK, non-perfectly round hole. But still, c'mon. Obviously it wasn't a plane. And the Pentagon has hundreds of cameras and we only get to see the one video clip.
1 nonorat 2015-12-23
The BBC reported it only because Reuters already had.
It was twenty minutes.
Reporters report. There's a difference between someone who reads news and someone who gathers it.
viewers could see the still-standing building - And the New Yorkers who recognised the building in question would have been able to see the error. But why do you think the people from the BBC would recognise it? It's not famous or well-known to anyone from the UK.
Well... it was! The Americans were in a state of complete shock and disbelief.
No, they didn't predict it. The fire-fighters on sight had already declared hours earlier that the building was going to fall, given the internal sounds of collapse, and bulging walls.
This is a matter of debate, but I'd go with the fire-fighters on-site, who saw the building structure weakening over a period of hours.
EDIT- BurningEmpire's section on the timeline of the reportage of WTC7's collapse is more detailed than my own.
1 angelway 2015-12-23
You want to uncover all the true about 9/11, and start a deep investigation about it.
Solution: Direct democracy, local and PERMANENT .. No more middlemen , no more oligopoly, no more private bankers to dominate world. Power is in the hands of all the local citizen.. No more globalization laws.
0 burningempires 2015-12-23
Much of this is evidence of incompetence more than conspiracy, and there are also quite a lot of factual errors and blanks.
C'mon: name names. Provide evidence here!
No. what he took were copies of a memorandum called the Millennium After Action Review and I've seen no evidence the 9/11 Commission asked for and was denied access to this. It appears in the sources for their report.
What, exactly, "mimicked" the attacks? Did any of them involve jetliners being deliberately crashed into buildings? No. And how did these exercises "obstruct the response" exactly? According to General Eberhard, "it took about 30 seconds" to realize what was happening was not a drill.
No, the investigation actually revealed the original source of the belief WTC 7 had collapsed was the BBC mis-reporting their own reporter. "At 4.27pm, a BBC reporter, Greg Barrow, who is in New York, appears on our radio news channel, BBC Radio Five Live, and says: "We are hearing reports from local media that another building may have caught light and is in danger of collapse." He then responds to a follow-up question by saying "I'm not sure if it has yet collapsed but the report we have is talking about Building 7." At 4.53pm, on the same radio station, the programme's presenter, Fi Glover says "25 minutes ago we had reports from Greg Barrow that another large building has collapsed just over an hour ago." At 4.54pm, the BBC's domestic television news channel, BBC News 24, reports the same thing. "
Not so, according to the official report which states: "The SEC and FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous."
-5 ilikepancakez 2015-12-23
Look up steel beams. You are being despicable. You know what you are? A sheeple. You're indoctrinated and you're touting something you don't understand to annihilate something you didn't even look into. And you're a troll. Things in the truther movement come with proof, you realize don't you? Guess who can generate the nano-thermite? ME. Not you. I can do what I want. And I know what reality is. So you shut your trap and go stick a holographic nuclear missile where your jet fuel came from.
3 Appallingstench 2015-12-23
/s
-2 burningempires 2015-12-23
So, no argument with the facts then.
Got it.
-4 ilikepancakez 2015-12-23
lol no I was making fun of this guy. He apparently posts on /r/conspiracy a lot.
https://np.reddit.com/r/maths/comments/3xx2z2/making_pi_countable_with_a_2dimensional_turing/cy8rmcp?context=1
7 bittermanscolon 2015-12-23
If youre trying to be funny, you are confusing the issue more and cluttering up a thread for.....unhelpful reasons. I cant tell youre copying some nut job. That and, did you downvote the OP because he didnt know who you were trying to pretend to be?
Please explain. It doesnt do much for this thread and keeping comments on target.
1 ilikepancakez 2015-12-23
I didn't do any downvoting. I would assume it would be /u/DronePuppet doing the downvoting since /u/burningempire was disagreeing with him.
-2 burningempires 2015-12-23
Ah, fair enough. You convinced me!
0 [deleted] 2015-12-23
https://www.reddit.com/user/burningempires
0 JYarbz 2015-12-23
You'd think that these people would at least put a minimal effort into pretending to care about other personal interests or subreddits lol.
0 wPoLrAdY 2015-12-23
Source?
1 PhrygianMode 2015-12-23
http://digwithin.net/2015/08/08/fourteen-facts/