Must have been a dumbass stupid sloppy assassin to leave the pillow on top of his head and then clean up any other signs of a struggle.

A sloppy assassin who ensured the body did not receive an autopsy and that it was embalmed to ensure that doesn't change.

Guess his family must have been in on it too since they didn't want an autopsy done either.

Because people coping with extreme grief act completely logically at all times.

OK, then the sloppy assassin who didn't bother to remove the pillow from his victim's head somehow foreknew exactly what decision they would make in their time of grief.

You're right, that makes this scenario all the more plausible.

Parents from the Sandy Hook massacre are being given grief on other posts in this sub, because - "They didn't act like they were sad enough... which, of course, is the "logical" thing to expect. But the Judge's family are to be given the benefit of the doubt on this occasion because...? Also If you're going to kill a Supreme Court Judge, it probably makes more sense to do it in your first term. So that after you vote-fix your 2nd 4 years, you can introduce Socialist Healthcare and Gay Marriage laws to your heart's content. *edit- words missing.

Guess his family must have been in on it too since they didn't want an autopsy done either.

source?

A manager at the El Paso funeral home where Scalia’s body was taken said that his family made it clear they did not want [an autopsy].

So we've not actually heard from the family, then? We've only heard what somebody told us the family said?

That's kinda how the news works in general. Unless you happen to know the family personally, I suppose.

Disagree. Good reporter would call SCOTUS press relations, get a confirmation or denial from family member.

We'd still only be hearing what somebody (the reporter, the press relations person, whoever) told us the family said.

True, but that's only one person removed from the source, not two.

they did but never received a comment back, this is assassination proof actually.

Not proof. Just suspect.

I'm less forgiving. coverups prove guilt

$$$ and they probably hate their ahole conservative rich grandpa.

I support killing him but after a trial for crimes such as being bribed to support citizens united not an execution and coverup

While I think Scalia died of natural causes, I would mention that there's been A LOT of sloppiness in these conspiratorial events. The thing that everybody involved knows is that they still control enough levers of power to keep it hushed up.

9/11 was a mess, right? Tons of holes in the story. Didn't matter. The media helped keep people sleepwalking. The beheadings? The recent false flag shootings? Tons of holes. Doesn't matter.

So, once they've eschewed the autopsy, it's game over. Doesn't matter how sloppy it was, short of leaving a note or painting a message on the wall in blood.

well said

Yeah obese 79 year olds hardly ever die from natural causes....

Obese 79 year old smoker...

Boom

against weed, probably on every old man prescription under the sun.

lets do autopsy to confirm that

As long as you are paying for it! Go nuts

weak ass rationale

Most people don't live much longer than 80. You're looking for something that isn't there. The taxpayers don't need to pay for an autopsy to quench your fanatic paranoia.

is cost really your excuse I mean it's pretty cheap . . . I mean what if your mom or dad shows up dead in some resort . . . you're fine with no questions asked . . . well if you're paid off I'm sure you would be . . . but please no more weak excuses. please read thru this:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/22/1112509/-The-Gentleperson-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies

Tin foil sales must be through the roof.

let's put tin foil in the water supply

You think it's not already in there? You're so naive.

meltdown?

Sarcasm

Dont confuse laziness with conspiracy.

If they were gonna assassinate him. why wait until now?

Give us concrete proof instead of innuendo and conjecture and we'll consider your claim.

maybe scalia was starting to grow a conscience and worried about going to heaven so was gonna spill beans about all the evil stuff he knows of.

Sleep and die where your ticket is punched:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNCT6pA5I9A

[deleted]

More likely by an environmental or gay rights activist. They have the most to gain by tipping the balance court to the left and the court just ruled against Obama's climate bill last week.

The Supreme Court did issue a major anti-eco-terrorist stay against the Obama administration hours before it happened.

doubt it remember Obama is establishment himself or why did he keep wars going, not stop NSA etc . . . is he left or right? meaningless but do you really think Obama cares about the environment?

but do you really think Obama cares about the environment?

No but i do believe he cares about passing the largest tax increases in history. And to radically empower the executive branch of government to club those who are not blessed by them.

he gave largest tax cut in history but that didn't matter much cuz no one had a job so a taxcut wouldn't help. need a new new deal

You're drunk.

The Bush Tax cuts were the biggest in history.

Edit: citations from deeper in thread

96% of tax payers at the middle of the income distribution would see their taxes go up [nearly $2000]

www.npr.org/2012/07/10/156493984

Bigger picture:

www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=456

Note the total average federal tax rates in 2000 and see how they plumet across the board after the tax cuts.

Who pays income taxes? The Rich, mostly.

www.pewresearch.org/?attachment_id=268166

Bush tax cuts: $544.3 billion

the bulk of that cost -- $463 billion... for families making less than $250,000

the rest -- $81.5 billion... to the highest income families

http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/07/news/economy/tax_cut_deal_obama/index.htm

for the rich maybe

No. For the middle class and in aggregate. 66% of the Bush Tax cuts went to bottom 70% even though the bottom 70% barely pay 33% of the aggregate taxes.

So no matter how you slice it, for everyone.

false

I'm for destroying your fragile little mind. Please tell me which part of my statements is false and i will cite it for you.

all of em

96% of tax payers at the middle of the income distribution would see their taxes go up [nearly $2000]

www.npr.org/2012/07/10/156493984

Bigger picture:

www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=456

Note the total average federal tax rates in 2000 and see how they plumet across the board after the tax cuts.

Who pays income taxes? The Rich, mostly.

www.pewresearch.org/?attachment_id=268166

Bush tax cuts: $544.3 billion

the bulk of that cost -- $463 billion... for families making less than $250,000

the rest -- $81.5 billion... to the highest income families

http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/07/news/economy/tax_cut_deal_obama/index.htm

Got it now?

got any legit sources

Gtfo

never

Why would anyone here give a shit about Scalia? What difference does it make how the old bastard died?

Old people die. I'm sorry for your loss.

why would someone come to this sub to say this unless he is a paid troll

Scalia was assassinated.

good. fine. whatever. fuck that puss bag.

its a victory in the struggle against alien overlords.

is cost really your excuse I mean it's pretty cheap . . . I mean what if your mom or dad shows up dead in some resort . . . you're fine with no questions asked . . . well if you're paid off I'm sure you would be . . . but please no more weak excuses. please read thru this:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/22/1112509/-The-Gentleperson-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies

Tin foil sales must be through the roof.