Of anyone would be payingg for delegates it would have been insiders lime bush with his 100 million becuase the delegates are mostly insiders.
Why is it so hard for people to beleive that americans are supporting someone who for once says he will put americans first over international companies and over illegal immigrants and who speaks put ahainst the main stream media and politicians that take money from lobbists? He is what everyone has been hoping to hear. Of course his support is real. We can onlyy hope that he is really doing ot for the reasons he says and i dont think anyone cpuld be such a good actor as to fake it on so many interviews without a script.
I just hope the establishment doesnt hurt him. My bifgest fear is thestablishment takes him out like Kennedy (s).
I think you have confused Trump with Hillary. Trump resonates with people by not being intimidated by the liberal PC crowd and not showing fealty to the Republican leadership.
He only spent 200k on ads in NH, Jeb bush spent over 37 million. Trump won by a landslide there. People like him, they are tired of the PC crap and trump want's to bring jobs back and people agree with him on immigration. He's winning big.
Political elite get to bribe the newsmedia elite (which are ironically owned by the same corporations) and it's all just money laundering/legalized bribery.
So, inevitably:
The political elite bribe the newsmedia elite to report how they want to report and then sell the proles and plebs narratives that somehow twist reality into a place where the federal government reading and cataloguing all of your electronic, voice, and any other communication (including this) is inherently a good idea because terrorism.
All while the lawmakers continue to pass legislation that was paid attention to before (remember when reedit blacked itself out to stop SOPA/PIPA/CISPA? Well they got CISA in the NDAA this year and nobody gave a shit because they all got paid to store all this juicy metadeta.
It's all different, even now - compared to just two years ago when I got into this strange arena. And I feel like I'm doing a terrible job.
Because it is a racket. And I'm watching it happen.
I'm not so sure. Hillary won more decisively in Nevada last time around, and as much as I distrust polling, I do feel that they show a real trend nationwide that Hillary's lead is shrinking.
It all comes down to who can make the big play before the clock runs out.
I was actually going to do a post saying just the opposite..that Trump proves it is the message people vote for and if you have the right message all the other guys money doesnt matter.
Trump has spent almost no money.
I hope this emboldens a lot of other people to run for office on his message and be bold. Youdont have to have money. The internet gives you a voice.
I looked atpolling.
Trump began to do very well ealry on long before he got mainstream medoa coverage. That was because people could find out what he stood for on tue internet immediately. The paid for media is becoming more and more irrelevent in modern elections. It seems to only matter still for old voters.
His outrageous statements are deliberate and why he keeps dominating the press. The media is trying SO hard to just ignore him, but they can't help themselves. Most beautiful thing I've seen in my lifetime.
He does alienate minorities, its the majority that votes for him. He's popular because he's not PC, people are tired of the PC nonsense and are supporting him as a form of backlash. But as popular as he is, he's unelectable. He'll prove something, all right, he'll be pushed out and will prove that what the people believe to be a democracy, is indeed an oligarchy.
I'm not so sure. Hillary won more decisively in Nevada last time around, and as much as I distrust polling, I do feel that they show a real trend nationwide that Hillary's lead is shrinking.
It all comes down to who can make the big play before the clock runs out.
Political elite get to bribe the newsmedia elite (which are ironically owned by the same corporations) and it's all just money laundering/legalized bribery.
So, inevitably:
The political elite bribe the newsmedia elite to report how they want to report and then sell the proles and plebs narratives that somehow twist reality into a place where the federal government reading and cataloguing all of your electronic, voice, and any other communication (including this) is inherently a good idea because terrorism.
All while the lawmakers continue to pass legislation that was paid attention to before (remember when reedit blacked itself out to stop SOPA/PIPA/CISPA? Well they got CISA in the NDAA this year and nobody gave a shit because they all got paid to store all this juicy metadeta.
It's all different, even now - compared to just two years ago when I got into this strange arena. And I feel like I'm doing a terrible job.
Because it is a racket. And I'm watching it happen.
32 comments
13 Arseface_TM 2016-02-22
Trump has spent a negligible amount on his campaign.
If anything he's proving that all publicity is good publicity. Unless you insult the Pope.
-2 [deleted] 2016-02-22
[deleted]
5 qaaqa 2016-02-22
Thats not happening.
Of anyone would be payingg for delegates it would have been insiders lime bush with his 100 million becuase the delegates are mostly insiders.
Why is it so hard for people to beleive that americans are supporting someone who for once says he will put americans first over international companies and over illegal immigrants and who speaks put ahainst the main stream media and politicians that take money from lobbists? He is what everyone has been hoping to hear. Of course his support is real. We can onlyy hope that he is really doing ot for the reasons he says and i dont think anyone cpuld be such a good actor as to fake it on so many interviews without a script.
I just hope the establishment doesnt hurt him. My bifgest fear is thestablishment takes him out like Kennedy (s).
5 Dawg1shly 2016-02-22
I think you have confused Trump with Hillary. Trump resonates with people by not being intimidated by the liberal PC crowd and not showing fealty to the Republican leadership.
4 Give_me_an_M3 2016-02-22
Are you following this election like at all? Like even in the slightest?
11 JedYorks 2016-02-22
He only spent 200k on ads in NH, Jeb bush spent over 37 million. Trump won by a landslide there. People like him, they are tired of the PC crap and trump want's to bring jobs back and people agree with him on immigration. He's winning big.
2 zyklorpthehuman 2016-02-22
Who is on the receiving end of those 37 million?
1 JedYorks 2016-02-22
The guac bowls
1 JamesColesPardon 2016-02-22
The Networks.
2 zyklorpthehuman 2016-02-22
It begs the question, with Super PACs and hundreds of millions floating around, is the election process a racket?
1 JamesColesPardon 2016-02-22
It's one of the best ones.
Political elite get to bribe the newsmedia elite (which are ironically owned by the same corporations) and it's all just money laundering/legalized bribery.
So, inevitably:
The political elite bribe the newsmedia elite to report how they want to report and then sell the proles and plebs narratives that somehow twist reality into a place where the federal government reading and cataloguing all of your electronic, voice, and any other communication (including this) is inherently a good idea because terrorism.
All while the lawmakers continue to pass legislation that was paid attention to before (remember when reedit blacked itself out to stop SOPA/PIPA/CISPA? Well they got CISA in the NDAA this year and nobody gave a shit because they all got paid to store all this juicy metadeta.
It's all different, even now - compared to just two years ago when I got into this strange arena. And I feel like I'm doing a terrible job.
Because it is a racket. And I'm watching it happen.
1 DeafDumbBlindBoy 2016-02-22
And if there had been more Democratic candidates, we might be seeing the same thing with Sanders.
We kind of are, he's hanging in there.
1 nakedtime313 2016-02-22
He's done and everyone knows it.
1 JedYorks 2016-02-22
How is bernie done?
1 DeafDumbBlindBoy 2016-02-22
I'm not so sure. Hillary won more decisively in Nevada last time around, and as much as I distrust polling, I do feel that they show a real trend nationwide that Hillary's lead is shrinking.
It all comes down to who can make the big play before the clock runs out.
6 Fauglheim 2016-02-22
Money is necessary to get your foot in the door, but I disagree with your conclusion.
Trump is staying in the limelight because he's good at it, not because he's bribing anyone.
I don't believe a candidate has ever called one of his opponents ugly during a debate on national television. That was probably a first.
5 Zmxm 2016-02-22
Trump has spent among the least of the candidates but has gotten most votes. If anything it shows money is not a factor.
4 qaaqa 2016-02-22
I was actually going to do a post saying just the opposite..that Trump proves it is the message people vote for and if you have the right message all the other guys money doesnt matter.
Trump has spent almost no money.
I hope this emboldens a lot of other people to run for office on his message and be bold. Youdont have to have money. The internet gives you a voice.
I looked atpolling.
Trump began to do very well ealry on long before he got mainstream medoa coverage. That was because people could find out what he stood for on tue internet immediately. The paid for media is becoming more and more irrelevent in modern elections. It seems to only matter still for old voters.
3 Give_me_an_M3 2016-02-22
Trump has spent 5x less than Jeb! who didnt even poll 10%. Shit tier post
2 TRUMP_UNDID_911 2016-02-22
His outrageous statements are deliberate and why he keeps dominating the press. The media is trying SO hard to just ignore him, but they can't help themselves. Most beautiful thing I've seen in my lifetime.
2 sheasie 2016-02-22
false.
proof has existed for decades.
hillary is counting on it.
trump is showing how a bit of name recognition (and being a DC outsider) is worth gold.
FEEL BERNIE SANDERS -- the longest serving "independent" in US Congressional history.
0 parrhesiaJoe 2016-02-22
Great comment
1 [deleted] 2016-02-22
[deleted]
0 sheasie 2016-02-22
let's hope so...
GO BERNIE GO!!!!
3 Give_me_an_M3 2016-02-22
LOL. He meant that Sanders is prooving it cant be because his supporters are donating copious amounts and its not doing shit for him.
1 boomer95 2016-02-22
I thought the Koch brothers already proved that.
1 sheasie 2016-02-22
it's been proven for dacades, if not millennia.
1 nakedtime313 2016-02-22
Those evil little Koch's!!! Theeeeeeeyre rascals, I tell ya!
1 bamtron5 2016-02-22
socialism is bad
1 jarxlots 2016-02-22
Venezwho?
0 sharked 2016-02-22
don't worry, he's going to throw the election.
-3 skuzmak 2016-02-22
He does alienate minorities, its the majority that votes for him. He's popular because he's not PC, people are tired of the PC nonsense and are supporting him as a form of backlash. But as popular as he is, he's unelectable. He'll prove something, all right, he'll be pushed out and will prove that what the people believe to be a democracy, is indeed an oligarchy.
4 ekudram 2016-02-22
He just might pull the election off. The majority will get you elected.
Besides why vote for a puppet when we can have the real thing?
3 sheasie 2016-02-22
i'll vote for admitted racist trump™ over zio-fascist (also racist, by definition) hillary™ in a heartbeat.
/at least trump is attempting to pry-open the 9/11 bullshit.
1 JedYorks 2016-02-22
How is bernie done?
1 DeafDumbBlindBoy 2016-02-22
I'm not so sure. Hillary won more decisively in Nevada last time around, and as much as I distrust polling, I do feel that they show a real trend nationwide that Hillary's lead is shrinking.
It all comes down to who can make the big play before the clock runs out.
2 zyklorpthehuman 2016-02-22
It begs the question, with Super PACs and hundreds of millions floating around, is the election process a racket?
1 JamesColesPardon 2016-02-22
It's one of the best ones.
Political elite get to bribe the newsmedia elite (which are ironically owned by the same corporations) and it's all just money laundering/legalized bribery.
So, inevitably:
The political elite bribe the newsmedia elite to report how they want to report and then sell the proles and plebs narratives that somehow twist reality into a place where the federal government reading and cataloguing all of your electronic, voice, and any other communication (including this) is inherently a good idea because terrorism.
All while the lawmakers continue to pass legislation that was paid attention to before (remember when reedit blacked itself out to stop SOPA/PIPA/CISPA? Well they got CISA in the NDAA this year and nobody gave a shit because they all got paid to store all this juicy metadeta.
It's all different, even now - compared to just two years ago when I got into this strange arena. And I feel like I'm doing a terrible job.
Because it is a racket. And I'm watching it happen.