Trump / Clinton 2016
7 2016-03-16 by RoughJohns
Its not out of the realm of possibility to imagine that they're working together.
The Clintons ask their ol' buddy Donald to create a ridiculously over the top, disgusting, violent, racist campaign in order to bring out the Dems who wouldn't vote for her unless there was a crisis like this.
He rises to the top of the right, smashing all opponents along the way and exposing the ugly underbelly of "the silent majority".
PS - they're silent because racism and sexism is generally frowned upon in the 21st century.
73 comments
9 jacks1000 2016-03-16
God, this stupidity will never end.
The Trump campaign is appealing to what is called "civic nationalism" - it is the OPPOSITE of "ethnic nationalism" or what the looney-tunes on the left call "racism" (except for Israel.)
Trump's campaign has been attacked by the violent left - Bernie Bros, Black Lives Matter people, and hostile aliens have snuck into virtually every Trump speech and started loudly "protesting," using "fighting words" and screaming at people, calling them "racist" and the like.
The other day some professional left wing agitator actually rushed the stage to try and attack Trump, but was stopped by the Secret Service.
Not to mention in Chicago, where the anti-Trump rioters threw bottles at police, blocked ambulances, and screamed violent slogans.
I mean, really, the far left wingnuts need to look in a fucking mirror. They are acting like unhinged lunatics.
Trump is basically a Democrat - some of his rhetoric could have been Jimmy Carter's rhetoric in 1976. That's how far to the left the Democrats have veered in the last few years.
3 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Violent left. Heh. That's funny you see it that way.
3 Mae-Brussell-Hustler 2016-03-16
Unfamiliar with Weather Underground?
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
Yeah, or the Communist party? The Red Brigades? The Maoists?
The left has a pretty solid record of violence and genocide.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
How bout now though?
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
#BlackLivesMatter
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Yes, I am aware of that social movement. So what?
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Sure, but what about now? What's the left doing that's violent?
1 shenronFIVE 2016-03-16
Why do you think the left is not violent and the right is? What are you basing that on?
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
I'm trying to constrain this post to current events. As far as I know there hasn't been any violence at Democrat events.
0 jacks1000 2016-03-16
There is nothing funny about the violence coming out of the left, historically and in modern times.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
What violence is coming out of the modern left in the USA?
1 shenronFIVE 2016-03-16
Any riot that has happened lately, involving Laquaan McDonald, Ferguson, but it does't really matter. You really are naive and a little delusional if you think that one side of the government is just, and non-violent, and the other side is evil and violent.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
And those riots weren't spontaneous events.
1 shenronFIVE 2016-03-16
spontaneous or not they still were violent.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
As a result of continual violence perpetrated by the state.
1 otistoole 2016-03-16
Heh I didn't even read your post but I posted something very similar. Yours is better though.
2 CantStopWhitey 2016-03-16
They're both very good.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
Frankly, I don't even really like Trump. I've written numerous articles spelling out his shady connections.
But the anti-Trump people are such fanatical hateful bigoted assholes, it almost makes Trump seem good by comparison.
1 shenronFIVE 2016-03-16
Spot on, the over the top dislike of Trump makes me like him out of spite. These extremist liberals are dangerous.
0 otistoole 2016-03-16
Yeah, I feel exactly, exactly the same way.
I have my doubts about trump. I doubt he will end the drug war, and I doubt he will support the 2nd amendment enough for my liking.
But he pisses the leftists and the RINO's off SOOOOOOO much, that I find myself silently cheering for him at times.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
I know, I fucking hate the goddamn leftists and Bernie Bros for making me sympathetic to fucking ... Donald Trump, the Celebrity Apprentice.
I will never forgive them for that.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
It's almost like it's a CONSPIRACY
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
From the left perspective we are being given a second chance to stop hitler before his rise to power. I think it's logical to take some slightly extremer methods in order to raise attention to the issue. I don't want him assasinated, but I want him to be exposed as an idiot who was given his fortune by his family (with nazi roots) and not actually made very much for himself aside from bad decisions and publicity stunts. He would be the buzzfeed reality TV version of a president, lowest common denominator shit right there.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
You're racist against German people. Do you also call people with Russian - or Jewish - roots "Communist?"
Of course you don't.
Your bigotry, hatred and political lunacy is laughable. Thankfully you're just some kid in Canada that doesn't know any better so you'll never be able to harm anyone.
Good bye.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
his father financially supported the nazis, that's a family with nazi routes.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
No he didn't you are lying.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
Super sorry, I had confused Trump's father with the Koch brothers father. Trumps dad was not a Nazi as far as I know. That being said, one must admit Trump seems to sympathise with the Nazis/Hitler, or at least admire him in some way since he reads books of his speeches. http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trumps-ex-wife-once-said-he-kept-a-book-of-hitlers-speeches-by-his-bed-2015-8
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
No, one must not admit that, because there is no evidence of it.
You, being a Communist, simply like to smear everyone as your fellow travelers, "Nazis."
You are no different than a Nazi. And of course, you make up lies, post false lists of supposed "KKKs" and do nothing but slander people.
It's nothing but a reflection of ignorance, fear, and bigotry.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
I am so confused by you dude. Show me facts. I've asked you to prove there are no KKK, you did not, I asked proof for many of your claims, you have supplied me none. I claimed that he sympathises with hitler or Nazis and gave you the proof of his wife saying he reads books of Hitlers speeches. Maybe Trump only likes him for his abilities as an oriator and wants to be as good as he was at giving speeches. Even if that is the case, one of the tames explanations of him reading Hitler speeches, he still is attempting to use the same emotionally charged statements and nationalist sentiment that Hitler used. Maybe your right, and the only familiarity is their ability to envigorate a crowd and gain the peoples confidence, but even if that's the case, I don't like it when politicians are taking notes from Hitler. Can you see where I'm coming from? and once again, IM NOT A COMMUNIST, you are projecting that onto me because you don't like communism, and you seem to not like me.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
You haven't supplied proof of ANYTHING at all. That list of supposed KKK wasn't proof of anything - it is just a list of random names, and was debunked in the press. It was literally from some anonymous group online.
I could make a list of the KKK. Here's a list of current KKK members:
There, that is PROOF. Now PROVE you aren't in the KKK, Grand Dragon.
You see how STUPID what you are claiming is?
So now you are claiming that if someone reads a book, they must "sympathize" with the author? That idea is beyond stupid. I've read the Communist manifesto, does that mean I'm a Marxist? What an idiotic idea. Second of all, all you are quoting is hearsay - that's not proof. And third, Trump himself has denounced Pat Buchanan claiming he was a "Hitler lover" - and guess what? Trump sounded just as stupid making up that lie as YOU do making up your lies about Trump.
LOL - get back to us when you finish high school, Lil Lenin.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
Also, I've decided you're either a troll, a disinformation psy op poser, or someone who is so firmly entrenched in there beliefs that they don't want to listen to anyone else. I'm literally asking for you to price your claims with sources and you haven't done it ONCE. Learn how to have a dialogue and get back to me
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
I've decided that you are a Communist, young, and clueless. You don't want to listen to anyone else, and you don't even believe that people who disagree with you have human rights - you have said as much yourself. If you decide that you think someone is a "Hitler" you don't believe they deserve representation and it justifies violence against them.
That's monstrous, but hardly surprising coming from someone who is literally a Communist apologist.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
NEVER, encouraged violence towards Trump, I've even complimented him a few times and attempted to find some common ground between us that we can appreciate him on, I don't agree with his over all politics. NEVER, said that people I disagree with don't deserve human rights. And I have graduated highschool thank you very much. To be honest, I think you're a mean dude right now. I posted that I enjoy the kind and logical conversation on this subreddit, and you have refused to engage in that, but comment anyway. I'm just trying to have a chat and discuss some things. The fact that you still deny the existence of the KKK is silly. They were havinga fucking march not that long ago, people where there fucking uniforms still. If you are suggesting that they are all faking it, that's interesting, and something I can't prove right or wrong, can you? You have never tried to prove anything to me, at least I have tried, not my fault you reject my sources. Goodnight :) I hope you have a nice day and wake up on the right side of the bed tomorrow.
1 jacks1000 2016-03-16
As we see, KKK Grand Wizard "coolio-o-doolio" encourages violence against average people he calls "white" - presumably, due to his Communist ideology.
We now know that coolio-o-doolie is AGAINST free speech and believes that murder and violence is acceptable against anyone who isn't voting for Communist Bernie Sanders, or anyone who doesn't support Communism.
I mean, coolio-o-doolio has admitted it himself, as he is a supporter of mass genocide, Communism, mass murder, and Communist atrocities.
I know, I personally don't support his blood-thirsty violent narrative, but I do think it is important to allow free speech for Communist supporters of mass murder and genocide like coolio-o-doolio (he is a typical Communist "Bernie-Bro") to say what is on their mind.
That way, we get it on the record.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
I'm so confused. Are you trying to make a point by imagining a narrative of me? I DARE you to quote where I advocated violence, genocide, or revoking free speech.
2 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Love all the negative responses. Doth protest too much methinks.
2 jacks1000 2016-03-16
Yes, no doubt, the Bernie Bros and anti-Trump lunatics screaming about "racism" and the like are, in fact, protesting too much.
I think the Bernie Bros are in serious denial why Sanders has virtually no support, out side of his lily-white base of "progressives."
Certainly, black and brown Democrats are voting in huge numbers for Clinton, not Sanders.
Just look at a Sanders rally, it's whiter than a Tea Party.
Plus, when Black Lives Matter interrupted the Bernie Sanders event and called all his lily white fans a bunch of "racists" and told them to "shut up" and let colored people speak for once, the lily-white progressive were aghast.
I mean, if all those white progressives actually shut the fuck up, how would anyone know what wonderful "anti-racist" progressives they are? The whole point of being a Bernie Bro is to signal your moral superiority.
So, you know, the Bernie Bros have resorted to shrieking "Raaaaacist!" at Trump, to hide their own, er, "problematic" issues with race.
Yes, methinks the Bernie Bros doth protest too much.
2 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Say lily-white again bitch.
2 jacks1000 2016-03-16
Ooh, someone was triggered!
3 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Nah, I'm just lifting up your cute ballerina gown.
2 jacks1000 2016-03-16
Your comment is truly creepy on many levels.
3 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
What's underneath your frills is what's creepy
2 RMFN 2016-03-16
Bernout.
2 Bacore 2016-03-16
Arguing about the candidates is good. As long as you're fighting each other, you're not coming after their handlers. Keep up the good work Citizens. Now, back to your infighting.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Huzzah.
1 Farmzworth 2016-03-16
Trump and Hilary get the nominations, Hilary wins, FBI finds her guilty on her email scandal, throws her in the slammer, OBAMA stays in office......
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Lol wat.
1 Britt121 2016-03-16
LOL, this has crossed my mind too!
0 orrery 2016-03-16
You're a fucking idiot.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
How so?
-1 otistoole 2016-03-16
I swear to God, the left are such drama queens. Trump hasn't said anything more or less offensive or violent than any randomly chosen politician of the 20th century. The American people are largely behind him, they don't want muslim refugees or free trade or having leftist youth mobs threaten them as they peaceably assemble as is their constitutional right. Actually I feel that Trump has been rather restrained.
The left is going to keep up the pressure, trying to gin up trouble, making mountains out of any molehill they can dredge up, and just generally doing what the left does best. And it's annoying, really it is. It is annoying and sickening to see, and I don't even care about Trump, but because the left hates him and is up to their old tricks, here I am put in a position where I am defending him. Whatever, though. Hopefully sooner or later the populace will get sick of this shit and start putting things back in order.
3 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
"Trying to gin up trouble"
Well we see where your allegiance lies.
1 otistoole 2016-03-16
Yeah, not with the 'protesters', that's for damn sure.
0 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
"Trump hasn't said anything more or less offensive or violent than any randomly chosen politician of the 20th century."
Seriously? Are you fucking serious?
2 otistoole 2016-03-16
So you are going to go into hysterics now because Trump said something mean?
0 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Answer the question.
1 otistoole 2016-03-16
It's not worth answering. We are talking about the 20th century here...in the US....where japanese were interned in camps.....I am sure a politician in the US in the 20th century has referred to that situation in ways we would now fin.
That's just one example. At one point, talking about 'killing japs' would probably be considered acceptible behavior from a president. I am sure that history is full of dozens of other examples of presidents and presidential candidates emoting and commenting in many controversial and 'violent' ways.
But since it's Trump here, break out the fainting couches and make room for the wilting violets....
-1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
It's not worth answering huh.
2 otistoole 2016-03-16
Yeh. It's a stupid, half-rhetorical question borne out of your 'Trump derangement syndrome'.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
You're funny.
2 otistoole 2016-03-16
Maybe, but I am also right.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
So am I.
2 otistoole 2016-03-16
Why don't you read this carefully:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/15/obama-criticizes-trump-violence-rallies/
'At a campaign event in Philadelphia in June 2008, Mr. Obama told supporters, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun. Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.” '
Hmmm....knives....guns....brawling.....
But when Trump does it, he is 'inciting a riot'.
You people are a sorry bunch.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Ok now give me ten more examples
1 otistoole 2016-03-16
you only deserve the one.
-3 TheDoubleDMeansValue 2016-03-16
Dear fuck, just stop this fucking shitposting.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
I mean, this is conspiracy is it not?
0 TheDoubleDMeansValue 2016-03-16
Yes, conspiracy. Not “post any bullshit that comes to mind”.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Way to downplay what's going on for the race to become the most powerful ruler in the world.
1 TheDoubleDMeansValue 2016-03-16
I’m hardly doing that. I just want legitimate conspiratorial things to be posted. This isn’t that. It’s complete bullshit. Everything that either candidate has ever done disproves it.
1 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Sorry, I don't agree. It's so easy to imagine this scenario I've laid out.
1 TheDoubleDMeansValue 2016-03-16
What the fuck does that have to do with anything? All of reality contradicts your scenario.
1 otistoole 2016-03-16
Heh I didn't even read your post but I posted something very similar. Yours is better though.
3 RoughJohns 2016-03-16
Violent left. Heh. That's funny you see it that way.
1 coolio-o-doolio 2016-03-16
From the left perspective we are being given a second chance to stop hitler before his rise to power. I think it's logical to take some slightly extremer methods in order to raise attention to the issue. I don't want him assasinated, but I want him to be exposed as an idiot who was given his fortune by his family (with nazi roots) and not actually made very much for himself aside from bad decisions and publicity stunts. He would be the buzzfeed reality TV version of a president, lowest common denominator shit right there.