Your're being distracted by politics.
80 2016-03-20 by wanab3
It's an election year. The powers that be, have an easy source of distracting news. News about things we all care about and are important, yet we have no real control over.
It's distracting a lot of good people from real issues that immediately affect the lives of all people.
Posts about GMOs in our food supply, lead and other toxins in our drinking water, and chemicals in the air we breath, are being passed up and overlooked because of meaningless politics over political puppets.
No matter where you are on the environmental debate spectrum. It's obvious that environment is more important in our lives than politics is. No matter who's in office we still will have the same environmental problems. In my opinion politics is secondary to my health. I imagine it's that way for a lot of us.
My hope is we can post more about real problems and circumvent the political smokescreen blocking us from correcting the results of corruption.
78 comments
22 Putin_loves_cats 2016-03-20
I think you may be talking to the wrong crowd. Many of us here can handle multiple topics at once. While I agree politics is a distraction, and there are bigger issues, it's still a part of our lives that we must discuss. The key is to have the ability to balance multiple topics.
5 wanab3 2016-03-20
You want to balance out the immediately important food, water and air toxicity, with talk about the names and triviality of spoken words of a circus side show?
Is it your comic relief?
If we solve the toxicity in our food, water and air it's irrelevant who's in office.
Working within the system hasn't worked ever. Politics is meant as another source to distract us from solving these real problems ourselves. They are the ones who poison the world, so that you need to buy your life from them.
Politics is important for lobbyists, not for us. We need to lobby each other, not some 'representative.'
6 bozobozo 2016-03-20
The environment is supremely important. Unfortunately for us, politicians control the polluters. (Or vice versa)
Politics is all show. But Hell, I'm glad that so many people are distracted by politics instead of the usual distractions like sports and what not.
4 wanab3 2016-03-20
We must directly combat any source of toxicity. Polluters control politics.
Hence the show. We need to help focus people back to the real issues.
1 bozobozo 2016-03-20
For sure. But what better way to get people to look at environmental issues (and many other issues as well) than through the political spectrum?
3 wanab3 2016-03-20
The political spectrum inherently comes with divides. The solution multiplier is to directly work to remediate pollution and its sources.
We can argue all day about amounts of pollution, this is politics, but the fact remains that the pollution is there until we do something about.
No amount of toxicity is safe. That's the only way people need to look at environmental issues.
1 bozobozo 2016-03-20
I'm not arguing. Pollution has taken years off my life. You're correct, no amount of environmental polluting is safe. That's the only way we should look at it. Profits before people though. Unfortunately for us, politicians help control what is released.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
Sorry for being aggressive. I'm trying to be succinct.
Politicians are supposedly representing us. The truth is they represent corporate interests.
As a work around for this negative feed back loop of politics and pollution. We must take direct action against the toxification of our environment.
This looks like building an alternative to industrial living like one poster here has. Another is maintaining a predominately vegan diet. Grow your own vegetables, not matter how trivial the volume might feel. Collect rain water then filter and purify it, or filter municipal water. Create garden plots or natural areas. If we do these things only for ourselves we all still win.
The less energy, electricity or fuel you use the better obviously.
If you want to go farther organize the cleaning of natural areas.
2 bozobozo 2016-03-20
No worries mate! You're not being aggressive. I just take it as you bring passionate for a cause that you believe in. But you're preaching to the choir. I'm all for eco friendliness. I try to do my part with my shitty little garden. But hell, every little bit helps.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
Cool. Spread the word maybe. Don't let people be distracted by politics.
2 BuildStart 2016-03-20
I'd like to say politics is a just a small step up from bread and circuses, but it really isn't. Instead of grunts and dirt we have suits and professional manipulators.
1 bozobozo 2016-03-20
True. Still a slight step up from the usual distractions.
0 pjvex 2016-03-20
I think the toxicity of air, food, and water is important, but there is a good deal to be concerned about beyond it...
3 wanab3 2016-03-20
Such as?
Edit: To clarify, everything happens in our environment. How does something happen "beyond it?"
1 pjvex 2016-03-20
Yes, but if you can eat, drink and breathe safely, do you want to then be in jail because your government is corrupt and all natural civil rights have been stripped away??
Don't be so myopic.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
I can understand how this might seem myopic. Obviously if it gets to the point of natural rights being stripped the focus should go to war, but still not to politics. It's not myopic, it's systematic solution creation. Clean environment is step one.
If we have our basic needs met we will better to be able to resist this kind of horror. We generally lack infrastructure independent of the government and large corporations. If we build alternatives we take some of their power away and comes back to us.
Environmentalism creates truly healthy and beneficial infrastructure.
If the people have their needs met it's increasingly difficult for governments to justify the need, or build support for, mass imprisonment to the remaining free citizens or the world.
2 911bodysnatchers322 2016-03-20
What he said. And check the new queue
1 TRUMP_UNDID_911 2016-03-20
Right! And even though voting may be partially (or completely) rigged, it requires a such a trivial amount of effort it seems foolish not to.
4 [deleted] 2016-03-20
[deleted]
3 Outofmany 2016-03-20
Religion is the basis of war?
So the World Wars were religious? What about Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War?
People believe that religion has answers, that makes it an easy vehicle to push your agenda. The cause of war is people thinking they are right.
2 RedditIsPropaganda23 2016-03-20
and putting profit ahead of humanity.
central banking is a ticking time bomb of fiat currency and should be outlawed. JFK tried and failed. But we the people, together, can succeed.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
I don't think you'll get anything shadow banned.
I agree with paragraph two. This is precisely why we must focus on cleaning, or keeping clean, the food, water and air in areas we spend a lot of time in. It would defiantly help to produce some of your own electricity too.
Economy is a mess because it's mostly imaginary at this point. Our economy has almost created an alternate reality for many people.
Religion was a main excuse to go to war. The vengeance inspired by religious wars certainly helps wars continue. But many people would sadly simply follow something else if there wasn't religion.
There are sadly many people who do terrible things often, which is why it's increasingly important for people to do good.
The illusion of race like religion has perpetuated many wars.
All you need to know about global warming is that it is happening for some reason. If you keep your food, water and air clean then global warming will probably settle it self out. Again does not hurt to generate your own electricity.
This idea of the mark of the beast is very intriguing. I feel like cellphones are it. It could have been, is, fiat currency too. Or it could be genetic manipulation.
I think most people have faith or hope, so were all religious, or spiritual, to some degree.
Too bad much of Tesla's work is hidden or destroyed. We could be so much further along technologically. We would probably also have less social struggle. His free energy devices are sorely needed in our era.
0 911bodysnatchers322 2016-03-20
Don't worry you won't get shadowbanned for that. I openly encourage people to join petitions to legalize psilocybin mushrooms and cannabis--and have a full justification for it that actually turns the law on its own head by using the government's own sources to contradict itself.
I think that's powerful, they probably think it's laughable. Why? Because they're a bag of dicks. Or putting it a better way, they are authoritarian bullies who have no respect for cogent argument, consisency, ethics, morals or dogma; or even principle. If they did, by their own standards there would be no drug war--all would be permitted.
I also post inflammatory stuff about how the medical industry doesn't know what the fuck they are doing. Pharma and Nestle (swiss companies generally) are purposefully putting poison in our food (probably because they are a tiny mountainbound country with an increasing population and no where to put their trash so they package it up in their food and ship it to us.... biolaundering is a new term I'm using for exporting your trash into food.
I also post about how the CIA is runnign both sides of the drug war and it's provable now and nobody cares (well, we care here... I consider everyone outside of /r/conspiracy to be a big fat nobody--lol)
So don't worry. Say what you will, but speak only your truth and you'll be fine.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
[deleted]
3 [deleted] 2016-03-20
The whole point is responsibility. People want a politician to have all the responsibility.
Knowing how powerful And responsible you really are is painful and mind controlled out.
5 Britt121 2016-03-20
Agree. The only solution is to become responsible for these things. Once I learned about these things, my husband and I began doing what we could. Getting some land, paying off the mortgage as fast as possible, raising our own beef, growing some food, getting a water filter etc. Now that people are trippin about Flint and all the water problems happening, we have friends and family coming to us for advice on these things. Politicians give zero fucks so every person has got to start getting their shit together.
2 [deleted] 2016-03-20
So basically you're saying You and your husband are extremely intelligent and brave? (:
2 Britt121 2016-03-20
I don't know about brave but I'd go with survival instinct. We were both raised in cities so we are constantly learning what the hell we're doing- it doesn't come natural lol. It just seems like the only option at this point. I refuse to see this world swirl down the toilet bowl and sit around waiting for a politician to fix these things. They're out there doing weird Satanic shit, abusing MK ultra slaves, murdering people in war and stealing from the people. These people simply cannot be trusted. So what choices are left? I guess I could play the victim card, but that's boring. Also, when I start thinking about a dollar collapse/societal meltdown, I feel compelled to act.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
If every one could do this it's a great solution, but there simply isn't the space.
This is why we must focus on environmental problems so that eventually cities can be remediated.
2 Britt121 2016-03-20
Not everyone can do exactly what I'm doing but they can support their local farmer's market, work on getting out of debt, grow what they can, make their own products, chill out on the consumerism. We can all do something :)
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Precisely!
1 -INFOWARS- 2016-03-20
We're literally fucked (excuse my language) though. We've got so many wars going on it's insane. We're fighting the Illuminati and the NWO, Clinton, GMOs, FBI, CIA, ISIS, World Governments, World Pollution, Rothschilds, Koch brothers, Google, NSA and so many more. I've never been more depressed by the amount of things that we have to fight. Or maybe I'm just slowly realising that the fight is much bigger than I thought before.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
We're not fucked. Not until we're all dead. Despite the broader international actions of governments, domestically we should still be working on solutions to environmental problems. If we have solutions to environmental problems, dealing with political turmoil becomes much easier.
There still is general peace in the US that allows us to address environmental problems. If we have our basic needs meet, clean environment, that will help to defuse political turmoil.
1 -INFOWARS- 2016-03-20
Problem is that those in power only stay in power precisely because of what they're doing to the environment. Obama talks about climate change and pollution and then hops in his big dirty plane to fly over. We're abusing our relationship with the KSA and allowing a growth of extremism for oil. China and India are opening new power plants every two weeks. Even if in the US all our energy was solar, wind, water etc...., it won't be enough. And what right do we have to tell sovereign nations like China and India not to do what they're doing re: environment? Nothing. I'll go out and grow fruit and vegetables, but I can't force others to do the same. Unfortunately, the brainwashed mass simply don't care. But I'll try educating them anyway.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
So we must directly remediate what they are doing and build solutions.
If each person has a windmill, solar panels, and hydro power if possible at their homes and work it's entirely feasible for green energy to slowly replace conventional chemical energy sources.
The problem is people are corralled into thinking that a centralized the energy model is best because it's what we have had in the past. Centralized models are more profitable for business. The truth is decentralization of the energy grid has always been better for end users.
No power huge outages, no huge electric bill, and more energy per dollar spent in the long run. These are the reasons decentralized green energy will inevitably take over.
If centralized energy systems adopt green energy generation methods along with all households and businesses green energy is absolutely viable. This does not happen if people don't start solving this problem for themselves.
There will always be competition for oil because it makes many other useful things beyond fuel. If we take away the attractiveness of generating electricity from chemical sources we take away a large incentive and excuse to go to war.
Thank you for educating people.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
"They're out there doing weird Satanic shit, abusing MK ultra slaves, murdering people in war and stealing from the people. These people simply cannot be trusted" Thank you for bringing this up. People need to realize they are sacrificing new born babies on alters with sickening regularity. It is not a coincidence that in my wealthy, bloodline town , there have been hushed rumors of moloch worship. Do you understand what that means? This is eveywhere. This is why I follow this commandment :“You shall not murder." And keep It close to my heart. they don't deserve jail.
1 Britt121 2016-03-20
Creepy!
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
This is an example of the beginning of a potential solution.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
The point of corporations and bureaucracy is to dilute responsibility. People are not getting what the accountability want from politicians because the game has been rigged.
What does "responsibility" mean for politicians fines, jail time, or simply just loosing office? The last in the majority of cases. It's especially not responsibility if politicians then go on to work in the top tier of corporations, making more money than they could in politics, and gaining even further political influence.
Our responsibility is only painful if we continue to do nothing about it.
0 [deleted] 2016-03-20
"They're out there doing weird Satanic shit, abusing MK ultra slaves, murdering people in war and stealing from the people. These people simply cannot be trusted" Thank you for bringing this up. People need to realize they are sacrificing new born babies on alters with sickening regularity. It is not a coincidence that in my wealthy, bloodline town , there have been hushed rumors of moloch worship. Do you understand what that means? This is eveywhere. This is why I follow this commandment :“You shall not murder." And keep It close to my heart. they don't deserve jail.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
mmm... Not my quote...
Not murdering is certainly a great way to help ones environment though.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
I condemn murder not killing however
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Yes. Killing can be accidental, even unpreventable. Intentional killing, murder, should always be prevented.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
is it wrong to kill a human who sacrifices babies?
Personally I believe it is not wrong.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
That's an archaic question. I think it's wrong to sacrifice babies.
If we segue that into a discussion on abortion, I think there are many justifiable reasons to have abortions. But being justifiable does not make it right, because it's still killing, but it's not necessarily simply murder.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
I'm not talking about medical abortion.
I am taking about ritualistic sacrfices of living born babies on an alter with the use of swords and knifes.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Alright. I think that's wrong. I'm not judging you though.
What material benefit do you think this kind of action provides?
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
It pleases demons which in turn grant them favor, money , power , and mind control techniques both literal and spiritual. This "sacrifice" also keeps the world in a lower density keeping the demons hidden and undetected.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
I see. Have you ever experienced a demon first hand?
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
Many times. For me though , we play subtle battle against each other. What I see are shadows and "movement" of dark matter. I have intuition which can sense them. I have seen 1 full apparition.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murmur_(demon)
If u click that link you'll see a seal for that demon. I saw that seal on a dollar bill right after I was researching that exact demon because it relates to the music industry.
While walking in the woods in pitch black (same day I found the Bill) I saw an enormous scarecrow on a tree branch, it flew down right in my path in front of me. It was 4 times the size of normal scarecrow. It also made zero sense why I could even see it. It was total darkness. But this thing gave off just a hit of its own light basically.
This demon is said have French military garb with a scarecrow always on his shoulder.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Interesting you say dark matter. I've had strong feelings about that being where spirits and daemons reside.
Your account is very intense. Do you still have this bill?
I've never experienced a daemon. I believe I may have very active and powerful guardian angels.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
Dark matter to me is a formless ,usually small but can be larger, shadow. Usually only lasting a second but that doenst mean it's just gone, just hiding. There is evidence to their being evil in certain other dark matters. but that gets complex.
If you feel protected then you are which is excellent. Keep your thoughts, intentions, actions pure and their strength and influence grows.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
That dollar is spent. I smoke an immoderate amount of marijuana so my funds lack. It's my strange battle. I'm close to winning.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
All very interesting. I guess I'm lucky. We all have our vices. Glad to hear you're winning.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
Sometimes they just simply impregnate a woman just to have Her get a standard abortion in the name of Satan. This however is not common among elites.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Not surprising.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
According to the teachings of Christ, humanity is comprised of the spiritually Living and the spiritually Dead. The Dead are products of this world, subject to its rules, obedient to its standards. They sacrifice spiritual priorities for personal and material pursuits. Meanwhile, the Living are in this world but not of it, they contain an inner quality that transcends worldly factors. We become more one or the other depending on where we place our priorities.
The role of Christ is not to unify the World but to bring total division between the Living and the Dead, not to bring peace but initiate total war between the World and the Kingdom. The role of false dichotomies is to distract us from this higher dualism, to keep us busy making false or irrelevant choices instead of the one that truly counts.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
That seems logically consistent.
I have never all heard that before. It does sound more realistic.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-20
Yeah. Its ok to distsnce yourself from Anyone. The battle is too serious and your mind is too powerful to be influenced with out consequences. We create our own reality.
3 spearthrower 2016-03-20
The real smokescreen in terms of rampant degradation of the environment is blaming the energy sector and accompanying CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions have gone down since 1996, while methane from the agricultural sector has slowly risen.
As the almost completely unregulated agricultural sector finds more ways to cut corners and increase dairy/meat production, "emission factors per head are increasing, [but] emission factors per unit of product are going down."
The multifarious impact the meat industry has is often completely ignored by so called environmentalists because it's something we can actually all combat by changing our lifestyle - way too much real activism for the armchair types. Just as much a conspiracy by the meat lobby as those perpetuated by AIPAC, etc
4 wanab3 2016-03-20
Factory farming isn't any better or worse than a factory as far as pollution is concerned. Both types of industry also pollute the food and water while polluting the air.
Maintaining a predominantly vegan is a decent approach to help solve agricultural pollution.
1 spearthrower 2016-03-20
Right but farming also incurs vast forest clearance for grazing and for growing cattle-grade (non edible for humans) crops - corn, soy etc. The input far exceeds the output, unlike most industrial processes, but this inefficiency is countered by huge government subsidies. If meat actually cost what it takes to produce it would be a luxury item.
You're right - and that's what I was getting at. But use the v word in even the most anti-establishment thread and watch the downvotes cascade.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
If people are following a predominately vegan feeding animals for slaughter requires far less resources...
VEGAN. let's see what happens.
2 Maritalrelations 2016-03-20
While environmental issues need to be honestly discussed, they are not the issues that are at the immediate forefront. The true fight is within media control. They want us divided. We all have common grounds, and that is a narrative the media ignores.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
You don't think the food, water and air you consume are not at the immediate forefront?
That's part of your environment. Environments is the common ground.
This is how we multiply.
1 NukeItGood 2016-03-20
Does it not concern you, regardless of the inherent truth that the environment is our most human common ground, that you have to beg people to care about it?
Politics are the reason we legally have to be connected to those centralized power grids, you know.
This person agreed with you, but also very correctly stated that we cannot allow ourselves to get divided because of public tunnel vision of the issues. Then you argued, "Nope", your concerns are the more important ones after all.
I find that the spreading of real content pertaining to things that are actually happening right now is far less distracting and harmful than what is essentially a thread trying to get people to ignore information.
Ignore nothing; please do not preach tunnel vision.
2 wanab3 2016-03-20
Of course. It also concerns me that you read this as reductionist.
There is a strong encouragement to be connected to the grid. We don't have to be connected to the grid. There is also no way for them to know you're off the grid if you're truly off the grid.
"Tunnel vision," "ignoring," hold on. What I'm asking is that we look at the biggest picture possible, environment. It's the exact opposite of ignoring and tunnel vision. Politics is an unnecessary, however relevant, middle man between us and changing our environment.
What information are people ignoring exactly? Everyone who posts in /r/conspiracy agrees politics are a joke and a distraction, we ultimately have no control over who is 'elected.' Do you really think discussing the latest joke out of these puppets mouths is going to better our lives? We know everything is completely backwards.
The most beneficial thing we can discuss is how to fix our food, water and air. Hence our environment.
We can all get distracted, it's part of the psyop. Spamming of politics in conspiracy forums is a way the greater psyop self perpetuates. Politics is important sure, but it's not good for us to give it as much attention as we are. It's ultimately like watching a grand chess game between elitists. It's entertainment, not something we actually participate in. You're votes, petitions, FOIA requests, and rants on the internet don't matter. TPTB will do what they like, they are in it for them selves. This is why we need to fix our sources of food and water, and clean our air. Because 'they' won't, 'we' must.
0 NukeItGood 2016-03-20
I guess I understand that your core argument is that if we don't fix things, no one will. That is a great mentality to have, and to share, but we cannot forget that we can't fix that which we have no control over.
The political system is most definitely broken. But it is still extremely important. In fact, that's precisely why. It doesn't matter how much lobbying your city's new proposed Big Shitty Riverfront Factory does if the citizens are vigilant and well-informed about the public health hazards. If too much red tape is created for them, Big Shitty Riverfront Factory Inc moves on to scout a different city with more malleable public opinion. This happens all the time.
This sort of tangible result does not come about from a few people tying themselves to trees. It comes from a whole buttload of people yelling nonstop at their local government to drop the contract. And yelling in the correct way that government should be yelled at if they are to be expected to do anything about it.
If you have a shitty bicycle, and it is barely functional, it will still probably be faster for you to ride it to work every day than to walk there. After you get a feel for which aspects of the bicycle are faulty, it becomes easier to ride, because you can avoid those hard left turns that invariably lock the brakes and put you into a ditch. You crash way less when you start paying closer attention to it.
The government is like an old shitty unrepairable bicycle. It sucks but it still beats walking; it's all that you have and you don't have to like it to get it to take you where you want to go. Make an effort to understand it.
I want to know how you think you can solve something like clean water, or a sustainable food source for a community, without involving the government in some way. That may wrongly come off as hostile, but I am always open to the possibility that someone knows something I don't know.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
We do have control though. There are millions of us, just in the US, and a few thousand of them world wide.
The octopus has many arms but you can make yourself look like a lot less of an attractive lunch.
Effective protests use all available methods. Not just one. With out the 'spot light' protesters people don't pay attention, with out bureaucratic protesters policy practice and law don't change. This situation is when politics are not a distraction.
Sure, politics isn't irrelevant. In increasingly many cases were not leaning how it works though, we're just learning about sensationalism of things politicians say. This is the distraction. Also how it works on paper is very different from practice. In practice it's nearly 100% corrupt and the law is irrelevant.
If you grow your own food it's many times better quality than what can be found in supermarkets. If you have water filtration and purification systems then you are safe from water pollution. If you make your own electricity and create green planter spaces your cleaning the air. Once you have these things go out and help others set themselves up with your labor or your resources. Once your community does this, you're all healthy as can be.
None of that requires government to step in.
At that point it's even easier to lobby government support because you have created the example of the infrastructure they should be following.
1 NukeItGood 2016-03-20
No... It really won't be easy to lobby for anything when you're becoming a threat that could end up costing your local utilities companies that kind of serious money.
Especially when they can easily hire people to snoop online and see the environmental movement being spoken about in the same sentences as suggesting that cell phones are the "mark of the beast". Congratulations, now you're labeled as extremists.
...
Ah. Well played. Well played indeed.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Ha! So what? Be labeled an 'extremist.' Better than being a sheep.
Everyone that's posted in this entire sub is already considered an extremist.
You might as well have something to show for it if they are just going to come at you anyway.
1 sixsexsix 2016-03-20
What specifically are you talking about? You just say toxins and gmo's like a science illiterate.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Heavy metals and toxic elements: Pb, Cd, Ni, Co, Hg, As, etc.
Plastic polymer molecules, which I won't begin to list.
GMOs are still largely banned pretty much every where but the US because they are suspectedly dangerous, but mostly because they just encourage the use of pesticides which are also dangerous.
I'm aware of the science. I'm talking like this because of the ease of communication.
2 make_mind_free2go 2016-03-20
i agree; the majority of people are distracted, it doesn't take much to get them to 'look' in one direction. all it takes is a 'celebrity' name mentioned. even if it's not a celeb name, anything blasted on MSM is enough.
EDIT: there are many on this sub that are distracted, they mistakenly think that having a favorite candidate is correct, at the same time they feel the system is rigged, IMO, that doesn't make sense.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Yes. Tragic.
1 TheyCallHimFlipper 2016-03-20
I understand your point but politics unfortunately now do affect our health thanks to the unaffordable health care act.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Here is the thing though if your environment is clean you will be healthy. Politics defiantly plays a role in our health, but the largest impact rests on being able to control the cleanliness and health of our environment.
There are also easy ways to circumvent the health care act. The penalty for not having insurance is also cheaper than insurance. So really all they did is raise taxes.
Crummy, but we can have a much larger say in our health by actively keeping the environment clean. By at the very least doing one or more of the following: filtering your water, growing some of your food, produce your own electricity, creating green spaces, commute less or use less electricity we can make ourselves and our environments cleaner and healthier.
1 gonzobon 2016-03-20
Global water issues are being ignored. Growing pains.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Yes indeed they are. Events like flint are going to be and more common unless we start caring for our water, food and air.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
As many of you can tell I've been watching this thread. It's funny how it's slid down rapidly overnight because of political spam distractions.
You all have read The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies right? This should be a sticky post at the top of this sub.
If not do so. That's what's going on in this sub, really hard core right now. Not because of just this post, but because that's the general method to maintain the psyop.
1 wanab3 2016-03-20
Ha! So what? Be labeled an 'extremist.' Better than being a sheep.
Everyone that's posted in this entire sub is already considered an extremist.
You might as well have something to show for it if they are just going to come at you anyway.