What the Panama Papers could really be about.
70 2016-04-05 by Putin_loves_cats
My theory is: this is going to usher in a global tax/bank bail-in for the peons/higher up peons (millionaires), and a whole hell of a lot more.
- https://www.chelcovat.com/swiss-bank-secrecy-ends-in-2018/
- http://www.economist.com/news/international/21693221-tax-haven-professes-stand-principle-risking-pariah-status-problem-child
Then this "leak" comes out about Panama. I think this is the beginning of a consolidation move for the uber elites.
All major Western countries are now talking about investigating all these "tax evaders" from around the world. They are planning on instating laws/regulations/etc etc in regards to this "leak". People from the East are being called out for their "safe havens", yet very little is coming out for Western elites. I know there is more to come, and I'm sure more Western mid level people will get called out, but I think this is to instate a new global tax/regulation bureaucracy, and possibly a move for global bank bail-ins before the collapse of the global economy.
Add in the TPP, and this global tax/regulation, it's one more step towards a Western NWO. These new regulations will allow the elites to have access to all of the world's banking information. Everyone's transactions/accounts will now be under the scrutiny of a global bureaucracy. Once this system is in place, a push for digital transactions (only) will be enacted. That means no more cash, and no privacy for person-to-person purchases. I feel like this could be like the banking version of the spying apparatus that we have. Just one more step to full global surveillance of the world.
Problem, reaction, solution. We all know these leaks are not shocking or should not be shocking to anyone. Elites/corps have off shore accounts, no shit. Yet, the reaction is what the purpose was for this (along with demonizing some of the West's enemies), and now they are already talking about a global coordinated solution.
I can see were Trump and Sanders fit into this narrative. As many of you know, I think the plan is Trump v. Sanders. What their plan is, idk. But I think either would play a part in this. Doesn't matter which.... Either will do.
What do you all think?
18 comments
9 Putin_loves_cats 2016-04-05
Well... This is getting downvoted hard.... Curious...
2 end_of_rainbow 2016-04-05
Well you have my upvote, sir.
3 spiraljockey 2016-04-05
I also had a vague feeling the papers were going to be part of a push for a cashless system, but you really tied it together here.
This leak is like the warning shot for mid-tier pyramid dwellers to change the way they launder their cash and evade taxes. The meaty portions of it could even be held back for insurance that they bail-in.
Great post, man.
4 Putin_loves_cats 2016-04-05
Thanks, mate. I'm trying to think on their level and some of this shit is not sitting right with me (many things seemingly not connected). Hence this post.
2 Pologrounds 2016-04-05
More bad will have to happen in the continental U.S. in order to really get the N W O pistons firing. I think things will stay the status quo of media induced chaos propaganda until the party nominees are finalized in July.
1 leomethus 2016-04-05
Do you really think the plan is Trump Sanders?
8 Putin_loves_cats 2016-04-05
I think so. I think Hillary will bow out because of the indictment. She wont go to jail, but she'll be grey listed. Lick her wounds and serve in other ways. She wont be president (She royally fucked at Sec of State, I think that was her "interview". She failed). I think they want Trump v. Sanders. They need "outsiders" to continue the facade (imo). False underdog story, like we actually have a voice. We don't. I should note. I'm not for anyone. I'm more for anarchism/voluntarism.
1 HITLERS_SEX_PARTY 2016-04-05
Anarchy is great until your daughter gets raped or your car gets stolen. Who you gonna call?
4 Putin_loves_cats 2016-04-05
All that happens in the current systems we have, so, it's kind of a non argument point. As for anarchism/voluntarism, it doesn't mean no rules it means no rulers.
3 end_of_rainbow 2016-04-05
^ this
1 HITLERS_SEX_PARTY 2016-04-05
If you think anarchy works, move to Somalia. Yeah, thought so.
1 HITLERS_SEX_PARTY 2016-04-05
There will always be someone who will rise to the top of every system. Smarter, bigger, stronger, longer cock...
2 CullTheMasters 2016-04-05
Who made you think you need someone to protect you?
1 HITLERS_SEX_PARTY 2016-04-05
I wasn't speaking about me. But when your car gets stolen, why don't you call the ACLU.
2 kayjaylayray 2016-04-05
Because that doesn't happen under whatever you call the current system. Only under the current system, your daughter's mind is raped into believe things can't get any better.
0 HITLERS_SEX_PARTY 2016-04-05
wait...do you believe that police detectives never solve any crimes?
1 Odbdb 2016-04-05
Time for plan B.
1 Arguments_are_stupid 2016-04-05
C
8 Putin_loves_cats 2016-04-05
I think so. I think Hillary will bow out because of the indictment. She wont go to jail, but she'll be grey listed. Lick her wounds and serve in other ways. She wont be president (She royally fucked at Sec of State, I think that was her "interview". She failed). I think they want Trump v. Sanders. They need "outsiders" to continue the facade (imo). False underdog story, like we actually have a voice. We don't. I should note. I'm not for anyone. I'm more for anarchism/voluntarism.