Global Corporate Extortion as a path to world government

41  2016-04-06 by 911bodysnatchers322

I had never thought of the prospect that inversion, shell accounts / tax havens would be the primary means by which a global public is convinced of the need for a world government but I'm guess that this will be the trick.

Everyone thought it would be wars, or starvation, or overpopulation or even climate control (hi, bill nye). But I think the trick TPTB will use will be to propose a fix to corporate crime.

Because it's not just America doing it. It's every transnational or large corporation in every country. There's a story here in /r/conspiracy (which reads a lot like swiss/russian propaganda btw, but it's not untrue), that corporations in other countries are using Reno, NV and other places throughout the US as tax havens.

Because it's all about legally subverting your government's jurisdictions. The UN can only pass measures but ultimately countries have to abide them. All it takes is one country to profit off tax shelters and then they are all doing it for each other.

Mass surveillance works this way too. The CIA may have to abide by domestic federal laws on domestic spying, but nothing saying they can't (nudge nudge), phone the Queen's special wire service division and ask her for updates.

This effectively means we're already in the NWO. A world government would only really be for administrative purposes of saving money and streamlining process for TPTB. In terms of control, it might be easier for them to control us by maintaining the illusion of different country lines.

Ultimately, our governments don't protect us, they abuse us. They don't shield us, they extort us. They don't respect our rights, they allow everyone else to tromp them, and in fact, they've designed a system that encourages this behavior as it yields fruits that TPTB can then use in many other ways, to make money while further inhibiting our ability to prevent them from doing so.

18 comments

6  ZapPowerz 2016-04-06

Just to add to your post, we are moving toward a cashless society which will make it even easier for a global government to regulate all "money" and tax it "appropriately". The NWO doesnt work if there are ways to earn/spend money outside of its control.

Whats next? bank account numbers tattooed on our hands so we can buy/sell things? Well that'd be weird.

2  PythonEnergy 2016-04-06

What is next is that you will only be able to use your phone to pay for things. All transactions recorded.

6  -INFOWARS- 2016-04-06

That's why Iceland had to go. Because they are against the NWO.

The way I see the NWO is that it is one GIANT machine. From Russia to the US and to Africa, everyone is in it.

2  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

I hope the pirate party wins. Because then there will be at least one country that we can flee to, if they will have us.

2  ragecry 2016-04-06

Great post man.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

ty

2  mtlotttor 2016-04-06

That's why every single voted in Government are all bowing towards the TPP enablers. Who are these men? What are the complete names of the people pushing this agenda? Certainly the buck has to stop somewhere?

2  know_comment 2016-04-06

This is about more global financial regulations. The world banking capital is going to move very soon. I'd project that another large part if this is going to come in international corporate regulations. Something that can be taxed at a global level. Like carbon.

2  PythonEnergy 2016-04-06

We are slaves. They fuck us over bigtime and provide little of value back. The corporations control the governments and the governments control the people.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

While that is true, I think there are fascist policymakers that control corporations by creating laws that enable them to do this. Those policymakers have so much money that it's actually meaningless, which means their game is about something else--I believe that game is acting as the jailers.

2  PythonEnergy 2016-04-06

I do not think that it is meaningless. You can lose it all very quickly. Their positions are constantly under attack from all directions. They compete with one another.

I think that they are interested in power and control. In addition to money, they also want information, access, the media, and of course violence.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

I dont' think we're in disagreement on any of those points.

2  Ihopeitsround 2016-04-06

There will be armed revolts in the United States if they keep slippin up, however. I think we still have a chance to overcome this, in the long term. Hundreds of millions will die in the process.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

That is why armed revolt is not the way to go. The better way to go is to

  1. build our own internet and don't let them in. Not one. Not one government employee is allowed on our internet, or if they are, they are chaperoned and highly restricted in the same manner that we are highly restricted to 'security clearnance' information.
  2. everyone grows their own food
  3. everyone generates their own power
  4. everyone participates in an effort to delete ad valorum and property tax--what's yours is yours
  5. everyone particpates in an effort to create a new A-la-carte government where you pay for what services you support. This way you can opt out of paying for war or paying for welfare or for schools (you don't have kids, why pay for schools). If you don't own a car, you pay for public transportation and that includes the cost of roadways. If you own a car, you have to pay for the roadways. That's just common sense. Then no one can complain about anything. If there's not enough money to help the poor, then expect tent cities.
  6. everyone participates in decriminalizing all drugs worldwide. This would drastically reduce crime, policing costs, prison costs, wars, occupations, mafia crime, gangs, and blackmarkets.
  7. degrade government in any way you can by opting out, not participating, not giving your money, time, attention, admiration of it.
  8. stop worshipping veterans. they are not super heros. They are people without other options or they were never going to be smart enough to do any real work other than killing people they don't know (murder) and then thinking it doesnt' violate the ten commandments because Obama told them to.

2  Ihopeitsround 2016-04-06

I'm behind you on literally everything you said, man, I just don't think the stupid masses of brainwashed morons we live with have any chance of waking up in time to save themselves. Save yourself, fuck everyone else; at least the ones who just won't hear it. And especially the religious people, fuck them. We need them to take a hike anyway.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

I hate that you're right, but you are.

If the world hopefullly doesn't collapse in 2017 as many have predicted (starting later this year), then give it 5-10 more years and a huge demographic shift towards the young being in power will happen because the boomers will die off in droves. I call it the neocon die-off. Now this wont' solve things, but it will give us an edge. So focus on 'waking up the millenials' or 'revitalizing the smartest x-ers' Focus on singletons, families are like trees, they aren't going anywhere. Also, that's who we fight for, so best to let them do their thing. Sometimes this knowledge, this awakening can be like mental terrorism to a family that just wants to raise a familiy and not be drawn into world politics and events. In other words, they've cocooned and don't count because they are abdicating all their powers and rights to the status quo, so just leave them alone.

If you are a neocon and you read this and think it's insane, well that's why we're looking forward to a future without you. You've not payed attention or you don't accept the paradigm of truth, which is that our government has betrayed you and us. I understand how you want to take your incorrect model to bed with you--you don't accept it as incorrect. However what you consider integrity is now what the rest of the world thinks it is

1  -INFOWARS- 2016-04-06

1) What does that even mean? Do you just mean an intranet that is encrypted?

2) Agree.

3) Hmm... Theoretically, but I don't know how poor people can do that.

4) Agree.

5) Agree.

6) I agree with that in a nation state but I don't see how you can force other countries to do that against their will. Remember, it's their choice. If they don't want to do that, then they shouldn't have to.

7) Agree. Have a limited government (Libertarian stance).

8) Irrelevant to me to be honest.

1  911bodysnatchers322 2016-04-06

Hmm... Theoretically, but I don't know how poor people can do that.

Compost based heating is one example. Painted soda can pipes and glass / plexiglass scraps for solar air heating is another.

1  -INFOWARS- 2016-04-06

1) What does that even mean? Do you just mean an intranet that is encrypted?

2) Agree.

3) Hmm... Theoretically, but I don't know how poor people can do that.

4) Agree.

5) Agree.

6) I agree with that in a nation state but I don't see how you can force other countries to do that against their will. Remember, it's their choice. If they don't want to do that, then they shouldn't have to.

7) Agree. Have a limited government (Libertarian stance).

8) Irrelevant to me to be honest.

2  Ihopeitsround 2016-04-06

I'm behind you on literally everything you said, man, I just don't think the stupid masses of brainwashed morons we live with have any chance of waking up in time to save themselves. Save yourself, fuck everyone else; at least the ones who just won't hear it. And especially the religious people, fuck them. We need them to take a hike anyway.