That's not what's happening. I've listened to him and agreed with him for years. Now I'm saying, "it's wise to stop listening to him" or "if you listen to him, know that he's going to try to sneak poison into your mind". You're welcome to do as you will, however I won't accept anything from chomsky anymore, and I'd appreciate if others stopped posting chomsky crap. I won't even listen to him personally.

(Do you agree with things ann coulter says? I do. Do I have to actually listen to her anymore? No. She ends up creeping her way in somehow, but I am not going after it. I think she's a nasty human being.)

Why stop listening to Chomsky? First, he's said the same things for the last 40 yrs, except when he talked about 9/11. Red flag. Secondly, because he actually is just a celebrity and has no more authority than you or me. Seriously. Do you read? Ok, then, you've got the same authority as Chomsky. He's a political analyst because he talks about politics and people are willing to listen. If you stop listening, he ceases to be a political analyst and then becomes just like you and me, "cowardly bloggers who oh so bravely post vicious attacks on the government, on online forums like reddit or something", except he'll go back to being 'just a linguist'. Yet he'll always have Nim chimpsky the delightful monkey that learned rudimentary human langauge in his name. So there's that.

Why does he have no authority? Because he is actually not a political scientist, he's a linguistics professor from MIT who speaks well and has authored books. In politics, however, at the end of the day, he's blogger with a miniscule amount of authority. He reads a couple of books and thinks he knows geopolitics. It's very brave of him to go onto a podium in a ratty sweater with messed up hair and the abject inability to speak clearly even though it's his career to be heard and 40 yrs of practice--forcing everyone to try very hard to make out what he's saying, as if they are listening to someone from russia with a thick accent. Everything he says about Israel is incorrect, they don't have to fight palestine, they have no motivation to fight them. See what I just did? I just pulled a chomsky.

Chomsky is either an agent or a coward who was emasculated by occupy NYC when they asked him to talk and no one could understand him. Human microphone failed because he's a gravelmouthed loser who misread the room. So then I guess it broke his brain and he switched sides. So, yeah, fuck him.

Good answer. That's what is at the heart of this post. Trust. When someone betrays it so completely, you can never ever listen to them again.

It's like what Thomas Sheridan says of psychopaths. Once you're identified someone without any doubt that they are psychopath and in your life, you must never contact again. This is good advice.

You see, psychopaths don't have any feelings, thats' why it's moral to do that. If you did that to a normal person it would be crushing, callous and cruel. And also, unforgiveness hurts the unforgiver more than the unforgiven. Psychopaths never ask for forgiveness, so you're not required to give it; you're just required to run as fast as you fucking can.

Chomsky is a psychopath. Anyone going along with the 9/11 lie on purpose is a fucking psychopath. I personally believe he should be destroyed like a faulty television set. Give him back to the archons kind of thing.

I could have put the above more simply:

"If Goebbels were alive today, would you be listening to his podcast?"

Then why does sweaterfag mumblehag get a pass?

"it doesn't matter" and "who cares" mean two different things. The latter is an insult to culture in its implication that there is (and should rightly be) an overwhelming majority that think it is not important. This is not true about truthers or falsers, everyone thinks 9/11 is important.

"it doesn't matter" doesn't carry the same insulting connotation and is more ambiguous. It is not neutral language, but it's more neutral than 'who cares'.

Yep, I'm not going to make a checklist of each chomsky statement, sentence-by-sentence and put a check by things I agree and x by things I don't agree with.

That takes too much effort. Better just to cut the cancer out, then trying to dab a little poison on it daily.

I can do that "like reasonable people do" with most every other celebrity or public figure, but not Chomsky. His words are like plutonium poured into your ear

'effort'. lol thanks? I agree it could be much better, formatting and flow got deranged because I was hasty....and mad

Exactly. It's not so much what he said is how he said it. In listening to Chomsky for years, I've never heard him get more nasty and angry than talking about 9/11. If he were talking about the facts about it (which he expressly avoids), it would be one thing. But with him, it's clear that 9/11 goes into some kind of chomsky triggering meta area that we're not privy to. Like "Chomsky if you talk about 9/11 we'll shoot your dog, your wife, and the rest of your family...so get angry when asked, put on a show, or else. yours truly, donald rumsfeld" or "listen you need to get mad at truthers, otherwise we won't be able to cap the pyramid next year as it gets out of control. yours truly, brother thomas of knights of malta baltimore chapter"

Thank you, sir! Exactly this.

Also, most people don't even understand what he's contributed to linguistics, because even linguistics people don't understand linquistics. I had a friend in a masters in linguistics program and he and his classmate couldn't explain it to my satisfaction (specifcally chomsky also) and I'm of at least avg intelligence. So I think it's stupid. It's probably not though. I think if you can't explain it then it's not realworld, and so why if you deal with etheric nonsense do you have authority in real world applications? Answer: you don't--if you live and breathe in etheric, you think etherically. Unless you're scripted, which Chomsky clearly is. At least he is now, maybe not pre-911.

Thank you.

Aaron Swartz was also at MIT, probably fringe part of lulzsec; same ethic, certainly very smart. Swartz is one of the exalted truth warriors in this war, remembered in the hall of heroes

Please explain to me how I am a gatekeeper. Or do I have to wait until 11?

I could have put the above more simply:

"If Goebbels were alive today, would you be listening to his podcast?"

Then why does sweaterfag mumblehag get a pass?