NYC subway users should class action lawsuit the city and subway system (and homeland security) for allowing the gas bioterrorism drill; Also it wasn't a drill, or a scare, or predictive programming, it was an experiment to create new human disease as particles contained 'random dna'
75 2016-05-14 by 911bodysnatchers322
They said the gas was harmless, but this link says it was a sugar similar to splenda with a small amount of fluorescent material (like a glow stick), both of which we know are harmless, especially if breathed instead of consumed.
http://gothamist.com/2016/05/09/this_is_totally_normal_right.php
But wait This part is really something: the particles contain DNATrax like a barcode. Which means every particle has a different kind of dna in each one, being absorbed through the epithelial cells of the lungs. That's wonderful.
It's like they are trying a shotgun approach at creating new disease and human mutations by dispersing exogenous, randomized dna into particles to be uptaken by the lungs. They will of course say 'those dna were randomized in a non-critical 'junk dna' area of dna' or 'inactive dna' or some shit. You know they will science it up to sound cute, but the fact is, even some miniscule percentage is going to screw up and cause a problem.
Anyway, this is about the most fucked up, Bain-level thing I've read about in ages, and as such it deserves more attention than it's being given on /r/conspiracy. These psychopaths are getting more bold by the minute.
Here's the corbett-mediamonarchy take on it
39 comments
13 johnny_c_note 2016-05-14
Hahaha yeah, sure. I trust NYC to be honest with its citizens about health risks involved here.....NOT.
I used to live in NYC and I seem to remember the city telling us that the air downtown was safe to breathe just DAYS after 9/11. Whoops!
4 911bodysnatchers322 2016-05-14
I was in NYC for a week and I can tell you it's an abusive puzzle maze. I mean one could get acclimatized to the sub system, but when I was there, the return path from wall st to port authority changed every day after 3 days. They were doing construction. I asked if it was normal, 3 people said 'yeah'.
So basically they are running this experiment on people to delay them, move them around; they are probably monitoring people and watching how people 'learn to course correct'
Like those lab rat experiments where you put the cheese and make them run the maze and then you move the maze around and see which ones adapt the fastest
Keep in mind, I had to run this maze to the port authority and back to NJ to/from wallst while in a happy ketamine haze, and only been to NYC twice before, so it was only mildly annoying to me.
1 justamonarch 2016-05-14
Sometimes it is the small things that help you through. I would love that therapy opportunity, by the way if you didn't dig in my history my dad volunteered at Edgewood and my screen name chosen after a good therapist pointed out a little bit of history.
3 Cecilia_Tallis2 2016-05-14
The city and even worse...the EPA.
9 [deleted] 2016-05-14
It will continue to get bolder as long as no one does anything substantial about it.
5 whipnil 2016-05-14
Alriiiiiiight then... I'll do it.
6 NoFaking 2016-05-14
!RemindMe in 5 months that this nigga didnt do shit
1 RemindMeBot 2016-05-14
I will be messaging you on 2016-05-14 15:18:15 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
1 justamonarch 2016-05-14
.....slowly raises hand..... "What we gonna do boss, what we gonna do?"
1 whipnil 2016-05-14
Create.
Music, art, story, food, community, knowledge.
1 justamonarch 2016-05-14
I do...i do..
9 ragecry 2016-05-14
Completely agreed. This is unethical human experimentation and I've spoken up about it every time I see this story. How do we not just punch the people in the face trying to do this? Shit's getting real bad. Wake the fuck up!!! Some of these past experiments are directly related to Zika virus. They are testing bioweapons, not preparing for them. Terrorist liars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States#1950s
6 Pologrounds 2016-05-14
It's systemic. Across the globe too.
1 justamonarch 2016-05-14
And they are getting good at targeting groups....
1 heyisthatcyclopean 2016-05-14
This is a really important point: even if you naively believe the propaganda about this "test", it was done without informed consent of all participants, which flies in the face of post WWII conventions.
7 RowdyRoddyPiper 2016-05-14
Just get out of NYC in general...? Great place to visit, but Sandy showed a glimpse of a grid-down WROL situation and it will be nasty.
Don't leave your life in the hands of collectivist control freaks
3 911bodysnatchers322 2016-05-14
Some people don't have a choice; others would never leave.
You know how they say that a city has a culture? NYC definitely has a culture. Every time I go there I get a glipse of it, through the advertising your bombarded with from the ads that hover at the rooftops of the subway cars, to the ads on cabs, to the constant flutter of things at times square and other electronic billboards that are everywhere now; even to the things overheard by street musicians, knockoff mongers, and other 'street performance people', and other tourons too.
Lights that rage all night--it's a luciferian city--why it's called gotham.
People are well invested into the culture of NYC and they won't leave. It's funny becasue they think that their culture is the same outside of the city and it's not. It's just as insular as they claim other locales are. You only know this by traveling between them. Its even more insular since you have to go through a long dark tunnel or bridge to get there. It's a cauldron. Non natives don't give a rats ass about broadway unless they want to sound like an insider, which everyone knows is pretentious. Its an expensive way to say you did the ny experience
My point here is that people are going to stay in NYC even if it kills them, letting themselves be boiled to death by the witches of cultural engineering. There's also something to that, thats even darker...from the numerous pre-videocamera gargoyles staring down at you to the authority-chic, shiny black wrought iron clad buildings acting as a standin for a gateway to oblivion. And they love it, willingly.
3 RowdyRoddyPiper 2016-05-14
Don't get me wrong, I love NYC. But a lot of the infrastructure is crumbling, and it would not do well in a grid-down scenario of any length...
4 MomChomsky 2016-05-14
WHY!?! JUST TELL ME. Why are we doing these things to each other?
3 Pologrounds 2016-05-14
Isn't it odd that counterterrorism prep is covertly bioterrorism on the population?
2 MomChomsky 2016-05-14
Everything is odd. Was this shit happening before we were adults? And just that its penetrating our adult understandings more?
2 Pologrounds 2016-05-14
Yeah, it's just that people are waking up more and more, and that modes of information travel at the speed of light now, so information can't be as hidden and suppressed as in the past.
1 justamonarch 2016-05-14
Yes, yes it was. It is the electronics and thenanobots we should be worried about now.
3 greggerypeccary 2016-05-14
I'd rather take my chances riding a bike on the streets than traveling underground in the catacombs of death.
3 zyklorpthehuman 2016-05-14
Operation Big City
1 911bodysnatchers322 2016-05-14
That is extremely disturbing. Wikipedia has nothing on it.
I think we figured out why incidences of cancer has increased greatly since the 60s
1 zyklorpthehuman 2016-05-14
Disturbing for sure.
I think it's a culmination of factors, for one the use of the benzene ring in the vast majority of medicine. Benzene is a known carcinogen.
http://www.compoundchem.com/2014/09/01/benzene-derivatives-in-organic-chemistry/
1 Scroon 2016-05-14
Ok, I do not agree with their methodology or practice, but I can see why they came up with this particular system. They're using DNA because we have very well established, almost trivially easy, techniques for amplifying miniscule amounts of DNA - namely PCR. By using coded DNA fragments, they can selectively amplify only the fragments of interest. Using this technique you could theoretically detect a single DNA molecule in a sample. That's good detection.
However, spraying synthetic fluorescent DNA particles into a public air system? Not a good idea.
1 joshua_ray 2016-05-14
You seem to misunderstand the Polymerase Chain Reaction. That aside, why does them using dna make sense? What does PCR have to do with the OP?
3 perfect_pickles 2016-05-14
its a way to organically 'barcode' a cities population, everybody would have a random non repeating collection of alien DNA inside them.
technically its illegal and unethical medical experimentation, also possible genocide or mass murder if something mutates. and unforeseen mutations happen as seen in GMO crops and cultured GMO animals.
2 justamonarch 2016-05-14
This guy gets it...now add nanobots and radiosignals.....yeah.
1 joshua_ray 2016-05-14
None of what you just said is based on science, and I doubt your logic and reasoning.
1 Scroon 2016-05-14
Hmm...what am I misunderstanding about PCR?
1 joshua_ray 2016-05-14
It's not a DNA molecule. It's an allele. Fragment is ok to say, but codon is more correct. Oh, and it's not theoretical detection. It's actual detection. :p You weren't far off. I just had to correct your use of the word molecule, mainly.. Have a wonderful day :D
2 Scroon 2016-05-14
Ha. Thanks for the correction. :)
Can I re-correct the correction though? Any form of DNA is a molecule. A single strand of DNA is a bunch of atoms held together by covalent molecular bonds...thus a long, complex molecule. See this:
http://www.austincc.edu/emeyerth/dna.htm
An "allele" refers to a variant of a particular gene. "Codon" is a coded sequence of DNA (or RNA) that is used to encode the protein transcription process.
Also, I didn't mean it is a theoretical test but that it is theoretically possible to detect a single molecule of DNA. This may not happen in practice since the single fragment may be lost or somehow damaged in the collection and amplification process.
(I was a molecular biology major. Did this stuff change since I studied it?)
1 joshua_ray 2016-05-14
Well I just took Bio 160 and I think you should be saying macromolecule :p The rest seems fine.
1 Scroon 2016-05-14
Terminology does change, so macromolecule it is!
1 joshua_ray 2016-05-14
To be fair I may be wrong. Thanks for playing the game :)
1 Scroon 2016-05-14
It's a great sign of maturity to even entertaining the possibility of being wrong. Props to you! ;)
3 RowdyRoddyPiper 2016-05-14
Don't get me wrong, I love NYC. But a lot of the infrastructure is crumbling, and it would not do well in a grid-down scenario of any length...