Infowars is as shill as they come. Actor Alex and his Stratfor handlers are less than trustworthy. The fact you would offer such "proof" says a lot about you.
When people are so blatantly pushing disinformation, the choice to waste time debating a fool is solely up to the poster. Much of why you've had no one here bite. I don't find anything you've claimed here to be credible, nor do I owe you a debate on your highly questionable nonsense posts.
Says the blatant apologist trying to use the shill rag Infowars as a resource. Talk about laughable. Who then provides no evidence showing that ANYONE BUT CRAFT INTERNATIONAL WAS OUTFITTED WITH PRESSURE COOKER SIZED BACKPACKS IN THE DIRECT VICINITY OF THE FIRST EXPLOSION. Mind you, in the exact same location they announced they would be detonating a training device prior to the first explosion.
The Boston Bombing HOAX was not believable. You are not believable. All you have to support your asinine claims that officials didn't directly detonate the alleged terrorist devices at the Boston Marathon is an article from the pro-zionist shill Alex Jones. That, and cries about everyone else has "no counter-argument then, just ad hominem attacks!" Oh, poor you. People aren't going to waste their time debating with people who are clearly only posting apologist replies. You know everything, every little detail, but when pressed, as expected, you have nothing to back your apologist claims up with.
All you have to support your asinine claims that officials didn't directly detonate the alleged terrorist devices at the Boston Marathon is an article from the pro-zionist shill Alex Jones.
"Zionist shill"? Oh, dear...
Anyway, I guess you don't read good. Or you'd have noticed the source I provided initially was not Infowars.
I mentioned Infowars, purely to show that even some conspiracy sites now accept the Craft International myth has been debunked. There's no credible evidence for it - any more than there is for...
in the exact same location they announced they would be detonating a training device prior to the first explosion.
Another entirely fabricated story. The sole evidence for this "controlled detonation" story is a Tweet that was actually sent after the bombs went off. Seems that some people are just too dumb to understand how time zones work.
The evidence for Boston being any kind of staged event is basically non-existent. It's a mix of false claims, like the one of yours I just debunked, poorly interpreted events and post-facto attempts to connect it to a training exercise that was actually months later.
Another entirely fabricated story. The sole evidence for this "controlled detonation" story is a Tweet that was actually sent after the bombs went off. Seems that some people are just too dumb to understand how time zones work.
This tired time zone lie doesn't work. Time-stamped 12:53, some what, 20 minutes prior to their planned actual detonation? Someone still outside of the decision the craft international staff were going to take the drill live tweeted what they heard. An internal notification of the upcoming stages blast.
If your blatant lie here were true, perhaps they would have actually detonated EVEN ONE suspect device. They didn't. Your lie instantly crumbles upom even the lightest scrutiny.
This tired time zone lie doesn't work. Time-stamped 12:53, som what, 20 minutes prior to their planned actual detonation?
Guess I was right when I said: "Some people are just too dumb to understand how time zones work." Let me explain this in detail. Hover over the date/time of the Teeet on that page. You'll see a pop-up:
Time posted: 15 April 2013, 19:53:32 (UTC)
This can also be confirmed if you pull up the original Tweet, view the source code for the page, pull out the "data-time" field [1366055612], which is the Linux timestamp, and convert that.
Boston in April uses Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDT), which is four hours behind UTC. So, the time of the tweet was actually 3:53pm. Well AFTER the bombs went off - the rest of your claims then fall apart like the poorly-constructed house of cards they are.
There was absolutely no mention of them detonating a training device prior to the explosion. It flat-out DID NOT HAPPEN.
There was absolutely no mention of them detonating a training device prior to the explosion. It flat-out DID NOT HAPPEN.
More apologist lies. An answer for everything, yet complete and total nonsense. The timestamp doesn't lie. It was just prior to the explosion at the finish line. The Globe was definitely on the scene. If the tweet is referring to a different device being detonated at the Library, show us a detonation after the library.
Because there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library. And the Boston Globe called it. We refer to this training device being exploded as "Bomb #1."
It was just prior to the explosion at the finish line
As proved beyond all doubt above, it wasn't. The bombs went off at 2:49 pm. The Tweet went out at 3:53 pm. You are simply wrong. End of story.
Because there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library.
Presumably you can show me an entire roster of eyewitness reports confirming an explosion "directly at the library"? Because there were, literally, hundreds of thousands of people present. And, yet, I've heard no-one say they heard or saw this supposed explosion you claim "absolutely" happened. Odd.
And the Boston Globe called it. We refer to this training device being exploded as "Bomb #1."
Again, proven completely false, there's absolutely no evidence this "training device" ever existed.
Finally, you know who was among the first to make this mistake about the timezones, pronounce it a "training exercise", and is largely responsible for this myth? That would be your "Zionist shill" friend Alan Jones whose mistakes you are repeating.
You keep claiming this. Prove it. Show where the bomb squad donated something in a controlled explosion AFTER the actual finish line bomb explosion. You can't stretch these words.
They were PERFECTLY CLEAR in their working. Yet again, your apologist lies have been promptly demolished.
You keep claiming this. Prove it. Show where the bomb squad donated something in a controlled explosion.
Actually, it's you who "keep claiming this". You said, and I quote, "there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library... We refer to this training device being exploded as "Bomb #1.""
So, prove it. Where are the eyewitness reports of this happening, as you claim, before the finish-line bombs went off? Where is the video footage of this? All it seems you have is a solitary Tweet - one conclusively proven as sent an hour AFTER the bombs - and the false claims of someone you called a "Zionist shill" in this very thread.
I trust you understand why this seems thoroughly unconvincing.
Your brain apparently is fully incapable of understanding truth. I've asked this multiple times, and you've continued to dance around it. IF the tweet was twat AFTER the finish line explosion, WHERE WAS THE BOMB SQUAD'S CONTROLLED DETONATION as announces by the Boston Globe.
If you're telling the truth (which isnquite clear that you're not), I'll ask it again. Where and when did they safely detonate the explosive announced by the Globe? There was only one solitary explosion that EVER occurred at the library. The tweet perfectly described its timing and location.
No other devices were found. No other devices were safely detonated in that area. You're a liar. And not even a good one. It's just sad. The same nonsense repeated over and over. As wrong as the very first time it slimed out of that lying weasel mouth.
Because there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library.
YOU are the only one claiming this happened. The Boston Globe Tweet - sent an hour AFTER the explosions - was a garbled report apparently based on them misinterpreting an entirely separate incident, a fire at the JFK library, several miles away.
Let's review your various claims in this thread.
they announced they would be detonating a training device prior to the first explosion.
No, they didn't.
Time-stamped 12:53, some what, 20 minutes prior to their planned actual detonation
Flat-out wrong.
Because there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library.
This simply never happened.
There was no training exercise on the day. There's no evidence Craft International were present, or that this was a "drill gone live". You're repeating unproven and/or false statements from your "Zionist shill", which don't stand up to scrutiny.
Right back to the same amateur bullshit. Can't provide anything outside of Alex Jones, not respond to direct questions (when those questions sink his toilet bowl deep theories). The original fatal fuck-up for your same bullshit story that remains completely unaddressed.
And for those who stumble upon this exchange with a disinformation apologist, worth about he same as the entirely worthless puppets on the controlled media talking points, this is how you can easily tell exactly what you're dealing with. A full page response summed up in one grunt:
**NUH-UHHHH!
And for the actual cowardly responses, dancing around the fatal point in his pathetic apologist argument (if you could even call it that):
Homie the clown here doesn't have a shred of credibly himself, but knows everything as long as you're playing state apolgist. With exactly as much credible sources (exclusively InfoWars, MetaBunk - in the process identifying his zionist source). It's been fun, liar.
Got a "credible" one that proves Craft International were present? Because when even Infowars admits this has been debunked, seems you don't have much left.
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
30 comments
4 GoldenTruth 2016-05-16
Our purpose was to document the event.
oh woops that was 911 lol
3 ragecry 2016-05-16
Were they also posing as 3 cops for a Sandy Hook interview?
https://twitter.com/Way2Wonderland/status/325838061231562752/photo/1
Was it a CRAFT or Punisher hat? It was a CRAFT hat:
https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/boston-bombing-third-man-with-craft-international-ops-carrying-two-bags-others-quickly-leave/
Mick West is having a hard time debunking:
https://www.metabunk.org/boston-navy-seals.t1411/
Discussing Chris Kyle's death:
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2212241/pg1?disclaimer=1
Some more discussion:
http://beforeitsnews.com/terrorism/2013/04/proof-that-craft-or-blackwater-agents-did-the-boston-marathon-bombing-2445882.html
Very interesting.
2 Rumpi_Tumskin 2016-05-16
They had nice backpacks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjocGidSLJw
-6 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
Except, they weren't.
[Edit ] Damn, /r/conspiracy. So many downvotes. Such a complete lack of counterevidence.
5 DoctorMiracles 2016-05-16
Then it's worse. Who were all those backpacked guys with caps, then? Just friends of the yellow balloon lady?
2 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
They were "National Guard Civil Support Teams (CSTs) that were pre-scheduled to be at the event."
Oh, and that's from InfoWars, so not even an MSM source.
2 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
Infowars is as shill as they come. Actor Alex and his Stratfor handlers are less than trustworthy. The fact you would offer such "proof" says a lot about you.
1 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
So, no counter-argument then, just ad hominem attacks. Thanks for confirming my case.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
When people are so blatantly pushing disinformation, the choice to waste time debating a fool is solely up to the poster. Much of why you've had no one here bite. I don't find anything you've claimed here to be credible, nor do I owe you a debate on your highly questionable nonsense posts.
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
And still, not one shred of evidence for the claim Craft were present, beyond the misidentification of a baseball cap.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
Says the blatant apologist trying to use the shill rag Infowars as a resource. Talk about laughable. Who then provides no evidence showing that ANYONE BUT CRAFT INTERNATIONAL WAS OUTFITTED WITH PRESSURE COOKER SIZED BACKPACKS IN THE DIRECT VICINITY OF THE FIRST EXPLOSION. Mind you, in the exact same location they announced they would be detonating a training device prior to the first explosion.
The Boston Bombing HOAX was not believable. You are not believable. All you have to support your asinine claims that officials didn't directly detonate the alleged terrorist devices at the Boston Marathon is an article from the pro-zionist shill Alex Jones. That, and cries about everyone else has "no counter-argument then, just ad hominem attacks!" Oh, poor you. People aren't going to waste their time debating with people who are clearly only posting apologist replies. You know everything, every little detail, but when pressed, as expected, you have nothing to back your apologist claims up with.
Thanks for playing. Come again
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
"Zionist shill"? Oh, dear...
Anyway, I guess you don't read good. Or you'd have noticed the source I provided initially was not Infowars.
I mentioned Infowars, purely to show that even some conspiracy sites now accept the Craft International myth has been debunked. There's no credible evidence for it - any more than there is for...
Another entirely fabricated story. The sole evidence for this "controlled detonation" story is a Tweet that was actually sent after the bombs went off. Seems that some people are just too dumb to understand how time zones work.
The evidence for Boston being any kind of staged event is basically non-existent. It's a mix of false claims, like the one of yours I just debunked, poorly interpreted events and post-facto attempts to connect it to a training exercise that was actually months later.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
This tired time zone lie doesn't work. Time-stamped 12:53, some what, 20 minutes prior to their planned actual detonation? Someone still outside of the decision the craft international staff were going to take the drill live tweeted what they heard. An internal notification of the upcoming stages blast.
If your blatant lie here were true, perhaps they would have actually detonated EVEN ONE suspect device. They didn't. Your lie instantly crumbles upom even the lightest scrutiny.
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
Guess I was right when I said: "Some people are just too dumb to understand how time zones work." Let me explain this in detail. Hover over the date/time of the Teeet on that page. You'll see a pop-up:
This can also be confirmed if you pull up the original Tweet, view the source code for the page, pull out the "data-time" field [1366055612], which is the Linux timestamp, and convert that.
Boston in April uses Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDT), which is four hours behind UTC. So, the time of the tweet was actually 3:53pm. Well AFTER the bombs went off - the rest of your claims then fall apart like the poorly-constructed house of cards they are.
There was absolutely no mention of them detonating a training device prior to the explosion. It flat-out DID NOT HAPPEN.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
More apologist lies. An answer for everything, yet complete and total nonsense. The timestamp doesn't lie. It was just prior to the explosion at the finish line. The Globe was definitely on the scene. If the tweet is referring to a different device being detonated at the Library, show us a detonation after the library.
Because there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library. And the Boston Globe called it. We refer to this training device being exploded as "Bomb #1."
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
You're right about that, but...
As proved beyond all doubt above, it wasn't. The bombs went off at 2:49 pm. The Tweet went out at 3:53 pm. You are simply wrong. End of story.
Presumably you can show me an entire roster of eyewitness reports confirming an explosion "directly at the library"? Because there were, literally, hundreds of thousands of people present. And, yet, I've heard no-one say they heard or saw this supposed explosion you claim "absolutely" happened. Odd.
Again, proven completely false, there's absolutely no evidence this "training device" ever existed.
Finally, you know who was among the first to make this mistake about the timezones, pronounce it a "training exercise", and is largely responsible for this myth? That would be your "Zionist shill" friend Alan Jones whose mistakes you are repeating.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
You keep claiming this. Prove it. Show where the bomb squad donated something in a controlled explosion AFTER the actual finish line bomb explosion. You can't stretch these words.
They were PERFECTLY CLEAR in their working. Yet again, your apologist lies have been promptly demolished.
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
Actually, it's you who "keep claiming this". You said, and I quote, "there absolutely was an explosion directly at the library... We refer to this training device being exploded as "Bomb #1.""
So, prove it. Where are the eyewitness reports of this happening, as you claim, before the finish-line bombs went off? Where is the video footage of this? All it seems you have is a solitary Tweet - one conclusively proven as sent an hour AFTER the bombs - and the false claims of someone you called a "Zionist shill" in this very thread.
I trust you understand why this seems thoroughly unconvincing.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
Your brain apparently is fully incapable of understanding truth. I've asked this multiple times, and you've continued to dance around it. IF the tweet was twat AFTER the finish line explosion, WHERE WAS THE BOMB SQUAD'S CONTROLLED DETONATION as announces by the Boston Globe.
If you're telling the truth (which isnquite clear that you're not), I'll ask it again. Where and when did they safely detonate the explosive announced by the Globe? There was only one solitary explosion that EVER occurred at the library. The tweet perfectly described its timing and location.
No other devices were found. No other devices were safely detonated in that area. You're a liar. And not even a good one. It's just sad. The same nonsense repeated over and over. As wrong as the very first time it slimed out of that lying weasel mouth.
0 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
This is what you said, not me.
YOU are the only one claiming this happened. The Boston Globe Tweet - sent an hour AFTER the explosions - was a garbled report apparently based on them misinterpreting an entirely separate incident, a fire at the JFK library, several miles away.
Let's review your various claims in this thread.
No, they didn't.
Flat-out wrong.
This simply never happened.
There was no training exercise on the day. There's no evidence Craft International were present, or that this was a "drill gone live". You're repeating unproven and/or false statements from your "Zionist shill", which don't stand up to scrutiny.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
Right back to the same amateur bullshit. Can't provide anything outside of Alex Jones, not respond to direct questions (when those questions sink his toilet bowl deep theories). The original fatal fuck-up for your same bullshit story that remains completely unaddressed.
And for those who stumble upon this exchange with a disinformation apologist, worth about he same as the entirely worthless puppets on the controlled media talking points, this is how you can easily tell exactly what you're dealing with. A full page response summed up in one grunt:
And for the actual cowardly responses, dancing around the fatal point in his pathetic apologist argument (if you could even call it that):
Homie the clown here doesn't have a shred of credibly himself, but knows everything as long as you're playing state apolgist. With exactly as much credible sources (exclusively InfoWars, MetaBunk - in the process identifying his zionist source). It's been fun, liar.
-1 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
And, I see now even the OP has seen fit to delete his claims.
So much for "credibility".
3 toneii 2016-05-16
Looking for bomb threats. They had a radiometer.
3 DankKappaLinks 2016-05-16
your link isn't very credible..
1 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
Got a "credible" one that proves Craft International were present? Because when even Infowars admits this has been debunked, seems you don't have much left.
1 Juan__Lennon 2016-05-16
Yeah, it's called our own eyes.
-1 treerat 2016-05-16
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
-1 BlackStarPrince 2016-05-16
Because it's not a credible source.
1 SkeptiConspiracist1 2016-05-16
Got a "credible source" that says Craft International WAS there? Ideally one that can tell the difference between them and a Punisher baseball cap...
1 treerat 2016-05-16
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.