Shooting at a night club in Orlando with reports of another shooter at a nearby hospital. Lots of unknowns, but reports of up to or above 50 injured, possible hostages taken, and possible IED on scene.
224 2016-06-12 by FlashoverPhantom
Excuse the lack of links initially, I literally found the first applicable links and those are the ones I'm using.
Initial Reports HERE
Orlando Fire Dept. Large Scale Incident Channel HERE. I could not find any police channels at this time, but will keep looking. Sorry.
Orlando Police Twitter Account HERE
Also reports of a shooter inside a nearby hospital where victims were taken. Reports like these are now beginning to surface.
Last number I've seen was 54 injured/killed, but unconfirmed numbers. It's more than odd it's been almost an hour and not one major US news network has picked this up.
Please remember that if you listen in on emergency frequencies, do not post specifics of police/fire/EMS movements as they are happening. I WILL UPDATE AS THE EVENT CONTINUES TO UNFOLD. All times will be in Central Time due to exactly how quickly new information is obtained. Orlando is in the Easter Time Zone, so all times are 1 hour difference from posted times. Please excuse any formatting errors, they will be cleaned up later.
E1: HERE is the live twitter feed. HERE is the BBC article stating possible hostages.
E2: As of aproximately 0315 Central time Bomb Technicians, Crisis Negotiator and Hazardous Materials Technicians on scene.
E3: As of 0341 Central, Staging lane is clear, new crews tookng over responsibility of triage of victims aprox 20-30 mins ago. Arson investigator on scene at aprox 0343 C.
E4: Here is a video taken from the about the furthest the public was aloud to go. What sound like gunshots can be heard. 0344 C
E5: People have started posting memes of the shooter being identified as Sam Hyde, a comedian. These are not true. Relevant article. It was a stupid thing 4chan does. Just so everyone knows. No news sites I have found have identified the shooter. 0353 Central
E6: No more reports of gunman at hospital can be found at this time. There are now however unconfirmed reports that the gunman inside the night club is strapping bombs to hostages. HERE is one of them. Keep in mind these reports are unconfirmed. 0357 CT
E7: Updated patient count as of 0358 CT is 40 trauma alerts sent to ORC, 2 more sent to another hospital per Orlando Large Incident channel linked to earlier. 42 total patients, including those who where not transported by ambulance. There was some traffic about 12 rescues, unknown what exactly that means at this time. Possibly number of hostages?
E8: At aprox. 0405 C, Orlando PD made a controlled explosion of some kind. Unknown what exactly it is. At 0412 C PD told FD to expect more patients for triage, sounds to be 3 more.
E9: 0416 C Emergency services on scene reports shots fired. Emergency services notified they may be requested to move
E10: 0418 Officer injury reported at OPD Command, OPD officers also brought out one victim to an awaiting ambulance. NonPD patient is a trauma alert to ORC. OPD is a self transport.
E11: More patients reported behind a business nearby that is a secured location. Possible OPD officer at 0422. One more sent trauma alert at aprox 0423. EOD command states one patient is being taken to transport units with multiple GSWs to chest and legs @ 0428
E12: OPD loaded multiple patients into a pickup and brought 3 to triage while others were taken directly to ORC, sounds as thought all are trauma alerts @ 0431. 2nd treatment group established with 2 Engine and 1 Ladder companies, roughly 10 with ALS capabilities. @ 0433. More non trauma patients arrive to triage at 0436
E13: OFD Command states "They are bringing everyone out of one side of the club. They may be able to funnel all patients out of the club." Treatment requests 5 more transport units. @ 0438.
E14: EOD Command reports no more casualties will be brought out to Fire Command. @ 0439.
E15: OFD Command reports numerous Code Green and Code Yellow patients are waiting in triage, other Rescue units requested. @0433
E16: More and more people are circulating the photo of Sam Hyde, a comedian, and every time there is an incident like this 4chan circulates his image. Please remember these are false, as is stated by the article in Edit 5.
E17: OFD Units and Command notified to change location @0447
E18: At 0248 Eastern OPD tweeted they expected to have a news briefing held shortly thereafter. Unknown if this has been completed at this time. Cannot find anything but am listening to OFD Command channel actively. 0454C
E19: Rescue reported nearby. One rescue unit sent @0500
E20: At aprox 0504, there are reports active shooter has been neutralized. I cannot find an official statement by OPD at this time standby for further.
E21: At approximately 0450 C, OPD tweeted the shooter within the club is dead. Link to tweet here. It is interesting to note they don't state "the gunman" they continue with "inside the club" seeming to imply there is another, but that is nothing more than pure speculation. Standby for further.
E22: EOD reports they are breaking out the robot at 0510 C. Rescue unit put on standby for EOD response 0522
E23: Command beginning to demobilize and debrief units at command post. Situation slowly drawing to a close. Staging area is now demobilized other than 4 transport units to finish out transports needed. 0514
E24: OFD Command is releasing most units to return to service. Command staff is now attending a debriefing 0521
E25: District 2 is now IC, channels moving to Tac 3 and Tac 4. 0527
E26: Large structure fire reported on major incident channel. 0530
E27: Public press conference to be held at 7am local.
E28: EOD command notified that "the vehicle" is the only "suspected device." 0540
E29: Per CNN, OPD has NOT confirmed the shooter inside of the club is the only shooter. 0546 As of 0549 the reported structure fire is now taking up most of the traffic on the major incident channel on the linked website. Waiting until hearing further for actual hard numbers on victims. Personal estimate is between 50 and 60 injured and dead. At one point it was said over 40 trauma alerts were sent to one hospital alone (possibly the nearest Level 1 or 2 trauma center), added on with rescues in the double digits and an unstated number of deceased. 0552
E30: If you or anyone you know witnessed the Orlando shooting, please report to Orlando Police HQ, 100 S. Hughey Ave. to give a statement. OPD posted on twitter. Apart from Local PD, OCSO, Seminole County Sheriff and Florida state police agencies, the Federal Bureau of Investigations is now on scene. 0609
E31: Press conference is live now, 0611, with continuing updates throughout the day. Shootout started with officer working that responded to shots fired call. Hostage situation ensued. One gunman dead with an "assault type rifle" and a handgun. OPD stated that there was a device on the gunman, and numerous deceased on the inside of the building. EOD units are now going through to verify a lack of secondary and tertiary devices.
E32: Aprox 3 months ago there was an MCI (Mass Casualty Incident) drill in Orlando. Relevant post here.
E33: Confirmed over 40 injured by OPD, estimated another 20+ dead inside the building per OPD press conference. 0631
E34: Alright, I wanted to go to bed when all of this started but I figured you guys would want to know all the stuff that happened too. So I stayed up way past my bed time. I'm going to sleep now but thanks guys. Also a shoutout to my brothers in Orlando Fire who did an awesome job today (last night?) . I'm definitely making it a point to stop by a few of their fire houses if I'm ever in the city. If any of you are reading this, remember your defusings and debriefings. If you need a brother, reach out and I've got you. Good night. 0735 5E35: Omar Mateen is the gunman's name, he pledged alliance to ISIS. 50 people are dead, another 53 injured.
294 comments
69 doughboy192000 2016-06-12
Holy fucking shit... /r/news has locked 3 posts about the shootings.
They just deleted another one.
39 cheekymusician 2016-06-12
I just woke up and saw it on the news and thought "Reddit will have the story."
I had to dig just to find this...what the fuck?
21 TrumpItPlaya 2016-06-12
ya... the deadliest shooting on US soil, isn't even on the front page here? What the hell is going on with this site? Used to be the only place to get my news, now??
2 Whafles 2016-06-12
Even Reddit gets censored
-17 iateyourcake 2016-06-12
Not to be crass but im pretty sure the folks at the alamo would beg to differ about this being the deadliest shooting on american soil.
Not saying what happened last night was not deplorable. But you know. Facts
12 Flytape 2016-06-12
The Alamo was a battle between two armies. It doesn't count towards shootings in the same way.
-19 iateyourcake 2016-06-12
Ok a war, but still shooting. If you want to be literal then it should be peace time shooting.
6 tofagerrl 2016-06-12
If you want to include war, what about Gettysburg, and Antietam, or half a dozen other Civil War battles with more casualties than the Alamo?
4 tinsolider3 2016-06-12
A shooting is always meant domestic peace time shooting. YOU took it literally and included the Alamo.
1 HerbaliteShill 2016-06-12
You're kind of stupid.
1 iateyourcake 2016-06-12
Says the herbal life shill.
1 HerbaliteShill 2016-06-12
That's HerbaLife
1 iateyourcake 2016-06-12
In all honesty i dont really believe anything i say on reddit. I just like to see people get pissed off about nothing. Because words on the internet arent real.
Also, im trying to see where the line is to get banned from subs. Its been kind of fun.
1 iamjustjenna 2016-06-12
Suuuuure.
3 TLV74 2016-06-12
The Alamo was not American soil at the time.
1 TrumpItPlaya 2016-06-12
50 people, is A LOT... I mean a whole LOT. Even before news broke of this asshole being an ex security guard, I knew it would be someone heavily trained with firearms to be taking out that many people. Even if you're in an enclosed area like he was, killing that many people, shows of someone who knew what they were doing, felt extremely comfortable around a firearm, and extremely comfortable killing. I wouldn't be surprised to learn he was radicalized overseas, and fought overseas as well. This isn't some disgruntled kid, who can never get laid, so he buys a gun, takes it to school and exacts his revenge... no, this is calculated, this is studied, this is prepared. He knew what he was doing and unfortunately, did it extremely well. I am a HUGE pro gun person, and this one actually scares me with regards to the 2nd amendment. This is big... all the others haven't scared me at all in regards to the guns and laws, but something about this one, is gonna enact some serious change... and shockingly, right before Obama is getting out of office...
1 MoJo81 2016-06-12
Free speech gone. Posts don't show up.
1 vehementt 2016-06-12
Ken M?
15 doughboy192000 2016-06-12
News mods have deleted a shit ton of posts regarding the shooting. Which now is the deadliest shooting in US history. They are still actively deleting new posts.
1 publicpretender69 2016-06-12
How many total are dead so far?
2 RidleyScotch 2016-06-12
50
-3 kiltrout 2016-06-12
Maybe they have grown some integrity. Everyone knows there are CDC guidelines to try to prevent viral behaviors like suicides and in my opinion there isn't enough censorship to protect us from ourselves. Stop reporting so damn much on these shootings. It'll reduce the recurrence and potential for immortality through fame. Freedom of the press ends where it turns our schools and public places into war zones.
1 MrWiffles 2016-06-12
Idk if you saw, but /r/askreddit stickies a thread.
0 RedditsNewGuy 2016-06-12
You had to "dig" to find this? The front page of /r/conspiracy? What does that mean?
14 iThrowFactsAway 2016-06-12
If you aren't subscribed here or didn't come here looking for it, you will not find it. Usually for a shooting like this there are multiple unlocked threads on frontpage of /r/all.
Only one right now is the_donald's, which I am banned from.
edit: grammar
2 HerbaliteShill 2016-06-12
It's on the front page of a few subreddits, including /r/askreddit.
The deeper you have to look the spookier it gets though.
-1 oelsen 2016-06-12
Don't conclude from you head into others. Pleeeeaaaase... You know what a link is and how you can use it. You belong into the category "1%" of all global Internet users in this regard.
7 DiscoLollipop 2016-06-12
I just went and looked at a new post and in less than 15min it was locked and all comments were removed.
9 doughboy192000 2016-06-12
This has to be addressed by the admins... the mods are abusing their powers. Unless the admins agree with the mods agenda
6 dagonn3 2016-06-12
The mods push the admins agenda.
6 nowellmaybe 2016-06-12
Here's how it works:
answer to
who answer to
who answer to
who anwser to
7 Scroon 2016-06-12
I saw that too. Can someone explain how locking and deleting comments helps anyone? What does that accomplish?
9 Homer_Simpson_Doh 2016-06-12
It's conditioning you to not speculate with your fellow redditors or community. They don't want a bunch of people corroborating information like three shooters or two shooters or one. They want to control the narrative.
Mass shooting? Next step is to lock all the threads down. Want to talk about this with your neighbors? Nope, no talking with your neighbors about this either. This is getting weird.
1 Scroon 2016-06-12
Thank you. This makes sense now. When people talk together, people think. Isolate people and you only have a one way flow of information - from mouthpiece to mind.
7 thompsonj04 2016-06-12
If the shooter wasn't a suspected extremist Muslim, this would be plastered over the front page.
4 vivalapants 2016-06-12
If he was a white Christian male this would be the front of Reddit for the next week
0 thompsonj04 2016-06-12
Absolutely. The narrative warps depending on the perpetrator's race, religion, gender, etc. Shameful.
4 thompsonj04 2016-06-12
Ridiculous. People from all walks of life have an interest in knowing this information.
3 doughboy192000 2016-06-12
Can you see this?
2 Top-Cheese 2016-06-12
yes, lol
2 thompsonj04 2016-06-12
Yes
4 holocauster-ride 2016-06-12
All comments being deleted. There is some kind of fuckery afoot
4 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 AutoModerator 2016-06-12
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by prefacing your reddit link with np.reddit.com.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 PreLubricatedPenguin 2016-06-12
With how massive this story is, I can't help but think this is a distraction.
1 RagePlusPlus 2016-06-12
What is going on with the mods over there?
-1 WhataJoke- 2016-06-12
People need to stop worrying about censorship on reddit (everyone already knows how biased and corrupt mods are in /r/news and /r/politics) and start focusing on what the other hand of the these sick puppetmasters are doing. Mass shooting happens during the Bilderberg meeting to take the focus off them.
26 mrpilot21 2016-06-12
I don't frequent this sub very often, I'm mostly in the aviation subs but I enjoy skimming through here from time to time when horrific stuff like this happens. I live in central Florida, not Orlando but very close to it and a couple things strike me as weird. The specific bar where all this took place is a good distance from where all the other bars are at and on any given weekend-night there are thousands of people at all the bars. It seems like if someone really wanted to kill as many people as they can, that's where they would go. Granted there are tons of cops in downtown Orlando around the bar streets on the weekends I guess that could have stopped an attack. Almost seems more like a hate crime attacking a gay night club when hundreds of bars down the street have way more targets.
5 JohnnyHopkins77 2016-06-12
Also a central florida native here. The gay night club attacked isn't a well known bar in that area, like I have driven by that intersection 100's of times and didn't know it was even there. (Also note i'm not gay which might have something to do with it) My family had your exact thoughts earlier. The scary report i heard was that the man who did it was apparently on the FBI watch list. That's why the FBI's freaking out right now in Orlando. Edit: Grammar
22 TrumpItPlaya 2016-06-12
Glad we have all this SPYING going on here in the US, with the NSA and FBI having no doubt heard about this guy... still goes to keep the NSA's record intact of 100% never catching a terrorist.
1 Whafles 2016-06-12
All the information they get is too much for them to handle
7 AntiAntiDrug 2016-06-12
Orlando native. Its a pretty well known spot. Probaly the top gay bar in Orlando afaik, except the one on OBT down on the west side. It was almost certainly more of a hate crime than an attempt to kill as many people as possible.
3 cinta 2016-06-12
Yup, I don't get all these comments people saying it's not well known. I'm not even gay and I know about Pulse. The only other one I can think of that might have more immediate recognition is Parliament House, but I'd definitely say it's in the top 5 most well known gay bars in Orlando.
3 Beef_Amoeba 2016-06-12
Ok, this is one of the premier gay nightclubs in Orlando, it is very well know. If you have a friend that is gay, chances are they know about it.
5 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
8 mrpilot21 2016-06-12
I had a couple friends that would make the drive from the coast out to pulse 2 times a week. I'd say it's a pretty popular. Splitting hairs though, this isn't supposed to be an argument amongst us, it's a moot point.
-3 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
2 peppaz 2016-06-12
Maybe a lot of people in Florida don't want others to know they follow a gay nightclub on Twitter.
0 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
2 mrpilot21 2016-06-12
That club has been there for almost a decade.
0 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
2 mrpilot21 2016-06-12
My friends have been going there for 7 years? I can't tell what angle you're trying to get at.
2 peppaz 2016-06-12
What is your point lol do you think the place isn't real??
Go to /r/conspiritard
Jesus christ
-1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
0 peppaz 2016-06-12
Full of shit about what?
I never made any implications - you're the one implying 'only 6,000 twitter followers' means the club isn't real or some bullshit.
1 cinta 2016-06-12
Are you implying that Pulse is not an established and well known club in Orlando? If so you're an idiot. Pulse has been around forever dude.
-2 JohnnyHopkins77 2016-06-12
I mean every bar owner says they have the "hottest club in town" but i see what you're saying. My point rather, was that it's not in a bar/clubbing atmosphere like Church St or Wallstreet. It's more secluded in a shopping plaza
2 sleazlybeasly 2016-06-12
Targeting gays
2 JohnnyHopkins77 2016-06-12
That's the point i was trying to make
1 Beef_Amoeba 2016-06-12
Very true, but when you look at where the lbgt clubs are here in Orlando, they tend to be more on the outskirts, Revolution is on bumby, pulse is on south orange, and Parliament House is on OBT close to Fairvilla. I'm not sure the reason why it's like this, but that is how it is. I think the practice of putting lbgt clubs in inconspicuous places started in NYC, which then was how gentrification started, but mostly to make sure their Patrons could feel safe whether they were open with their sexuality, publicly or not. Sorry for the rant. Went down there earlier and it's incredibly bizarre. Not as if anything funny is going on, but the shock that something this crazy happened in my hometown.
1 098765432112 2016-06-12
Every mass shooting is a hate crime. It just so happens it appears this guy was connected to ISIS and ISIS warned about attacks in florida 3 days ago.
21 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 Sadchipkelly 2016-06-12
There's a sub called r/amishadowbanned
21 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
MSNBC just had a gentlemen speaking about how quickly a name and a link to terrorism has been found already and how impressive police work and intelligence has gotten from all of these shootings (citing San Bernardino and others), as if these things have improved their efficiency.
Hmmmmm
1 SlothropsKnob 2016-06-12
Good point!
20 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
Christ.
And off we go folks. For anyone who has been awake for any length of time, what the hell is there to even say at this point. I don't mean to sound hopeless but our situation in America kind of is.
8 HackQuack 2016-06-12
New regime. More war. Nothing changes.
3 WhataJoke- 2016-06-12
Is it any surprise this is happening during the Bilderberg meeting? Or that David Petraeus is there in Germany right now and is heading up a new gun control group? Or that Hillary will soon be selected as president to finish Obama's job?
2 captain_teeth33 2016-06-12
Much more effective than your average powerpoint presentation isn't it? Stupid corporate 'leaders'
1 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
Frankly, no.
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
One that doesn't sicken me to find out what it does in my supposed name everyday. That would be a start.
0 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
Depends on your definition of poor.
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
My definition of poor and prosperous isn't just attached to monetary value, is my point. Yes, America is loaded, but we are morally bankrupt.
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 BurninEpix 2016-06-12
I think that's where it ends and you are right. Just depends on what a person values and finds important.
15 yopeee 2016-06-12
I don't have the emotional capacity this month to deal with this shit. I have already been cleaned out.
10 VotesBasedOnYourVote 2016-06-12
Idk why you're being downvoted. I feel you. It's pretty disgusting how quickly these stories turn into political rally cries.
15 infamousdude13 2016-06-12
Literally last night I was reading a comment someone posted here about how a mass shooting would happen within a few days because of elections. Then I wake up and see this happened.... Very eerie..
5 slim_ironwood 2016-06-12
I think the writing has been on the wall for quite some time. After the Paris farce, I was on this sub predicting the same thing happening in America this year, although, I did also predict that there would be multiple simultaneous attacks. Granted, that would be more difficult to pull off, assuming this is some sort of false flag / hoax operation.
There's far too much political stuff going on between now and the end of the year, with the election, the Hillary investigation, TPP/TTIP, occupation in Syria...that you just knew some shit would hit the fan to keep the focus off it all. This is probably just the first of a slew of shootings we'll see from summer through fall.
Obama may be headed out of office, but Clinton is probably even more adamant about tighter gun laws. I guess we'll see.
1 sassisarah 2016-06-12
I have a friend who doesn't believe the Orlando shooting happened and I'm on this sub to read what others have written about it. He mentioned the phrase "false flag" also and doesn't think there is enough evidence. What are your thoughts?
1 slim_ironwood 2016-06-12
Well here's the thing - we won't get much, if any, concrete evidence to support anything. Me personally, I don't truly think it's a complete hoax, but the ONLY reason I say that is because a longtime friend of my mom's claims to have lost a nephew in the attack. That's a somewhat vague, shill-sounding thing to say, but I can't imagine this person lying.
However, this is, without question, a false flag. If you're just popping on to the sub for the first time, and are unfamiliar with how most of us perceive geopolitics, then it might be a bit hard to grasp. But the mainstream media is in cahoots with whoever is perpetrating these events, whether it be the CIA, Mossad, ATF, DHS, whoever, and they won't hesitate to regurgitate whatever they're told.
I DO think the Paris attacks were probably a full-on hoax. The photo from inside the Bataclan is a joke, the venue was recently purchased by wealthy Jews, and the only people heard from who were inside were industry insiders and actors. The "suicide bomb" that went off in a cafe, which killed NO ONE but the bomber, by the way, did so little damage to the inside of the building, you'd think someone just threw a plate and a glass.
Either way, we are witnessing Broadway theater on a massive scale, the likes of which the world has never seen before, and with all the disinformation that flows out after these attacks, we have to resign to the fact that we simply do not know what happened. But I'm glad you're looking into this - I think anyone with a critical mind can look at this news coverage and wonder..."is this person being honest? Why are some witnesses being ignored? Why are they letting media into the shooter's home just two days later?"
It simply does not add up. Instead of investigating the facts, mainstream and social media is instead focused on how the attack can be prevented, and what laws need to change, which is exactly what the UN-installed government wants.
1 mintyangel21 2016-06-12
Didn't read all of this but I was lead to believe that a false flag means it was set up but people were still killed, a hoax means it was set up and there was no victims
1 slim_ironwood 2016-06-12
There's been some recent debate about this terminology...the basic idea is that "false flag" pertains to anything that is done by one group of people and blamed on another, whether or not there are murders. A "hoax" is a completely fabricated event where no one died. So while a "hoax" is not interchangeable with a "false flag", the two are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
In other words..."false flag" is a safer way of referring to anything we're lied to about, without sounding insensitive in case it wasn't really a hoax.
1 mintyangel21 2016-06-12
Didn't read all of this but I was lead to believe that a false flag means it was set up but people were still killed, a hoax means it was set up and there was no victims
1 mintyangel21 2016-06-12
Didn't read all of this but I was lead to believe that a false flag means it was set up but people were still killed, a hoax means it was set up and there was no victims
1 mintyangel21 2016-06-12
Didn't read all of this but I was lead to believe that a false flag means it was set up but people were still killed, a hoax means it was set up and there was no victims
1 mintyangel21 2016-06-12
Didn't read all of this but I was lead to believe that a false flag means it was set up but people were still killed, a hoax means it was set up and there was no victims
1 BikesAreForKids 2016-06-12
To be fair, with hundreds of mass shootings per year, if you predict there will be a mass shooting in the next few days there's about a 100.00% chance you'll be correct.
14 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
Targeting the left. Welp time to go to war with Isis . Good job "tbtb" your might have actually succeeded this time.
remember how last year at this time everyone in the USA hated the idea of going to war in Syria. Now watch what happens
9 Onyyyyy 2016-06-12
You know we are already in Syria and the ISIS is not the same as Syria, right?
They are not going after the left. They don't see it that way. There is us the population and the them, the men behind the curtain. They create events and push agendas. They are why you categorizes people into left or right. This looks more about gun control than anything else.
3 TLV74 2016-06-12
A Muslim extremist shooter will not convince the public to support gun control. TPTB know that.
1 Onyyyyy 2016-06-12
I agree in some states, but others I think the population is more passive and already sees guns as "evil".
1 avohec 2016-06-12
FSA = ISIS = Al-Qaeda.
1 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
Okay yes and wouldn't a war against the countries they hate the most kill even more people? That's what I'm saying.
And wouldn't the left who have been against a Syrian invasion/ground war more than the right. Hate it when they put more forces in.
What's the best way to counter the lefts hate for war ... By killing 50 gay people in a gay bar. That would swing the sjw/left vote way further.
Edit : your right about gun control that's why it's always an m16 or ar15. Notice how it's never an ak like most Muslim terrorists use.
13 RCnoob69 2016-06-12
Why is the /r/news thread locked???????? Complete BS
36 sixsexsix 2016-06-12
Because shooter was revealed to be muslim
9 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
he thread is locked because its Muslims on Gay crime. they would never be able to control the comments section, so in the most basic Hebrew tradition....Shut. It. Down.
6 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
This doesn't make sense. If the Jews are trying to paint a picture of Muslims being dangerous wouldn't they profess loudly at every opportunity that he was Muslim? Doesn't it make more sense that the site is moving in a more PC SJW direction and so the mods are skewing information that way? And since Muslims are viewed largely as the societal underdogs the mods of these PC subreddits might want to protect their image by suppressing information that might spark hatred towards the group/religion as a whole? That's the kind of self-contained small-scale conspiracy I can get behind.
5 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
the 'SJW' movement is powered by marxist jews.
-1 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
ok
1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
maybe you should do a little research, Jerry.
-3 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
the more you peel the onion, the more it stinks
7 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
the more you reference tv the less I pay attention to you. goodbye, Jerry.
1 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
Is this the part where you claim that tv is scheduled Jewish programming that alters the viewer's perception of reality and you're better than the sheeple because you post to an Internet forum which, also according to you, is likewise run by your evil arch-nemesis Hebrew International? Or will you try to say that your baseless depthless comments hold more water than my own baseless depthless comments?
7 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
it takes an awful lot of words to deny the jews run hollywood.
3 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
And yet the Hollywood Jewish news is at conflict with the narrative they've supposedly supplied about this incident for the likewise Zionist subreddits. Interesting that.
4 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
are you sure about that?
4 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
I'm not sure if your half-answers are eventually going to lead to a point or not. You seem to be Woke enough to Awaken me...by all means, please do so as a service to your fellow man.
2 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
these arent half answers, these are absolute truths that dont require a lengthy hasbara style explanation.
2 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
"Hasbara style"? Do you realize how stupid that sounds? Do you think throwing sideways swipes at anything related to Jews even where it doesn't make sense somehow makes you enlightened? I can do that too, but then I'd be stooping to the level of matzah
3 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
using more words to deny the truth doesnt make you correct.
2 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
Alright: I don't believe you. Please wake me up.
2 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
that isnt my job. but the truth stands, the jews run hollywood and the media and the "SJW" movement is powered by marxist/bolshevik jews.
2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[removed]
2 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
well, then maybe as your assignment you look up George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Barbara Lerner Spectre, and the control of Hollyqood and the media. once you have done that, get back to me. hurry along, you have much to learn.
1 SovereignMan 2016-06-12
Rule 10. No personal attacks. Removed. 1st warning.
2 ButMuhHITLER 2016-06-12
You've got Zionist Jews pulling every string to keep you distracted, ignorant and ripe for the picking.
1 Kishou_Arima 2016-06-12
Because some on their mods are muslims and don't want to make their people look bad. Even a SJW mod wouldn't censor this much since the scale of the shooting is very high.
-5 TheRealRodBalsamic 2016-06-12
Probably to prevent wild speculation from armchair criminal forensic experts on Reddit.
17 shaikann 2016-06-12
Nope, they locked it after FBI confirmed shooter is muslim. If you don't know /r/news is ruled by muslim mods like other default subs. It has 6 muslim mods.
7 Decalance 2016-06-12
Didn't know people here trusted the fbi. Obviously only when it helps further their agenda
1 Dude_wtf_seriously 2016-06-12
Ya because everyone that posts here believes the EXACT same thing. Silly conspiracy sub stereotyper.
2 Decalance 2016-06-12
If he isn't downvoted that means either people agree with him or don't think it's too outlandish
13 DarthStem 2016-06-12
Trump will come out anti Islam, Hillary will come out anti gun, Bernie will come out and say let's unite and actually do something.
12 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
I Have Some Questions!
1) Was there some kind of a "swat team training exercise" near by when it happened?
2) Has there been irregularities with the communication systems in the area 24-48 hours before the event?
3) How fast did the corporate owned mass media arrive at the scene?
4) How did the perpetrators look, what kind of clothe did the wear and is there any reliable photo evidence?
8 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
It is unknown on all but question 3. Granted I am not from the area, and just happened to be in this subreddit when I read that this all started going down. I don't even live in the same time zone as Orlando.
For the US major news outlets to report on it took well over an hour. The /r/news thread was what I first heard about it. I instantly began keeping the opening to the post in a notepad folder and flipping through major news websites. The BBC website had more information than any domestic news outlets until about three hours ago, which the incident has now been going on for roughly five hours.
Initial reports is some victims are stating there were 2 shooters. OPD has not confirmed the one dead gunman is the only gunman. EOD stated on the major incident channel that "the vehicle is the only suspected device." My question is how did he manage to get a "long arm" like a rifle or shotgun past security?
4 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
Thank you for your kind and sincere answer.
3 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
I'm not here to judge, just to give all the information I can
7 no1113 2016-06-12
Am I missing something? Did this comment get edited by the OP and it was originally asking some stupid, inflammatory questions? These all seem like legitimate questions to me. Why the downvotes?
2 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
I don't think they like being questioned. I think it provokes their angst, if you ask them to take even a mildly critical look at what is going on. They rest is just knee jerk behavior and fear surfacing in an attempt to stay inside their pretty little bubble. I kind of feel sorry for them!
6 no1113 2016-06-12
Who is "they" though? I mean this is /r/conspiracy isn't it? These very kinds of questions you asked are part of the very purpose of this sub, no?
It's about critical thinking and considering as many options as possible - including, if not especially, those that might be difficult to grasp or uncomfortable to consider.
I just found it strange that you were at like -2 when I came upon your post. I was like "Did he ask some completely irrelevant question and then edit it and replaced it with fully valid questions or something? cuz I see no reason to downvote what he posted."
Weird.
Regardless, valid questions you asked. Keep it up.
0 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
Once upon a time maybe. Not anymore. r/conspiracy has been turned into echo chamber for fools and idiots, a mere shadow of its former self, abandoned a long long time ago by the intelligentsia.
I agree.
I agree.
-1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[removed]
1 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
Those are all the questions that should be asked. Not sure what you're on about.
1 Sabremesh 2016-06-12
Removed. Rule 10.
-6 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
Then laugh my friend, laugh as hard as you can, share you laughter with anyone, slander me while you laugh and keep laughing...
1 Vitalogy0107 2016-06-12
Ignore these folks, ask the tough questions because you see the writing on the wall and you're not asleep.
-3 Tabnam 2016-06-12
I hope you know you sound like an idiot, not a poetic marginalised revolutionary like you're trying oh so hard to convey
7 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
Salty comment! I just asked a few questions, I think I might still be allowed to ask questions despite the Patriot Act. Is it making you uncomfortable that I ask this kind of questions?
2 WisdomModifier 2016-06-12
I'll be able to give you the answers once Wolf Blitzer gives them to me!
-7 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[removed]
1 Denmark1976 2016-06-12
I have no previous history of mental illness nor does anyone in my family. Are you uncomfortable with my questions?
1 Sabremesh 2016-06-12
Removed. Rule 4.
0 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
Why does someone asking the real questions upset you?
0 grungebot5000 2016-06-12
lol the "REAL" questions
closest one to a real question is #4
2 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
They're all things that should be considered. Any irregularities in any of them could be a sign of something fishy going on.
0 grungebot5000 2016-06-12
that's true except #3, but if the first two applied it would be a story, no?
11 BrotherSpartacus 2016-06-12
Excellent post btw.
6 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Thank you
2 Cesarek13 2016-06-12
Yea, seriously. Mvp award. Great job
11 AnonJustice 2016-06-12
Orlando resident here.
The Orlando shooter seems to have a Muslim name ("Omar Mateen"), so they're already trying to make ties to Islamic fundamentalism and terrorist groups despite the fact that it was most likely a hate crime.
This all comes within a week of a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that concealed carry is not protected in the constitution, allowing them to make it difficult/impossible for Americans to apply for and receive CCW permits.
Central Florida has some pretty lax gun policies--University of Central Florida students are even allowed to carry their guns in their cars on campus. I have a glaring suspicion that this will all soon change, with legislators citing "the deadliest mass shooting in US history."
My message: if you haven't gotten a license to carry your own protective equipment, it would be in your best interest to do so now.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Or just live in a state like mine where everyone over 21 and a clean criminal record has a permit just by virtue of being alive. Constitutional carry is great
10 LupinePeregrinans 2016-06-12
One of the earliest tweets/reports was this saying that there were two gunmen?
12 Enigmatic_Continuum 2016-06-12
It always makes me wonder when there are initially reports of 2 shooters, but then it ends up there was just one. We saw this with the Aurora shooting and now this one. There were reports that one shooter left the club and started running down the street towards the hospital while shooting, which is why the hospital was put on lock down. Now, the media is saying that there was a lone wolf gunman that was killed inside the nightclub. IF there wasn't a second shooter, I'm interested to hear the reasoning for why the hospital was put on lock down.
7 test98 2016-06-12
The was apparently a police officer working inside the club who initially returned fire. Easily could have been mistaken for a second shooter at first.
9 Enigmatic_Continuum 2016-06-12
Plausible, but that doesn't fit the scenario I heard unless the cop got scared and started running down the street away from the club while shooting, which I'm sure would be against protocol as innocents were in the streets trying to escape.
Aside from the reports of two shooters in recent incidents, the idea of accomplices has been a very grey area for the police. For example, the most glaring instance in the past few years has been the idea that John Wayne Gacy had one or more accomplices as some of the victims found buried in his basement came up missing while Gacy was, in fact, out of town. A few years ago, it was reported that Chicago was preparing to arrest a person they suspected was working with Gacy, then it fell off the radar, and never spoken of again. Why the secrecy? Things just get curiouser and curiouser...
3 thedrunkmrlahey 2016-06-12
Yeah Gacy said he had 'accomplices' and the only survivor said he believed as second person was present in the house.
Not sure what it implies, I'd guess a want to wrap up the case or lack of evidence, but strange indeed.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2099744/Did-killer-clown-John-Wayne-Gacy-accomplice.html
3 worseforwine 2016-06-12
For more information on the massive cover ups surrounding Gacy, Son of Sam, and many other "serial killers", read The Ultimate Evil by Maury Terry, and Programmed to Kill by David McGowan. Really gives perspective on every mass media promoted act of violence in this country, including this most recent shooting.
2 Enigmatic_Continuum 2016-06-12
Thanks for the recommendations! I'm sure it will be fascinating reading.
6 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
At this time it is a possibility. I've been googling for a police scanner feed since I started the thread. I can't find one, but my googlefu isn't the greatest. It was also reported that there was another gunman inside of the hospital nearest to the club. The hospital was put on lockdown for a while. All I currently have is the OFD command feed, so my information is more based on patients. Thanks
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
3 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
On the broadcastify page there is a Major Incident feed as well. The OFD Fire feed has some normal calls outside of the active shooter. Major Incident has only active shooter. Thanks
2 KiefKong 2016-06-12
I have a screenshot on my cellphone from last night, while the event was still in progress. It states, "The New York Daily News has reported that one witness saw "at least two assailants open fire with what sounded like a semi-automatic firearm inside the nightclub and outside the south Orlando venue from a vehicle".
1 prest0G 2016-06-12
Can you post that?
1 KiefKong 2016-06-12
I put it up as a separate post on this sub as well.
http://m.imgur.com/1DUnHP6?r
10 avohec 2016-06-12
Perfect timing to distract people from the Bliderberg meeting in Dresden, Germany.
4 youvebeenliedto 2016-06-12
I agree.
8 BribeEmporium 2016-06-12
caption
-5 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 BelDeMoose 2016-06-12
My gf was working the night shift for sky and they got the story (broke it ten or fifteen mins before anyone else in the uk) through social media. She spoke to eye witnesses contacted via social media too. Honestly any idea this is 'fake' and not just yet another hate filled asshole just has no pull for me.
8 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
5 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
the narrative must be controlled at all costs, these are dire times no room for failure.
8 azbcethananderson2 2016-06-12
Get ready for the usual social media cycle following a terror attack: Let's not just assume it's Muslims merely because witnesses heard shouting in Arabic! It could be anyone! Ok, fine, it was Muslims, but clearly they weren't REAL Muslims, just some crazy people using religion as an excuse! Here's some statistics on non-Islamic terror attacks. Remember, those happen too! What about the KKK and the Crusades? Did you forget about those? Proof that all religions are the same! Muslims are the real victims here. Their peaceful religion has been hijacked by some crazies that make them look bad.
-4 DakinisJoy 2016-06-12
Every libturds and SJWs ever
7 random_redditor19 2016-06-12
Link to ISIS and discovered manifesto in 3,.... 2, .....
6 Legion1375 2016-06-12
So is it true that the shooter is muslim? If this was domestic and you know what I mean. They wouldnt be locking any threads
6 FlotsamJetson 2016-06-12
I can't shake the feeling that this shooting was cooked up by America's own.
5 bad_pattern10 2016-06-12
his afghan background and muslim identity are social constructs and therefore they do not matter and focusing on them is hatethink
5 Sportfreunde 2016-06-12
I find it strange how hung up people are about the censorship part because it's some muslim. Let's be honest here, this just furthers the elitist agenda because that censorship in itself will only increase hate against that group and it will only divide people further. Plus we'll see the gun debate brought right back to the forefront and it'll be part of the election cycle for sure.
Really one of those 'according to plan' things for the illuminati or whatever you believe in.
5 thedrunkmrlahey 2016-06-12
Not sure how this is going to play out or if it will look like a false flag... but as soon as I turned on CNN, gun reform talk. A woman mayor(?) talking about assault rifle magazine clips and shit when all the facts aren't even out.
False flag or not, the anti-gunners will be out in full force. Great timing with the election, too.
4 [deleted] 2016-06-12
Bomb squad and crisis negotiator are on scene
8 m4k4v3l1Th3d0n 2016-06-12
i wonder if obama has started trying to pass more gun control yet.
5 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
I'd give it until early afternoon
-4 AmadeusK482 2016-06-12
Do you think we'd be better off with less restrictions to guns? I believe we need to reduce firearm proliferation -- majorly. Limit the manufacture of guns, limit the importation of firearms, limit the access to ammunition, ban videos of sports shooting on youtube and other websites --like FPSRussian because they entertain and create a wreckless gun culture that only fuels proliferation.
Firearm proliferation does not thwart foreign invasion, does not thwart surveillance on citizens, or thwart diminished rights ... all of these things occur with gun proliferation. Access to education and equality in society are the only things that thwart gun violence or violent extremism in general
The only thing that proliferation of guns provides is the enrichment for stakeholders in the arms industry. I think it's funny that people in this sub are afraid or dismissive of socialism and capitalism but it's capitalism that created US fascination with gun culture ... yet any discussions of curtailing capitalism doesn't address the gun culture.
1 m4k4v3l1Th3d0n 2016-06-12
yes i think we would be better off with less restriction.
Firearm proliferation does not thwart foreign invasion
really?
0 graysond 2016-06-12
I'm not for takings guns away but what would people with Guns do in this situation? Should everyone be carrying all the time? And even then, the element of complete surprise and shock and being placed under fire...!is every member of society supposed to know the tactics of a trained marine? There needs to be better security at these places. More guns in the hands of everyday pedestrians doesn't solve this problem. And we need to look at the underlying mental illness problem that is so big in our country. We have legislation that makes it hard for people to get the help and treatment they need but then those shame people have easy access to dangerous weapons. We will continue to see these types of events as long as we do nothing about it. One place to start is making it easier for people to access mental health recourses. And maybe we start addressing religious extremism because that always seems to play a factor in these events. It's becoming more and more clear that religiously minded individuals "not all" tend to have a passion to stop violators of their beliefs and we are seeing the results of delusional thinking.
-9 kgt5003 2016-06-12
What do you mean by more gun control? Obama hasn't passed a single stitch of Federal gun laws in his entire tenure. He came into office with a super majority in the House and Senate so he could have passed anything he wanted to and he didn't. The "Obama is coming for your guns" was just a slogan that the NRA and gun advocates used to get people to run to the store and stockpile guns and ammo and donate money. If he wanted to actually pass sweeping gun legislation he could have done it when he had the super majority and nothing could have stopped him.
6 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
While I don't buy into the idea that "Obammer gunna taek muh guns." line, his priority when he got into office was Obamacare. He knew it would be a fight, and it was. He spent a lot of political capital on it, good or bad. He's only recently began focusing on guns, but if her were going to try and pass gun legislation of any kind, now would be the time to do it. Historically it has always caused candidates who were openly anti gun to lose votes in national elections. He doesn't have to worry about that now. Especially with the recent 9th Circuit court ruling, and ATF no longer allowing certain types of FFL licenses and pressuring bans on certain types of ammunition that have been allowed for import for years.
I don't know if he's really antigun, or if he's just doing it because it's somewhat in vogue and may help drum up support for the Dems in November. But either way, he'll mention gun control.
Edit: I should also point out that the Executive Branch, which he is in control of, has disallowed import of types of ammunition (7n6), attempted to ban making certain types of ammunition (M855), no longer allows appeals to a NICS denial (so even if I were legally allowed to buy a firearm, but was confused with someone who wasn't, I am pretty much barred from buying a firearm from an FFL until this is fixed), ATF issuing contradicting rulings on hardware that fits into a legal gray area so that what they say is law because they could use original wording of an arguably unconstitutional bill and contort it to fit an extremely obscure definition to make legal gun owners potential felons (redesign was the word, and shouldering a brace was the action). On top of that there was the import ban on rifles that are rarely used in crimes and account for less than 1% of firearms deaths every year because they're "too dangerous." Then there's the fact that the BATFE holds contradictary viewpoints that "trusts are not people," and NFA trusts are a thing, but they'll try and prosecute a trust holder who they gave a tax stamp to because they don't want him having the gun they gave him the tax stamp for already. He may not have passed any bills, but he's done it through executive power.
4 kgt5003 2016-06-12
Of course he'll mention gun control because that's good campaign fodder for both sides. The Republicans raise money saying they'll protect your 2nd amendment because Hillary wants to ban your guns and Hillary will raise money promising to pass "comprehensive common sense gun legislation." This happens every single election and no meaningful federal legislation gets passed because a majority of the members of Congress receive donations from the NRA. If Obama really was interested in gun control he had a super majority when he entered office and after Sandy Hook he had enough public support for a new federal universal background check law that he could have signed an executive order for it citing public polling data as enough reason to take matters into his own hands. He didn't do that. He said congress needed to get it done even though he signed a hundred executive orders for other shit. No real gun laws get passed because if that happens both sides lose their fundraising ability on the subject.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Read my edit, I typed it before I saw you responded
-5 kgt5003 2016-06-12
All that stuff is mostly a lot of "who gives a shit" stuff that the NRA doesn't even get worked up about. I'm talking about actual federal legislation that would effect normal civilian gun owners. When people talk about gun control they are afraid of gun bans and further limitations and national registries. Having certain types of ammo no longer allowed to be imported etc doesn't really matter. That's not a strong enough issue to raise funds over.
10 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
The rising number of lawful gun owners being denied their right because the system can't tell them from the felon across the country isn't a big deal? I wonder if there would be an outlash over it if people weren't allowed to vote or have 4A rights or have freedom of speech because they were confused with a felon. People would flip shit because they are controlling your birthright.
Artificially increasing the price of ammunition is all the ammo bans did. Which doesn't sound like much, but what would happen if the prices of computers were artificially doubled because it was deemed typed words were "too hurtful" when the computers aren't used in crime to a measurable degree.
These are issues to raise funds over. Especially the ammo bans raised a bunch of funds for the NRA. The NRA might not be the greatest thing, but they're the biggest protector of gun rights in the US, especially the NRA-ILA. That's why even though I hate them, I'm a member. Just like I fucking hate the ACLU sometimes, but I'm still a member. Liberty is liberty. Freedom is freedom. That's all I, and most others, want.
0 kgt5003 2016-06-12
The NRA consistently whips people into a frenzy over whatever Democrat is running for office by telling you they are coming to ban your guns. It's a cheap fundraising tactic. There's never a democrat who isn't coming for your guns but it never happens. Gun sales and NRA donations skyrocket and congress members get paid and that's it. It's extortion: give us donations or your 2nd amendment is gone. I don't believe that. I think there are enough members of Congress who would oppose a gun ban (and certainly enough citizens) without needing to be paid for it.
8 trumpetsFTW 2016-06-12
If you would like an example of what Democrats would like to do in regards to gun rights, look at California. Every legislative session there comes more and more restrictions, and I have no doubt that if they can do that in California, it's only a matter of time (either a little or a lot...more likely a lot, gun-control is the long con) before they try things like that at the national level.
-2 kgt5003 2016-06-12
California is not at all representative of democrats on a national level. That'd be like saying Texas is the example of republicans on a national level. Democrats in rural parts of PA and Vermont and New York State would never be ok with sweeping gun regulation. States can do what they want but that wouldn't fly at a federal level.
2 KornymthaFR 2016-06-12
It very much is, since they have strong majorities and dont need bipartisan support.
In CA: the most common type of ammo is banned from hunting use, there is no right to bear arms at all, only to keep at home.
They are actually currently pushing legislation with their majorities to ban all rifles with magazine locks that comply with restrictions, ban pieces of metal that merely resemble a firearm, and tried to ban all semi autos with detachable magazines.
0 kgt5003 2016-06-12
How the hell do you figure the most liberal state in the country is representative of democrats in rural PA who love guns? There are plenty of democrats who are socially libertarian but wouldn't relinquish their 2nd Amendment rights. California does not represent those democrats.
2 KornymthaFR 2016-06-12
Yeah, sorry. I cone from the land of no moderates.
6 HulaguKan 2016-06-12
More like "crisis acror" amirite?
13 NYComrade 2016-06-12
CNN is continuously interviewing this hipster with a fedora who seems to know a lot about bullets. They also keep showing him helping paramedics carry a victim to an ambulance. The similarities to other mass casualty events is beyond coincidental.
1 iamjustjenna 2016-06-12
No.
5 OB1_kenobi 2016-06-12
The headlines I've seen indicate that the authorities want to treat this "as a terrorist act".
How the fuck do they come up with that? It's a shooting at a gay nightclub. Definitely qualifies as a hate crime and as a killing spree. But why are they rushing so quickly to slap the terrorism label on this?
So, possible false flag... or just taking advantage of an opportunity to use the special powers they get when it's terrorism. It seems like they're trying to stretch the definition of terrorism to include almost anything... as well as getting the public used to living in an environment of fear.
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
I was just listening to the radio. News anchor was having difficulty understanding why they have contradictory information. The father said he hated gays, but some FBI agent told the news that it was "possibly" linked to ISIS.
1 OB1_kenobi 2016-06-12
Just wondering if the shooter was white or possibly middle eastern descent?
1 iamjustjenna 2016-06-12
He was of Afghani descent, but an American citizen.
0 sheasie 2016-06-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiBxr94XINg
am i crazy or is she crying w/o tears ?
edit. here she is again:
http://www.reuters.com/video/2016/06/12/witness-gunshots-screams-and-blood-at-fl?videoId=368884198&mod=related&channelName=Aerospace
(seems to have mustered some tears a few hours later after the sun went down)
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Thanks! Update made. I was busy flipping through the other threads looking for more information
1 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
MSNBC is reporting 50 dead now.
4 grey_water 2016-06-12
He was a registered Democrat, nonWhite Muslim of Afghani descent: No wonder they're censoring. The worse shooting in US history and it's not a white male.http://archive.is/deIDf
4 shredgnar10 2016-06-12
Is the TPP still up for a vote? This is the perfect scenario to pass the TPP.
4 brofidential 2016-06-12
Let's play spot the crisis actor. This is sad and tragic so I hope my gut instinct is wrong when I think there is more to this than a random hate crime. Please don't find any crisis actors!
3 PhilliesJawn 2016-06-12
/r/news is deleting and/or locking all posts about this. What the fuck is wrong with the mods of that shithole? Can we all just keep posting links to the story
3 noni2k 2016-06-12
Religion of peace strikes again!
1 Romek_himself 2016-06-12
I did read the father of this guy said in TV he was not religious - he just hated gays.
3 thedrunkmrlahey 2016-06-12
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/06/12/omar-mateen-id-d-as-orlando-killer.html
Interesting article on the alleged shooter with a comment from his dad
3 MoJo81 2016-06-12
Look up non profit Florida business listed as Government of Afghanistan in the family name May 2016. Facebook page of father all about 5th column in Afghanistan (Google translate from Arabic)
1 thedrunkmrlahey 2016-06-12
Take screenshots, in case.
1 spinjamn 2016-06-12
Link?
2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
curious, why did you ask not to post spicifics of police/fire/EMS??
Following case as well. Look forward to your updates. I'm listening to scanner feeds
10 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
I'm a firefighter. If for whatever reason the shooter(s) read reddit, they may stumble across it if they are barricaded with hostages. Until the event is over, posting specific movements may lead to the loss of more lives. After it's over, go to town.
Do you have a PD feed?
2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
ok duh, that makes sense. No PD feed. Thanks for kindly answering my question.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
No problem
1 avohec 2016-06-12
Holding hostages, firefight with cops, browsing reddit.
Yeah, I could see that.
2 slim_ironwood 2016-06-12
It is a hilariously ridiculous thought to picture a guy shooting a rifle, stopping to scroll through his phone while casually reloading his Reddit app, learning the position of incoming tactical officers.
But who knows, dude could have had someone in his ear. Point is, there's zero benefit to posting the info, and 0.000000001% risk, so, why bother.
2 elguapojefe 2016-06-12
When exactly did all this go down & how long was the shooter actually active. How did the media have all the detailed information so quickly.
2 prosekutt 2016-06-12
They had the script beforehand. It's been this way for a while now.
2 DPerman1983 2016-06-12
Marco Rubio just said it was one guy with a handgun.
6 WaitTilUSeeMyDick 2016-06-12
He would know. He was probably there.
1 no1113 2016-06-12
I just read a quick blurb that there was at least one machine gun involved...
2 DPerman1983 2016-06-12
Ya some US Marshal said it was a handgun and a semi-automatic rifle
2 CiitizenOne 2016-06-12
Great job, brother. Thank you for keeping us informed.
2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
1 terriblegoat 2016-06-12
The last thing I read were 40 something injured 20 killed, and that the police used some sort of explosive device. Now I read 50 dead 53 wounded and nothing about the police using explosives. Doesn't make much sense.
2 DogDaYort 2016-06-12
Mayor declare state of emergency pushing the governor for the whole state to follow suit wonder what their intentions are
2 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
Why isn't it ever an ak47 like PRETTY MUCH ALL Muslim terrorists use for assault rifles.
It's always with ar15 or m4 semi automatic rifles.
Couldn't they have smuggled a fully automatic eventually. Isis has had fully automatics all the way back to when they were is panic state of Iraq in 2006.
They couldn't send 1 fully automatic .. Isis does claim all these attacks so why is it always USA guns?
2 gatstrap 2016-06-12
you can't get one here. he most likely had a semi auto AR15 which is easy to purchase
-1 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
They could easily smuggling one in 10 years . They used to or might still make 1-2 million a day! That is 30-60 m / month. 360-730 million a year.. Do you not understand how much money that is . They couldn't send 1 to USA by now or anything else other than USA guns. Which they get from someone in the USA?
1 Farking_Bastage 2016-06-12
the video sounded decidedly semi-auto, not that it matters.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
I have not heard ISIS approved the attacks, merely that the gunman wanted it to be known that he agreed with them. If the shooter was unaffiliated, then he was working with whatever his budget was personally and no international network that can easily get fully automatic firearms smuggled into a country where they're illegal.
Besides that, in the US AR15s are more cost effictive, ammo is cheap and plentiful, accessories are present. They are the most popular rifle in the US
2 Romek_himself 2016-06-12
looks like after trillions of burned dollars and millions of wasted lives the war on terror is total useless ...
2 chippyblocked 2016-06-12
Look at the CNN footage of them carrying a guy wearing red boots. You'll see once they think they are out of camera range, they place him down on his feet and he walks away!
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Links or it didn't happen
1 BribeEmporium 2016-06-12
Thanks. Yeahhh I did think it was strange I hadn't read about it here before. I learned on rt and am still following ..
1 BrotherSpartacus 2016-06-12
Press Conference finished.
What stuck out to me the most was the Chief smirking and His answer to the second shooter question. "No reports of a second shooter"
4 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Literally three minutes after CNN outright said some people were reporting more than one shooter. Kind of odd, but I assume their first priority isn't looking into statements right now.
8 BrotherSpartacus 2016-06-12
The other shooters are usually the ones affiliated with whatever shadow organization is sponsoring the attack. Almost all the big shootings have multiple reports of multiple shooters. One shooter killed 20+ and shot another 40+ while taking fire?
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
There is also other explanations, such as when people who aren't used to these stresses find themselves in positions where these stresses are present, they usually "black out" and act on base instinct. In situations like officer involved shootings, for example, accounts given right after the incident can, and it's not uncommon for them to, differ greatly from what happened. The officer will think they fired three rounds, but actually fired twelve. Usually around 48 hours the mind has the chance to process all the information it took in during the stressed state and begin to put it in order. After 48 hours (or so), officers are usually able to walk through the incident in detail and give correct information. So it may have been two "snip-its" of memory that just make the person think they saw two shooters, but might have actually only been one.
Just a theory
2 BrotherSpartacus 2016-06-12
I get that but they even grabbed a guy in the woods right outside of Sandy Hook that one time.
0 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Like I said, just a theory. However, to me a flaw in human physiology seems ore likely than an outright conspiracy... But still, it's only a theory.
1 -o-o-o 2016-06-12
and the people who commit ''suicide'' with 6 shots to the head
1 IntJizzlefosho 2016-06-12
So no one had a gun?
2 iComeInPeices 2016-06-12
The cop/security guard he shot past did.
0 dagonn3 2016-06-12
The Muslim guy did.
1 NWO_slave 2016-06-12
Hoax
1 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
0 spinjamn 2016-06-12
When was this interview. He fixed his hair for this. Wouldnt he be at hospital with victims, people he was with that night?
1 Drunken_Mimes 2016-06-12
I'm sure there will be "conflicting" eye witness reports, just like san bernandino... and I would also bet they will blame it on the internet, and try to take away internet freedoms and enact more gun laws. We'll see.
1 lordrothschild 2016-06-12
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4cs4f3/the_months_ahead_a_summary/d1l8zw1
I later found out that his birthday was today, the 12th. And that it also was George H. W. Bush' birthday. And that Queen Elizabeth would turn 90 the day before.
1 gbubthethug 2016-06-12
Well they really killed 2 birds with one stone here. "Let's take their guns away, initiate a police state and drone an entire culture to death." Seems like the best way to go about it.
2 HS_00 2016-06-12
3 birds. You forgot about smearing Islam. Who benefits from this?
1 RamenRider 2016-06-12
This thread was brigaded by topmindsofreddit.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Why would they do that? It wasn't even really a conspiracy post, it was literally a live play of events as they happened while I was listening to scanner traffic. I only posted here because all the other subs I could think of already had active threads going and I wanted to keep a log of what was going on.
1 chippyblocked 2016-06-12
It looks like Joshua McGill might actually be Joshua Conrad Jackson, a psych major who graduated from McGill University. https://theconversation.com/profiles/joshua-conrad-jackson-259112 & Also list as lab cord at https://umd.academia.edu/JoshuaConradJackson
-1 RedditsNewGuy 2016-06-12
What's the conspiracy? Is it a false flag designed to make people who hate gays look bad?
5 dagonn3 2016-06-12
If you make people afraid, you can convince them to let you do stupid shit. Like Operation Iraqi Freedom.
3 [deleted] 2016-06-12
To get the left to back war
2 Sportfreunde 2016-06-12
Divide people, create more hate, bring back the gun control debate just in time for the elections, make the boogeyman threat bigger, etc.
-1 Flytape 2016-06-12
Deport Islam. Not compatible with Western values.
-2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
3 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
It's a club in a large city, some people are saying in tweets it's gay pride week down there. This is a club known for being frequented by the LGBT Community. 2+2=4
3 tikiwooki 2016-06-12
Hun, this is Orlando. It's ALWAYS pride week!
7 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
I once found myself in the middle of the Village in NYC during pride week when I was on summer vacation during high school. For a kid from Kansas it was quite odd. I was told the village was home to a large LGBT scene in the city. Since I didn't know it was pride week, I just assumed the parades and stuff was like an everyday thing. Then I grabbed 5 guys and went back to my hotel to take a nap.
1 Vitalogy0107 2016-06-12
You didn't know it was pride week but then proceeded to find 5 random dudes to take back to your room?! /s
1 Barry_Calgary 2016-06-12
Hey man, maybe he likes the taste of 5 guys in his mouth. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
2 alt123412 2016-06-12
It's a Saturday evening...just because they don't have any special events going on, doesn't mean they aren't open.
-2 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
5 Onyyyyy 2016-06-12
But why drive 2 hours away to do it? There had to be 100s of other targets that were closer to him.
I have a feeling he was Muslim and secretly gay and had some history with this specific place.
2 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
Possibly, but I gaurentee body count was a major factor in his choice. The building layout might have been that it allowed for a large damount of people to be trapped inside, thus an easier slaughter
2 Onyyyyy 2016-06-12
But why there 2 hours a way from home. I can't think of any clubs 2 hours away from me let alone a gay club. I think you are right about the layout but how would he know that or come across that info. Even if he was looking for the ideal location and building structure, how would that pop up on his radar.
I think he had been there before as a patron.
1 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
It is possible
0 captain_teeth33 2016-06-12
Hegelian Dialectic
-3 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
Nothing bad ever happens in the US. False flag confirmed.
1 avohec 2016-06-12
Shill confirmed.
1 WingedBeing 2016-06-12
Fuck you. My paycheck from the gov for what I write is bigger than anything you'll ever receive. Now fall in line like the good little sheep you've been bred to become, you can either be used for profit or become their favored pet. I like where I stand.
-6 JHVH_UNO 2016-06-12
I guarantee police killed a great number of those people.
-7 wheelinganddealing 2016-06-12
Can you we get any idea to if this is real or Hoax? Can we verify victims are real?
5 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
There is video on major news networks of people with gunshot wounds being carried away. So it appears, yes we can.
-1 wheelinganddealing 2016-06-12
That doesn't mean its real lol. MSM is almost 90% fakery and hoaxes. Researching the victims usually sheds some light on the truth. This has all the telltale signs of false flag hoax.
3 [deleted] 2016-06-12
[deleted]
-4 no1113 2016-06-12
It can be "legit" and yet still a false flag attack. Not saying it necessarily was, of course, but don't rule that out.
1 Balthanos 2016-06-12
Yup. People have this belief that the government wouldn't use individuals and throw them away. So they assume that anyone involved in these events is an actor with makeup. It's much easier for the government to just create real death and injuries.
5 no1113 2016-06-12
Jesus. The government has proven itself to be the single biggest enemy of the people and the population throughout all of history.
Well, that's definitely a possibility as well, however. There seems to have been a lot of crisis actor fuckery that's happened as of the past few years. That's for sure.
Well, that too as well.
I mean the government, or special interest groups, or clandestine blackop projects, or whatever, can be involved in all these things.
At the end of the day, the real point here is that TPTB can use anything really (the government, corporate groups, to military ops, etc) to exact all manner of heinous, false flag shit against the population.
-7 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
Post proof . That's not just media announcment
All you've seen is news reports and Twitter messages
-13 PaddleToNewZealand 2016-06-12
You guys are fucking retarded. Keep it up.
4 dagonn3 2016-06-12
"I just dont get it. These people cant really believe the extreme violent nonsense they preach...at least not most of them. Just seems like a built in excuse at this point to act like human garbage. Take out a bunch of people u have never met...in a park...and magically you are no longer a bitter jealous loser but a martyr who committed the ultimate unselfish act. Life more often than not is a swift kick to the balls. But we are all here going through some form of the same bullshit. Taking out lifes frustrations on random strangers is just pathetic and sad."
You were singing a different song 2 months ago.
1 RemixxMG 2016-06-12
?
2 alt123412 2016-06-12
It's a Saturday evening...just because they don't have any special events going on, doesn't mean they aren't open.
3 FlashoverPhantom 2016-06-12
It's a club in a large city, some people are saying in tweets it's gay pride week down there. This is a club known for being frequented by the LGBT Community. 2+2=4
3 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-06-12
using more words to deny the truth doesnt make you correct.
1 avohec 2016-06-12
Shill confirmed.
-1 Chandler60008 2016-06-12
They could easily smuggling one in 10 years . They used to or might still make 1-2 million a day! That is 30-60 m / month. 360-730 million a year.. Do you not understand how much money that is . They couldn't send 1 to USA by now or anything else other than USA guns. Which they get from someone in the USA?
2 Top-Cheese 2016-06-12
yes, lol
1 HerbaliteShill 2016-06-12
That's HerbaLife
2 thompsonj04 2016-06-12
Yes