What are some examples of disinfo?

Flat earth.

What would the objective be to use flat earth as disinfo?

1. Flat earth is obviously wrong so they are grouped with other more rational theories.

1. Flat earth is obviously wrong so they are grouped with other more rational theories.

I'm having a hard time finding a reason flat earth would be disinfo. I mean, what are they trying to hide, the earth is a ball and nasa is going out in to space? Not hiding that.

No it's BS nonsense to make everyone in this forum look crazy by association.

Spend time better used elsewhere on worthless subject matter, even if only to knock it down or explain why it's stupid and/or a distraction (kinda like this reply).

Make non-critical thinkers lump crazy shit like flat earth in with genuine conspiracies.

Those in power need people to rule over. Long ago the powerful told people the Earth was flat. They told them that traveling could mean that they could fall off the edge of the flat Earth into the unknown.

I thought we were talking about present day flat earth.

They flooded the 9/11 truth movement with bullshit about lasers... And holograms... And countless other theories ....

I hear you /u/ruejitsu. It's meant as obfuscation from the controlled demolitions that took down the twin towers and WTC7. See, they want us to argue about the method of controlled demo (thermite/unproven-tech/a-bombs even!) rather than to focus intently on Newton's Laws of Motion and how they completely and unequivocally show perfectly timed controlled demos for all 3 skyscrapers.

Start here, with noted physics professor David Chandler. Here, he analyzes the controlled demolition of the North Tower on 91101. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8

Then he gets into the downward acceleration of the North Tower, using a computer program to track the speed at which the 'top portion' of the building was given very minimal resistance to the 2/3rds of the intact below structure.

http://911speakout.org/ is a great place to learn more about the controlled demos and the individuals who are coming forward and demanding a new investigation into the controlled demolitions that took place on 91101.

A directed energy weapon (HAARP) was used to bring down the WTC buildings. There is more irrefutable evidence to support that as fact than there is the use of demolitions explosives or thermite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2mg5ndzVgg&list=PL_cJ8k_C3XEWi9IrA7dKse0vo8SE6J1oJ&index=1

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qb9ui/legally_armed_bystanders_break_up_walmart_shooting/

You do not see how that is important in terms of gun rights? Anti-gunners claim it never happens, when it has actually happened a lot. It's important to catalog these occurances.

"it's all the fault of the [ethnic/religious/political/etc group]! All we gotta do is get rid of 'em!"

eg, the only thing wrong is "republican obstructionism" for the democrat flavor. Or "it's all the leftists!" for the republicans.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qy6x9/so_what_are_the_bernie_supporters_doing_now/d4wser1?context=3

For the lazy: Cantstopwhitey posted - Why would you ever debate a girl/woman on anything?

Now you're just following me around, posting comments of mine you dislike, when you just complained about someone doing the same to you in this very thread. Hypocrite.

Now you're just following me around

I gave you 3 examples of disinformation in the same thread. Don't get so upset that your question was answered repeatedly! You should be thanking me. Instead you turn into a fussy kid who seemingly pooped their pants.

posting comments of mine you dislike

I'm posting disinformation, just like you asked for. Don't ask the question if you don't like the answers.

you just complained about someone doing the same to you

I'm answering you in 1 thread. The other user followed me through multiple threads. Kids don't understand the difference between singular and plural. That comes later. You'll get there eventually.

someone doing the same to you in this very thread

Once again, singular vs. plural. I gave you multiple examples in 1 thread, while the other user mentioned followed me through multiple threads spewing disinfo. I'm not surprised you're avoiding looking at that user's disinformation, it helps you obfuscate better. Example below, for those that are confused by your obfuscation attempts.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qlmus/disinformation_judy_wood_discuss/

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qiphn/disinformation_the_noplane_theory_discuss/

You've been caught.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qg8us/rconspiracy_s_own_flytape_laying_out_some_truths/d4sp18q?context=3

Unlimited Hilary posts so that you don't find the quality posts amongst the BS.

Yeah, it's not like Hilldogg is in the spotlight or anything right now to warrant those posts.

Indeed. But one or two quality post would do. They are the best magicians alive, hey look over here, while I do this without you knowing. Also I see multiple identical posts. Flooding this sub trying to camouflage any quality info.

Eh, the Clintons are involved in so much corruption and so many conspiracies you could dedicate an entire sub to them and never run out of content. I don't think that's actual disinfo or posted here to distract. You don't see the same three posters posting the same three Clinton articles, for example, but you see the same posters posting a lot race-baiting articles over and over ad infinitum (flat earth, too - and watch for forum slides).

"You don't see the same three posters posting the same three Clinton articles"

No, you're right, you don't, but that doesn't mean this sub isn't being flooded with content by groups that have an ulterior motive. You act as if whoever might do this is of such low intelligence that they would only create a couple of accounts and just repost the same shit over and over. Rest assured, astroturfing has become an exact science with oodles of dollars being poured into maximizing it's effectiveness; It's not just governments that are interested in doing it, it's anyone that has something to gain, financially or otherwise, from convincing groups of people that other groups of people approve or disapprove of someone or something.

I'm not debating that the Clinton's are corrupt garbage, they are, but to think that a subreddit like this wouldn't be targeted by astroturfing campaigns for political or commercial purposes is naive.

But to think that a subreddit like this wouldn't be targeted by astroturfing campaigns for political or commercial purposes is naive.

Where did I ever say this? We're bombarded on a daily by a large number of interests, many corporate, some government probably. Try saying "glyphosate" three times fast for ultimate enjoyment.

"Eh, the Clintons are involved in so much corruption and so many conspiracies you could dedicate an entire sub to them and never run out of content. I don't think that's actual disinfo or posted here to distract"

This sounds like you are dismissing the possibility that any, or atleast most, anti-Hillary content that is posted is artificial simply by virtue of the fact that she is a grade-A scumbag and lots of people don't like her.

My point in response was that just because she has a way of creating her own negative press doesn't mean that all the negative content that you find on here about her is from people who are posting it for legitimate reasons. If that isn't what you were implying then I apologize.

What are some examples of quality posts?

[deleted]

Sort what by new? There's about four comments.

[deleted]

Might want to check your link. Might want to know that I only visit the new queue. Might want to explain how, supposing your first comment actually made any sense, visiting the new queue will provide a good example of quality vs. Disinfo.

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qlmus/disinformation_judy_wood_discuss/

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qiphn/disinformation_the_noplane_theory_discuss/

Then, I asked a user (who was following me from thread to thread) to follow up on his obfuscation from a previous post. SOMEONE on this subreddit erased this link because it made the JTRIG-trainee look like the complete obfuscation expert he is:

https://NP.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4qiphn/disinformation_the_noplane_theory_discuss/d4tf1b0

He's getting the rocky treatment. Anyone familiar with this sub knows what that means.

no planes

After this OP posted this, what spun off was a circular "tempest in a teapot" and bickering. Suffice to say there is disinformation and they have more resources than you or I.

"Eh, the Clintons are involved in so much corruption and so many conspiracies you could dedicate an entire sub to them and never run out of content. I don't think that's actual disinfo or posted here to distract"

This sounds like you are dismissing the possibility that any, or atleast most, anti-Hillary content that is posted is artificial simply by virtue of the fact that she is a grade-A scumbag and lots of people don't like her.

My point in response was that just because she has a way of creating her own negative press doesn't mean that all the negative content that you find on here about her is from people who are posting it for legitimate reasons. If that isn't what you were implying then I apologize.