While some may consider this conspiracy kind of 'out there', looking at the facts and the current trends, it seems entirely possible, especially given what history has shown us.

The last two world wars in Europe are the result of nationalism, plain and simple, directed towards other nations, and various situations of multi-polar politics, such as prior to World War One where the accumulation of arms resulted, with the death of Franz Ferdinand as a catalyst, in war. What we are currently seeing is the re-nationalisation of Europe. This referendum result in the UK is the catalyst of what will become a wave of referendums in Europe, tearing the European project apart and resulting in its collapse, along with the potential separation of the Union over in the UK, just to add insult to injury. With the increasing assertiveness of Russia (and the USA), testing boundaries and response times (2013 mock invasion of Sweden, Russia / USA Baltic 'jet face off'), along with progressively projecting her influence into the middle east, not only leading to potential for 'power clashes' reminiscent of pre-World War politics within the middle east through undermining US hegemony in the region, but also exacerbating a NATO Russia divide that is increasingly become apparent (NATO currently engaged in largest exercise ever in Poland / Russian arms build up ( http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-06/putin-s-military-buildup-in-the-baltic-stokes-invasion-fears ), along with issues in the South China sea over sovereignty and nationalism (http://www.wsj.com/articles/china-to-hold-military-exercises-in-south-china-sea-raising-tensions-1467542325), furthered by the rise of North Korea as a nuclear power, the world is in a more unsafe position than it has ever been, since 1945, being a perfect example of multipolarity.

Indeed, even the harmonious Japan has recently, under legislation from government, transformed their military into a force capable of foreign intervention. ( http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/03/29/national/politics-diplomacy/japans-contentious-new-security-laws-take-effect-paving-way-collective-self-defense/#.V36uCPkrLIU ) Such legislation could result in disputes over sovereign territory such as the Senkaku islands, potentially becoming more heated, simply adding more heat to a boiling pot of Eastern / Western tension.

"The country is divided, the conservatives are divided, the labour party is divided". This is just in British politics. Recent politics has been hugely polarising, which is dangerous, as we have seen, twice in a century. Indeed, the rise of Trump or Le Pen in France highlight this. Frederick Bastiat spoke of how "if goods do not cross borders, soldiers will". Indeed, this further reinforces my point. We are not trading with Russia like we should be. In fact European sanctions have pushed Russia and China closer together than ever before, essentially forming what Bush spoke about, an "axis of evil".

This was simply some historical background, and current information.

Many believe the migrant crisis to be a mistake on the behalf of the EU, highlighting its inability to find common ground due to political, social and economic splits between member states. Some conspiracy theorists thus, due to this obvious failure, believe this was an effort by the 'elites' of the European project to remove sovereign barriers within Europe, thus facilitating the 'European Dream' of a federal Europe that so many European elites very obviously hold. ("“Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose but which will irreversibly lead to federation.”" // "There will be no peace in Europe if the States rebuild themselves on the basis of national sovereignty, with its implications of prestige politics and economic protection…. " - Both quotes Jean Monnet, architect of the European project.) The migrant crisis was not social engineering to break down sovereign barriers between states, thus facilitating a federal Europe in the long run. It was an attempt to exacerbate the swing to the right, which we are seeing. Those in control are not dumb. They understand human nature, and they also recognise the fact Europe is a culture built on the foundation of ancient ways, hugely resistant to short term change through migration, as somewhere like America may not be. Indeed, the regular publicising of acts of religious fervour in the news, further this.

I'm afraid this is all part of the movie we see unfolding day by day. This is nothing new. The British exit from the EU is not the end of the elite. This is not the end of federalism, and this is not the end of the path we are inevitably going down. We all know what happens in relation to federalism and integration after a war. We have seen it before (both world wars! - WW1 followed by the league of nations, World War 2 followed by a literally endless list of international bodies that undermine sovereignty of states). Perhaps the next one is going to be on such a grand scale, it facilitates integration that we have not yet seen, while also culling huge bodies of the population, making the human race's movement into the future more sustainable, and more controllable. http://www.mural-us.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/516409288_6ab1baafbc_b.jpghttp://www.detwilerart.com/artgallery_images/MURALIMAGE.gif

Thus, to conclude, I believe, like many that the current situation in international politics is being engineered by an elite that we do not see or know of. Again, like many I believe that previous wars have been finely engineered, to further the underlying cause of every conspiracy on this page, and on the internet, a global government with no boundaries and a unified global population. What this may look like (Orwell or Marxist global utopia?) I do not know, so I will leave this to you and your imagination. I believe that what we are seeing in politics with right wing and left wing becoming increasingly disparate and popular, is never healthy, and inevitably results in war. Those who argue it does not, are simply refusing to learn from history. After all, history repeats itself. I believe that Brexit is the beginning of a 're-nationalisation' and weakening of Europe that will result in conflict between Russia and the West (weak Europe = assertive Russia), thus potentially igniting the dangerous situation that is seen in the East, resulting in a world war that will bring about a period of peace and unification like we have never seen before.

Pretty out there, I know, but it said speak your mind. Sorry about this shit writing also, this was written in one massive brain dump. Hopefully you can make sense of all of this. No hate lol.

Update - I'm going to continually update this post from now on as this 'situation' develops, which it very obviously is.

Cameron pledge of British troops to Russian zone of influence - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3680030/PM-pledges-650-troops-Nato-curb-threat-Putin-Cameron-tell-leaders-Britain-global-force-despite-Brexit-summit-Warsaw.html

Putin statement on the current developments - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMMscY7Btus (Sorry about the source, Alex Jones has become increasingly annoying recently.)