Rothschilds own both candidates.

Colour me totally unsurprised.

Mdm Clinton was decided probably before Bill got in

Yeah, but they prefer Clinton over Trump. Roths own the media and we can clearly see who they are pushing.

except that leads to revolution. they're already creating the anti-establishment candidate to put in after the revolution.

there's no chance there will be a revolution after clinton is elected lol

They want the whites to revolt so that will be squashed, then the globalists will have full power controlling those who care little about true freedom and only from sucking the government tit.

....yeah like every person who lives in America that's a shade darker than you don't like freedom. Seriously?

By the way over 90% of blacks vote democrat.

Illegal immigrants don't care about the constitution

okay thats not true. many who come here love constitution and republicans are able to bring in a lot of Spanish voters on this idea alone even when they hate what republicans say.

I would say that black people do not care because they are communist brainwashed.

They literally break the law as the first thing they do when they enter.

Many immigrants slander the founding fathers because because some of them were white slave owners. Most immigrants are poor and want the free shit. Sorry those are the facts.

You're a fucking retard. Go talk to an immigrant. You have no life experience dude. I've worked with immigrants. They're here to make a better life. You're so brainwashed that you can't even see humans. You're an useful idiot for political parties. Wake up.

What about cultural assimilation and certain immigrants having a lot more kids then native populations which puts a huge burden on our education system which gives us the low ranking system we have now globally.

Also should these immigrants be able to send money back to the native country because that means they are not investing in their new home nation.

What affect does immigration have on developing nations? are we stealing their brightest and best chances to develop and modernize their countries? Like if we take in doctors from India are we robbing India of its opportunity to be the medical leaders of the world.

No need to get so upset. Often times it is the release of anger which indicates an ignorance on the subject. Illegal immigrants do not care about our constitution. Do you really think immigrants care about our laws and our founders or just about getting what's theirs I've never said people don't want better lives. There are ways to do that other than voting for the government to get bigger and control us more.

You say illegals do this and that. Have you interviewed any? Because most likely if they came illegally, they were raped financially by the immigration system. I'm not giving them a pass for coming in illegally but they aren't a boogeyman. They're human.

So unless you have a full unedited interview you'll never know. Don't repeat the people on TV or who's appealing to you for a vote. They'll leave you hanging afterwards.

I've known illegal immigrants beyond interviewing them. I worked with many when I was a teenager and they were very nice people. That's not the point. Ultimately they are being used as pawns to break the country. They are being ALLOWED to flood in by the globalists. Borders cost the elites LOTS of money. That is the point of all of this, Constitution be damned.

And the elites care nothing about the everyday man. Why worry about them? They fucked everyone of us back in 2008 with the bail out that destroyed us, the American people.

It's beyond race man, it's class warfare. Race shit is carrot on a stick given to you by the same elites. Stay petty, fight the small fight or get privy and fight the ones who want to keep you a slave.

Lemme say this, if slavery hasn't taught people anything it's the idea of the house boy. House boys stayed in with Master while the others worked the fields. The house boy don't realize that he's being used to cause envy, hatred and anger between the other slaves. The house boy may know and don't care. Either way the house boy is a pawn.

Now equate that to everyday people. Black, White, Hispanic, Asian. It doesn't matter because we are slaves to the elite. Stop being their pawn man.

I don't care what your race is. I care if you are adding to the destruction of the constitution. If you study history white people were slaves too.

Hierarchy is a natural thing. How you climb the ladder however must be kept sacred.

minus the criminals who run drugs back and fourth. do you see immigration as a solution to the problems these people are running from? How many immigrants can america take in IYO? Should we be more focused on stabilizing and developing the countries these people come from?

I have seen some Ted talks that suggest its selfish to have a immigration system that takes in the more educated and wealthy immigrants from developing countries. that it is also impossible to take people who just want to walk here in. That the worlds woes are to great for america to just take in mass.

So how do you see your role in helping these people? Do you blame western imperialism for the state of affairs they suffer from? Do you see immigration as an atonement?

That's what I thought. You've got nothing.

There are more than two candidates.

Prove it. Prove that a 3rd candidate truly has a shot.

In all seriousness, independent (3rd party) candidates have won numerous local and state elections including congressman, senators, and governors. Is it possible? Yes. Probable? Unlikely.

Here's a question: would people still support Trump if he would have run as a third party candidate from the beginning? What about Sanders?

The proof should be a vast number of votes for said 3rd party candidate. But alas, the internet awaits proof of 3rd party existence. The establishment is pleased with your comment, stranger.

Exactly. Any party other than the Repubes or Demoscats has absolutely no shot. If we were truly setup to allow more than one of 2 candidates we would see a 3rd party win some day. Proofs in the puddin. Its an illusion.

Edit: Lol this used to be common knowledge here. Since when is this against the norm here? Im confused

The sub is more brigaded than ever before, plus it's summer and election season. There are still some real people here though don't worry.

Stranger, I'll make a deal with you right now: we both vote for Jill Stein, and when Shillary scams out a victory, we'll move to Canada. Or the Bahamas. I can live with some sunshine.

Gary Johnson is polling just under 15% right now. The debate commission has signalled they might let him on th estage even if he fails to make the 15% cutoff. The old party candidates are among the most hated in US history. The only thing we need for success is for people to stop thinking their one vote is going to change the outcome, and instead simply vote their consciences.

Basically the door is wide open like no time in recent history.

Would be awesome to see. It would open the floodgates i think.

If the 3rd party brakes a 5% threshold of the popular vote that party will receive funds from the federal government in the next election. Proof. 3rd parties need your vote now to have a chance to compete later.

This is somewhat unnerving information. I support Trump hugely over Clinton, but in the back of my mind I can't help but think... These are the most powerful and smartest people who have been in control of the world for centuries... What if this was their plan all along? To have both candidates operate under their interests whilst systematically pitting the entire nation against each other? If they don't at least TRY to assassinate Trump, I think that's a big red flag that we are in big trouble.

you don't get as wealthy as trump is without getting dirty in the process. They don't call it "filthy rich" for nothing. He is establishment. Big money is the establishment. This is an oligarchy masquerading as democracy. Divide and conquer is one of the oldest tricks in the book and still working wonders.

http://philosophyofmetrics.com/how-rothschild-inc-saved-donald-trump-freepom/

"If they don't at least TRY to assassinate Trump"

that's circular logic.

bit slow on the uptake there buddy.

except hillary is gonna take a dive.

I disagree. I think Trump will be the one to take a dive.

Gotta think a few moves ahead.

When Soros's Democracy Spring thing kicks off, someones head will have to roll (bow out on health terms) to create the illusion of success when Trump and Putin team up.

Sounds like you have more insight than I do. My prediction is pretty much based on intuition.

Either way, American citizens have a tough no choice to make.

FTFY.

No offense, but how fucking crazy far down the rabbit hole do you have to be to start seeing shit in cartoons.

he was also asked about it by oprah

[removed]

Rule 10, first warning.

Why is this rule in effect?

Why is a rule preventing users from attacking others personally while adding nothing of substance to the discussion in effect? Come on, you really have to ask that?

What I meant is that it's a bit ambiguous as to what is considered an attack, and could thus be exploited to ban someone.

It isn't really ambiguous at all. A comment that attacks the user or users of the sub as a whole personally rather than the arguments they're making violates the rule. The only ambiguity is in the second sentence, and those violations depend on context and the specific mod's interpretation.

So here we have ties to Rothschild, ties to the CIA, ties to the mob, ties to Mossad, and ties to Rockefeller. And yet people think Trump is going to save us from the powers that be? Give me a break.

His supporters share his arrogant qualities

We'll either get Obama in white face makeup or we'll get Obama is white face makeup going drag.

Cornell West calls Obama Wall St. in black face makeup. Credit to Cornell West for the figure of speech.

I have no doubt both candidates are controlled by the powers that be.

the two party "system" (Democrat/Republican) is BS; always has been.

edit: from the article you post - "For those wondering, Wilbur L. Ross Jr. spent 24 years at the New York office of Rothschild Inc. In the late 1990’s he started a $200 million fund at Rothschild Inc. to invest in distressed assets. In 2000, on April Fool’s day, Ross raised an additional $450 million to invest in troubled companies."

Why the emphasis? April 1st is the first day of the financial year for most financial services companies.

i thought it was funny (appropriate?) that it was April Fool's Day.

So is gary johnson any better? He says he's gonna sign the damn TPP so i doubt it. And jill stein is having serious trouble.. So we're screwed any way you slice it

"We need a #PeaceOffensive - not a foreign policy that comes from Kissinger, wrapped in a military-industrial complex, & topped with a drone."

Can't think why Jill is having a bit of trouble.

Her twitter feed is full of semi-anarchic nuggets like this, she's the only politician saying anything controversial that actually makes sense.

I just watched the Libertarian "Town Hall" on CNN last night. They're hardly even libertarians. More like soft spoken centrists. They say things like "Libertarian or not, the government needs to do something". Well, that's sort of the idea of Libertarianism... small gov't. I understand if you don't agree. But you're not a libertarian.

Saw a little of some Libertarian convention on CSPAN a few weeks ago. The big "speaker" they had, was basically saying that it is pointless and stupid to try to stand up for libertarian values, because it's a stupid ideology, and if you want change, you have to compromise(I.E. let there be big gov't). The crowd(which traveled to come hear people talk about HOW they were going to get LIBERTARIAN ideas out there), basically just heard, "Give up already". It's obvious they are suppressing the Libertarian movement, after Ron Paul stoked the flames a bit.

Theyre also taking some money from large donors, so that may have something to do with it

"Either way, American citizens have a tough choice to make."

It's already decided bro, and it's been decided for years. Cmon, you should know that.

Doing business in New York so long means you gotta learn to deal with those in power. Maybe he was indifferent back then but he lost people close to him in 9/11 and he's been against them at least ever since. Those connections are pretty weak anyways, just means he has dealt with them doesn't mean that he supports any of the nefarious things that Clinton has

Not to mention, trump said he saw "thousands" of Muslims in NJ cheering after 9/11. This was obviously a cover for the Israeli spies who got caught cheering after 9/11.

Trump also famously attacked a judge for his "mexican heritage". Once again, this is cover for Israel. 4/8 US Supreme Court Justices are Jewish. Obama was trying to nominate Jew #5(Majority Jew control in Supreme Court). Trump "taught" us that attacking a judge based on his/her ethnicity/heritage is wrong. Even if a 1.4% minority(Jews) gain a 55% majority in the supreme court. Trump taught us that like with the Mexican Judge, you cannot use a person's ethnicity/religion/heritage against them(or you'll get the beat down, like trump did).

Trump doesn't make much sense in what he says, much of the time. Unless you realize he's here to teach us lessons, and not to win.

Trump is a fall guy, to get Hilary elected. Along the way, he's conditioning the American public, and making the south, as well as old ideas seem like the "wrong" side to many people(especially young people).

Trump is just another Alex Jones(if that isn't made clear enough, by Alex Jones supporting Trump).

I think you'll find that Trump supporters have mastered the mental gymnastics of accusing Hilary Clinton (who has a poor background) of being in bed with the Rothschilds and Reptilians, whilst simultaneously glossing over the fact Donald (a billionaire born into shady privilege) has dirty hands and questionable past associations.

It's a sign of how batshit this US election cycle is when a billionare tyrant who won't release his tax returns is accused of running fewer conspiracies than the Clintons, whom Donald has been friends with for decades...

Clinton was Board of Directors of Wal-Mart, then her husband becomes President, opens up one-way trading with China, Then Wal-Marts Profits go Parabolic.

It is unless you can prove that this billionaire is also a zionist. Doing business with a zionist doesn't make you a zionist. He could just be good at business?

They're all fucking zionist. Show me one billionaire that isn't a zionist?

Edit: I'm waiting.......

Musk

So you think the ruling families of the United Arab Emirates (several are billionaires, with a combined worth of a trillion+ USD) are "Zionists"? Or is the fact that they're Muslim Arabs just part of some Zionist conspiracy?!

Easier to feign competition and be friends than actually be in competition. It's a rigged system folks.

Waiting for the anrichrist.

lol off topic but your comment conjured an image of a shitty documentary. So shitty it would gain a cult following

Mayer Amshel Rothschild didn't trully exist. His name was some sort of cabalistic numerology metaphor.

Read it somewhere but can't remember, can't find the link.

many bias replies, left or right, to this post. But what I did not see is anyone actually providing substance and proof of what has happened since. Yes, it appears Trump created a relationship with the Rothschilds years ago. However, he apparently paid off a significant debt and his ties to them were officially severed. You can find info on it by simply Googling "Trump Rothschilds", the one I read was on harddawn dot com. I won't give the exact link as I don't want to get my comment banned. But do some research people. Trump clearly made friends and got involved with the elite over the years but its apparent that he has grown distasteful of them and wants to ruin their globalist agenda. I am not a Trump nor Clinton fan. I am looking at this picture at the elite level, they are the main source of the problem.

Just because the Spotlight in the 70s said something about something doesn't make it so; and more likely than not - not so.

Circular citation. Rothschild and Rockefeller do not give two hoots about casinos; they weren't initial investors. Poppycock. They don't slum it with the likes of Trump and Lansky.

They lend you money afterwards when you are about to loose your hat and collect interest.

MGM Resorts is not the same as Resorts International, actually.

Spotlight have and never will cite a source for anything they write about. It makes it easier to make shit up whenever they want to accuse a Jew of being under the bed. For Piper to cite a Spotlight hack piece - and only that - is pretty lazy.

Total bullshit trump is the people's candidate he's admitted to being part of the system, and you better bet the system is against him now. Quit being brainwashed by mainstream media and get on the trump train. You know I'm for real because my account is 4 years old. Cant say anything about anyone else here

most sensible comment here. And now we wait...

The proof should be a vast number of votes for said 3rd party candidate. But alas, the internet awaits proof of 3rd party existence. The establishment is pleased with your comment, stranger.

In all seriousness, independent (3rd party) candidates have won numerous local and state elections including congressman, senators, and governors. Is it possible? Yes. Probable? Unlikely.

Here's a question: would people still support Trump if he would have run as a third party candidate from the beginning? What about Sanders?

The sub is more brigaded than ever before, plus it's summer and election season. There are still some real people here though don't worry.

Stranger, I'll make a deal with you right now: we both vote for Jill Stein, and when Shillary scams out a victory, we'll move to Canada. Or the Bahamas. I can live with some sunshine.

Gary Johnson is polling just under 15% right now. The debate commission has signalled they might let him on th estage even if he fails to make the 15% cutoff. The old party candidates are among the most hated in US history. The only thing we need for success is for people to stop thinking their one vote is going to change the outcome, and instead simply vote their consciences.

Basically the door is wide open like no time in recent history.

It isn't really ambiguous at all. A comment that attacks the user or users of the sub as a whole personally rather than the arguments they're making violates the rule. The only ambiguity is in the second sentence, and those violations depend on context and the specific mod's interpretation.

okay thats not true. many who come here love constitution and republicans are able to bring in a lot of Spanish voters on this idea alone even when they hate what republicans say.

I would say that black people do not care because they are communist brainwashed.

If the 3rd party brakes a 5% threshold of the popular vote that party will receive funds from the federal government in the next election. Proof. 3rd parties need your vote now to have a chance to compete later.